Listening Booth: Bruce Springsteen, “Working On a Dream”

Bruce Springsteen - Working On a DreamBona fides: I’m a Jersey boy, and a fan. I’ve got more than 50 Springsteen concerts under my belt. I’ve even met him once or twice, and no, I never call him The Boss. Now on with the show.

Someone on Twitter (follow us @popdose) recently wrote that Bruce Springsteen’s Oscar snub by the Motion Picture Academy was his punishment for “Outlaw Pete.” Maybe. I do know that the failure of the Academy to include Springsteen’s title song from The Wrestler in the Best Song category is one of the most egregious oversights I’ve ever seen in my years of following the Oscars. Are the Academy voters allowed to write in their choices?

I do understand the sentiment about “Outlaw Pete,” though. The song’s placement as the leadoff track on Working on a Dream (Columbia) is one of he most curious decisions in rock history. First of all, the thing is more than eight minutes long. Second, the story doesn’t make much sense. I suppose, based on his acknowledged respect for the iconic western films of John Ford, Springsteen was trying to create a widescreen western epic of his own. What he ended up with is more akin to the spaghetti variety.

I tell you this as someone who has listened to the track over and over in an attempt to understand its significance. I’ve done this because the balance of the album contains some of the best work that Springsteen has done in years. The E Street Band is in great form, despite the very noticeable lack of input from Clarence Clemons (wouldn’t a sax solo have been preferable to the whistling verse on the title track?), and producer Brendan O’Brien, working with Springsteen for the fourth time, has tamed most of his impulses toward the murky sound that nearly destroyed Magic for me.

Springsteen has once again returned to the touchstones that have guided his career for inspiration. He’s been talking a lot about The Byrds in recent years, and sure enough, the seminal folk-rock band’s influence is all over this album, as it was on Magic. Where Springsteen’s earlier music was highly steeped in classic r&b and soul, as well as ’60s garage rock, in recent years the rock influence has become more prominent. Check out the chorus harmonies on “What Love Can Do,” the stunning raga-rock guitar solo (which would have been right at home on “Eight Miles High”) on the beautiful and dark “Life Itself,” and the “Ballad of Easy Rider” homage that is “Tomorrow Never Knows” to fully understand the impact that the Byrds have had on Springsteen.

Bruce Springsteen has not only name-checked Roy Orbison in song (”Thunder Road”), he has, on occasion, appropriated the great vocalist’s operatic style for his own recordings. Consider his performance on one of the album’s strongest tracks, the towering “Kingdom of Days.” Springsteen soars Orbison-style again on the album’s title track. Speaking of the song “Working on a Dream,” I didn’t think much of it when it was released as a single. Here is a classic example of a song that grows within the context of an album. It’s one of my favorite tracks now, and though I could still do without the whistling, it’s mercifully short.

For my money, Springsteen is arguably the best rock vocalist in history. I say that because while others can do one thing well, Springsteen can do it all vocally, from the guttural to the sublime. The years have done nothing to diminish his abilities in this area. In fact, time has burnished his vocal instrument in a most appealing manner.

It would be remiss of me not to mention the touching “The Last Carnival.” It is Springsteen’s tribute to his late keyboard player Danny Federici, who died from melanoma last year. Danny’s son Justin fills in for his father on accordion. “We won’t be dancing together on the high wire, facing the lions with you at my side anymore. We won’t be breathing the smoke and the fire, on the midway.” The is the second album in a row that Springsteen has had to say goodbye to someone dear to him in song. It was “Terry’s Song” for Terry McGovern on Magic, and now this one for Danny. It’s not easy growing old, a fact that Springsteen acknowledges throughout this record.

If you’re like me, you like to consider an album as a whole. I’m not into this new world of picking and choosing digital singles. I want to hear albums that are of a piece. So I would tell you to just leave “Outlaw Pete” off of your iPod playlist for this album, but I know I won’t be able to bring myself to do it. This is the way the artist intended his album to be, and that has to be respected, no matter how wrongheaded a decision it may be. If you are willing to exclude that track, however, you will find that Working on a Dream is the best Bruce Springsteen album in years.

P.S. “The Wrestler,” which is included as a bonus track here, is deserving of an Academy Award, and if you’ve seen the film, it’s simply unforgettable.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • The LA Times today had an interesting observation that Springsteen is a seminal contributor to the Rock Album pantheon. His records were carefully and meticulously crafted for the deep listen.
    Now he's trying to make it in the grabcan hodgepodge world of singles and, truth be told, he doesn't have that ability.
    In preparation for this record I listened to the entire studio canon from Greetings to Magic. I blurbed a bit on facebook and I girded myself. See, I really thought Magic was a mess. A poor collection of songs with no coherent vision or resonance.
    Ditties, at best.
    Dream is a few notches below Magic. It's as though it was created by the SpringsTron 2000. Able to craft songs in the Bruce Springsteen idiom but with none of the power or grit.
    Forget Outlaw Pete, an egregious ripping off of Kiss's I was Made for Loving You and poorly devised "epic" track. Wait, let's not forget it for a second. Bruce has done these 8 minutes Opuses before:
    Jungleland, arguably one of the most interesting and powerful tracks of the 70s and Drive all Night, a claustrophobic cautionary from The River.
    But Outlaw Pete??!?! This is garbage.
    GAR-BAGE.
    And then there's the matter of Queen of the Supermarket. Written by someone who, it would seem, has been so cloistered as to not even enter a supermarket.
    Bruce's infatuation with being the voice of the Middle Class has always been suspect. A concoction of Landau's to take the Dylan wannabe and turn him into a superstar. It worked for a long while, mainly because Bruce was working out his own demons with his father and his childhood.
    He tossed off that mantle in the 90s as he got awards for songs he could write in his sleep, like Streets of Philadelphia.
    The Rising was the first time in more than a decade that Bruce had something to say and it worked.
    By Magic and now Working on a Dream, the man is so divorced from those working class "roots" that he almost seems glib.
    I would always jump at the chance to see him in concert but, knowing that he doesn't care for L.A. (where I live and his concerts are always lackluster and not well thought out or generous) and that fully half of the concert will be filled with crap from this album, I'm gonna have to take a pass.
    I beg you to go back and listen to this record again with a decidedly objective ear.
    Being a Springsteen fan all too often clouds the critical ear. (Being from NJ I totally get it. He's a god, etc.....)
    I think if you revisit this one in a short while you will come to the same conclusions-that Working on a Dream would be better if you never woke up and discovered you had paid for this nightmare.
  • Allen, thanks for your comment. I listened to the album all the way through at least five times before I wrote this piece, and I've listened since. My feelings have not changed. In fact, repeated listenings have revealed more to like about the album. "Kingdom of Days" is for me one of the most powerful and beautiful songs in the Springsteen canon, and as I said, the title track gets better and better in the context of the album.

    I pointed out my bona fides at the start because I was about to slag "Outlaw Pete." I assure you, I am completely objective about Bruce. I have had no love for much of his later career, or behavior. I wasn't a big fan of the Rising, or Magic. They were largely ruined by Brendan O'Brien's production. Of course there were great songs on each, but not a whole album's worth. This album, with the one exception, is much more consistent, and the production isn't nearly as annoying.
  • mojo
    Well, if he is going through a Byrds and 1960s phase...those bands were all about grabcan (nice word) singles LPs and not fully flowered albums, right? Booker T & the MG's "Soul Dressing" is the grabcan'niest record I own...and is in my personal top 10 of all time.

    I have not heard the album all the way through. Just saying, this notion of "singles anthology" isn't as bad as its cracked up to be.
  • I do a Tom Petty impression. It's kind of easy: you strain your mouth and jaw into the EEEEEE shape and hold it. You keep your tongue slack in the bottom of your mouth. Practice with songs like "Deliver Me" until you get the right "dee-liv-uhrr mee" enunciation.

    Now, all of that is to say that "What Love Can Do" specifically doesn't sound like Springsteen aping Roger McGuinn, but like Tom Petty who made a career out of his inherent Byrd-isms.
  • Perhaps not, Dw, but the beauty of much of Bruce's work is that there is a cohesiveness to the tracks as collected on an album. This is an artist who painstakingly chose what songs would and would not be included on a record (all too often leaving out "Roulette" in the 80s, why, I know not) and it feels like he's just sort of gotten dodgy.
    Bruce has a musical idiom, to be sure. He excels at that Bruce sound. Somewhere bridging the gap between 50s trashcan warblers and Journey is the world that Bruce inhabits. (Go with me, this isn't a comparison)
    I would suggest that his style has been left in the wake of changing musical styles, for the most part and that may have been why so much of his output after the 80s was abysmal.
    The only time he really resonated and connected with his audience was with The Rising. There was a cohesiveness, not a "concept" album but one informed by events.
    The River, BitUSA, B2R, Darkness, Nebraska, all of these share that sense of "album" by definition.
    You wouldn't make a scrapbook of your family and, in the middle, toss in a picture of an office party, would you? You connect to both pictures but the office party one is out of place and would stick out.
    That's what's going on here. Cohesion has been tossed out the window. Okay, if Bruce was a singles writer then I would say, fine, gmme the best tracks and I'll be on my way, uploading them to the minivan.
    But he isn't. It doesn't wear on him.
    Which is why the pastiche nature of these two records and the slapdashed feel of them is annoying.
    Queen of the Supermarket is better than any other tracks he was writing??? Then, please, god, let us never ever hear those songs.
    I enjoy a good grabcan record every once in a while. I just expect more than a toss off by this guy.
  • outsidecounsel
    "[A]rguably the best rock vocalist in history"?!? I'm not so sure that you can make a case for Springsteen being in the top ten. Lessee, Chuck Berry, James Brown, Orbison belongs somewhere in the top five, Elvis, Paul McCartney, Smokey Robinson, Stevie Wonder, maybe Mick Jagger, probably John Lennon, certainly Janis Joplin, arguably Dusty Springfield, Carl Wilson.... and that's not even considering crossover artists like Howlin' Wolf or Muddy Waters, or Ray Charles.

    Certainly Bruce belongs on the list, probably somewhere between Burton Cummings and Neil Diamond.
  • So I'm assuming that you've never heard "Adam Raised A Cain," "Jungleland," or "Kingdom of Days" for that matter.
  • outsidecounsel
    "Adam Raised A Cain" and "Jungleland" are well done. I'm not saying Springsteen isn't a fine singer-- a great singer, even. I'm not saying he's one-dimensional, either, although all of the singers on my list are more versatile. What I think I'm getting at is that if a claim is going to be made that a singer is one of the greatest of all time then that singer should meet certain criteria. I'd like to suggest that a sense of swing is important;and an ability with a ballad, as well as with a straight-ahead rocker. I'd like to hear how the singer does with other people's material-- does he (or she) make it his/her own? I want rock singers to be able to demonstrate some facility with the blues-- something Springsteen has not done. If we are talking "greatest in history" for this still young art form I'd like to see evidence that the singer has influenced other great singers. Who has Springsteen influenced? Meatloaf? Have a look at the dozen I reeled off without even pausing. Can you seriously say that Springsteen is a better singer than any of them? By what possible measure? I mean the man no disrespect. He is certainly a powerful singer, and he is able to convey multiple emotions-- although perhaps not the full palette of human feeling.
  • I love all the artists that you mentioned, and have enormous respect for their contribution. That said, explain to me the diversity of Chuck Berry or Janis Joplin as singers. They were extremely one-note, no pun intended. If you really think about it, so was Orbison. Where is his flat out rock and roll track?

    Springsteen has more than proven himself as a ballad singer. One listen to "Racing in the Street" will show that. He has also proven himself an excellent interpreter of other people's material, though the best of that has always come in live performance.
  • outsidecounsel
    Check Berry is one of the inventors of the form. He sings straight ahead rockers ("Johnny B. Goode", "Back in the USA"), straight blues, country, callipso, ballads--in his versitility he is more like B.B. King or Elvis than just about any other artist in the form.

    Janis handled the rockers, the blues and ballads with consistent excellence. I don't think there has been a woman singer in rock that could do as much so well.

    "Racing in the Streets" is not the example I'd have used-- but there are numbers on "The River" that illustrate your point. Again, I'm not saying he's a bad singer- that would be absurd.
  • EightE1
    He has certainly done much with what, at first listen at least, is a limited instrument. He's always had the rocks and gravel thing down, but he can also soar, and, to my ears at least, the last couple records have shown more versatility than we're used to hearing from him. Ken picked a good one with "Kingdom of Days" off the new record, but I'd also point to "Thunder Road" (lead and bg vox) and, if you can find it (I'll have to dig up some of mine), live versions of "Youngstown," from Ghost of Tom Joad. I have a bootleg called One Night in Amsterdam or some such thing, from the Tom Joad tour, and what he does with his voice in the tail end of that song is otherworldly.

    Rob
    EightE1
  • outsidecounsel
    I need to let go of this, but I just can't. Over the course of about an hour in the car last night and today better singers kept coming up. Sam Cooke. Brian Ferry. Rod Stewart. Levi Stubbs. Probably the singer that everyone cites as the worst, or most irritating-- ladies and gentlemen Mr. Bod Dylan. Freddy Mercury. Van Morrison. Neil Young. In the middle of my reverie "Candy's Room" came on, and you know what? I over-rated Springsteen by putting him with Burton Cummings and Neil Diamond. I'm actually hard pressed to say who Bruce is better than at this point. Phil Lynott? Mark Farner?
  • Dan
    I found 2 versions of The Wrestler on the net. One is 3:50 and the other is 5:28. Any idea what that is all about?
  • The one I have is 3:51.
  • Malchus
    The longer one is probably the version used in the actual film. It's longer to cover the entire end credit sequence. Where did you find it because I think having the piano play all the way out at the end instead of the fade out is far more moving.
  • Good point Scott. I think you're right about that.
  • Dan
    Can't remember. I'll try to figure it out.
  • Dan
    Here is where I found the longer version: http://synchronized-love.blogspot.com/2008/12/t...
  • Malchus
    Bummer, the file has expired. Would you mind emailing it to me?
  • Dan
    No, it was re-upped to a mediafire file. Scroll down the comments on that page.
  • Malchus
    This is fantastic. Anyone who loves this song should download the long version of it.

    Thanks, Dan.
  • Elaine
    I'm listening to the song (long version) for the first time. It's good. I'm sorry to report that my mind goes to the 'movie version' of what I figure the images will show me. That's a bummer. Guess it's the price we pay for advance notice.

    My own personal annoyance at the way Bruce says long-A "dance" survives, too.

    sigh
  • EightE1
    "It’s not easy growing old, a fact that Springsteen acknowledges throughout this record." Good point. I would add that he's acknowledged such in recent interviews, as well. He's pushing 60 (hell, Clarence is 67), he just lost a bandmate he's had for, what, 40 years? It seems to me that records like this one and Magic are less about striking out into the singles market than allowing himself the luxury of releasing more music this late in the game, before it's too late. Isn't that what we all wanted from him when he was taking 5 or 6 years between records?

    Magic grew on me with repeated listens, and so has Working on a Dream. There are a couple clunkers ("Outlaw Pete" and "Surprise Surprise"), but I'll deal with them in order to have "My Lucky Day," "Life Itself," "Kingdom of Days" and "The Last Carnival, " just as I was willing to trade "I'll Work for Your Love" and "Magic" for getting to hear "Girls in Their Summer Clothes," "Long Walk Home," and "You'll Be Comin' Down" last time out. Them's is decent trade-offs, to my ears.

    Rob
    EightE1
  • Great comment Rob. To the great songs from Magic, I would add "Last to Die."
  • Just another point since I am a huge fan masquerading lately as a Bruce hater.
    I've read (and agreed) that Outlaw Pete steals its melody from a KISS disco tune and that's horrible enough.
    What does that say in the shadow of Radio Nowhere's blatant rip of Jenny 8675309)?
    For that matter, while, yes I hear the Meatloafiness of the back end of Queen of the song I ran out of ideas for....but does no one hear that the BEGINNING of that track sounds suspiciously like the theme to St. Elmo's Fire??
    What's the deal, Bruce?
  • Stu J
    Interesting review, I have to stick up for Outlaw Pete as a clearly-defined allegory for Bush's America crossing over to Obama's - that although the American public has seen fit to eject the violent and destructive old world in favour of a more peaceable approach, there's still things that can't be written out of history which the country will carry on it's shoulders.

    "We cannot undo these things we've done". Particularly after D&D and Magic (the songs) this track opening the album hits me as a kind of mission statement which puts his politics aside for the rest of the album, and I've got to say I love it as a song and musically. Really great stuff, combining the GOTJ obsession with the west with the modern E Street Band. Real one-of-a-kind track for me.
  • Good analysis Stu. I'm going to keep listening in the hope that maybe this can become an even better album.
  • Allen
    D&D? Magic? Perhaps Bruce is telling us something. Maybe he should have called this album "Dragonball Z".
  • Allen
    D&D? Magic? Perhaps Bruce is telling us something. Maybe he should have called this album "Dragonball Z".
  • Stu J
    Ha ha, I think so. Next up: Bruce Springsteen - Part Man, Part Pokemon
  • Gary
    Ken - I believe that Outlaw Pete is a great song. The song uses the western backdrop as a symbol of what we all go through -- trying to live a life without our demons. To one extent or the other, we all struggle to do the right thing. Sometimes we disappoint ourselves. While Outlaw Pete attempted to put his past behind him; his instinctual nature, his history and his very being would not allow him to be successful.
  • 1JOSIGUERRAA
    I love Bruce, I would very much like he would in Brazil!! kisses!!
  • 1JOSIGUERRAA
    AMO BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN, WAS PART OF MY YOUTH I THINK IT IS WONDERFUL IN ALL
    THAT HAVE MUCH IN MU ORKUT VIDEO DELE OHC IT ALL IN GOOD NEED TO COME
    IN BRAZIL, I WANT TO KNOW YOU PERSONALLY... KISSES
blog comments powered by Disqus