New Music: The Beatles, “The Beatles Remastered”

remasterAs a consumer, viewer, and overall commentator of pop culture, I find myself looking for those dreaded paradigm shifts, those touchstone moments where I can say, “This is the moment everything changed.” After all, that gives me something to write about. In September, one of those possibly pivotal moments could occur: The entire Beatles catalog gets a remastering and deluxe re-release.

Where Elvis Presley could be considered the start of youth culture as an economic force, the Beatles are arguably the lynchpin of youth culture gaining political and cultural power. Their voice became louder than the establishment and their actions could create real change, versus the symbolism of previous movements. They were the frontline for the Flower Children as well as pop music in general, and as such, positioned themselves as the Baby Boomer generation’s social icons.

No surprise, then, that in 2009, those Boomers probably already own all the Beatles albums on CD. While some are genuinely excited that these remasters are coming, it’s easy to make a case that the same Boomers are post-double-dip, having already “upgraded” from vinyl and (ha-ha!) 8-track, and to steal a quote from Pete Townshend, they “won’t get fooled again.”

That leaves the new generation, some of which are just as ardent admirers of the Fab Four, that have learned of new ways to get their music, shiny aluminum discs be damned. For some, their copy of The Beatles Rock Band video game will be enough, while for others, those remasters need to hit iTunes or else risk complete irrelevance. For still others, the interwebs and bittorrents will give them whatever they want for the unreasonable price of $0.00. So, if a fraction of the first wave of fans bothers to buy into the upgrade, and the most recent converts have forsaken the CD format and the concept of paying for music, what does that mean?

Likely, it means that for the first time in almost a half century, the Beatles will not be the reliable cash cows they’ve always been, and the incredible force that had been Baby Boomer buying power will need to cede control to Generation Net. It’s a big statement to make, even in the face of the success of The Love Album, the Cirque Du Soleil soundtrack that mashed up the best of Bug Music, sold way above expectation and helped set the stage for this massive refurbishment.  Remember that album was, in part, based upon the mash-up novelty and was, in a way, a new entity. These remasters aren’t. To hazard a guess, I’d expect the diehards are going to cherrypick what they choose to replace, further reducing the impact of the Beatles Armada.

But again, none of us win the horse races 100% of the time. I could be dead wrong and we could be ushering in yet one more massive win for Team John, Paul, George and Ringo. It’s a long, long, long time to September, but one thing’s for sure. Either way, we’ll have a lot to write about.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • mojo
    If the Beatles reissues are a watershed moment for the end of the 'naughts, then that just confirms to me that current music is pathetic. The Beatles crushed all comers in the 1960s, were better than the best of the 70s even rehashed, made quick work of the 1980s music when they first came out on CD (third time I thought they'd lose some steam, but no!) and if a fourth rerun is better than the best the current scene has to offer...well, it affirms that the Beatles were truly all-time greats.

    But it also makes a total mockery of the young kids out there hustling new tuneage...must be embarrassing to be in your early 20s getting your teeth kicked in by an 80-year old Sir Paul. I mean, really.
  • george
    not again!!!!!!!!!!!!! i have bought the catalogue 4 times in my little lifetime!
  • Just found your blog through Google, and I have to say I thoroughly enjoy it.
    Thank you for the info. I’m looking forward to the additional valuable information here.
  • Old_Davy
    I'm hoping these remasters will rival the DMM colored vinyl German imports I have of the Red, Blue and White albums. Also looking forward to a decent sounding "Abbey Road" since the 87 CD sounds like crap (I was never fortunate enough to find one of those highly illegal Japanese pressings). I'll most likely cherry pick the ones I want of these, but I'll probably end up with most of them, if I don't break down and buy the brick.
  • eddie
    The problem with Beatles CDs wasn't the audio quality, it was that the singles weren't on them. You're supposed to buy Past Masters which is a totally awkward collection of songs that don't belong together. The way it should be done is to add the singles as bonus tracks at the end of the album that was released around the same time, and not have a Past Masters.
  • MatthewF
    The point of remastering them digitally was to prepare them for download, but since they don't seem to have managed this you do wonder what the point is. Mind you, now that iTune have variable pricing can a deal be far away? Beatles tracks, yours for only 2 dollars.
  • Right on that point, but the core Beatles fans have the original CDs and may be past the whole "trading up" point of the reissues. New fans are digitally adept and just as likely to download the remasters from a torrent.

    So Capitol/EMI sees a payday based on the old models, models which may no longer apply.
  • xenoglossy
    Forgive me if I'm wrong, but you seem to be saying that any young person digitally savvy enough to buy from iTunes would just as soon illegally download the songs, and I'm not sure I agree. I mean, surely if that were the case, iTunes would've gone under long ago because no one would be buying.

    Personally, I'd love to have some Beatles songs on iTunes. It's always annoyed me that they're not available there, since that's the first place I look when I want to buy music.

    (It is quite true that I no longer buy CDs, though, unless I have to.)
  • So far as iTunes is concerned, that's tricky. I don't discount there are people who buy albums through iTunes, but they're outnumbered by people who cherrypick for hits 8-to-1. It's still debatable when The Beatles will be on iTunes at all, perhaps not in time for the reissues. If that's the case, then certainly, the illegal downloading of the albums will be substantial.

    The Beatles were the first group to really seize on the notion of album-as-statement and as a complete entity. iTunes defeats that in a way and sends these "statement" back into singles-only mode. Avoidance of iTunes can't last forever, but this has to be a consideration on their part.

    But let's not kid ourselves. The free-is-free contingent may buy the straggling hit song from iTunes for the convenience of it, but they have grown to take, and the taking is easy and relatively anonymous. I can absolutely see a day when even iTunes won't be able to compete but, by then, physical music product would be a thing of the past and the point of protecting the integrity of "the album" will be rather moot.
  • MatthewF
    What I can't believe is that there are people out there who really really want to own the beatles but only if they can download them, legally or otherwise. I mean, how long are they prepared to wait? I don't know what CDs go for in the states these days, but in the UK there's damn all difference price wise, at least for chart CDs, so wouldn't thet just buy them and rip them if they were so desperate.

    Also, and not to get all Neil Young about it, but if they were so worried about the sound quality that they wouldn't buy the old CDs, why would they want to buy 128k MP3s?
  • Well, iTunes has in a way made consumers incredibly lazy. For instance, DRM files. I don't like them and feel if you buy something, you should be allowed to utilize them however you like. On this I agree. In the meantime, if you want to transfer files ad infinitum, burn them to a cd-r.

    That's it. Once they're burned, you can rip them as MP3s on however many computers you like. So these customers who complained about how their files were held hostage by Apple could have taken the end run, but instead chose to wait and whine (in many cases).

    So yes, the fact that they're being so anxious about Beatles on iTunes versus having those songs right now speaks to the de-evolution of the modern music buyer.
  • EightE1
    Is there a suggested retail price posted yet for the brick? I'll guess $200-$250.

    Rob
    EightE1
blog comments powered by Disqus