How Bad Can It Be?: “Hannah Montana Volume 5: Keepin’ It Real”

As I grow older, time seems to go faster. That’s an illusion, I suppose, stemming mainly from an ever-keener awareness of my own mortality—but it’s due, too, to increased ubiquity of mass media and the attendant global interconnectedness. If everything seems to be happening all at once, well, maybe it always was; what has changed, perhaps, is our ability to observed and process it on the fly, instead of absorbing the mediated version after the fact. Perhaps.

Or perhaps not. Because pop culture is a highly mediated phenomenon, with corporate interests acting as stakeholders and gatekeepers—and yet the accelerated boom-and-bust cycle is apparent in pop culture, too. Not so long ago, the Beatles had to play a couple of years at five sets a night in the sailor haunts of Liverpool and Hamburg to attract the notice of management; and although they eventually came to be marketed primarily as personalities, it was their musical skills that were their initial product, before their personal charm and humor could be monetized effectively.

These days, though, young stars arrive as pre-packaged omnimedia engines. It’s not enough to be one thing anymore; backed by deep-pocketed conglomerates like Disney and Viacom, these kids début in a flurry of hyphens—singer-actress-comedienne-dancer-fashion designer, with a CD, a tour, a basic-cable sitcom, and a Vanity Fair spread all bursting on the scene at once. All the revenue streams are cross-branded and cross-marketed, regardless of the stars’ skills or shortcomings in any of those market sectors. There are ways to compensate, after all. Not such a great comic actress? That’s what laugh tracks are for. Autotune can sweeten the vocals, and a sufficient cadre of backing dancers makes even pedestrian choreography look impressive. Thus can sufficient budgeting make a megastar of a mediocrity—for a certain audience, anyway. A very young audience, in the main, with indiscriminate tastes, plenty of discretionary income, and indulgent parents.

The cost of this career fast-tracking is an accelerated burn rate. While there are occasional youth stars who survive off the reservation—recent examples include former Disney kid Shia LaBeouf, by this point a genuine movie star, and Nickelodeon stalwart Josh Peck, who’s been cobbling together an impressive indie-film résumé on the side—most fall away somewhere along the line. Sometimes their fall is public and tragic (e.g., Lindsay Lohan), sometimes it’s a slow fade to obscurity: What do you hear from Hilary Duff lately? How about the kid from Cory in the House? Shia’s old co-star, Christy Carlson Romano, has had a quiet couple of years. So has Amanda Bynes. Frankie Muniz was making 5 mil a picture, not long ago. These days? The occasional direct-to-DVD project, which leaves him plenty of time to drive race cars.

Here’s the thing: Not everybody has the savvy or the luck to go out on a high point. For most of these people, in most of these careers, there had to be a moment when it became apparent that the good times could not last. Maybe the certainty doesn’t come all at once, but it comes nonetheless. And what do you do then? What do you do when you know that it’s all but over? When your numbers are down but you’re still under contract for another ten episodes, another album, another tour—how do you keep on? Do you suck it up and hack it out? Do you rage against the dying of the light? Or is it business as usual? I find myself asking this because I’ve just watched the DVD Hannah Montana Volume 5: Keepin’ It Real—collecting episodes of the Disney Channel sitcom—and it seems like a product of that fading twilight, that hour of the wolf.

If you’ve somehow managed to avoid the Hannah Montana juggernaut—and how I envy you if you have—the show features singer-actress Miley Cyrus as Miley Stewart, a seemingly ordinary teen who (by donning a blonde wig that’s got to be the least convincing disguise since Clark Kent’s glasses) secretly becomes the pop sensation Hannah Montana. Miley lives in Malibu with her dad (played by real-life dad Billy Ray Cyrus, cast against type as a washed-up country-pop star, and eschewing his famous mullet in favor of a haircut reminiscent of Jennifer Aniston’s in the second season of Friends) and her brother, portrayed by a kid who looks like a shaved Troll doll; in between concerts and celebrity charity events, she struggles to live the life of a typical, non-famous but still fabulously wealthy Malibu teenager with perfect skin and unlimited free time. You know, keeping it real.

It’s easy to see why the character and the attendant licensed products have been a huge hit with the target audience of young girls. The concept touches on issues of persona and self-creation in a playful way, just when its audience is engaged in the hard work of creating their own identities. But the execution is utterly grating. It’s brightly-colored and crackling with manic energy, but there’s an air of exhaustion over the whole thing. The sets look cheap. Plots are freely plagiarized from old episodes of I Love Lucy. The players mug and flail and can’t find their marks. The banter has constant undercurrents of hostility and contempt. This, I thought, is what a franchise looks like in its decadence. This is how you keep busy while waiting for the cancellation notice that you know is inevitable.

The show itself all but admits its own impending obsolescence. In the most metafictive episode, Miley/Hannah comes under the wing of an older established pop-star, a transparent Madonna stand-in, who has stayed on top in the business by constantly reinventing herself. Hannah thinks about nastying up her wholesome image, but in the end decides to stick with the tried-and-true. It’s couched as an affirmation about staying true to oneself, but in context it comes off as an admission that Miley Cyrus’s own career is not built to last. The hour of the wolf has come, and it’s only a matter of time. Surely, I thought, this explains the sourness and the rot, the listlessness, the apathy. Surely, I thought, this is the work of a production team on auto-pilot, servicing the franchise, running out the clock.

Then the Hannah Montana movie opened at a strong Number 1, and it’s still making money weeks later. I was wrong; the franchise has legs yet. This raised an even more horrifying possibility—that the mess that I had watched, that I had needed great quantities of bourbon merely to endure, was not a once-passable show in its decline—that it was instead as good as the show ever got, that this lazy shrill trainwreck was par for the course.

And here the true evil of the multimedia branding approach emerges: Every bit of it is of a piece with all others. No component is more important, or more painstakingly crafted, than any other. And so the show—the flagship of the brand, mind you—conforms to the same quality standards as the rest of the line. It is one revenue stream among many, and it is no less cheap and shoddy than the flood of licensed merchandise that bears its brand, and that in their overweening cynicism everyone is okay with this—because it is understood and assumed that the franchise is ultimately disposable. The true horror of Hannah Montana the TV show is that it is no better than it absolutely has to be.

And so the show is a pot of Chinese-made lip gloss laced with glycol antifreeze. The show is a loosely-stitched backpack with a lead zipper pull that will fall off and present a choking hazard. The show is a MAGIC ROCKSTAR MICO-ROPHONE!! with its reverb spring affixed to a cracked plastic diaphragm, rendering your child’s voice buzzy and demonic when she sings into it. The show is a garish pink scooter with a loose bolt on the wheel assembly, and a child will fall to the pavement in a clash of metal and a grind of sparks, and she will be injured. The show is a lunch set with a defective thermos that will leak milk all over the inside of the lunchbox, imbuing it with a foul cheesy smell that will not fade. The show is a packet of tainted fruit snacks. The show is a poly-blend T-shirt with a transfer decal that will blister and peel, made in a sweatshop by a child who will never have cable TV. The show is a quickie “souvenir poster magazine,” blurrily printed on an offset press ordinarily used for pornography. The show is a hazardous object that will shatter upon viewing, causing deadly shards of stupid to lodge in your brain. The show is the tour is the album is the DVD is the board game is the fashion doll is the ghostwritten autobiography is the locker poster is the pen-and-pencil set is the spiral notebook is the Halloween costume is the show and I am so cold, so cold, and sleep will not come.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • David_E
    My daughter (6) and I have somehow never seen an episode. In advance of a camping trip, we needed to buy her a fishing pole. She wanted the pink one. The pink one was branded. Yes, the Hannah Montana fishing pole.

    She caught more fish than anyone over the weekend. Do with that what you will.

    Also, it should be noted, the fish were ALL crappies.

    Do with that what you should.
  • JonCummings
    Jack, Jack, Jack...how do you really feel? I recognize your frustration at having sat through six hours of children's programming -- six hours that you'll never get back, no matter how you rail against it -- but Hannah is hardly a sign of the apocalypse. It's funny to see the show through your jaundiced perspective...but, despite recognizing that it's not great art, I'd much rather see it through the eyes of my daughter, to whom Hannah is (for the moment) everything.

    http://popdose.com/jesus-of-cool-why-hannah-mon...

    She'll move past Hannah eventually--as my son will move past his hatred of Hannah, even as his very reaction to the show plays out the dynamic between Miley and her fictional brother. Hopefully she'll move on to better art, to art that doesn't synergize with backpacks and T-shirts and toy lines.

    But let's not forget that Beatlemania came in the form of T-shirts and toy lines (and wigs!), and that a generation of snide commentators who were certain the Beatles were a passing fade dismissed them and bemoaned their influence much as you've dissed Hannah here. I'm not making a qualitative comparison here; all I'm saying is, in our culture we give the kids what they want so that we can make money off them, and right now Hannah is where the money is.

    And the little girls understand.
  • I pointedly avoided any discussion of Hannah Montana's music in the piece, because - with the exception of one brief and intentionally-terrible punk-style song - there was no Hannah Montana music on the DVD. Six episodes of the show, two documentaries, and not a single music video or performance clip. Which seems kind of odd, to me.

    And yeah, the Beatles were horrendously overmarketed in their time, and there were those who thought them destined for the dustbin of history - my own sainted mother, back in the day, pronounced the Fab Four "a flash in the pan." And the Beatles cartoon series remains the standard for cheap, cynical, wit-free cheapjack animation - but every single episode featured a Beatles song played in full.

    Now, for all I know, Hannah Montana's music may be the single saving grace to the whole enterprise, the one lonely bastion of quality in a sea of shoddy merchandising. But I honestly don't know that for sure, because I haven't heard any. There's just this huge web of cross-marketing with no actual product at the center. It's just weird, is all.
  • The Cotch Kid
    Funny thing about that Beatles cartoon with me is, I can remember watching that as a 5-7 year old (born 1963, I don't know when its' actual run was, some time in the 60s?). When I seriously got in to music by 13-18, I always considered the Beatles a joke. My image of them was solely as cartoon characters and thought their music was all the teenybopper pop from their early era. When in college a friend of mine loaned me 1967-70 and started the almost universal obligatory love of their music and genius, I was always surprised at how many songs I already recognized and knew, especially the non-hits. In the end, I figured it triggered a memory of those old cartoons and how they played the music throughout the show, even non-radio songs like "Dr. Robert," "Got to get you Into My Life," and such. Maybe it was brainwashing! And speaking of each generation eating up all the branded merchandising and promotion, while disdaining all things Beatles as childish in my early teens, you gotta know I was a card-carrying, patch-wearing member of the Kiss Army.
  • MeredithF
    The difference with Frankie Muniz is he CHOSE to leave acting, he is not even considering roles (his words) because his is racing cars professionally. He will continue to make 1-2 mil a year, as is owns a % of Malcolm in the Middle. Most of the drivers at the level he is entering in the next year or 2 make WAY more than any actor in Hollywood... because remember, half of that check for a film goes to taxes, 10% to manager, 5-10% to agent, and 5% to lawyer.
  • And Macaulay Culkin chose to retire from acting so he could devote more time to drugs.
  • I enjoyed this post far more than I should have as, if it isn't crystal clear by now, I have never had an appreciation for this franchise. I've never been a tweenage girl either, despite what my brothers say when they want to go out for beers.

    Two things though: time is not moving faster. The fact that we as adults have responsibilities and are dragging our asses across the Friday finish line for that all-important check means we're not really living 365 days, but 52 days with a hell of a lot of static in between. Take heart. Your life is not fleeting, it just sucks like poverty.

    The second thing: We're in a post-arc society where, even if Diddy and Kanye say "Dress fly," the kids are still floating their waistbands beneath their bungholes. While everyone launches slings and arrows at American Idol, it remains TV's number one program. Survivor has worn out its welcome years ago and will continue to do so many years from now. Much like children cling to consistency, pop culture society clings to their chosen touchstones not because they're any good, but because they're familiar. It's comfort food for the boob tube, and Hannah Montana is a big, runny can full of weak Franco-American Mac & Cheese.
  • JonCummings
    Nah -- Hannah is Chef Boy-Ar-Dee Ravioli. You know it's made from kinda nasty stuff, you know it's bad for you, but the kids think it's awfully damn yummy.
  • Gus Walker
    Everything I've ever thought about "Hannah Montana" summarized in one brilliant piece of writing. Keep up the good work.
blog comments powered by Disqus