CD Review: Avett Brothers, “I and Love and You”

Ken Shane September 29, 2009 21

Avett Brothers - I and Love and YouLast summer when I saw the Avett Brothers at the Newport Folk Festival, they were a charming, energetic, ragtag bunch of guys dressed in white shirts and vests with skinny black ties. This summer, at the same venue, albeit on a larger stage, they had been cleaned up, buffed up, and one of the brothers was wearing a leather vest with no shirt, and sporting a bandana. That, my friends, is what a major label deal will do for you.

The Avett Brothers have not only gotten themselves signed to major international megalith Sony, their debut album for the label, I and Love and You, was produced by the top honcho, the big dog, Rick Rubin himself. It’s the dream, right? Not so much. How exactly does an acoustic band playing Americana music make a bloated album? First of all, you include 13 tracks. If I’ve said it once, I’ve said it a thousand times, there are very few artists that I want to hear that for that long at one sitting. The vast majority just don’t have that much to say, and the Avett Brothers are no exception. Maybe I’ve got ADD or just plain old short attention span, but more than 40, or 45 minutes at the outside is too damn long for an album. I’ve got a life to live, you know — such as it is.

I guess the reason I seem a little angry about this is because the title track, which has been widely available for several months, holds so much promise. “I and Love and You” is a great song which the band and their producer have wisely chosen to be the leadoff track for the album. The problem is that nothing remotely its equal follows. If you’re going to set the bar that high, it’s likely to piss people off when you fail to reach it again.

None of the above is to say that this album is not without its charms. Rootsy songs like “January Wedding” find the band closing in on its massive promise. It seems like it would have been such an easy task to edit the album down to more manageable ten good songs, and that would have been an improvement on every level. “Kick Drum Heart” is another fun song, and a hoot when they do it live. The bottom line though is that the songwriting is simply not good enough here to sustain a 13-track album. Rick Rubin, you’re supposed to be the expert on choosing songs. What happened?

I would never want to root for a band to lose their deal, especially a band that I have appreciated as much as the Avett Brothers. For me though, they just don’t belong on Sony Records with Rick Rubin producing. There are a number of strong indie labels that would welcome this band, and plenty of producers willing to help them create a more concise statement of musical purpose. Of course if this album fails to meet commercial expectations, Sony will be bidding the Avett Brothers adieu as they have so many other artists in recent years, building a career no longer being a major label option.

  • jeffowtk

    I don't understand your opening paragraph at all. The Avett Brothers wear bandanas all the time and having a vest with no shirt, essentially removing the shirt from last year's wardrobe, is a sign they've been cleaned up because they're now on Sony? That is nonsense. Also nonsense is the # of tracks. Emotionalism has 14 tracks. 4 Thieves Gone has 17. So they made their debut record thinner than previous indie releases. I and Love and You, the album, is like 48 minutes and it's too long because you have a life? Do you force yourself into solitary confinement when you listen to an album? Not in the car, on the subway, or any other time while you are living your life?

    I haven't heard the entire new album yet, but this is a fairly thoughtless review.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    Believe me, I am not the only one who noticed the image difference at Newport. I'm sorry that you don't like what I had to say, but I was reviewing this album, NOT their previous efforts. Were any previous albums mentioned in my review? As I said, I have been a fan of this band, and I look for better things from the in the future. I'm sorry that you find my review “thoughtless” despite the fact that you haven't had the time to listen to this bloated album in its entirety.

  • Pingback: CD Review: The Avett Brothers, “I and Love and You” | Popdose « Jersey Days

  • rocketman7

    I thought the same things as the first commentor, Ken. If you decide to take up criticism (though heaven knows there might be other things you could do with your life, such as it is), then you ought to be willing to take some yourself. The problem is that your thesis – folksy, charming indie band goes major, gets co-opted & bloated – is cliche and seems pretty effortless. In fact, it's not really worth saying much more. For my part, I'm enjoying a third full (and enjoyably lengthy) listen.

  • jeremyokai

    Did you just buy this and review it? Just curious. If so your judgments are a tad harsh. Give it a few listens…

    like the above poster. Their wardrobe has changed show to show since 2001. Catch a couple more shows and you'll see this.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    I've seen them four times in the last year. How many shows do I have to go to before I “get it”? I don't mind people not agreeing with my reviews. First of all, I listen to every album that I review three to four times at a minimum for the very reason that music can grow on you. Second, the commenters here act is if I'm the only one who has this opinion of the album. I assure you that I am not.

  • jeremyokai

    You're the only review I've read today.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    I wasn't necessarily talking about writers. I try to stay away from other people's reviews while I'm writing mine. No, I've heard from several friends whose musical insight I appreciate. Some of them, not all, share my feelings. I know that people love this band. I posted a video that I took of them at SXSW on YouTube, and it's had like 16,000 views. So the band certainly as fans. I'll say again, I remain a fan, I just didn't like this album that much. I'm sorry that some people see that as a personal attack on a band that, for them, can apparently do no wrong. Perhaps the little indie band getting big label deal thing is cliche, but that's exactly what happened in this case.

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    In defense of Ken, what he's essentially saying is that Sony fixed what wasn't broken in order to wedge the Avett Bros. into a marketing mold. The readers who are commenting are defending the band's previous albums alongside the new, so the inherent question is if those previous albums were so great, why was there the need to alter what was working?

    I haven't heard the album, so I cannot comment on its merits in either direction, but let me appeal to all the readers on one point: even though CDs can hold 75+ minutes of music, is it necessary to fill them all? I'm not looking to start a flame war or anything, I just want to gauge the public thought about this. Do you feel slighted if the album is less than 50 minutes length or, conversely, has the idea that every artist now has to make a double-album each time caused a lot of filler to go out?

    Speaking for myself, it goes either way. There are a couple really long CDs that have been brilliant all the way through, and some that only had 45 minutes of greatness, with the rest filled with b-side oddities that got added for padding. Somewhere inside Foo Fighters' In Your Honor is a career-high release, but two full length CDs is far too dense an offering to see the wheat for the razorgrass. If I could assume Ken's position for a moment, I think he feels that somewhere in this is a solid, short recording. The fact that the very best song is made the first single and “blows the load” too soon, and that judicious cherry-picking was the better call versus dropping every little thing at once has made this release way too much like every other release, a fate the Avetts don't deserve.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    What you said. Thanks.

  • Tony S

    I listened to this CD several times on AOL Spinner (it's out as of today). And I agree with what Ken has to say. I found it boring, save for the handful of tracks Ken mentioned.

    My take: the group realized they had a shot at the bigtime and tensed up and got self-conscious. To compound matters, it doesn't seem like Rick Rubin helped matters since the arrangements don't seem to bring out the best in the songs.

    I don't think length is necessarily a problem for all artists. The Clash's gargantuan “Sandinista!” is one of my favorite albums. But if you're going to go on for 40 minutes or more, you need some variety and some seriously compelling melodies and performances. I don't see that this record had either.

  • Iconostential

    Interesting. I'm EXACTLY of the same mind with regards to album length. I think that a 15 song good album can almost always be whittled down to a 10 song great album, and should. In this case though, I don't find the album too long at all. Admittedly I've only listed to it all the way through a few times, but there isn't a song here that I would cut – if I had to, maybe “Incomplete and Insecure”, but anything more would feel stunted to me.

    I guess what I feel is strange about this review is the overall negative tone considering you only really express one complaint: That it's too long. You even go so far as to say that they should leave the label and change producers based on this complaint. I suspect that this stint with Rubin will be their last anyhow, but it seems odd to hinge so much disappointment on runtime alone.

    Oh well, your job is to say what you think.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    Well thank you for understanding. I have to say that I did cite something other than the length as a problem. I said that I just don't think the songwriting is strong enough. For me, the songwriting is the basis of any album, from hip hop to heavy metal. So if the songwriting isn't strong enough, that's always going to be a problem for me.

  • Linda

    The brown leather vest has been worn for years, as well as bandanas. This seems to be a critique of something so mundane and trivial as garments, yet you seem to have missed the profundity of lyrics and well constructed melodies and arrangements. Not to mention the congruity of theme.

  • guest

    whatever. it's the avett brothers. who cares? nothing new, interesting or worthwhile about them.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    yeah, I missed all that. I've been to four shows in the last year. If that's not enough times to be up to date on the band's wardrobe, I'm sorry. The arrangements are dull, the melodies are nothing to write home about, and the lyrics are ok in some places.

  • henapea

    thank you for the first review i agree with. i literally wept over the loss of thier rawness

  • henapea

    thank you for the first review i agree with. i literally wept over the loss of thier rawness

  • henapea

    thank you for the first review i agree with. i literally wept over the loss of thier rawness

  • Dixonamoran

    their album is great all the way through! Who wouldn't want a longer album of great music? I've bought 2 copies of I and Love and You, I'm a huge fan and this review is dumb

  • Pj Ohnson

    this review is very elementary. You offered no insight on the style/genre/overall sound of the album. I do hope you are not getting paid to do reviews. Aside from your ADD, you are downright awful at understanding music.