Jesus of Cool: Michael Jackson’s Crossover Nightmare

Jon Cummings July 30, 2009 25

I promised myself that I wouldn’t do it – that I wouldn’t dive into the already overcrowded waters of Michael Jackson obituary, hagiography and/or armchair autopsy. I managed to keep that promise for a whole month – primarily because I didn’t have a coherent “take” on Michael’s life or his death. Yet here I find myself … inevitably, inescapably, if about five weeks late.

I have declined to babble about the moments when Michael’s music provided my life’s soundtrack – how the J5’s Greatest Hits was the first album I ever owned as a 5-year-old; how my friends and I cruised my hometown debating whether the best part of “Wanna Be Startin’ Something” was the “Mama say, mama sa, mama coo sa” part or the “Yee hahs!”; how the entire world (including even my cloistered grad-school community) paused to take in the premiere of the “Black or White” video and then burned up the phone lines asking each other, “What the fuck was that last part?”

I have stifled the urge to pontificate on how the world leapt right past forgiveness to forgetfulness last month, or how the family trotted out and exploited Michael’s long-sheltered children to help ensure that his extramusical legacy wouldn’t (exclusively) involve images of surgical masks, hyperbaric chambers, court appearances, Emmanuel Lewis and Bubbles. And I’ve remained quiet as, in the weeks since the memorial service, we have so quickly and efficiently stuffed MJ into Elvis’ (metaphorical) box. To wit: Elvis was a hugely influential pop progenitor and oft-described King who died bloated, sequined and strung out on prescription medication. Michael was a hugely influential, sequined crossover-pop progenitor and self-described King who died emaciated, caucasian … and strung out on prescription medication.

But last week, as we passed the one-month mark since Michael became omnipresent once more, I finally figured out what I’d like to say to him as he passes into legend. It’s this: Thanks for destroying the record industry!

OK, maybe that’s a stretch, but hear me out anyway. We all know that Michael sold a lot of copies of Thriller – somewhere between 25 million and 7 billion worldwide, depending on who’s doing the counting (as my colleague Ann Logue documented last week). In the process, he changed a pop landscape that had become almost lily-white for a couple years following disco’s decline. He broke down the racial barriers at MTV with the video for “Beat It,” a song that bridged the gulf between R&B and rock ’n’ roll via Eddie Van Halen’s guitar solo. Over the next year he would rack up an unprecedented seven top-10 pop hits from a single album, invent the moonwalk and the dancing zombie, and remind us that Vincent Price was (for the time being) still alive.

That’s all well and good. No one can deny the significance of those achievements, and nobody argues the merits of the music on Thriller. But while it hardly invented the blockbuster album as an event – Frampton Comes Alive, Rumours and Saturday Night Fever all preceded it – Thriller did create a monster: the blockbuster as a goal, as an expectation even. Michael obviously let those sales figures and pop-radio hits go to his head – as did Epic Records, and as did (eventually) all the major labels. Commercial considerations, rather than artistic ones, came to dominate MJ’s “creative” life, beginning with the Bad album and continuing (with ever-diminishing returns) the rest of his career. And the lengths to which he and his corporate enablers went to break more sales records and attain greater ubiquity became – despite those diminishing returns – the template for a major-label trend toward de-emphasizing artist development and lesser-selling genres in their zealous pursuit of blockbuster hits.

As the tsunami of hype surrounding the release of Bad crested in mid-1987, Epic execs spoke with apparent seriousness about releasing every one of its 11 tracks as singles. (Mercifully, they would quit at seven, though two others spawned videos.) The album itself seemed calculated not so much to expand Michael’s artistry, but to replicate and/or reference past achievements. There was the gloppy duet for a first single (“I Just Can’t Stop Loving You”), the plot-enhanced video helmed by a major film director (Scorsese’s “Bad”), the incestuous offspring of “Billie Jean” and “Beat It” (“Dirty Diana,” featuring Steve Stevens on guitar), and the first of what would become several attempts to revisit “We Are the World” (“Man in the Mirror”). I’m not saying there’s nothing of quality on Bad – “Man in the Mirror” and “The Way You Make Me Feel” (the song, not the so-disturbing-it’s-hilarious video) are pretty wonderful, and “Smooth Criminal” has a great groove – but, honestly, is anything on the album as memorable as this?

Of course, inspiring a classic “Weird Al” parody (or two) is an achievement in its own right, but it’s also symptomatic of the overexposure that turned Michael’s crossover dream into a nightmare. It stemmed, in part, from his determination to be all things to all people – a pop star and a soul man, a lover and a fighter (to twist a misbegotten lyrical aside), a “Bad”ass and a Disneyland attraction … black and white. His videos reflected the diversity of the audience he demanded. Just think of those videos, from “Beat It” through “Remember the Time”: casts of dozens (if not thousands), representing every conceivable race and ethnicity. It became the default crossover-video meme: Surround your black face with multitudes of nonblack ones in a cozy, can’t-we-all-get-along environment. (Consider also Lionel Richie’s “All Night Long,” “Hello” and … ugh … “Dancing on the Ceiling” – Lionel’s own crossover journey paralleled Michael’s in its compulsiveness – as well as Whitney Houston’s “How Will I Know” and “I Wanna Dance with Somebody,” numerous Janet Jackson clips, and the impossibly multicultural audience shots throughout Purple Rain.) Michael’s “Black or White” video obviously was the culmination of all this; heck, its pandering smorgasbord of ethnicities inspired a key section of my Master’s thesis, which was titled (I shit you not) “Paint It Black: The Visual Conventions of African-American Music Videos.”

“All things to all people,” however, was not just how Michael wanted others to see him – it’s clearly how he saw himself. The overwhelming success of Thriller seemed to spawn in him a neurotic obsession with being the Biggest Pop Star Ever … the King of Pop, if you will (and he did). And so, even as his sales figures (not to mention his creative mojo) dwindled album by album, he and his marketers at Epic (eventually owned by Sony) dreamed up a succession of gimmicks to prop up his numbers and allow him to claim new achievements. Sales of Dangerous sagging too quickly? Let’s place “Will You Be There” (incongruously) in a kids’ movie about a whale! “Scream” failed to reach #1, even with sis’s help? Let’s flood the market with half-price singles so you can score the first-ever (and perhaps worst-ever) hit to debut at the top, “You Are Not Alone”! He seemed to pursue honorary awards and made-up distinctions – a Grammy “Living Legend” award, even a listing in the Guinness Book of World Records (one of many he would “earn”) as the entertainer supporting the highest number of charities (39). The most bizarre such incident came, famously, at the 2002 MTV Video Music Awards, when he mistook Britney Spears’ birthday-wish babbling for an “Artist of the Millennium” award.

It was sad (though, let’s admit it, also funny) enough to watch Michael grasp at such straws, even with everything else he was going (and putting himself) through. But it’s been difficult, and often infuriating, to watch the increasingly conglomerated major labels take cues from his antics as they transformed themselves into smash-hit-or-bust box-office junkies. Even as they released fewer and fewer singles through the ’90s, concerned that new (and pricey) CD singles were “cannibalizing” the album market, they also followed Sony’s lead and cooked up #1 debuts by their established artists via temporary discounts. (The artists who benefited from these shenanigans were, not coincidentally, fellow crossover acts: Mariah Carey, Whitney Houston, and Boyz II Men.) The competition for album-chart placements became overheated as well, with marketing departments bending over backward (and manipulating release dates) to score the #1 debuts made possible by Billboard’s implementation of SoundScan sales-tracking technology.

Michael himself had, beginning with the Dangerous album, chosen to offset his own creative decline by working with the then-burgeoning crop of pop/R&B writer-producers. By the end of the ’90s, such puppetmasters (Kelly, Teddy Riley, Rodney Jerkins, Max Martin, etc.) ruled the U.S. pop scene almost completely, working their magic with substance-deprived (though clearly MJ-influenced) acts like Britney and Xtina and J. Lo, the Backstreet Boys and ’N Sync, Brandy and Monica … and, later, the full range of Disney-approved starlets. It is clearly an unfair overstatement to claim that, as a result of all this, real musical talents have lately been relegated to the indie-music ghetto while major-label A&R now takes place at shopping malls and theme parks, rather than smoky bars and street corners … but it certainly feels true, doesn’t it?

Look, I’m not saying that MJ is solely responsible for the state of the music business as we know it. Certainly there are plenty of other factors that have contributed: the bottom-line obsessiveness that has come with conglomeration; the chart manipulations that have become possible with new technologies for tracking sales and airplay; the crippling effects of the Napster free-for-all and the uncertainties of the online future. But the Thriller cash cow indubitably went a long way toward putting those dollar signs in the eyes of Sony, Seagram and other multinationals in the first place. And Michael’s own fixation with commercial dominance engendered marketing tricks and dicey claims of achievement, the likes of which have become standard operating procedure at the major labels.

Just as the major movie studios largely have abandoned “art” in favor of the type of popcorn fare that can compete for the top of the box-office charts and impress corporate shareholders, so did the major music labels largely turn themselves into routinized hitmaking machines — matching voices and images with behind-the-scenes magicians who produce R&B-tinged pop songs and rap albums that predictably debut atop the charts, then quickly make way for the next flavor of the moment. Michael Jackson created a lot of great work and entertained untold (though oft-counted) millions during the middle 30 of his 50 years; he also, through a combination of happenstance, ambition and megalomania, helped create the lust for blockbuster sales that today dominates the shrinking multinational music business. He’s gone now, but he’s left us to keep living with that part of his legacy, along with the rest of it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Pingback: Fast Thursday links « sandyjane

  • Oldetymer

    Agree with almost everything you said,except one thing, MJ didn't invent the moonwalk. He may have done it better, but here is a video of Bill Bailey doing it a long time ago.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRByZlHS6GE&feat

  • http://robertcashill.blogspot.com BobCashill

    Between Annie's piece last week and yours today, you have well and truly buried the King of Pop. Are you happy? :) It's like being reminded that there is no Wizard of Oz, and never was.

    I think you should turn your thesis into a video essay. Seriously, I'd watch. It's the new form of critique/commentary.

    Over the past few months, I've bought—err, downloaded–new albums by U2 and Green Day. I guess they were high up on the charts for a week or two–are they still? They seem to have sunk fast, but I admit I don't follow the charts that avidly. What constitutes “blockbuster sales” anymore in the record store-less present?

  • JonCummings

    Well, I didn't exactly come to bury Caesar, but I didn't come to praise him either (at least not today). Anyone who doesn't have decidedly mixed feelings about Michael's many legacies just isn't thinking clearly.

    My thesis, for better or worse, is ancient history now (1992). In order to turn it into anything more than a snapshot of a long-ago era, I'd have to watch a thousand interminable rap and Nickelback videos (for comparison's sake) from the intervening era … and someone would have to care about the evolution of music video over the last 15 years. And since neither MTV nor VH1 can be bothered, why should anyone else?

    Green Day is currently #20 on the album chart after 11 weeks, U2 #77 after 21 weeks. (Demi Lovato is #1, and may just stick there another week or two–her new single is, I'm sorry to say, kinda hot.) Each of your albums debuted at #1 but quickly dropped. “Blockbuster” status in the music biz clearly ain't what it used to be; these days 3-4 million albums is a real killing. But then, the competition for many acts & their labels isn't necessarily to sell that many copies; it's to get that #1 slot and meet sales projections for the first week out.

  • JonCummings

    Nice! It's not like a hundred Soul Train dancers didn't do variations as well over the years. But I'm not sure it counts if you're not wearing sequined white socks with your black dancing shoes.

  • liarseverywhere

    You must be on drugs yourself and under anesthesia; you should have keep your silents if you think you can get away with twisting the truth like this YOU ARE DEAD WRONG!
    Please stop trying to take away from MJJ's legacy with your jealousy and pettiness!

  • deltaslide

    Yeah Jon-you should go easy on the anesthesia. We must learn from Michael's mistakes! Not to mention keeping those silents to yourselves…Actually a brilliant, very well-written article and I think you really nailed it. Excellent stuff.

  • http://www.lancereviews.homestead.com/ Lance

    @Liarseverywhere;

    Jon makes several well-considered points in his article. While I don't agree with all of it–especially the perceived anti-melting pot sentiment, and in my opinion, if you're going to blame a single individual for bringing out the music industry's greedy nature to the forefront, why not just fall back on the default blaming of Spielberg and Lucas for the excesses of Hollywood's renewed search for the almighty blockbuster(the greed was always there, La-La Land just happened to let it show after these two proved what successes summer films could be)–I REALLY wish that anyone firing back would at least learn to SPELL CORRECTLY!!!(“kept” instead of “keep” for the tense, and “silence” instead of “silents”)

    This would add something called VALIDITY to your point of view, even if your point of view(“You must be on drugs yourself and under anesthesia”…what??! And how can you spell “anesthesia” right and get “silence” wrong, anyway? Are we on MySpace and I don't realize it?!) might make you seem like someone who didn't get their own proper dosage at Arkham Asylum.

    Sorry, folks…that just drives me totally bat-shit up a wall.

  • DavidMedsker

    Wow, Jon, all this time I thought you approached your subjects carefully and with an open mind, but apparently you’re just jealous and petty.

    I am sick to death of the ‘you’re just jealous’ defense. It’s lazy, not to mention it doesn’t make any sense.

  • Pete

    A very well written post. It's nice to see some people swimming against the tide of willing forgetfulness that's swept the populace after his death. MJ was a complicated individual…so it only makes sense his legacy should be just as complex.

  • mary3

    QUOTE: “The most bizarre such incident came, famously, at the 2002 MTV Video Music Awards, when he mistook Britney Spears’ birthday-wish babbling for an “Artist of the Millennium” award.”

    Do your research! Michael never “mistook” anything. MTV played a cruel birthday joke on him. They told him he was getting the Artist of the Millennium award when he wasn't. MTV should be ashamed of themselves; they intentionally tried to humiliate MJ. MTV became so popular because of MJ and this is what they do to him! I don't understand why the American and British media were so jealous of MJ and felt a constant need to bring him down.

  • mary3

    Bill Bailey only tapped backwards, any moron can do that. The black kids in the ghetto were doing the “backslide” but it still didn't have the illusion of going forward while actually going backwards. Michael actually did INVENT the moonwalk as we know it today. On the Oprah interview MJ said that he got the idea from the street kids but ENHANCED it. He was even humble back then. No one before did the moonwalk like MJ did on Motown 25.

  • JohnHughes

    Please provide links or supporting material for your research. Thanks, muffin!

  • JonCummings

    If you actually watch the video, Bailey is doing nothing like “tapp(ing) backwards.” He's doing exactly what Michael did. You gotta give credit where it's due.

  • JonCummings

    I'm with John. That's a preposterous accusation. We'll need some concrete proof.

  • jgar

    this was silly. Destroyed it? When did the music industry concentrate on art more than sales? Just look at the sound alike bands of the 60's after the beatles. GOSH it is an industry, they focus more on money than art, understand that before you make a silly thesis.. Dwindling sales? Whose standards? Bad was supposedly a commercial flop because it didn't sell as much as thriller, but um it sold 30 million around the world. People celebrate if you sold 2 million lol. It was not an album for just musical artistry, it was an album meant to support visual artistry. NEVER was MJ lesser as a dancer, performer than in moonwalker/smooth criminal. Even this ridiculous account of saying Bad was just taken from Beat it etc. Michael was a sharper, more versatile and more polished dancer on Bad and smooth criminal than anything he did in Thriller. It was an evolution on an already great dance style. Did you see Kelly or Astaire evolve so greatly in such a short amount of time? Dangerous a flop? The biggest selling new jack swing record is a flop? Gosh this is silly.

  • jgar

    so if he thought it was a birthday, why did he have a list to say thanks to people? I certainly wouldn't. Obviously he was informed of an award. Kinda common sense, you get an award you get a list of people to thank. You get a birthday and you say thanks and not pull out a piece of paper. Before you ask for research use common sense.

  • Tweet

    Jon…you really need to go back and do more research on what you have attempted to speak about. As a professional, writing an article..you should have stated the cited facts and left YOUR opinion out of it..leaving the final draw to the reader. It seems that your above article is laced with your opinionated poison. For example..Thriller was the largest and best selling album of all time, however Bad sold 30 million copies which is nothing to sneeze at. The music industry if they could sell 8 million copies for an album would consider themselves lucky. MJ had out did himself with Thriller..so quite naturally 30 million would seem like a slip..but in reality..Bad was the SECOND largest selling album in history..and Michael did it AGAIN.

  • JonCummings

    So what we have here, if you're correct, is a conspiracy on the part of MTV — with Britney Spears, of all people, enlisted to say something just leading enough (like “to me he's the artist of the millennium”) to seal the deal — all designed to make Michael Jackson look ridiculous. Really? Is that the “common sense” you're asking for?

  • JonCummings

    Mr. or Ms. Tweet, why on earth would I leave my opinion out of an opinion piece? I'm pretty sure any reader could tell this wasn't a straight-up “objective” article or obituary as soon as they read the first word, which was “I.”

    Anyway, “Bad” is probably not the second-biggest-selling album of all time, though it's impossible to get any real idea how many copies it sold internationally…which, of course, didn't stop Michael and his PR specialists from making up their own numbers (which is a big part of what this column is about). In terms of U.S. sales, “Bad” pales in comparison even to the “Bodyguard” soundtrack from a few years later.

    You should absolutely feel free to disagree with anything I write. But note that I never, anywhere in the piece, suggested that “Bad” was a flop. What I suggested was that it was a coldly calculated piece of product, designed far more to sell another 40 million copies than it was to advance Michael's artistry. If you want to argue about that, go for it. But if your entire argument is “'Bad' sold umpteen million copies…look what a success it was!” then you're playing right into the same commerce-over-artistry trap that, in my opinion, made the latter stages of MJ's musical career very sad to watch.

  • http://www.eDrugSearch.com/ buy prescription drugs

    I guess it is kind of a double edged sword. He is responsible for both inspiring creativity and overproduced music in search for huge sales. He accomplished much musically

  • http://twitter.com/doodie_pants doodiepants

    No no, he is alive. They found him in the woods. Then the video taper got it!!!!

    http://doodiepants.com/2009/08/27/michael-jacks

  • http://twitter.com/doodie_pants doodiepants

    No no, he is alive. They found him in the woods. Then the video taper got it!!!!

    http://doodiepants.com/2009/08/27/michael-jacks

  • http://twitter.com/doodie_pants doodiepants

    No no, he is alive. They found him in the woods. Then the video taper got it!!!!

    http://doodiepants.com/2009/08/27/michael-jacks

  • pariscooper

    boy how do i love michael jackson… michael is the best thing that happened to this world its so sad that he died but i love himmm to death… hes a ledgend all over tha world and forever in my heart!!!! RIP BBY!!! i love you