Could Tim Tebow Be The Next Eli Manning?

Dave Lifton January 17, 2012 11

Like most American males, my grade-school gym classes were regularly filled with games of dodge ball. Because being scrawny and nearsighted are not the ideal tools for a world-class athlete, the smart decision would have been for me to intentionally take an early hit and watch my classmates fight it out from the safety of the sidelines. But I was competitive and wanted my team to succeed, so I mostly hung out in the back, hiding behind my bigger teammates as they did all the dirty work. On those occasions when I did get the ball, the toughest kids on the other team would all move closer to the line, daring me to throw at them. More often than not, my throw would be caught. Other times the ball would be so badly thrown that I completely miss the target from ten feet away. But once in a while, usually by luck, I could put the ball in the right spot to glance off their bodies and I would run back to safety as my vanquished foe embarrassingly sulked to the bleachers.

It was kind of like that episode of Freaks And Geeks

I had long since repressed those traumatic memories, but they were dislodged in the wake of the Denver Broncos’ victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers in the Wild Card game. As with me in dodge ball, no one gave Tim Tebow a chance against Pittsburgh’s famously punishing defense, as drawn up by their legendary coordinator Dick LeBeau. But as it was pointed out all last week, the Steelers’ repeatedly stacked the box with both safeties, leaving no deep coverage. While this was largely effective in stopping Denver’s excellent running game, it also left Pittsburgh’s secondary vulnerable for Denver to turn play action mid-range passes into big plays, which is exactly what happened on the first, and last, play of overtime.

Contrast that with the run of improbable come-from-behind victories Tebow during the regular season. In those games, the Broncos’ opponents followed the traditional method of protecting a late lead, which adds cornerbacks to prevent the receivers from going out of bounds and stopping the clock, and places the safeties higher up the field than usual to prevent a big play. You can give up yardage as long as they don’t get behind you and the clock keeps moving. This made no sense because Tebow is unlikely to have consistent success throwing deep. But over-the-middle passes to a wide-open receiver with room to run? No problem. This is why Tebow could look horrible for three-and-a-half quarters and look like a world-beater in the game’s late stages.

This Saturday, Tebow Time came to a crashing halt, as it did in the regular season, against the New England Patriots, whose defense this year has been a shell of what it was during their rise to greatness a decade ago. But Bill Belichick is no idiot, and his defensive scheme played into Tebow’s greatest weakness. Fifteen of the Broncos’ plays in their 45-10 loss to the Patriots went for negative yardage. What looked like repeated breakdowns of Denver’s offensive line was more likely the result of Tebow’s inability to recognize the Pats’ disguises and adjust the protection at the line of scrimmage. The Patriots showed him respect, but no mercy, proving for the second time this season that God’s favorite quarterback is no match for Satan’s favorite coach.*

If nothing else, Tebow has been fascinating to watch because he’s challenged football’s conventional wisdom about running a college offense in the National Football League. Now that there’s a significant amount of game film on what he can and do, we’ll all be watching next season to see both how teams prepare for him and how he adjust. But with his first year as a starter in the books, there is no metric that suggests that Tebow is even an NFL-caliber backup quarterback, no less a starter. His fans may point to his 7-4 record as proof that he has the intangibles of a winner, but New York Jets fans were saying the same about Mark Sanchez a year ago, and now they want to run him out of town. There’s a fine line between “poise” and “big loser.”

The beauty (or pain, depending on who you root for) of the NFL is that its parity-driven structure means that the difference between winning and losing can sometimes be the result of fluke plays. If, say, a botched snap, a wrong call by the officials, and an “immaculate reception” goes your way in a season, an otherwise 8-8 team that misses the wild card turns into 11-5 and a possible first-round bye. For example, if, in the Broncos’ 13-10 overtime win against the Chicago Bears, Marion Barber doesn’t make two Marion Barber-like mistakes, the Broncos finish 7-9, miss the playoffs, and there is no talk of divine intervention helping Tebow. If Tebow is to succeed, it should be because he realizes he was very lucky and remains dedicated to quickly improving his craft. As a neutral who enjoys watching good football, I want him to do well, but that doesn’t mean I want him anywhere near my beloved New York Giants.

Best. Day. Ever.

Speaking of which, perhaps Tim Tebow would be well served by looking closely at Eli Manning’s career. Like Tebow, his critics have suggested he’s had a sense of undeserved sense of destiny throughout his career (due to his father and brother), and whose greatest career achievement to date was more the result of a strong defense and a bit of luck than his own ability.

But beneath his goofy exterior and a persona that rivals Derek Jeter for blandness is a competitive streak, intelligence, and self-confidence that is, well, Jeter-esque. Out of character, he made headlines in the pre-season for suggesting that he should be considered among the league’s elite. That those words came after a 2010 season where he led the league in interceptions and the New York Giants failed to make the playoffs for the second consecutive year made him the subject of ridicule. It didn’t help that the off-season that saw him lose two of his favorite targets (Steve Smith and Kevin Boss) and two linemen (Shaun O’Hara and Rich Seubert).

Manning responded by proving the doubters wrong, throwing for a Giants single-season record of 4,933 yards, with nine fewer interceptions. Like Tebow, he specialized in late-game heroics, setting an NFL single-season record 15 touchdown passes in the fourth quarter. Similarly, many of those wins were also the result of Manning’s ability to pick apart a prevent defense.

The difference is that, for much of the season, Manning carried the Giants on his back, his right arm keeping them in nearly every game as their usually powerful running game stalled and their weak secondary was picked apart by Manning’s opposite quarterback.  Manning also improved as the games went on because he’s become very adept at reading defenses at the line of scrimmage and making quick decisions. Tebow, on the other hand, too often relied on his defense to keep the games close so that he could pull out those clutch victories.

The truest measure of Manning’s improved leadership isn’t that he orchestrated those comebacks, but in how he has dealt with those off-season transactions. The rebuilt offensive line struggled early, but Manning became more adept at throwing the ball away where in previous years he would have taken a sack, or worse, made a dumb throw that resulted in an interception. At tight end, rookie Jake Ballard, who rarely ran routes at Ohio State, turned in Kevin Boss-like numbers, while Smith’s replacement, Victor Cruz, a virtual rookie (he was injured for most of his first year) who was undrafted, showed big-time playmaking skills as he salsa-danced his way to a Giants-record 1,536 yards with nine touchdowns.

It’s unfair to compare Tim Tebow to Eli Manning, just as it has always been wrong to compare Eli to his Hall Of Fame-bound brother. They’re all at different stages in their careers and in different systems. But like Eli Manning in his first few years, Tebow is young and driven to become the best he can be. Proper coaching, both on the field and in the film room, could correct his deficiencies (and it helps to have John Elway right there to guide him along and maybe fix some of the flaws in his delivery). A veteran backup who’s not Brady Quinn would also be good. But that’s of little consolation to Denver fans today as they head into a long off-season.

* For the record, I care precious little about Tebow’s religious or political beliefs as they relate to his ability. I made that cheap joke mainly because it also takes out Belichick. Many athletes in all sports openly display their faith and they’re not used as a lightning rod in the national shouting match about religion. That said, Tebow’s eye black and alignment with Focus On The Family make him fair game.  In the name of discourse, please keep all discussion of Tebow’s faith out of the comments for this post. 

  • JonCummings

    The Giants lost to the Redskins. Twice. I don’t care if they win the Super Bowl. That’s still a failed season.

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    It’s nice to be able to have something that you Redskins fans can point to with pride. 

  • http://sportsmyriad.com Beau

    I see Tebow having the opposite problem of Eli. Tebow passes poorly but has the intangible of “leadership.” Eli always had decent mechanics but has grown as a leader.

    So the questions on Tebow are:

    1. Can he improve his passing?

    2. Will his “leadership” ability no longer seem so wonderful when the Broncos aren’t winning games behind their running game, their defense, Marion Barber’s mistakes and well-timed 59-yard field goals? Leadership, as defined in Tebow’s case, works wonders when you already have a confident team. What happens when the breaks go against them?

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    It’s not about their on-field similarities, but how Eli’s work ethic and intelligence have changed the standard line on him from “He’s OK, but he’ll never be as good as his brother” to “He’s been consistently excellent all year.” 

    To answer your first question, Tebow will need the same traits that have worked for Eli to improve not only his technical skills, but also his in-game intelligence (reading defenses, finding his secondary receivers and checkdowns, etc.). Those are all issues any first-year starter will have, but when you factor in Tebow’s poor mechanics, that’s a lot to overcome.

    Your second question is why I brought up Sanchez, who in his first year put up numbers very similar to Jamarcus Russell. But because, like Tebow, the Jets’ defense kept them in games and he beat a few prevents (and benefited from the Colts’ decision to rest Peyton), he got to the AFC Championship and was tagged with the intangible “poise.” It only took one bad year for that to be erased. 

  • JonCummings

    I’m more of a “fallen” Redskins fan — I’ll emerge from my latent stage as soon as The Danny is no longer owner, if that ever happens. But the Giants are always impossible to believe, even when they’re doing well. I remember there was (is?) a syndicated columnist named Norman Hand, who did humorous predictions every NFL Friday — and I remember one season when, every single week, he would note the Giants’ record as being “on the way to 8-8.” Even when it was clear they would have a winning record, he would write, “9-5, on the way to 8-8.” That’s how I’ve always felt about the Giants. They may have won the division somehow, they may have beaten the Packers, but there’s no way they win their next game. Unless they prove me wrong and do something that seems to make no sense at all.

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    Ah yes, Norman Chad, who never wrote a joke he couldn’t run into the ground (especially those involving his multiple marriages). 

    And as a lifelong Giants fan, I’m perpetually skeptical of them when they start looking good. There’s always a horrible crash looming. Even if they lose this week, they’ve achieved more than was expected by everybody (most of the beat writers predicted them to be around 7-9).

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    I’m still smiling from Sunday’s Giants game…or maybe it’s the Nyquil finally kicking in. Either way, the cheeseheads can kiss my big ol’ hairy butt.

  • JonCummings

    Wow, Freudian slip … Norman Hand was a defensive tackle who finished his career with the Giants, then keeled over dead at age 37 a couple years ago.

  • Bob

    I don’t see it happening, Dave.  Tebow is heading into his third year and still has the same bad mechanics and s-l-o-w delivery he’s always had. (e.g. I typed that last sentence faster than he can get a pass off.)

    History has shown us that inaccurate NFL quarterbacks very rarely make great leaps in passing accuracy. And it’s pretty much unheard of for an NFL quarterback with a slow delivery to suddenly develop a quick release. Either one of these flaws typically spells doom an NFL quarterback. Tebow has both. 

    Bob

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    Good points, Bob.

  • http://notthatyoung.blogspot.com Anonymous

    What really mystifies me is that Teeebow! was a 70% passer at Florida, yet throws like my 7-year old niece in the pros. 

    Yeah, yeah, pro game faster, better athletes, yadda, yadda, yadda…

    Still, 70%!

    I believe that he can learn to be a pocket passer…but he’ll never get there because it’ll take him 3 or 4 years to learn, but he’ll be dumped after next year because the Broncos will be 6-10 and no other team will touch him…