Basement Songs: Wings, “Silly Love Songs”

basementsongs.jpg

Last year my friend John Burland questioned my sanity when I told him of my devotion to Wings’ smash hit “Silly Love Songs.” I’ll admit that it may not be Paul McCartney’s deepest composition, but it is a finely crafted tune with different layers of pop sheen displaying the former Beatle’s knack for arranging and producing radio-friendly material that makes you feel good. Yes, the lyrics are simple and, well, silly, but McCartney wasn’t setting out to write “Yesterday.” His passion to remain a touring act meant he needed material other than Beatles songs for his audience to respond to in concert. “Silly Love Songs,” a response to his critics who assailed him for writing too many ballads (and, I assume, for not being John Lennon or George Harrison), was an enormous hit in 1976, reaching #1 on the charts. It was difficult to tune to an AM station that year and not hear the song. That’s where I first heard it.

Long before sports opinions and political blowhards took over the AM dial, music was actually played on these stations. FM was in its early, experimental stages, and it was run by longhairs ushering in much of the music we’re still subjected to daily on classic-rock stations. Meanwhile, AM stuck to safe hits, songs that weren’t too offensive or were sly enough to hide their lewdness within a sugary Top 40 sound (”Afternoon Delight” is a perfect example). During the ’70s my family took long summer vacations that had us driving to KOA Kampgrounds throughout the U.S. This was the era before cassette players, so radio — specifically, AM radio — was all we had to accompany us on our long journeys.

Although I may have complained about being stuck in a car or van with my parents and three siblings, I look back on that time fondly. Through all of the jockeying for primo seat positions and bickering over who was annoying who, my parents provided us with a time to be a family unit. I wish my wife, Julie, and I were able to take these sorts of long vacations with our kids and explore the nation’s history and odd tourist attractions, but for now it just isn’t feasible.

The time I spent on the road in the ’70s, traveling the vast and varied landscapes, had a profound effect on me. To this day I still love lengthy car rides with little conversation — just me, possibly a companion, the open road, and the radio. Thirty years ago my family would listen to whatever station we could pick up. We heard all the cheesy songs you’re likely to find on the plethora of ’70s music compilations available these days (Rhino’s massive Have a Nice Decade collection pretty much covers everything, including news sound bites), but most of those songs don’t have any lasting power for me. However, “Silly Love Songs,” despite the innocuousness of the music, has stuck with me throughout the years.

After passing through the halls of heavy metal and graduating into classic rock and the underground college-music scene, my good friend James lent me Wings’ compilation Greatest (1978) during my sophomore year of high school. I spun that LP for a week straight before having to give it back. Hearing not only “Silly Love Songs” but “Jet,” “Let ‘Em In,” and “Band on the Run” made me fall in love with the solo work of Paul McCartney. From that same record I discovered “Junior’s Farm,” “Another Day,” and one of my faves, “Mull of Kintyre.”

You have to remember that during this time — the mid- to late ’80s — the only McCartney songs still getting lots of Top 40 radio play were his duets with Michael Jackson and, to a lesser degree, Stevie Wonder. Occasionally you’d hear a current solo song like “No More Lonely Nights,” but you’d have to have the tape deck rolling if you wanted to hear it more than once. I was thrilled to have my BASF cassette copy of Greatest to keep a smile on my face and my fingers drumming along. I owned that cassette for years. And I remember when I discarded it — 1989.

That year McCartney released Flowers in the Dirt, a strong effort that included many excellent tracks cowritten by Elvis Costello. In support of this great album, McCartney toured for the first time in years and promised to play many of the Beatles songs he’d long sworn off while he was trying to establish himself as a solo artist. When he and his crack back (plus wife Linda on keyboards and vocals) landed in Cleveland, my friends Matt and Steve and I, along with Steve’s younger brother, went down to the old Cleveland Municipal Stadium to scalp tickets the night of the show.

Unfortunately, we had to split up — four tickets together were impossible to find. Steve and his brother wound up in nosebleed seats, while Matt and I, having bought the tickets of some dude who was spending that night in rehab, found ourselves in the 16th row, center stage, sharing a joint with the rehab dude’s buddies, who had sold us the tickets. Numerous times during the concert I would stop and point at the stage, exclaiming into Matt’s ear, “Dude, that’s Paul fucking McCartney!” It was unreal. The next day I ditched my old cassette of Wings’ Greatest and bought the CD. It accompanied me throughout college and the blue house basement days and still resides in my collection.

Long after college and well into my marriage, Greatest has remained one of my favorite albums, and “Silly Love Songs” continues on as one of those rare and wonderful tunes that can bring a smile to my face in its first few seconds. From the funky bass line to the groovy horn arrangements, from the layered vocals to that plain and simple drum part, I hear the song and I’m at ease (at least for the duration of its nearly six minutes). Because it’s been with me for so long, it allows me to reflect on who I was, who I am now, and how I grew into the person I am.

It’s no mistake that for one of the first road trips Julie and I took to Tucson, Arizona, where my parents moved in 1997, the travel tape I made for that short vacation included “Silly Love Songs.” I can’t tell you what else was on that tape, but I can recall singing along to the song with Julie as we headed into the desert. That trip, in 1998, was significant not only as our first trek to Tucson but also because it was the last time we would visit my parents by ourselves. The following January, our daughter, Sophie, was born.

This week we’re heading back to Arizona to visit Mom and Dad for Easter weekend. It’s become a tradition, I guess, to drive from Saugus to Tucson each year for the holiday. Generally, I do most of the driving while Sophie and Jacob, our son, watch movies and Jules reclines for much-deserved kick back time. But there are always moments during the eight-hour drive when we all listen to music together: Sometimes it’s Julie’s choice of Jackson Browne. Other times we put on Sophie’s request for Hannah Montana. When it comes to me, my mind always drifts back to the ’70s and those endless summer vacations. That’s when I want to pull out Wings’ Greatest one more time and try to fill my kids’ heads with “Silly Love Songs.”

  • I could be wrong, but wasn't "Silly Love Songs" performed in McCartney's dreadful film "Give My Regards to Broadway" with actors from the musical "Cats" in full makeup? Whenever I hear the song, I think of that part of the film, which is unfortunate, because I really do like the song. It's no "Jet" or "Junior's Farm," but it's good, gooey soft rock. Even Bruce Springsteen recently said that he didn't like it when it came out but now he appreciates what McCartney was saying.
  • JonCummings
    McCartney's achievement with "Silly Love Songs"--and it must be called that, even though the lyric is so frivolous--was to introduce all those disparate melody lines and instrumental hooks over the course of four minutes, then layer them all on top of one another at the end.

    I tend to think of "Silly Love Songs" inseparably from his next huge (U.S.) hit, which I greatly prefer--"With a Little Luck." They both meander from hook to hook in a sub-"Band on the Run" way. In a way, they're both attempts to cram the side-two-of-Abbey-Road suite effect into one pop single. As they both topped the charts, it must be said that they succeeded.

    I was entirely awestruck when I saw Macca at Madison Square Garden at Christmastime in '89, early in that tour. I saw him again at the top of RFK Stadium in Washington the next summer, but we were in the nosebleed seats for that show and the sound didn't travel well at all, so we heard the show as though it were being transmitted through a tin can.
  • David Ragland
    Silly Love Songs is and always will be one of my very favorite McCartney songs. Great hooks. Great melodies.
  • side3
    I have always really dug the bass line. Paul rarely puts in the time to craft a great bass part like he did with the Fabs.
  • regardless of whether or not it's top 40, pap or pop, listen to that bassline. I mean, really listen to it. This is before Chic, this predates disco. It might have helped invent the damned genre.
  • macaca
    Also v. underrated, the Linda factor, audible on "Listen to What the Man Said" (even more so on the live video version) and she was sorely missed on "See Your Sunshine" from Memory Almost Full.

    This site (or Jeff's previous one) was the only place that treated McCartney's "Press" with the respect it deserved...
  • Yeah, but he hated "Driving Rain," so SCREW JEFF GILES!
  • Oh yeah, McCartney... My own family anecdote: a couple of months ago when explaining musical instruments to my 4 year-old daughter, I showed her the youtube of Mull of Kintyre and explained the concept of the bagpipes :-) She wanted to see it over and over again and frequently requests to hear or see it again.
    Even though she doesn't speak a word of English, she picked up on it phonetically and sings it every so often.

    PS: her other Wings favorites are Live And Let Die and indeed Silly Love Songs... Thinking of it, I'm gonna have to youtube 'We All Stand Together' for her soon.
    Greetz from Belgium!
  • Mclenarr
    Paul gets a lot of bad press over here in the u.k i don't know about the U.S.or anywhre else. I hate that he accepted a knighthood...It's like saying you want an award for being better than other people...But he's the Man, Man. He complained once about John 'getting all the street cred.'. That's like saying he's jealous...If i ever meet Paul i'm gonna tell him that and say 'Er, your Paulness, i think in terms of street cred. you've nothing to worry about...Your'e Paul Mccartney...You do realise that. That. you. are. Paul Mc cartney don't you? Your'e bass line on Paperback writer alone gives you more street cred that 99.999999999999999 of the human race could even dream about.'
    When Ram came out some proposterous thing called Robert Christgow (it's not spelt like that) wrote in Village Voice that he 'only tolerated McCartney's crotchets because of his mates'. Y'know basically saying all Paul could do was write nice pretty songs. Like, errr, that's like why Hey Jude topped the U.S charts for most of 1968. What it is is theres all these jounalists who want to feel that pop music is an intellectual medium and they hate anyone who isn't intellectual and just wants to have a good time and enjoy music. Art for art's sake...but Paul doesn't give them anything to proselytize about so they hate him. Basically, these aren't people who like songs about 'rozzers wearing pink balloons upon' their shoes or songs that warn you about 'jumping waterfalls'...silly love songs. These are people who are unhappy and can't get it on with, to use 1971 phraseology, a chick so they need something to hate.
    Sorry...Scott but the article needs editing...
    Mclenarr
  • McCartney is given a lot of shit in the U.S. as well, Scott, and I sometimes wonder: What if McCartney had been murdered in 1980 and Lennon had lived? How would people view his Wings material then? I'm not sure, but Lennon certainly has the martyr factor working in his favor, as crass as that may sound. I do think it's unfair that Lennon was always seen as "the true artist " while McCartney was treated more like a guy who could just crank out the radio-ready hooks whenever he needed to, as if that sort of thing doesn't take artistry or talent.

    I'm just glad to know that despite the things they said about each other in the press after the Beatles broke up, Lennon and McCartney did remain friends. I'm sure they weren't as close as they had been before, but even the friendships of mere mortals fade in intensity over time.
  • Mclenarr
    Hi, Iv'e never thought about what if it had been the other way round...On the evidence of Double Fantasy i'm glad it wasn't...I'm glad you responded like you did you sound a lot more moderate than me. I'm new to this kind of site, infact i've only been on-line a week. They definatley made up after the acrimony of the break up. I think for us to look at them we can't understand why they weren't just loving being the Beatles. That's another thing about the critics they don't realise that Mccartney kept the prestige of the Beatles singles success going for the last 3 years. So, maybe John was jealous of Hey Jude and Get back. And that got in the way of his enjoyment of playing on Pauls songs. There's still a real mystery to what happened during the White L.P sessions. Ive read loads about the Beatles and you never him much specific...just that there was a lot of tension. I only found out recently that Paul didn't contribute to She said she said 'cause he'd walked out after an arguement!!Anyway, i'm also a member of Beatles number 9 fansite if you want to check out some of the stuff there. You'll definatley make a good contribution. I'm going to try and get to grips with this site...I don't even know what it is...
    Bye baby bye> Subject: [Disqus] Re: Basement Songs: Wings, “Silly Love Songs”> From: > To: stephenguest4@hotmail.co.uk> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 21:14:06 +0000> > rwcass wrote:> > McCartney is given a lot of shit in the U.S. as well, Scott, and I sometimes wonder: What if McCartney had been murdered in 1980 and Lennon had lived? How would people view his Wings material then? I'm not sure, but Lennon certainly has the martyr factor working in his favor, as crass as that may sound. I do think it's unfair that Lennon was always seen as "the true artist " while McCartney was treated more like a guy who could just crank out the radio-ready hooks whenever he needed to, as if that sort of thing doesn't take artistry or talent.> > I'm just glad to know that despite the things they said about each other in the press after the Beatles broke up, Lennon and McCartney did remain friends. I'm sure they weren't as close as they had been before, but even the friendships of mere mortals fade in intensity over time.> > Link: http://popdose.disqus.com/basement_songs_wings_...> > --> You may reply to this email to post your response. To turn off notifications, go to your Disqus settings at: http://disqus.com/settings/notifications/
    _________________________________________________________________
    The next generation of Windows Live is here
    http://www.windowslive.co.uk/get-live
  • Hey, I'M the editor of Scott's post! Them's fightin' words! ... but I'm with Scott in that I'm not sure if you meant what you meant. His "Basement Songs" posts are meant to be about his memories as much as they're supposed to be about a song or artist, so if you were hoping for more Macca info, sorry, but that's not how this writer rolls.

    Anyway, Scott and I, in the editing process, were talking about how much trash is talked about McCartney, and I said the only thing that bothered me recently about him was when he supervised "Let It Be ... Naked" in 2003. I told Scott I don't like when people George Lucas-ize their past work, but he said that McCartney was the one who convinced the group to do "Let It Be" when they were on the verge of breaking up; I've seen the footage (outtakes?) from the "Let It Be" documentary of Harrison getting mad at McCartney for telling him what to do when it really just seems like McCartney's trying to get the damn project going in the first place. I didn't envy him in that position.

    As for the public thinking it must've been great being Beatles, yes, it's easy to think that, but anyone who's been in a band or on a team or even in a sketch-comedy group like I have knows that it ain't no fun being in a group after a while, and just because the final product of your work turns out great doesn't mean your painful memories of arguments and resentments are suddenly golden.

    I'm rambling. Edit THIS, McLenarr! (Just kidding, but as you can see in my first comment in this thread, I thought your name was Scott based on your punctuation. I'd have a field day editing you, sir ...)
  • Mclenarr
  • Mclenarr
  • Malchus
    I'm not quite sure what needs editing with the piece. In no way was I trying to diss Paul McCartney. In fact, I absolutely love Paul's post Beatles music and give all of his record s a chance. For every "World Tonight" here is a "Spies Like Us." I appreciate your passion and devotion to Paul, Mclenarr, but I'm a little confused by your closing statement.
  • timandmonica
    I agree about Silly Love Songs! I have to admit I HATED it when I was a kid, but somehow connected with it as an adult. (That rarely happens to me.) The rich bass line, the lighthearted orchestral parts, and the lyrics that let you know he's not trying to be deep. It's simply "I Love You".

    What's wrong with that?
  • Elaine
    Regarding if John Lennon and lived, I've thought about it. I came to two conclusions: 1) if he still lived all these years in the U.S., he'd have led the way for more non-Americans to feel free to get seriously involved in our politics. (I'm sure you notice that British and Canadian famous people are often shouted down with snorts of, 'what do YOU know about it!' I believe Lennon could have changed that.) If not specifically, seriously involved in our politics, then maybe I'm thinking he'd have bridged a wider gap between our two countries in general. I dunno, it's just a theory. 2) I'll probably get shout-downs myself for this, but I believe John Lennon would NOT have ended up a DNC shill a la Streisand and Tim Robbins, Sean Penn and the like. I've seen things he said, for example about the concert for Bangladesh (which he described as "caca" - search for that word in the article and you'll scroll to it), and the futility of massive fundraising on a global scale. And, by the way, how America takes the rap unfairly. And how wearing the socialist label wasn't something he endorsed. He rightly said, hey, I work hard for my money and I'm wealthy. So what of it?!

    So, all in all, I think he was a pretty cool dude who made up his mind based on his brain, not what others were doing and saying in a trendy way. My own opinion is that Yoko has been a bit of an embarrassment to that legacy, but I'm not going to bash her for it. I do recall reading an interview where she said John used to lament that no one wanted to cover his songs the way people seemed to flock to cover Paul's. To find out that Paul was jealous and insecure about John being better than him is a bit ironic.
  • I hadn't even thought about how Lennon would have positioned himself in the political arena, so that's interesting to hear, Elaine. I agree that he probably wouldn't have been a political shill for the Democrats. Have you heard how Todd Rundgren's song "Rock and Roll Pussy" is about Lennon not living up to his revolutionary beliefs and how Mark Chapman took the song way too seriously?

    http://www.rhino.tv/page/FeaturesDetail/0,,1253...

    I just think Lennon would've made some mediocre music in his 40s and 50s and 60s just like McCartney has. I think he made mediocre music in his 30s just like McCartney. But he's an accidental martyr, so everyone acts like he was infallible. That's what I've never liked about the situation.

    I'm sure Lennon and McCartney were jealous of each other on many occasions and that they loved each other very much all at the same time. Friendships can be intense, y'all.
  • I still question your insanity, but it's a great post, Scott.
    Only just picked up on this - been down on the farm in NZ and I almost dropped in on you last week.
blog comments powered by Disqus