<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Dw. Dunphy On&#8230; Indiana Jones</title> <atom:link href="http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/</link> <description>your daily dose of pop culture</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: rwcass</title><link>http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-53742</link> <dc:creator>rwcass</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:35:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/#comment-53742</guid> <description>Good to know, Hagen.  After seeing all three movies again on the big screen two years ago I now think &quot;Temple of Doom&quot; is better than it used to be and &quot;Last Crusade&quot; is worse, but the latter is still a little better than the former.  You have to give &quot;Temple&quot; credit for getting rid of all the other characters from &quot;Raiders&quot; besides Indy and then making the tone as dark as  the PG rating would allow.  Then again, it was too dark for the PG rating, which is why the PG-13 rating came to be.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know, Hagen.  After seeing all three movies again on the big screen two years ago I now think &#8220;Temple of Doom&#8221; is better than it used to be and &#8220;Last Crusade&#8221; is worse, but the latter is still a little better than the former.  You have to give &#8220;Temple&#8221; credit for getting rid of all the other characters from &#8220;Raiders&#8221; besides Indy and then making the tone as dark as  the PG rating would allow.  Then again, it was too dark for the PG rating, which is why the PG-13 rating came to be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwcass</title><link>http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-42742</link> <dc:creator>rwcass</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:35:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/#comment-42742</guid> <description>Good to know, Hagen.  After seeing all three movies again on the big screen two years ago I now think &quot;Temple of Doom&quot; is better than it used to be and &quot;Last Crusade&quot; is worse, but the latter is still a little better than the former.  You have to give &quot;Temple&quot; credit for getting rid of all the other characters from &quot;Raiders&quot; besides Indy and then making the tone as dark as  the PG rating would allow.  Then again, it was too dark for the PG rating, which is why the PG-13 rating came to be.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know, Hagen.  After seeing all three movies again on the big screen two years ago I now think &#8220;Temple of Doom&#8221; is better than it used to be and &#8220;Last Crusade&#8221; is worse, but the latter is still a little better than the former.  You have to give &#8220;Temple&#8221; credit for getting rid of all the other characters from &#8220;Raiders&#8221; besides Indy and then making the tone as dark as  the PG rating would allow.  Then again, it was too dark for the PG rating, which is why the PG-13 rating came to be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwcass</title><link>http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-17727</link> <dc:creator>rwcass</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:35:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/#comment-17727</guid> <description>Good to know, Hagen.  After seeing all three movies again on the big screen two years ago I now think &quot;Temple of Doom&quot; is better than it used to be and &quot;Last Crusade&quot; is worse, but the latter is still a little better than the former.  You have to give &quot;Temple&quot; credit for getting rid of all the other characters from &quot;Raiders&quot; besides Indy and then making the tone as dark as  the PG rating would allow.  Then again, it was too dark for the PG rating, which is why the PG-13 rating came to be.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know, Hagen.  After seeing all three movies again on the big screen two years ago I now think &#8220;Temple of Doom&#8221; is better than it used to be and &#8220;Last Crusade&#8221; is worse, but the latter is still a little better than the former.  You have to give &#8220;Temple&#8221; credit for getting rid of all the other characters from &#8220;Raiders&#8221; besides Indy and then making the tone as dark as  the PG rating would allow.  Then again, it was too dark for the PG rating, which is why the PG-13 rating came to be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hagen</title><link>http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-17726</link> <dc:creator>hagen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/#comment-17726</guid> <description>The movie is not as good as the first, better than the second, and as good as the third. I had zero expectations going in, and I was ebullient by the end of it. It is a rare thing these days: a movie that doesn&#039;t feel the primal urge to cold-cock the audience with digital effects so you don&#039;t notice the plot is lame. Sure, the list of digital effects artists is as long as the list of Microsoft&#039;s crimes against humanity, but not once did I look at the movie and think, &quot;Oh, that is so green screen.&quot; The effects work, the cinematography works, and most importantly, the plot works. And Harrison Ford&#039;s welcome return to the hat and whip almost made me forget about Air Force One... but not quite.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Enjoy the movie. It&#039;s not hard to do.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movie is not as good as the first, better than the second, and as good as the third. I had zero expectations going in, and I was ebullient by the end of it. It is a rare thing these days: a movie that doesn&#39;t feel the primal urge to cold-cock the audience with digital effects so you don&#39;t notice the plot is lame. Sure, the list of digital effects artists is as long as the list of Microsoft&#39;s crimes against humanity, but not once did I look at the movie and think, &#8220;Oh, that is so green screen.&#8221; The effects work, the cinematography works, and most importantly, the plot works. And Harrison Ford&#39;s welcome return to the hat and whip almost made me forget about Air Force One&#8230; but not quite.</p><p>Enjoy the movie. It&#39;s not hard to do.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DwDunphy</title><link>http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-17725</link> <dc:creator>DwDunphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:04:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/#comment-17725</guid> <description>indiana Jones and the Catheter of Gold</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indiana Jones and the Catheter of Gold</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 1Py_Korry1</title><link>http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/comment-page-1/#comment-17724</link> <dc:creator>1Py_Korry1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 17:00:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/dw-dunphy-on-indiana-jones/#comment-17724</guid> <description>I&#039;m with you on &quot;The Last Crusade.&quot;  I thought they did a great job closing out the series and redeeming themselves for &quot;The Temple of Doom.&quot;  However, when I read about the the new Indy film, my first quip to co-workers was the following:  &quot;Fill in the blank...&quot;Indiana Jones and the (                ).&quot;  Well, you can imagine the old people jokes started flying.  There was  &quot;The Dentures of Death,&quot; &quot;The Quest for the Lost Clapper,&quot; and &quot;The All-You-Can-Eat Senior Buffet.&quot;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wasn&#039;t wetting myself either with news of this film, but I will be plunking down quite a few dollars when I take my family to see it this weekend!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m with you on &#8220;The Last Crusade.&#8221;  I thought they did a great job closing out the series and redeeming themselves for &#8220;The Temple of Doom.&#8221;  However, when I read about the the new Indy film, my first quip to co-workers was the following:  &#8220;Fill in the blank&#8230;&#8221;Indiana Jones and the (                ).&#8221;  Well, you can imagine the old people jokes started flying.  There was  &#8220;The Dentures of Death,&#8221; &#8220;The Quest for the Lost Clapper,&#8221; and &#8220;The All-You-Can-Eat Senior Buffet.&#8221;</p><p>I wasn&#39;t wetting myself either with news of this film, but I will be plunking down quite a few dollars when I take my family to see it this weekend!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Theme:              ddf04
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 57/70 queries in 0.063 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: popdose.com @ 2012-02-09 17:49:39 -->
