Julian Velard and the Audacity of Unhip

Dave Lifton March 12, 2012 13

A couple of years ago I had an idea for a regular column here. It started as an attempt to figure out why so many critically acclaimed bands did nothing for me. My intention was to document some sort of manifesto of what was missing in indie, namely an emphasis on traditional, emotional song craft in favor of obscurantism, deconstruction, and irony. I even had a great name for it, “The Audacity Of Hip.”

I eventually decided against doing the column because a) I’m lazy, b) I only had material for a handful of columns before I would start to repeat myself, and c) it was more negative than I wanted to be. Earmageddon notwithstanding, I’d much rather write about the good new music that inspires me – or, at the least, flawed but promising – than the sounds that leave me cold.

I’ve been thinking about that doomed column ever since last Saturday night, when I saw Julian Velard at Schubas, a small club here in Chicago. I learned about the 32-year old piano-based singer-songwriter last fall after Popdose Editor-In-Chief Jeff Giles interviewed him. That coincided nicely with his tour, which I saw (also at Schubas), and reviewed.

This time around, he didn’t do the full Mr. Saturday Night persona that I described because his “imaginary friend” Ryan Bull, who played guitar and triggered drum loops and sound effects crucial to the production, was unable to go on the road with him. It was just Velard and his keyboard doing a club show, not pretending to be streaming the show from his Brooklyn apartment, but it was still filled with his wonderful songs and stage presence.

But something he said from the stage surprised me. In talking about that last tour, he said that, of all the dates they did, the only show that connected with the audience was the one I attended, where it was pretty obvious to everybody what he was trying to do. He joked about several times during the night, but it was also obvious that it affected him.

Instead of saying "Cheese," we sang "You're The Inspiration."

Afterwards, he and I had a drink at the bar with some other fans he knew (including someone who had driven up from Indianapolis), and I pressed him for more details. He said that people didn’t seem to get the idea that it was, in his words, a “weird, absurdist musical,” and that when he read my review, he thought, “Finally, somebody gets it.”

Now, I didn’t write that to suggest that I’m blessed with brilliant insight that no other rock critic has (although i won’t stop any of you from saying it), but rather to return to my original point about the de-emphasis of craftsmanship in indie these days.

Velard is a throwback to a style of music whose peak popularity was between 1975 and 1984, and he’s neither unapologetic nor unironic about it. The Members Only section of his website features a gorgeous cover of Chicago’s “If You Leave Me Now,” a song I never thought twice about, even though I heard it regularly growing up. I wouldn’t say he’s retro like, say, The Black Crowes, but rather that he’s a traditionalist who’s not concerned with breaking sonic ground.

So when Velard comes to town and the local paper’s music reviewer, who probably only knows Randy Newman from Pixar movies, Hall & Oates or Billy Joel as ironic punchlines, or the Great American Songbook from, God help us, Rod Stewart, the reasons for the poor reception become clear. But I, and many of my Popdose colleagues who have become smitten with Velard since reading Jeff’s review, are older, so it makes perfect sense to us.

If the across-all-platforms success of Adele – probably the closest we’ve had to a consensus of critical and popular acclaim in years – has taught us anything, it’s that we’re all starved for tunes. We want smart, emotional, melodic songs that speak to us. That might not be the hippest concept and won’t lead to a high rating at Pitchfork, but although tastes and styles may change, great songwriting is timeless.

I don’t think that Julian Velard would automatically be as popular as Adele even if he had the full power of a major label’s starmaking machinery behind it. There are far too many factors beyond an artist’s control that are involved in that process for me to say that. But I do know that we’ve fallen pretty far as a music-consuming society if we don’t know how to react to someone so rooted in classic songwriting techniques who delivers them in an engaging and entertaining fashion.

  • Cruisewhu

    I agree! I saw Julian play a gig in a small bar in London a couple of years ago and it was amazing! He gets so lost in his music, and you can see he has so much fun with it. It helps that he has a good sense of humour too and this also shines through in his lyrics.

    I get this type of music (he describes himself as Billy Joelesque).

    A great review.

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    Thanks, Cruisewhu!

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    You, me and a large section of the Popdose readership just plain miss melodies. They don’t have to be new ones but they do have to be interesting ones, and so long as production techniques reign as more important than what they produce, listeners like me might go unsatisfied.

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    I wouldn’t say I miss melodies. I hear a lot of great melodies, but rather I miss a certain type of melody informed by jazz and blues that is inherently emotional and direct. It’s a strain of American music that runs from New Orleans to Tin Pan Alley, reinterpreted in England by McCartney and Elton, etc.

    Did you listen to the Explorers Club song I wrote about a couple of weeks ago? Gorgeous melodies all over that album.

  • http://twitter.com/carynrose Caryn Rose

    I’m not sure I miss melody so much as I miss sincerity. I miss meaning it. I miss giving a fuck. I probably also miss fun, or having fun, or not being afraid to have fun.

    This is why bands like Marah, Lucero, the Replacements, hell, even Springsteen are more popular in Europe than they are here. 

    I want to be entertained. I want a good show. I want blood on the tracks. I want to believe that the person I am watching onstage would rather be there than anywhere else.

    I want it to matter.

    I know this is not what you are saying but I think it’s part of it.

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    That’s the extended part of the argument, that too many indie bands are more interested in being cool than making that intense connection with fans. You and I could probably have a long discussion about my theories on these things. A comments thread is the wrong place for it.

  • KingP

    Are economics somehow to blame here? We seem to live in an era where you can’t swing the proverbial dead cat without walloping another guy/girl indie-whatnot duo.  Their output isn’t particularly bad, it just kind of sounds kind of unfinished or perhaps inadequately funded.  
    I know “overproduced” is the ubiquitous mark of shame in indie-rock, etc, but it once seemed like even the most fiercely “alternative” outfits (SST, Frontier, etc) had their own apparatus of producers, promoters, designers, etc that made sure that what was presented in the stores was in fact a complete product with obvious intent – and not what we seem to get now – which is a loose collaboration of people who sort of get along but do not want to seem too committed to a particular image or sound. 

    To reference Caryn Rose, I think we have entered the age of Hobby Rock.(Hobbycore?) Tunes made by people with nothing really better to do at the time than fiddle with their home studio and get their film school pals to AfterEffects a video when the need arises. 

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

     Yes I did, and I appreciate it greatly. However, what passes for melody in what I think is the most popular of pop music sounds like many variations of the same doorbell chime. I really appreciate a song that I can’t hum along with the very first time I’ve heard it.

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

     I think there are elements of that — that things are born because they can be, but not necessarily because they should be. Having said that, there can sometimes be great, beautiful stuff that comes from a cruddy old 4-track recorder, but only if the performer still takes the time.

    I would also argue that the proliferation of the NSFW music video also speaks to that because it is easier to pull off your pants than to make a point.

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    There’s certainly a case to be made for two types: the one that wants to make music and the other that wants to be famous for making music. Different seeds grow different fruit.

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    I don’t know. I’m not going to be that dismissive of anybody’s motives for wanting to be a musician because they’re all valid. And I’d probably rather want to see a bar band comprised of guys who just want to have fun and get laid than some pretentious jerks who consider it a “calling” and “have to share their gift” with the rest of the world. All I care about is that the music is good. 
    The collapse of the majors, the lack of filters, and the low barrier to entry means that I do get inundated with a lot of crap. But by the same token, I also get to hear someone like Velard. And I wasn’t putting down all new music, and I took out a lot to try to make it clear that I wasn’t. I just found it odd after speaking with Julian that there’s a generation of people that doesn’t understand this strain of music that was pretty much the backbone of popular music for much of the 20th century. Are they too indebted to irony to recognize genuine emotion? Have Gershwin/Arlen chords become so foreign to modern ears? I honestly can’t say.

  • http://twitter.com/scrubbles Matt Hinrichs

    Your article prompted me to buy the Mr. Saturday Night album. It’s excellent! Thanks.

  • http://www.wingsforwheels.net dslifton

    Thank you!