<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mix Six: &#8220;Woodstock&#8217;s Children&#8221;</title> <atom:link href="http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/</link> <description>your daily dose of pop culture</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Elvis Costello Covers The Beatles &#8220;All You Need is Love&#8221; &#171; Rock God Cred</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/comment-page-1/#comment-35935</link> <dc:creator>Elvis Costello Covers The Beatles &#8220;All You Need is Love&#8221; &#171; Rock God Cred</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:41:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=27213#comment-35935</guid> <description>[...] Click here to go to Popdose to check Elvis Costello&#8217;s cover of the Beatles &#8220;All You Need is Love&#8221; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to go to Popdose to check Elvis Costello&#8217;s cover of the Beatles &#8220;All You Need is Love&#8221; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/comment-page-1/#comment-51727</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=27213#comment-51727</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t want to go for the obvious selection off that CD, but for some reason Candlebox stood out as I was tracking through.  Plus, I like that that they say &quot;Hi we&#039;re Madonna&quot; -- an obvious nod that they were on the Maverick label.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t want to go for the obvious selection off that CD, but for some reason Candlebox stood out as I was tracking through.  Plus, I like that that they say &#8220;Hi we&#39;re Madonna&#8221; &#8212; an obvious nod that they were on the Maverick label.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hemisphire</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/comment-page-1/#comment-51726</link> <dc:creator>hemisphire</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:07:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=27213#comment-51726</guid> <description>Candlebox?  Really?  A lot of great performances that weekend, but I don&#039;t think Candlebox was one of them (and hey, I quite liked them at the time).  I went and the memory that sticks was that great Saturday lineup (Nine Inch Nails -&gt; Metallica -&gt; Aerosmith).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve got that Toronto Rocks DVD as well, but I only got for (and only watched) the Rush performance.  Now I&#039;ll have to check out the Stones.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candlebox?  Really?  A lot of great performances that weekend, but I don&#39;t think Candlebox was one of them (and hey, I quite liked them at the time).  I went and the memory that sticks was that great Saturday lineup (Nine Inch Nails -&gt; Metallica -&gt; Aerosmith).</p><p>I&#39;ve got that Toronto Rocks DVD as well, but I only got for (and only watched) the Rush performance.  Now I&#39;ll have to check out the Stones.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/comment-page-1/#comment-41867</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:03:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=27213#comment-41867</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t want to go for the obvious selection off that CD, but for some reason Candlebox stood out as I was tracking through.  Plus, I like that that they say &quot;Hi we&#039;re Madonna&quot; -- an obvious nod that they were on the Maverick label.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t want to go for the obvious selection off that CD, but for some reason Candlebox stood out as I was tracking through.  Plus, I like that that they say &#8220;Hi we&#39;re Madonna&#8221; &#8212; an obvious nod that they were on the Maverick label.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hemisphire</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/comment-page-1/#comment-41866</link> <dc:creator>hemisphire</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:07:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=27213#comment-41866</guid> <description>Candlebox?  Really?  A lot of great performances that weekend, but I don&#039;t think Candlebox was one of them (and hey, I quite liked them at the time).  I went and the memory that sticks was that great Saturday lineup (Nine Inch Nails -&gt; Metallica -&gt; Aerosmith).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve got that Toronto Rocks DVD as well, but I only got for (and only watched) the Rush performance.  Now I&#039;ll have to check out the Stones.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candlebox?  Really?  A lot of great performances that weekend, but I don&#39;t think Candlebox was one of them (and hey, I quite liked them at the time).  I went and the memory that sticks was that great Saturday lineup (Nine Inch Nails -&gt; Metallica -&gt; Aerosmith).</p><p>I&#39;ve got that Toronto Rocks DVD as well, but I only got for (and only watched) the Rush performance.  Now I&#39;ll have to check out the Stones.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ted</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/comment-page-1/#comment-35913</link> <dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:03:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=27213#comment-35913</guid> <description>I didn&#039;t want to go for the obvious selection off that CD, but for some reason Candlebox stood out as I was tracking through.  Plus, I like that that they say &quot;Hi we&#039;re Madonna&quot; -- an obvious nod that they were on the Maverick label.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#39;t want to go for the obvious selection off that CD, but for some reason Candlebox stood out as I was tracking through.  Plus, I like that that they say &#8220;Hi we&#39;re Madonna&#8221; &#8212; an obvious nod that they were on the Maverick label.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hemisphire</title><link>http://popdose.com/mix-six-woodstocks-children/comment-page-1/#comment-35910</link> <dc:creator>hemisphire</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=27213#comment-35910</guid> <description>Candlebox?  Really?  A lot of great performances that weekend, but I don&#039;t think Candlebox was one of them (and hey, I quite liked them at the time).  I went and the memory that sticks was that great Saturday lineup (Nine Inch Nails -&gt; Metallica -&gt; Aerosmith).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve got that Toronto Rocks DVD as well, but I only got for (and only watched) the Rush performance.  Now I&#039;ll have to check out the Stones.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Candlebox?  Really?  A lot of great performances that weekend, but I don&#39;t think Candlebox was one of them (and hey, I quite liked them at the time).  I went and the memory that sticks was that great Saturday lineup (Nine Inch Nails -&gt; Metallica -&gt; Aerosmith).</p><p>I&#39;ve got that Toronto Rocks DVD as well, but I only got for (and only watched) the Rush performance.  Now I&#39;ll have to check out the Stones.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             memcached
Theme:              ddf04
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/13 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 592/595 objects using memcached

Served from: popdose.com @ 2012-05-25 18:01:15 -->
