<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Listening Booth: Guns n&#8217; Roses, &#8220;Chinese Democracy&#8221;</title> <atom:link href="http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/</link> <description>your daily dose of pop culture</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Nick LaRocca</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50557</link> <dc:creator>Nick LaRocca</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:18:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-50557</guid> <description>What&#039;s hysterical is reading reviews within a day and a half of the album streaming that run the gamut from &quot;this is a masterpiece&quot; to &quot;this is absolute shit&quot;.  I don&#039;t think Popdose knows what it&#039;s listening to here, but it&#039;s fun to watch a little blog look idiotic next to a review in Rolling Stone that tends to get the record a little better.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, these songs suck.  And Hinder&#039;s first record was a masterpiece.  It&#039;s been so long since good music has surfaced that Rose would have been better off letting the tunes stay stripped down like Appetite for Destruction.  Then, at least, goofballs like Popdose would have been able to like the record.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it isn&#039;t just that Axl doesn&#039;t give a shit.  It&#039;s that you&#039;re wrong, man.  There isn&#039;t a band out there right now that could even COVER half these songs, much less write anything at once as ferocious, experimental, and melodic as just about every song on Chinese Democracy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And by the way, Axl Rose can sing.  The review doesn&#039;t even discuss his voice, which is at the center of the record.  It&#039;s like discussing a new album by Sade or Christina Aguilera without discussing the singer.  I don&#039;t even know what to say abot that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s hysterical is reading reviews within a day and a half of the album streaming that run the gamut from &#8220;this is a masterpiece&#8221; to &#8220;this is absolute shit&#8221;.  I don&#39;t think Popdose knows what it&#39;s listening to here, but it&#39;s fun to watch a little blog look idiotic next to a review in Rolling Stone that tends to get the record a little better.</p><p>Yeah, these songs suck.  And Hinder&#39;s first record was a masterpiece.  It&#39;s been so long since good music has surfaced that Rose would have been better off letting the tunes stay stripped down like Appetite for Destruction.  Then, at least, goofballs like Popdose would have been able to like the record.</p><p>But it isn&#39;t just that Axl doesn&#39;t give a shit.  It&#39;s that you&#39;re wrong, man.  There isn&#39;t a band out there right now that could even COVER half these songs, much less write anything at once as ferocious, experimental, and melodic as just about every song on Chinese Democracy.</p><p>And by the way, Axl Rose can sing.  The review doesn&#39;t even discuss his voice, which is at the center of the record.  It&#39;s like discussing a new album by Sade or Christina Aguilera without discussing the singer.  I don&#39;t even know what to say abot that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick LaRocca</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-41933</link> <dc:creator>Nick LaRocca</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:18:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-41933</guid> <description>What&#039;s hysterical is reading reviews within a day and a half of the album streaming that run the gamut from &quot;this is a masterpiece&quot; to &quot;this is absolute shit&quot;.  I don&#039;t think Popdose knows what it&#039;s listening to here, but it&#039;s fun to watch a little blog look idiotic next to a review in Rolling Stone that tends to get the record a little better.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, these songs suck.  And Hinder&#039;s first record was a masterpiece.  It&#039;s been so long since good music has surfaced that Rose would have been better off letting the tunes stay stripped down like Appetite for Destruction.  Then, at least, goofballs like Popdose would have been able to like the record.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it isn&#039;t just that Axl doesn&#039;t give a shit.  It&#039;s that you&#039;re wrong, man.  There isn&#039;t a band out there right now that could even COVER half these songs, much less write anything at once as ferocious, experimental, and melodic as just about every song on Chinese Democracy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And by the way, Axl Rose can sing.  The review doesn&#039;t even discuss his voice, which is at the center of the record.  It&#039;s like discussing a new album by Sade or Christina Aguilera without discussing the singer.  I don&#039;t even know what to say abot that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s hysterical is reading reviews within a day and a half of the album streaming that run the gamut from &#8220;this is a masterpiece&#8221; to &#8220;this is absolute shit&#8221;.  I don&#39;t think Popdose knows what it&#39;s listening to here, but it&#39;s fun to watch a little blog look idiotic next to a review in Rolling Stone that tends to get the record a little better.</p><p>Yeah, these songs suck.  And Hinder&#39;s first record was a masterpiece.  It&#39;s been so long since good music has surfaced that Rose would have been better off letting the tunes stay stripped down like Appetite for Destruction.  Then, at least, goofballs like Popdose would have been able to like the record.</p><p>But it isn&#39;t just that Axl doesn&#39;t give a shit.  It&#39;s that you&#39;re wrong, man.  There isn&#39;t a band out there right now that could even COVER half these songs, much less write anything at once as ferocious, experimental, and melodic as just about every song on Chinese Democracy.</p><p>And by the way, Axl Rose can sing.  The review doesn&#39;t even discuss his voice, which is at the center of the record.  It&#39;s like discussing a new album by Sade or Christina Aguilera without discussing the singer.  I don&#39;t even know what to say abot that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick LaRocca</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-16756</link> <dc:creator>Nick LaRocca</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:18:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-16756</guid> <description>What&#039;s hysterical is reading reviews within a day and a half of the album streaming that run the gamut from &quot;this is a masterpiece&quot; to &quot;this is absolute shit&quot;.  I don&#039;t think Popdose knows what it&#039;s listening to here, but it&#039;s fun to watch a little blog look idiotic next to a review in Rolling Stone that tends to get the record a little better.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah, these songs suck.  And Hinder&#039;s first record was a masterpiece.  It&#039;s been so long since good music has surfaced that Rose would have been better off letting the tunes stay stripped down like Appetite for Destruction.  Then, at least, goofballs like Popdose would have been able to like the record.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it isn&#039;t just that Axl doesn&#039;t give a shit.  It&#039;s that you&#039;re wrong, man.  There isn&#039;t a band out there right now that could even COVER half these songs, much less write anything at once as ferocious, experimental, and melodic as just about every song on Chinese Democracy.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And by the way, Axl Rose can sing.  The review doesn&#039;t even discuss his voice, which is at the center of the record.  It&#039;s like discussing a new album by Sade or Christina Aguilera without discussing the singer.  I don&#039;t even know what to say abot that.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s hysterical is reading reviews within a day and a half of the album streaming that run the gamut from &#8220;this is a masterpiece&#8221; to &#8220;this is absolute shit&#8221;.  I don&#39;t think Popdose knows what it&#39;s listening to here, but it&#39;s fun to watch a little blog look idiotic next to a review in Rolling Stone that tends to get the record a little better.</p><p>Yeah, these songs suck.  And Hinder&#39;s first record was a masterpiece.  It&#39;s been so long since good music has surfaced that Rose would have been better off letting the tunes stay stripped down like Appetite for Destruction.  Then, at least, goofballs like Popdose would have been able to like the record.</p><p>But it isn&#39;t just that Axl doesn&#39;t give a shit.  It&#39;s that you&#39;re wrong, man.  There isn&#39;t a band out there right now that could even COVER half these songs, much less write anything at once as ferocious, experimental, and melodic as just about every song on Chinese Democracy.</p><p>And by the way, Axl Rose can sing.  The review doesn&#39;t even discuss his voice, which is at the center of the record.  It&#39;s like discussing a new album by Sade or Christina Aguilera without discussing the singer.  I don&#39;t even know what to say abot that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: games</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-73604</link> <dc:creator>games</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-73604</guid> <description>This article I so true, keep on writing like this, enjoyment to read :) 270</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article I so true, keep on writing like this, enjoyment to read <img
src='http://popdose.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> 270</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darren</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-16755</link> <dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:17:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-16755</guid> <description>The one great thing about this album is that it has brought out the best in all of my favorite music reviewers (jeff being one of them).  Sure, its kinda &quot;shooting fish in a barrel&quot;, but seeing how much pure joy some scribes take in describing this disaster definitely makes for some great reading.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one great thing about this album is that it has brought out the best in all of my favorite music reviewers (jeff being one of them).  Sure, its kinda &#8220;shooting fish in a barrel&#8221;, but seeing how much pure joy some scribes take in describing this disaster definitely makes for some great reading.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DwDunphy</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-16754</link> <dc:creator>DwDunphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-16754</guid> <description>Uh... Um... er... that&#039;s rad, right?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230; Um&#8230; er&#8230; that&#39;s rad, right?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rwcass</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-16753</link> <dc:creator>rwcass</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:09:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-16753</guid> <description>Ugh ... you&#039;re so dated, Dw.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh &#8230; you&#39;re so dated, Dw.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DwDunphy</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-16752</link> <dc:creator>DwDunphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-16752</guid> <description>What? I posted a track! 4/01/08!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? I posted a track! 4/01/08!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DwDunphy</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-16751</link> <dc:creator>DwDunphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:07:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-16751</guid> <description>I&#039;d stick Morrissey in there too. Sorry, Moz fans but I just can&#039;t handle the guy.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d stick Morrissey in there too. Sorry, Moz fans but I just can&#39;t handle the guy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jefito</title><link>http://popdose.com/listening-booth-guns-n-roses-chinese-democracy/comment-page-1/#comment-16750</link> <dc:creator>jefito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:55:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=8750#comment-16750</guid> <description>Hmmm...most irritating vocalists -- there&#039;s an interesting idea for a post. Axl would certainly be on my list, but I think John Popper would rank higher up.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;most irritating vocalists &#8212; there&#39;s an interesting idea for a post. Axl would certainly be on my list, but I think John Popper would rank higher up.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             memcached
Theme:              ddf04
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/15 queries in 0.021 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 642/643 objects using memcached

Served from: popdose.com @ 2012-05-25 15:55:42 -->
