DVD Review: “The Mindscape of Alan Moore”

mooreAs the film adaptation of the seminal graphic novel Watchmen hangs on at movie theaters — it hasn’t exactly lived up to box-office expectations — a lot of questions have popped up about Alan Moore, the book’s writer. He’s refused to allow his name to be associated with the film, hence the “co-created by” credit that only lists the book’s artist, Dave Gibbons; Moore has even insisted that all of his royalties from the film be given to Gibbons.

So who is this enigmatic Englishman? How does he come up with his ideas? What do his colleagues think of him? How does he work? It was with these questions that I eagerly sat down to watch DeZ Vylenz’s The Mindscape of Alan Moore, a 2006 documentary about the author that came out on DVD last year in a two-disc set.

The bulk of the movie consists of Moore talking directly to the camera from, I presume, his home in England. Dressed in black, with snake and skull rings covering his fingers, and surrounded by stacks of books, Moore begins with the details of his tough childhood in the working-class area of England. He came of age in the ’70s during a period of unrest in the country, and after being expelled from school for selling drugs, he struggled to find any place that would hire him while at the same time trying not to join the establishment. Comic books became his freedom from despair.

By the time Moore discusses his entry into the world of comics, Vylenz’s use of psychedelic horror-film music and images of doom and gloom (slums, smokestacks, etc.) and creepy nature shots (bugs crawling across logs, fungus growing) have already begun to wear thin. What I thought would be an examination of Moore’s career wasn’t so much about the comics he’d written but an attempt to literally interpret what’s going on in the writer’s mind.

Watching The Mindscape of Alan Moore became like sitting with one of my far-out college professors after a night of toking up. Trippy music plays in the background, some weird Spanish film pours out of the TV, and the prof goes on for hours about government and society. The next morning — hell, an hour later — you remember being high, but you can’t fathom a damn thing the professor (or in this case, Moore) said, nor do you really care. Obviously I wasn’t the right audience for this documentary, but I wonder who is besides Moore fanatics.

Going into Mindscape, I foolishly thought I’d hear the writer discuss his interesting career and all of the work he’s done. Sadly, he only gives little tidbits of information about his writing for Swamp Thing, V for Vendetta, From Hell, Watchmen (of course), and what he considers his “pornographic” comic, Lost Girls. Meanwhile, long periods of his career are left out altogether, including his work at Marvel and on the 2000 A.D. series. Ironically, despite his disdain for Hollywood adaptations of his work, the titles of his that are discussed the most in Mindscape are the comics or graphic novels that have been adapted into motion pictures.

Instead of thoroughly discussing his work, Moore instead chooses to explain that he’s a practicing magician. He believes he is someone capable of transforming consciousness by means of manipulative language, symbols, and images, and he considers his comic book writing to be the avenue by which he can change the way people look at the world. I have no problem with this concept, except that there’s always an artist involved in the making of every comic book — it’s never 100 percent Moore’s vision.

So what do artists like Dave Gibbons think? We don’t find out in Mindscape. In fact we don’t hear from them at all until you pop in the second disc to watch supplemental interviews with many of Moore’s collaborators, but Mindscape would have been much more enlightening if we had heard their thoughts in the documentary itself.

There’s something fascinating about Moore — I’ll give him that. With his long, shaggy hair and unkempt beard, he comes off like the mystic he thinks he is. Unfortunately, Vylenz is more interested in idolizing Moore than probing his work. Maybe someday the fans of Moore’s work will get a documentary that delves into his achievements and not just his complex mind.

The Mindscape of Alan Moore (2008, Shadowsnake Films) can be purchased from Amazon.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • I thought the 2/3 of the "Watchmen" movie was pretty terrific...but then it became clear why no one was watching the Watchmen with me in the basement theater my local multiplex had banished it to. I get the whole vision thing...but somewhere between his mindscape and my multiplex something was lost in translation, not that he cares.
  • Malchus
    I felt that there were aspects of Watchmen that were remarkable,too, particularly some of the performances (Patrick Wilson is wonderful). But you're right, Bob, something did get lost in the translation from comic book to movie screen. It may have been the director revering the work too much and an unwillingness to deviate from it for the better of the movie. When I look at, say, the Lord of the Rings films, another body of work important to the sci-fi/fantasy community, I see movies that respected the original novels, yet Peter Jackson understood that books and movies are two different mediums and in order for his adaptations to work changes would have to be made. Zack Snyder, in directing Watchmen, seemed unwilling to trim the fat or do restructuring to make the movie flow. When I left the theater late Saturday night after seeing Watchmen my feeling was "eh." I don't agree with Alan Moore when he says that Watchmen is unfilmable. I believe that he is just being egocentric when he makes statements like that.
  • I concour, no squid was a good move which goes to say that I think the book is great, but it's no measure of perfection. Believing so, as so many do, dooms any adaptation and puts the original work beyond reproach. Nothing is.

    Now, when do we get a Miracleman or Swamp Thing adaptation? Miracleman?
blog comments powered by Disqus