<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mix Six: &#8220;Beatlesque&#8221;</title> <atom:link href="http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/</link> <description>your daily dose of pop culture</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-50004</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:28:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-50004</guid> <description>Yeah, there was debate about limiting when they were doing the remasters, but they ultimately thought it added some heft that was missing from the mix.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and I really liked Let It Be...Naked.  I didn&#039;t mind the clean sound and found the stripped down songs refreshing -- especially &quot;The Long and Winding Road.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there was debate about limiting when they were doing the remasters, but they ultimately thought it added some heft that was missing from the mix.</p><p>Oh, and I really liked Let It Be&#8230;Naked.  I didn&#39;t mind the clean sound and found the stripped down songs refreshing &#8212; especially &#8220;The Long and Winding Road.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-50005</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:25:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-50005</guid> <description>Well, it was certainly more catchy than the last two singles released, but maybe the label tested it in a few American markets and it kind of just sat there and did nothing...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was certainly more catchy than the last two singles released, but maybe the label tested it in a few American markets and it kind of just sat there and did nothing&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-39856</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:28:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-39856</guid> <description>Yeah, there was debate about limiting when they were doing the remasters, but they ultimately thought it added some heft that was missing from the mix.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and I really liked Let It Be...Naked.  I didn&#039;t mind the clean sound and found the stripped down songs refreshing -- especially &quot;The Long and Winding Road.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there was debate about limiting when they were doing the remasters, but they ultimately thought it added some heft that was missing from the mix.</p><p>Oh, and I really liked Let It Be&#8230;Naked.  I didn&#39;t mind the clean sound and found the stripped down songs refreshing &#8212; especially &#8220;The Long and Winding Road.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-39857</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:25:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-39857</guid> <description>Well, it was certainly more catchy than the last two singles released, but maybe the label tested it in a few American markets and it kind of just sat there and did nothing...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was certainly more catchy than the last two singles released, but maybe the label tested it in a few American markets and it kind of just sat there and did nothing&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-37325</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-37325</guid> <description>Yeah, there was debate about limiting when they were doing the remasters, but they ultimately thought it added some heft that was missing from the mix.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and I really liked Let It Be...Naked.  I didn&#039;t mind the clean sound and found the stripped down songs refreshing -- especially &quot;The Long and Winding Road.&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there was debate about limiting when they were doing the remasters, but they ultimately thought it added some heft that was missing from the mix.</p><p>Oh, and I really liked Let It Be&#8230;Naked.  I didn&#39;t mind the clean sound and found the stripped down songs refreshing &#8212; especially &#8220;The Long and Winding Road.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-37324</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:25:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-37324</guid> <description>Well, it was certainly more catchy than the last two singles released, but maybe the label tested it in a few American markets and it kind of just sat there and did nothing...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was certainly more catchy than the last two singles released, but maybe the label tested it in a few American markets and it kind of just sat there and did nothing&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bassbintwins</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-37263</link> <dc:creator>bassbintwins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:02:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-37263</guid> <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.megaupload.com/?d=INJBDNEY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.megaupload.com/?d=INJBDNEY&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://www.megaupload.com/?d=INJBDNEY" rel="nofollow">http://www.megaupload.com/?d=INJBDNEY</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tonys1</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-37199</link> <dc:creator>tonys1</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:50:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-37199</guid> <description>For Todd Rundgren Beatle imitations/tributes, check his version of &quot;Rain&quot; from &quot;Faithful&quot; plus all of &quot;Deface the Music&quot; with Utopia and much of the self-titled Utopia album from 1982.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Todd Rundgren Beatle imitations/tributes, check his version of &#8220;Rain&#8221; from &#8220;Faithful&#8221; plus all of &#8220;Deface the Music&#8221; with Utopia and much of the self-titled Utopia album from 1982.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: autodidact</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-37175</link> <dc:creator>autodidact</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:35:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-37175</guid> <description>Thanks, Ted. I own all of these except Oasis and ELO&#039;s Wimp. I&#039;ve never even heard Wimp. Surely Todd Rundgren has done some imitating of Beatles on his own work, besides the XTC production here. I say &quot;surely&quot; though I really don&#039;t know his catalog. I&#039;m guessing, though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ted. I own all of these except Oasis and ELO&#39;s Wimp. I&#39;ve never even heard Wimp. Surely Todd Rundgren has done some imitating of Beatles on his own work, besides the XTC production here. I say &#8220;surely&#8221; though I really don&#39;t know his catalog. I&#39;m guessing, though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: autodidact</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-beatlesque/comment-page-1/#comment-37173</link> <dc:creator>autodidact</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:27:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=29234#comment-37173</guid> <description>I&#039;m going to somewhat agree and disagree. The comparisons I&#039;ve seen between the 1987 CDs and the new 2009 remasters -- using software to compare the frequency balance -- generally show a bump up in the bass, and some sparkle added in the extreme high frequencies. On some of the graphs I&#039;ve seen a drop in frequencies around 4000-5000 Hz, which would mean guitars have less nasty bite to them, and the vocals do lose some of the overtones. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would have preferred a transfer to digital from the master tapes with as little equalization as possible, and no limiting or dynamic compression. I&#039;m a purist that way. The 1987 CDs are said by reliable sources to be pretty faithful to the master tapes as far as frequency response goes. Yet, on A Hard Day&#039;s Night, I like how the bass bump in the remaster brings out McCartney&#039;s bass work. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Well, you can&#039;t have everything. My biggest beef is that they shouldn&#039;t have used any limiting at all. The bass and treble boost I can live with. But I noticed the same suckout in the treble you did, which makes vocals and guitars smooth, but artificially so. Let It Be Naked has the same sanitized sound to it, but not to the same extreme.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m going to somewhat agree and disagree. The comparisons I&#39;ve seen between the 1987 CDs and the new 2009 remasters &#8212; using software to compare the frequency balance &#8212; generally show a bump up in the bass, and some sparkle added in the extreme high frequencies. On some of the graphs I&#39;ve seen a drop in frequencies around 4000-5000 Hz, which would mean guitars have less nasty bite to them, and the vocals do lose some of the overtones.</p><p>I would have preferred a transfer to digital from the master tapes with as little equalization as possible, and no limiting or dynamic compression. I&#39;m a purist that way. The 1987 CDs are said by reliable sources to be pretty faithful to the master tapes as far as frequency response goes. Yet, on A Hard Day&#39;s Night, I like how the bass bump in the remaster brings out McCartney&#39;s bass work.</p><p>Well, you can&#39;t have everything. My biggest beef is that they shouldn&#39;t have used any limiting at all. The bass and treble boost I can live with. But I noticed the same suckout in the treble you did, which makes vocals and guitars smooth, but artificially so. Let It Be Naked has the same sanitized sound to it, but not to the same extreme.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             memcached
Theme:              ddf04
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/16 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 637/640 objects using memcached

Served from: popdose.com @ 2012-05-25 19:25:52 -->
