Film Review: “District 9″ (updated for Blu-ray)

district-9The highly anticipated film District 9 is opening today, all set to make a killing at the box office (and it certainly deserves the reward. It’s a well-crafted film, both in tone and tale, and brings to the screen the most authentic-looking aliens I’ve seen in quite a while. The question remains, though: is District 9 truly the be-all and end-all of science fiction films that critics have been raving about for the past month? The answer, quite simply, is no. While being a highly original film for the most part, the story does closely resemble the 1988 sci-fi film Alien Nation, which starred James Caan and Mandy Patinkin, right down to one of its central themes. In fact, one could say that District 9 is in many ways just a more updated, adult version of Alien Nation, only with better effects.

District 9‘s main premise is that nearly 30 years ago, an alien ship entered Earth’s atmosphere and took up a holding pattern above Johannesburg, South Africa. After three months without contact from the beings inside, a military force finally cut their way into the ship and searched, only to find hundreds of malnourished aliens living in squalor. At this time, humanity rose to the challenge of proving itself capable of displaying what’s best in our species by treating the aliens, caring for them, and providing shelters for them in a segregated area known as District 9, when it became clear the aliens were incapable of returning home.

Cut to present day: District 9 is now a slum, with the aliens (we never learn the true name for their species — humans refer to them by the derogatory slang term “prawn”) stealing whatever they can find from one another and each other, human gang lords roaming the district scamming the aliens whenever possible, human prostitutes having interspecies sex and many of the aliens picking up the worst human habits, such as forming their own violent gangs. The district is also now being run by Multi-National United, a private company specializing in arms manufacture, and which has no interest in the aliens’ overall welfare. Company man Wikus van der Merwe (Sharlto Copley) has been placed in charge of overseeing the aliens’ forced relocation to another district further away from human contact, going door-to-door in order to obtain each alien’s signature on paperwork stating that they understand and agree to move. But with the military riding along with Wikus, it’s not like the aliens have much choice anyway. It’s during one of these stops to an alien shanty that something tragic happens to Wikus, which soon makes him the most wanted man on Earth.

District_9_2

The thing about District 9 which elevates it above standard science fiction fare is that it’s more of an allegorical tale about how humans mistreat one another for various reasons: money, power, jealousy and a host of other superfluous causes. If you see parallels in the lower-class status with which aliens are regarded and South Africa’s former ways of apartheid, it’s not just a coincidence. First-time director Neill Blomkamp and first-time writer Terri Tatchell, expanding the aliens’ tale from Blomkamp’s original short Alive in Joburg, have a firm grasp on the story and in spite of the aliens and their technology — the effects for both blend in with startling seamlessness with the humans (the duo are able to keep the film grounded in the area of the highly plausible. It also helps that the performances from all the actors are stellar across the board, especially first-time lead Copley, who was also featured (albeit in a different role) in Joburg.

The film starts to drag slightly in the final act, where it begins to descend into a typical action shoot-em-up (the same descent which doomed Alien Nation, and the effect for a suit of alien battle armor doesn’t always hold up that well. However, there are several quick twists down unexpected paths which Blomkamp and Tatchell take the story and the lead character at this point, which helps to keep District 9 from collapsing under its own weight.

In spite of whatever few flaws there are, District 9 is a treat to experience. In a highly uneven summer thus far, it’s nice that a little film produced on a relatively modest budget ($30 million) can come out of left field to deliver a pleasant surprise. There’s good news on both sides of the camera: For distributor Sony, it’s the fact that the movie will definitely make its money back. For filmgoers, it’s the knowledge that the film leaves itself wide open for a sequel.

Go visit District 9, but watch your back…there are aliens everywhere. –Lance Berry

The District 9 Blu-ray is a marvel, the kind of expansive, immersive experience you can spend 24 hours getting lost in (as Film School Rejects’ Neil Miller has done). Sony/Tri-Star did everything right, from the little details — like the two menus you can choose from to navigate the disc — to the loads of special features. Blu-ray consumers only get a handful of exclusives, but that probably has more to do with the generous helping of added content on the DVD than anything else — and besides, the exclusives are pretty great: You get an aerial map of the film’s Johannesburg that allows you to take an interactive tour of the District 9 environment, movieIQ content accessible via BD-Live, and for the PS3 owners in the audience, a God of War III demo with an unlockable making-of feature about the game.

And then there’s the small army of non-exclusive special features: Tons of deleted scenes, a commentary track from Blomkamp, a three-part documentary about the making of the film, and a stack of behind-the-scenes featurettes that give you an inside perspective on everything from the acting techniques used for the mocap-heavy production to the hours Copley spent in makeup. I’ve seen multi-disc “special editions” that contained less extra stuff than the District 9 Blu-ray, and when you stop to consider that it’s currently selling for less than $18 at Amazon, it’s awfully hard to resist, either as a gift for the sci-fi fan in your life or an addition to your own library. (Or both.)

In hi-def, as in theaters, District 9 looks and sounds impressive. Of course, $30 million is an awful lot of change no matter how you look at it, but a lot of filmmakers have done less with more; Blomkamp made the most of his budget and then some, thanks in part to some canny decision-making (such as the large number of brightly lit outdoor shots, which, as Blomkamp explains in one of the featurettes, helps add realism to digital creations). It also helps that Copley’s performance is so riveting that you’re never left staring at the movie’s CGI bits; they’re just the eye candy on a movie that blends white-knuckle popcorn thrills and social commentary as well as anything I can remember. Even if you don’t think you like sci-fi, check out District 9 — this is one movie that might surprise you. The hype was overwhelming, but it was justified. –Jeff Giles

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • But Jar Jar Binks, bad as he was, was a fantasy element. The superstitious, back-stabbing, prostituting Nigerians in DISTRICT 9 are presented as real, as if this is how they are. It rubbed me the wrong way--a different wrong way than Jar Jar.

    I probably am overanalyzing this. But look for me to climb my soapbox again next week regarding QT, Jews, and Nazis. Woo-hoo!
  • grege1
    Hey - I'm a white south african living in Johannesburg and think you've written a great review. Although from the other comments - I can't understand why Neill cannot make a comment (albeit an analogy) on Apartheid just 'cos he is white... It's like saying no African American can comment on the moon landing or no WASP type kid from the mid west can make an informed comment on US race relations... He was here, he knows.

    I can't wait for D9 to open here (this Fri). I have not seen the film - but I can tell you that Post Apartheid Johannesburg is a real African mixing pot of a city. You've got a little piece of every African Nation plus others from every continent - some first generation, some who've been here since the 1800's... It's a bit like New York but Africanised to the limit! Anyway - I guess the Nigerians do get a bad press globally and in South Africa it's no different - Unfortunately the truth is that they are behind some crazy stuff here more often than not - and none of it pleasant. http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/News/...

    He could have blamed Zimbaweans or a made up a name... but I guess selling the Nigerians as gangsters is an easy sell....

    What the reviewer might have missed is that during the filming of this movie in 2008, our country experienced terrible xenophobic violence - predominately poor south africans fighting with poor foreigners - when you're living in a slum and the competition for survival reaches a certain point, somethings gonna give... and unfortunately this occured - a couple hundered foreigners were killed in the mayhem - with the South African government either denying it initially, then slowly taking action (Much like your Katrina response).. anyway ... I think the film can be seen as an anlogy to this as well - how PEOPLE treat others badly more often than not... Is this the real Humanity?

    I would recommend you google a few issues on www.google.co.za, ticking the South Africa Only box - and check out what is actually happening here... you'll be both saddened and amazed. As much as we're one nation and are making great strides since the 'bad ol days' of the white regime - we are as much mired in that past as well - and continue to blame each other... As an example.. just check out the local press on the Semeya issue (world champion female athlete of questionable gender - suddenly it's a racial slur....) Thanks guys
  • This is an interesting article about Blomkamp's intentions, from "Wacky Taki's" conservative publication.

    http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/alien_nation/

    There's this bit, taken from Salon:

    "O’Hehir: You know, these images are pretty uncomfortable, especially for Americans who tend to be so careful in public discussions of race: Here’s a white guy from South Africa making a movie with scary, murderous black African villains.

    Blomkamp: Sure, I’m totally aware of that. … Unfortunately, that’s the reality of it, and it doesn’t matter how politically correct or politically incorrect you are. The bottom line is that there are huge Nigerian crime syndicates in Johannesburg. I wanted the film to feel real, to feel grounded, and I was going to incorporate as much of contemporary South Africa as I wanted to, and that’s just how it is."

    I'm still not satisfied, though. I guess I'll never fully trust a white South African telling me about the "reality" of race and ethnicity in South Africa, particularly when that reality seems to be derived from the grossest stereotypes, from here and abroad.

    And the more I think about, the more the timeframe bugs me. If Blomkamp really wanted to address the problems of contemporary South Africa, he might have started the movie in 1994, post-apartheid. Starting it in the early 80s (as the video timestamps would indicate), when apartheid was in full swing, confuses the issue. Is there no human apartheid in Blomkamp's South Africa? Or is the prawn menace so terrible the alien apartheid displaced it? "Largely a post-apartheid parable" doesn't cut it, either, nor does Blomkamp's I-wasn't-really-there youth. It's very muddled, politically, which detracts from the artistry.
  • I honestly think you're over-analyzing that part of the film. Just because it begins in the 80's doesn't necessarily mean any big thing...it's just a time-frame. I think that showing blacks protesting the aliens' presence helps to equalize the anti-alien sentiment across black-white racial boundaries. As for offensive stereotypes...I find the hideous caricature of Jar-Jar Binks to be far more offensive than any Nigerian portrayed in this film could ever be.

    I understand to a degree the point you're making about not trusting a white South African speaking about the reality of race and ethnicity in South Africa, but having known and lived with black South Africans(especially before apartheid ended), those folks preferred living in S.A., because at least the racism was overt, out in the open, as opposed to here in the States, where people stifle their feelings due to political correctness, then sometimes end up becoming living powder kegs later because of it.

    Again, these aren't the worse portraits of blacks in recent cinema...Michael Bay did far worse in two Transformers films.
  • While I admired aspects of the film, I had a real problem with some of it:

    http://robertcashill.blogspot.com/

    On a lighter note, Copley reminded me of Steve Carell on THE OFFICE. In fact, if this had been a straight-to-video item up for a US remake, I could see Carell playing it (and getting all kinds of praise for the creative leap).
  • Yeah, I've seen the Nigerian thing mentioned before. I'm black, and had very little problem with it at all.
  • zandria1
    I absolutely loved this movie and I really appreciated this review. I didn't even think about the film "Alien Nation" but you make a great point and this was one of the best reviews I have read on the film looking at both the positive and negative aspects without bias. Thank you for that.

    Sharlto Copley impressed me in this film and I too expect to see some nominations from it.
  • Thank you for the compliment on the review, Zandria. Glad you liked it. Let's all keep our fingers crossed that Sharlto gets noticed, come awards time. ;-)
  • MaryInDallas
    Enjoyed your review. I saw "D9" this afternoon, and I agree, it isn't the best alien flick ever, but it's a darn good one and well worth the price of a ticket. Lead actor Sharlto Copley gives an excellent performance, and I fully expect to see him nominated for some major acting awards next year.
  • Thanks for the kind words, Mary. I also expect/hope to see Sharlto nominated for some awards. His performance is highly credible for a newcomer, and definitively helps to elevate D9 as a believable "docu-drama".
  • JonCummings
    This is a nicely done review, one of the best I've read. I do feel a need to point out a couple of things, though. In the first paragraph you say the film "brings to the screen the most AUTHENTIC-looking aliens I’ve seen in quite a while." Later you write that the filmmakers "keep the film grounded in the area of the HIGHLY PLAUSIBLE." Look, Lance, I can tell you have a keen eye for metaphor, but really -- is there something you know that the rest of us don't?
  • Jon;

    Thanks for the compliment on the review. I wasn't going to say anything, but since you brought it up, yes...I am an alien bounty hunter...from the future.
blog comments powered by Disqus