CD Review: Michael Jackson, “Michael”

Dw. Dunphy December 8, 2010 23

In time travel movies, the big difficulty the characters are always  concerned about is the paradox. Don’t do this, this or that or else you’ll bring on a paradox, it’ll destroy time-space and we’ll all cease to exist, etc. and so on. There are paradoxes in reality too, impossible to reconcile so easily as “don’t cross your mother and father in the 1950′s.”

Try this one: the first posthumous collection from Michael Jackson, titled Michael without a hint of irony or levity, would have brought back his career based on the music, but first he had to die.

I wasn’t a fan of Invincible, his last studio album in life. I thought it was leaden and disjointed. It did not have a single song on it that grabbed me and, consequently, I found it easily forgettable. Yet at that time, his controversies and scandals were still front-and-center and yes, no matter how much someone wants to deny that has an effect on the decision-making process, it certainly does. In some twisted way, his death made it okay to enjoy Michael Jackson’s music again. If the events alleged did occur, they’re still inexcusable. If they did not, then he really was a victim of his fame. In either case, he’s not here to defend himself or do the time, and so focus shifts back to the work. Had these songs appeared while he lived, they would still fall into that gray region where doubt plugs the ear, it would have been likely viewed another comeback bid and would have likely languished on racks like Invincible. This newfound paradox allows the album to be judged in a more favorable light.

“Favorable” is key here. Like I said earlier, this album would have saved his career if it was only a question of music to be asked, but it is not without glaring inconsistencies. The first is that I still can’t understand why I’m hearing Michael Jackson in auto-tune. “Hold My Hand,” a duet with Akon, is a main offender and so is that annoying declaration up front of “Akon and M.J., yeah!” Accepting these, the song is actually quite effective, filled with synth-driven string swells and choir backups by the end, in true Jackson bombast.

It might just be that the auto-tune was needed to touch up an unfinished vocal line, but that’s a bit too generous. It seems more a nod to the sound of the times, and a glaring truth that, while Jackson doesn’t need auto-tune, Akon does. He can shout out his allegiance all he wants, but that will never make him an equal.

“Hollywood Tonight” has a fat, “Bad”-like groove and is a contender for my favorite song of the set. Teddy Riley and Neff-U bring dance energy to the fore without stifling the Jackson trademarks. Even though I can’t really stand 50 Cent, “Monster,” featuring a late-song rap and another lyric created with Jackson on the defensive against paparazzi and varied parasites, works on levels most of his other songs of the type don’t, including this album’s terribly self-defensive “Breaking News.” “(I Can’t Make It) Another Day” is the requisite rock track of the album featuring Lenny Kravitz, and of the songs here, this feels strangely the most natural. I’ve always believed Kravitz’ vocal harmonies had Jackson 5 D.N.A. in it, and this track proves it, plus his guitar solo is smile-inducing.

The problem with the album is that it is so consciously calculated. There’s the big rocker, the bid for hip-hop agreement, the huge inspirational track with the gospel tinge (“Keep Your Head Up” produced by Tricky) and the soft pop entry of “(I Like) The Way You Love Me,” all presented with that need to remind the listener of Thriller‘s multi-faceted musicality. However, nothing here sounds as effortless as Thriller did. This album is programmed from stem-to-stern, down to the incredibly creepy album cover featuring a cold-eyed portrait of Jackson being coronated King of Pop in death.

And if you strip away the offenses, you find a batch of really good tunes, and therein lies the rub. This album will attain an air of greatness it doesn’t deserve because Jackson is gone, and the stigma of being a fan of his music has eased. This is not Thriller and it’s hard to say much could challenge that, not only because of that album’s contents but because of the cultural reinforcement of it being “something” – the inherent merits are amplified by years of social adoration. Yet Michael is easily the most ‘fun’ of Jackson’s output of recent times and sits so much more comfortably next to Bad and Dangerous than HIStory or Invincible does.

The question hangs in the air though, and will remain there. The largest portion of Michael will make the fans very happy, and has the ability to catch those who are less than loyalist off guard, but would it be so if he was still alive? The best advice would be, just enjoy the music. That’s what it’s supposed to really be about, right?

Michael is available from Amazon.com.

  • Anonymous

    I agree that this album is much more “fun” than Invincible or History, but I also think it has the same problem as Invincible – way too many songs that self-consciously try to fit in with the times soundwise, to the detriment of the songs themselves. I think the last three tracks are killer, and “(I Like) The Way That You Love Me” is excellent too, although I have to admit that I liked it much better in its more stripped down version on the Ultimate Collection box set that came out 6 years ago. Other than that, I’m left cold. Also, that “Blue Gangster” leak that made the rounds was better than most of what’s here. I’ll still listen to History over this one when presented with the choice – now there’s a record whose imperfections only add to its character.

  • http://www.popdose.com Ted

    I actually like “Hold My Hand.” Sure, it’s laden with too many production techniques, but both Jackson and Akon convey some real emotion on the song, and I love the hooks. To me, the rest of the album doesn’t have that same pop sensibility that’s present on “Hold My Hand.”

  • AnnaM.

    The events alleged did not occur. And if you had done some research instead of basing on what the media has told you, you would know that. Don’t be affraid to research.MJ was innocent.He was a victim of his fame, media and of course his eccentic life style, which he never try to hide. He was eccentric, yes.But he was not a criminal.Why do you think so many people defend him.They are not delusional.They just have studied the fact and have seen the truth. Anyway. I used to enjoy his music before his death.And you know why? Because i can separate the man from his artistry. Do you listen to Elvis Presley? He was a proven pedophile.Do you listen to R. Kelly ect. It’s to bad that Michael will always be remembered for those stupid rumors. And it is bad that some can not rive of them. One sugestion to those kind of people. If you can not hear his music without thinking of the allegations or his appearence, don’t listen to him at all. Your loss after all.

    I had to make this comment because you had to mention the allegations. I find your review quite fair. I would like to hear your opinion about “Behind the mask” and “Much too soon” .
    Overall i think this album ones again demostrate the variety of “souls” of Michael’s music. It’s a very enjoyable cd with lots of hiden gems.

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    Here’s the problem – the allegations will never go away. Those who believe them false have every right to. Those who believe them true will do the same. I, as the reviewer, would be derelict in my position if I didn’t include it because the controversy persists. As much as I would love to approach the album solely on its merits without acknowledging the allegations, the Jackson legacy will always be caught in that bind.

    To be fair, it’s not just Michael Jackson that I’ve had to reconcile controversial data against the music itself. I had the same issues when tackling Guns ‘N Roses’ Chinese Democracy awhile back. In issues of art and the effects on it from worldly issues, you have to wade through a lot to get to the art itself. “Michael” the album should be judged on the content, and nothing but. For me as the writer to not acknowledge what you have to swim through to get to that place is to not present a complete review.

    I am a big fan of the Thriller-era music, and both “Behind The Mask” and “Much Too Soon” come from that stage, so I gravitate to them. Still, right now, I’m enjoying “Hollywood Tonight” and “(I Can’t Make It) Another Day” a lot. I think “Breaking News” is a huge mistake being on here. “Monster” was enough, and “Breaking News” is just incredibly heavy-handed. That song alone forces a reviewer, be they fair or unjust, to bring up the allegations by dint of them being called out on the recording.

  • B1wils

    I think History gets an unfair assessment here, because while not a “fun” album, it’s actually a very solid record. It’s full of Jackson’s trademark bombast, paranoia, drama, and occasional Streisand-esque moments. At his best, these trademarks produced amazing songs like Billie Jean, and at worst, still produced “pretty good” songs by anyone else’s standards.

    I agree mostly with this review of Michael though .. it’s uneven (as it should be for a vaults collection), and Akon is nearly as offending as when Rick James demanded “Temptations Sing” on Superfreak. (Really, Rick James?)

    But there are a few gems .. Hollywood Tonight (from the Invincible sessions. I think MJ’s biggest mistake with Invincible was going with hack producer Rodney Jerkins)

    Also, Behind the Mask and Much Too Soon. Great stuff.

  • Pingback: Today's Celebrity Gossip » Blog Archive » CD Review: Michael Jackson, "Michael" | Popdose

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    A side thread: Precisely. You don’t tell the Temptations to do anything. You do what they tell you. Even though I like “Super Freak,” that moment always makes me a little nutty.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    I don’t know … I like it. “Keep Your Head” up is a huge hit single just waiting to happen, and there are several other candidates too. I’m just trying to listen to it without all the baggage, and guess what, it’s pretty damned enjoyable.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    I don’t know … I like it. “Keep Your Head” up is a huge hit single just waiting to happen, and there are several other candidates too. I’m just trying to listen to it without all the baggage, and guess what, it’s pretty damned enjoyable.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    But Anna makes a good point. If we bring prejudices to artists because of “the allegations” we’ll never get to hear another Phil Spector record (and those are now proven facts, not allegations). There were all of those Sinatra mob allegations, and I couldn’t live without his music. Many of our heroes were in a drugged out stupor when they made the music we love, allegedly. I prefer to keep my head firmly in the sand when it comes to this stuff and just react solely to the music. To do otherwise is to create an never ending trail of heartbreak. The fact is that in the end we just don’t know, do we? And even if we did, does that make the work somehow less important?

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    But Anna makes a good point. If we bring prejudices to artists because of “the allegations” we’ll never get to hear another Phil Spector record (and those are now proven facts, not allegations). There were all of those Sinatra mob allegations, and I couldn’t live without his music. Many of our heroes were in a drugged out stupor when they made the music we love, allegedly. I prefer to keep my head firmly in the sand when it comes to this stuff and just react solely to the music. To do otherwise is to create an never ending trail of heartbreak. The fact is that in the end we just don’t know, do we? And even if we did, does that make the work somehow less important?

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    But Anna makes a good point. If we bring prejudices to artists because of “the allegations” we’ll never get to hear another Phil Spector record (and those are now proven facts, not allegations). There were all of those Sinatra mob allegations, and I couldn’t live without his music. Many of our heroes were in a drugged out stupor when they made the music we love, allegedly. I prefer to keep my head firmly in the sand when it comes to this stuff and just react solely to the music. To do otherwise is to create an never ending trail of heartbreak. The fact is that in the end we just don’t know, do we? And even if we did, does that make the work somehow less important?

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    I’m not saying we should run from the art because of the artist’s controversies, founded or unfounded. However, it muddies the water anyway. It’s human nature that once we’re told, “don’t think pink elephants,” bam, pink elephants abound. As a reviewer, I have to address it in some form or else I’m not looking at the big picture. It’s more difficult when, in Jackson’s music, he brings it up as often as others say don’t bring it up.

    Today is the anniversary of Lennon’s death. I still love his music, but he was very hard on Cynthia and Julian. If the LennoNYC documentary glanced over that, I’d feel the movie makers did a poor job. Even if that was only an allegation and Lennon didn’t do as he did, the allegation becomes part of the story. If Lennon brought that into his music (as he often did), it is an implicit imperative to the movie maker to come to terms with.

    Carrie Fisher was, by some accounts, high on cocaine throughout The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi, certainly during the filming of the Blues Brothers. I love those movies and try to divorce the film from the film-maker, but on a bigger level, you can’t. You enjoy the art, but eventually you have to factor in the artist.

    Having said all that, this CD could have been a colossal horror show. It’s by no stretch that. Is it perfect? No, but if this was the last thing out of the Jackson camp, it would rightfully be considered a high note.

  • JFeinberg

    really looking forward to the record release party in NYC on monday. If you’re in the city you definitely need to pick up a wristband this week at 1 of 4 Best Buys.

  • JFeinberg

    really looking forward to the record release party in NYC on monday. If you’re in the city you definitely need to pick up a wristband this week at 1 of 4 Best Buys.

  • Pingback: Michael Jackson: Michael – review | Northern Barbarians's Blog

  • Pingback: New Michael Jackson CD “Michael” Review « Joe's Blu-ray, Movie & DVD Reviews

  • Shunke Weeya

    Well alright, OK…if you can stop judging and comparing the CD “Michael” to past works such as Thriller, Invincible…or omit to mention the allegations of his personal life…and just listen…with childlike innocence…as I found myself doing… I am just happy to hear once again Michael’s beautifully clear, and emotionally truthful voice, as a Gift, that he was to this World, and as receiving a Gift from him, from the Spirit world.. Which this album appears to be in a way, for those of us who miss Him… I have been listening to his “ballads” over and over again, being uplifted each time, whether it be “Best of joy”, “or I like the Way that you lovin’ me”… just beautiful and sweet… as he was.
    “Keep your head up” has the grandiosity of the grand staging of “Will you be there” and I could so well see it being performed by him on stage… And tears came to my eyes when I first heard: -Well I guess I learned my lesson “Much too soon”…Michael is raw with pain and authenticity.
    And yes, some of the other songs are about his persecution by the media, etc… He wrote songs about what was true to him as he was living it, unveiling his emotional and mental processes for all to see, that’s how, I think, he could touch soo many people of different walks of life…
    So to compare this album to the past Bad or Thriller, isn’t founded here, they were different facets of him…long gone. This isn’t about rating someone’s latest album…but rather about acknowledging another gift from Michael, as he gave so many during his short lifetime… at least that’s how I’m receiving it…

  • Shunke Weeya

    Well alright, OK…if you can stop judging and comparing the CD “Michael” to past works such as Thriller, Invincible…or omit to mention the allegations of his personal life…and just listen…with childlike innocence…as I found myself doing… I am just happy to hear once again Michael’s beautifully clear, and emotionally truthful voice, as a Gift, that he was to this World, and as receiving a Gift from him, from the Spirit world.. Which this album appears to be in a way, for those of us who miss Him… I have been listening to his “ballads” over and over again, being uplifted each time, whether it be “Best of joy”, “or I like the Way that you lovin’ me”… just beautiful and sweet… as he was.
    “Keep your head up” has the grandiosity of the grand staging of “Will you be there” and I could so well see it being performed by him on stage… And tears came to my eyes when I first heard: -Well I guess I learned my lesson “Much too soon”…Michael is raw with pain and authenticity.
    And yes, some of the other songs are about his persecution by the media, etc… He wrote songs about what was true to him as he was living it, unveiling his emotional and mental processes for all to see, that’s how, I think, he could touch soo many people of different walks of life…
    So to compare this album to the past Bad or Thriller, isn’t founded here, they were different facets of him…long gone. This isn’t about rating someone’s latest album…but rather about acknowledging another gift from Michael, as he gave so many during his short lifetime… at least that’s how I’m receiving it…

  • Karenfoxy72

    Your reasoning of having to mention the allegations to justify that you have to include them to make a full, and complete or perhaps objective review in your thinking is actually the opposite. That you have to include them. I would bet many would agree they are not significant if your reviewing the music alone. When people buy the cd to find out if its good or not to listen to, do they stop first to think about the allegations before they buy it, before they listen to it? No..they just pop it in the player and listen and see if it feels good. If it’s already playing in a friends house you just listen to it..you don’t think about the allegations. The allegations they have been many years ago people are fed up of that and it only mostly circulates around you people in the business(media), bury them already and let the mans’ gift of music shine through for once. If your trying to review music, then just review music by not putting the bad taste first and tinging it with doubt and subjectiveness. Listening to music is not about being so technical about comparing his work..that instrument..that tone..that composer etc…its the complete whole picture and sound of it. These music were thought of-composed on different times of his life and are all very different in that sense. Mostly, if 2. Or 3 of the songs are great stuff that you like to listen to…or in my case ‘much too soon’ touched me soon…then it stops there to me as a great album. By the way, doesn’t mean you didn’t listen much to invisible that it was a flop..it wasn’t. A lot of music there is great I find him real inventive ahead of his times. Check your facts. Mj never had an album that didn’t sell well.

  • tabg

    My son loves Breaking News and he is 7 years old! He listens to that song all the time. I personally like the whole CD. When I first got it, it took me a whole 3 months to listen to it! I was going through Michael withdrawal and I was in part hoping I wasn’t going to be disappointed. One day I played it at work but I wasn’t listening to it and then all of a sudden I found myself bouncing to the beat of Monster. That made me perk up, rewind it and really start listening to it. Some parts of Breaking News remind me of Scream. I think the CD is good.

  • tabg

    My son loves Breaking News and he is 7 years old! He listens to that song all the time. I personally like the whole CD. When I first got it, it took me a whole 3 months to listen to it! I was going through Michael withdrawal and I was in part hoping I wasn’t going to be disappointed. One day I played it at work but I wasn’t listening to it and then all of a sudden I found myself bouncing to the beat of Monster. That made me perk up, rewind it and really start listening to it. Some parts of Breaking News remind me of Scream. I think the CD is good.

  • tabg

    My son loves Breaking News and he is 7 years old! He listens to that song all the time. I personally like the whole CD. When I first got it, it took me a whole 3 months to listen to it! I was going through Michael withdrawal and I was in part hoping I wasn’t going to be disappointed. One day I played it at work but I wasn’t listening to it and then all of a sudden I found myself bouncing to the beat of Monster. That made me perk up, rewind it and really start listening to it. Some parts of Breaking News remind me of Scream. I think the CD is good.