Early Thoughts: Bruce Springsteen’s “The Promise”

Matt Springer November 9, 2010 16

Envy Bruce Springsteen. He not only releases two of the definitive albums of the 1970s (Born to Run and Darkness on the Edge of Town), but even found time to fire off top forty hits for other artists between records (“Fire,” “Because the Night”). As it turns out, he also had upwards of forty unreleased songs from the same era sitting around in the vaults waiting for their day in the sun.

A handful of those forty-plus vault tunes made it out on the four-CD Tracks compilation in 1998, and now another twenty-two songs will see release on The Promise: The Lost Sessions from Darkness On The Edge Of Town. It’s a two-disc collection that also factors as a major component of an epic boxed set celebrating the release and recording of the Darkness record. That box features a documentary, tons of live and studio footage, and the remastered Darkness album itself, alongside these twenty-two songs.

It’s enough to make a Brucehead drool with anticipation, sure, but should an average fan of the Boss and his music care?

Even if you’re one of those folks with an old beat-up copy of Born to Run in your CD rack and little else from Springsteen, The Promise is a pretty amazing compilation. It takes the listener down any number of potential avenues where Springsteen’s music could have gone in the period between his great romantic opus to pop potential, Born to Run, and his stark exploration of the end of that road, Darkness on the Edge of Town.

Springsteen has referred to Darkness as his “samurai record, stripped to the frame and ready to rumble.” On Darkness, he learned about economy–in his songwriting, in his arrangements, in the themes he’d tackle on each record. He mentions in the liner notes that he was visiting New York City record stores to get the latest UK punk singles as they were released; in a sense, Darkness is Springsteen’s “punk” record, his own way of confronting the realities of American life for the first time in a focused, concrete effort. He retains his own sound, but discards any of the flourishes that might provide release for the listener. He knows what he wants to say and he says it unflinchingly.

The outtakes on The Promise chronicle that journey from the epic bombast of Born to Run to the taut power of Darkness. Hearing these tunes, you can imagine the process Springsteen went through to fully explore his Born to Run sound and his many influences as a songwriter before settling on the sparse Darkness approach. You hear fragments of ideas that would emerge fully formed on Darkness; “It’s a Shame” uses the central guitar lick from “Prove It All Night,” while “Come On (Let’s Go Tonight)” is a new set of lyrics to the melody of “Factory,” and “Candy’s Boy” is a very early draft of what would become “Candy’s Room.” It’s a tasty package, full of uptempo soul (“Ain’t Good Enough For You”), effortless Spectoresque pastiche (“Gotta Get That Feeling”) and pop balladry worthy of Elvis Presley (“The Brokenhearted”). While you can hear where Springsteen left off on Born to Run and where he’d end up on Darkness, it’s a fun ride between the two sounds, full of great songwriting and performances from the young and hungry E Street Band.

For my money, hearing these songs actually increased my appreciation of Darkness. There’s good tunes here, but is there a theme Springsteen was dying to communicate? Was there a unity of sound and purpose to be teased out of these explorations?

I don’t hear one. That doesn’t diminish the value of The Promise as a glimpse straight into the heart of Springsteen’s creative process (although a flawed glimpse–more on that shortly). It just means that, rather than a lost chapter from an amazing career, the collection represents the music Springsteen needed to expel from his system before he could confront the more potent truths and fierce music he would ultimately release in 1978. It’s exciting stuff, full of fun and romance and Spectorian bombast–several songs are already in heavy rotation on the ol’ iPod. But it’s nowhere near as essential as what Darkness would become. It’s fun to hear these alternate paths but I’m glad Springsteen found his way onto the road less taken eventually.

**

If you’ve read this far and you’re not a major Springsteen fan, or you’re not interested in watching the slow descent of a major Springsteen fan into near-incoherent babbling, then you may well want to depart. I’m a Springsteen obsessive so the rest of this may veer down a few rabbit holes. It also may be gibberish to those who are not also obsessives.

But I think it has to be said: While it stands perfectly fine on its own as a collection of songs, The Promise is an odd construct built from 1978 recordings and 2010 overdubs that doesn’t quite fit into either year. Based on the information present today, it’s tempting to regard the collection as a bit of revisionist history and perfectionism run rampant.

In the collection’s liner notes, Springsteen writes that these songs “perhaps could have/should have been released after Born To Run and before the collection of songs that Darkness on the Edge of Town became.” He’s reiterated that point in several interviews surrounding the release, as has his manager and chief creative aide, Jon Landau. I disagree, but that’s beside the point.

What it suggests is that Springsteen and his team want to put forward this collection of songs, in 2010, as an accurate representation of what happened in the studio between 1977 and 1978. That’s not the case. In fact, you need only venture two songs into the compilation to hear a song whose lead vocal was quite obviously recorded not in the middle of a long late-seventies night, but sometime earlier this year.

I think there’s some small dishonesty there. Obviously the Boss can do whatever he wants with his music, and the audience will either embrace it or reject it. But to claim this is some missing link of his most fertile and acclaimed period, while at the same time mumbling out of the side of his mouth that there were some more recent “enhancements” to the tracks, isn’t quite playing fair.

It’s not that I don’t want to hear Springsteen circa 2010 putting out completed versions of songs that Springsteen circa 1978 left to gather dust in a vault. It’s that I’d rather hear what Springsteen and his band actually accomplished in those years as an accurate representation of the artist, his music, and his process. Why not level with the listener and at least asterisk these tracks, or even separate them onto their own disc–disc 1 as 1978 tracks with minor additions/revisions, disc 2 with more overt 78/10 hybrid tracks.

There’s at least one song on here where Springsteen clearly drops a vocal overdub from 2010 in the middle of a 1978 vocal take. It’s jarring enough to remove me from the music and start my mind rattling. I don’t know if the casual fan will notice or care. I’m sure there are some diehards who definitely don’t care. They just want the music. I want it too.

In the end, it’s probably insignificant. There’s amazing, revelatory stuff on The Promise. But is there another great Springsteen record here? Perhaps. We’ll never know because as much as Springsteen might want to, you don’t get to release your follow-up to a 1975 album in 2010.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • http://twitter.com/tcote Thierry Côté

    To be fair regarding the overdubs, this isn’t exactly the first time this has been done – a prime example is the recent Exile on Main Street reissue where the Stones added new overdubs and vocals to the old outtakes included on the second disc. Bruce himself did a lot of work on the songs from Tracks, completing vocals, harmonies, adding guitar parts, etc. Perhaps it’s more noticeable on this because his voice is 12 years older?

  • Mfudgester

    I’m sure I’ll get this, but I’m not clear why this stuff wasn’t on Tracks if it’s good enough for release? I expect I’ll like it but it the whole things smacks a little of the self-indulgence of a guy who can put out anything he wants now.

    One of the things that really marked out springsteen prior to 2000 was his obsessive quality control, which led to so few records. In the last ten years it looks like he’s relaxed that further and further until he’ll put out pretty much anything that passes his fancy. I’m not saying that’s wrong necessarily but more records probably doesn’t equate to more good songs.

  • http://twitter.com/deltaslide deltaslide

    The new overdubs thing is a total dealbreaker for me and the reason I bought only the single CD Exlie remaster (which sounds amazing and is well worth buying.) Man-what a letdown. I was pretty excited about The Promise and now I find out that they’ve tinkered with the old tracks…arghh! Just kills the whole thing for me. I know the really important thing is the songs themselves and that they can be heard, but whatever sonic/performance improvements might be gained come at the expense of completely negating the historical value of of a release like this (at least for me.)

  • http://twitter.com/MattSpringer Matt Springer

    Yeah, it bothers me about the songs on the Exile reissue too, honestly. I should have made that comparison in the piece. Good point.

    I don’t know why it doesn’t seem as apparent on Tracks to me, but it doesn’t. To me there’s a very fine but visible line between altering instrumentation, adding various parts, overdubbing…and putting on a completely new lead vocal. It’s such a pivotal element to any song, and yes, part of it is definitely that his voice sounds much older now, so to me it makes the songs completely different. Just like any artist who still sings songs now that they wrote thirty-plus years ago; the songs change with the singer. It’s hard for me to imagine having it both ways.

  • http://twitter.com/MattSpringer Matt Springer

    I’m guessing this stuff didn’t make Tracks cause there simply wasn’t room. I know at one point it was going to be a 6 disc set, and I think they narrowed down from something like a couple hundred songs total, so I’m sure they were all in the running…and as you may know, and I hope to find time to write about one of these days, there’s STILL a small stack of potentially strong candidates from this era that haven’t seen the light of day, based on bootleg releases over the years, not to mention whatever is “in the vaults” that there’s no leaked record of.

  • http://twitter.com/MattSpringer Matt Springer

    I hear you. :) The songs are great, though. For me it’s more about wishing it were more transparent so that fans who want to really pay close attention to what’s “vintage Bruce” and what’s “revised in 2010 Bruce” can do so. I guess ultimately it’s fortunate so many of these are already out in the world as bootleg tracks from their original recordings…and frankly, it’s confounding in some cases as there are perfectly good vocals already out in bootleg form on at least a few of the tracks where he chose to re-record the vocal.

  • Music fan

    I don’t mind that he has finished the songs and fixed what was broken or missing before he released them. This is not archeology or about painting a historically true picture of who he sounded 1978. It’s about making those songs sound as good as possible.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OMSNGSWNHWYFCI7TCDDBOGIPBY L

    Bruce Springsteen photographer reveals details behind cover photo of new Darkness box set:
    http://www.artistdirect.com/entertainment-news/article/bruce-springsteen-photo-book-the-light-in-darkness-is-a-coffee-table-must/7709301

  • JeffK

    I understand the overdubbing concerns, and maybe I’ll agree with the disappointment after I get the CD’s on Tuesday (out of old-fashioned tradition, I’m trying wait for release day rather than listening much to the various streaming online options). But for now, I’m looking forward and excited for the work created jointly by Bruce 1978 and Bruce 2010, two of the best recording artists around and working together!

    One interesting side note: I recall that when Tracks was released, Springsteen explained that he did not include the beloved song “The Promise” because he was not happy with the studio versions they had in the vaults. So, when fans clamored for the song and he did include it on a single CD “Best of Tracks,” he recorded a completely new version. The version I’ve heard that is on the new set coming out next week, sounds pretty good, so I’m not sure why it was not on Tracks in the first place (or even on the “Best of Tracks”).

  • Mfudgester

    Kind of agree. The ‘new’ songs on Exile are blindingly obvious it has to be said (for one thing they don’t sound like they’re recorded through a sock) and no-one, Mick or Bruce, sounds the same thirty plus years down the line. Having said that, if they’re new or old songs it doesn’t really matter when they were written or recorded. They’re either good or they’re not…. or they’e OK (as per exile).

    But I agree it’s disengenuous to claim something is an archive recording when it ain’t. But hey this is the music industry and they’ve spent 40 years putting out ‘live’ records that were recorded in the studio.

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    This will sound harsh, but it’s the best excuse I could derive from all this – Had “Plundered My Soul” not done so well for the Stones and the Exile Reissue, this set would have had the original vocals.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_X3LXH4GPWKCCGNEJPYMGTV7C3U Brendan Barry

    The casual fan may like it for a while, until the next big reissue hits the stores. The hard core devotees will be left sitting up in the darkness, laying there awake in the middle of the night, thinking about how we got cheated by another fixed game. God help him if he ever comes face to face with Bruce 78.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_X3LXH4GPWKCCGNEJPYMGTV7C3U Brendan Barry

    The casual fan may like it for a while, until the next big reissue hits the stores. The hard core devotees will be left sitting up in the darkness, laying there awake in the middle of the night, thinking about how we got cheated by another fixed game. God help him if he ever comes face to face with Bruce 78.

  • Lenny Greenburn

    Just picked up the Promise outtakes set yesterday and I was a bit disappointed too by all of the revisionism. Big Springsteen fan and I felt a bit cheated and deceived by the studio trickery. And the boss obviously did all the 2010 studio work at home- leaving the disc sounding like an old fan with nice gear had finished it off. Found this review and I want to agree with it wholeheartedly as soooo many reviews are touting the Promise as a complete package that has been in the vaults since 1978, which clearly is not the case. I’m glad I have the scratchy old bootlegs. Reminds me of when Brian Wilson’s handleres were claiming that Smile 2001 WAS the record that could have been released in 1968…., certainly is not the case here. cecerclearly is not the case

  • http://twitter.com/escapeguy michael griffin

    Hi, great review. I know save my love is new vocals. Is the other one with new lead vocals gotta get that feeling? I actually like the older voice a lot on these. thanks

  • http://twitter.com/escapeguy michael griffin

    Hi, great review. I know save my love is new vocals. Is the other one with new lead vocals gotta get that feeling? I actually like the older voice a lot on these. thanks