Political Culture: Inglourious Democrats?

Like (I suspect) most viewers, I wasn’t too troubled by self-recrimination at the end of Quentin Tarantino’s must-see exercise in “Jewish revenge porn,” Inglourious Basterds. (The description comes from the Jewish Daily Forward, not from me.) I wasn’t worried about Q’s preposterous deviations from history, nor was I concerned that some Jewish folks might not appreciate – indeed, might be appalled by – their forebears’ cinematic transformation from victims to vigilantes. Screw the strictures of morality, the heavy burden of humanity! The way I figure it, most people leave the theater thinking just one thing: Man, if only the Jews had been able to open up a can of whoop-ass on those damn Nat-zees – that woulda been sweet.

My wife – a (sorta) Jewess who emerged from the film similarly exhilarated, and ready to grab a baseball bat for some impromptu strip-mall justice – recovered her faculties quickly and asked to stop in at Big Box Boox (i.e., Barnes & Noble) to pick up some chick lit. So she went off to fiction and I stopped at the bestseller rack, where I was confronted by an entirely different array of “revenge porn.” The titles included Mark Levin’s “conservative manifesto” Liberty and Tyranny (which leaves some question as to where his sympathies lie), Glenn Beck’s Common Sense (the first of two oxymorons in this column), Dick Morris’ Catastrophe and Michelle Malkin’s Culture of Corruption. The latter two tomes, which see fit to pass final judgment on the new administration, were released in June and July, respectively – which, even accounting for the sped-up timeline for publishing political books, means they were written no later than March or April … before the stimulus bill had even been signed into law.

I decided to seek some sanity in the WWII section, hoping I might find some facts half as audacious as Tarantino’s fiction. Instead I stumbled into American History – where I learned (however belatedly) that conservatives are no longer content to create alternate realities in the present; they’ve gone after the past as well! The genius behind this endeavor is Larry Schweikart, whose publicity bio places his legacy as “a former rock drummer who opened for ‘Steppenwolf’” (drummers once played opening sets by themselves?) ahead of his current gig in the history department at the University of Dayton (go Flyers!). Following up his 2007 Patriot’s History of the United States (We’re always right! Historians are liberal-elite pussies! Those Injuns had it coming!), Schweikart’s most recent treatise purports to debunk 48 Liberal Lies About American History – perhaps because if he had bothered to dream up 50 such straw men and delusions, he might have been forced to acknowledge that Obama’s birthplace is an actual state.

If you’re a frequent reader of my ravings you won’t be surprised to learn that, at some point in that bookstore, I snapped from all the lunacy around me – and proceeded to spend the rest of the afternoon plotting inglourious revenge fantasies of my own. Sarah Palin, facing down a firing squad for her crimes against truth, justice and David Letterman, and being asked if she now understands what a “death panel” is. Dick Cheney, fresh from his 188th round of waterboarding, at the bottom of a naked-guy pyramid with panties on his head. Sean Hannity, disemboweled by a bald eagle tired of being exploited as the symbol of his bullshit. Teabaggers and town-hall crazies, desperate for meds that will turn down the voices in their heads, being turned away from one of those massive Remote Area Medical clinics. Chappaquiddick fetishists, forced to sit through the audiobook of Ted Kennedy’s forthcoming memoir — twice (heaven forbid they read). A bound and gagged Ann Coulter … oh, Ann … watching a gaggle of 9/11 widows advance on her, ready to pluck out her eyeballs with her own stiletto heels, as a classroom full of immigrant children recites the Pledge of Allegiance without uttering the words “under God”…

Eventually, though, I came to my senses and recoiled in horror at my misbegotten reveries. Of course I did; it’s what Democrats always do.

We just don’t seem to have that instinct for the jugular – to scream bloody murder when we’re down, or to stomp the other side when we’re up. We don’t “win” an election by one vote (in the Supreme Court) and then start acting like the other side doesn’t exist; we win the presidency in a landslide and obtain a 60-vote supermajority in the Senate, then start begging the other side to negotiate bipartisan compromises. When we lose an election, we don’t immediately start talking about impeachment, secession, or “watering the tree of liberty”; instead we form a tidy, circular firing squad. And when a president of the other side comes to our town, we certainly don’t turn up toting assault weapons just to show how angry and intimidating (and unbalanced) we are.

It has been exceedingly difficult, as a Democrat who worked so hard to help the most recent election turn out the way it did, to watch mainstream Republicans (there’s that other oxymoron) get away with behaving like petulant toddlers and schoolyard bullies in the aftermath. They often leave me thinking, as a friend said while watching a U2-hungry crowd boo the opening-act Waterboys back in 1984, “If this crowd gets any more violent, I’m gonna have to hit somebody!”

In the wake of Inglourious Basterds and that menagerie of madness in the bookstore, I was left to wonder: Is our reticence as Democrats to play dirty, to seethe with pure partisan malice, or to openly plot political vengeance a noble thing – or a character flaw? The film’s Jewish critics are of little help in the matter. Some are just fine with its vision of Semitic ultraviolence; others have worried that “to seek revenge by murder [is] to lower yourself to the level of the murderers,” in the words of Brandeis University Holocaust studies professor Antony Polonsky, or that the film’s image of WWII-era Jews as vigilantes will feed perceptions of contemporary Israel as aggressive and/or oppressive.

Tarantino himself isn’t playing along with such diffidence, as he made clear in a recent interview with the Atlantic:

“I hate that hand-wringing shit,” he said [of most Holocaust movies]. He had a revelation in his early 20s, he recalled, when he saw Red Dawn (1984), a Cold War revenge fantasy in which a group of American high-school students, the “Wolverines,” battle Soviet and Central American soldiers who invade Colorado. “The Wolverines capture a soldier, and there’s a little bit of back-and-forth — should we kill him or not — and C. Thomas Howell just blows him away with his shotgun,” Tarantino recalled. “Those are the kind of things you say, ‘That’s exactly what I would do.’ It’s what I want to see, and when I don’t see it, I become frustrated, and then it feels like a movie as opposed to real life.”

So much for Quentin and “real life” (he’d have been great at My Lai, apparently). But before we go any further (as if I haven’t gone far enough already), cool your jets, conservatives – nobody’s calling anybody a Nazi here. Not today, anyway. In fact, considering the obnoxious Nazi comparisons Beck and others have been trotting out lately, and the extent to which right-wingers seem to be perpetually teetering on the brink of violence, I thought long and hard about titling this column “Inglourious Republicans.” But then I realized they might actually like that, so … no dice. Besides, this column is about my revenge fantasies – and the fact that they’d never, in a million years, be carried out. Not by any self-loathing respecting Democrat, anyway.

No, today’s Republicans don’t bear much resemblance to the Nazis. They do, however, remind me a lot of my 12-year-old – when he was two. Blissfully free of common sense; unable to admit they’ve made a huge mess, and unwilling to participate in cleaning it up; prone to extended tantrums and the occasional violent outburst. They don’t require a Basterds-style scalping so much as a good, stern Time Out.

What say we give them one? Senate Democrats, let’s leave Grassley in the weeds and forget about that futile attempt at bipartisanship in the Finance Committee. Forge the best bill you can with the Blue Dogs – compromising just enough to keep them from joining a filibuster, even if they refuse to vote for the end result – and let health care pass with just a vote or two to spare. Drag Biden in to break a tie, even. Hell, use reconciliation to implement the public option, if you have to! Let Glenn and Michelle and Hannity and Rush and the rest of them throw their tantrums in their Fox bedroom, with the door locked from the outside. The majority of the electorate that will benefit from health reform (and that still supports a public option) will be immensely grateful that you pulled your thumbs out of your asses and got something done for the good of the country. And they’ll remember the ever-shrinking party that tried so hard, and with so little civility, to stand in the way.

Yeah, I know – even tough-love parenting is probably too much to expect from the Democrats in Washington at this point. But I’m going to have to indulge my lame fantasies about imposing party discipline, because it’s no use dreaming of a Kenyan voodoo prince (do such men exist?) shrinking Bill O’Reilly’s head to the size of a pin. I mustn’t think such thoughts. I can’t. I’m a Democrat.

P.S. I asked my wife to look this over and see if she thought I’d gone completely around the bend. She said, “No, it’s good. It’s a little long, a little too violent, and a little scattered maybe. But it comes together well in the end. Kinda like the movie.” So there you go.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Mahatma Gandhi said "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." In my own fantasies, I see the modern Republican party in the midst of an exact opposite transformation - they got trounced in the last election, they are currently fighting their increasing irrelevancy by throwing a tantrum, they will become increasingly laughable and paranoid, and finally they'll just be ignored. It's a pipe dream, of course, because the media loves the horse race and has been giving increasing credibility to more and more ridiculous claims (i.e. "death panels").
  • The pipe dream part is correct because, even in the midst of tantrum, the media laps it up. It's less about what the town hall was about and more of the people screaming at each other. It's about hearing ludicrous punch-phrases like "death panels" and devoting a broadcast to explaining what it might be, even though it isn't a thing at all, so how to delineate a fiction? All the while, the proponents of such talk sit back and watch this thing they made enter the world and wreak havoc.

    But what this all really comes down to is this: the degree of cowardice and soul-selling in the Democratic party is breath-taking. This was supposed to be a unifying, slam-dunk moment. Health care reform is what this party was all about, except not during elections please, thank you. If we side with change, we lose out insurance company benefactors. If we side with the status quo, we lose votes. This is too hard. Please make this all go away until we no longer need to be elected, we're in our final terms and suddenly we're all legacy minded.

    If this is, in fact, the case then the only way we're to get our legislators to legislate without the cringing, hand licking and pants wetting is to make every position one-term-only. No re-election, free gonads for all our officials, and maybe they'll use them (or at least the testosterone.)

    Finally, I knew that was a doctored photo of Ann Coulter, not from the kinky overtones but because the body double has normal gams, not those spindly, anorexic, black-widow protrusions Coulter absent-mindedly shows off.
  • You mean "Democrets."
  • Lewis Thomas
    I heard Glenn Beck raped and killed a girl in 1990.
  • JonCummings
    That's a shocking, despicable allegation! (Tell me more...)
  • Don't be absurd. That was Ben Gleck.
  • steve
    Man, the post-inauguration entertainment factor is top-notch. Absolutely comical, yet predictably fascinating to watch.

    Jon, spare us your supposed self-control of your misbegotten reveries – there’s enough name-calling and vitriol in your post to make Ms. Coulter herself seem tame (although many of yours were funny…) The far right wing crazies and you far left wing-nuts are doing just as expected and behaving in the same-old schoolyard “I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I?” way. Like those not-quite-matured folks on capitol hill, but with worse health care than those folks (they drink a lot, they need it).

    Meanwhile us normal-thinking independents just sit back and laugh. And then cry….

    The best thing to watch is the Dems – DW dunked it with his “the degree of cowardice and soul-selling in the Democratic party is breath-taking” comment. Wise indeed. They have all the power, and filibuster-proof to boot. Yet they’re blaming (or is it screaming “I’m telling!!!”) at the Republicans from their corner of the asylum.. It’s in their court, so why can’t they just pass what they want?

    Oh yeah, DW hit that one out too – and I quote, “Please make this all go away until we no longer need to be elected, we're in our final terms and suddenly we're all legacy minded” He’s basically got it, but I’ll take it further and more to the point. It’s more like “I will be behind anything that assures I will be re-elected”

    Ooops, I think I just defined the word politician. So you Dems now cry boo-hoo at the blue-dogs (can’t we come up w/a better name than that?) and blah blah…. But here’s what you obviously don’t realize…. The very same dregs on the left in Congress who are now in full support of Obamas plan and who are also crying boo-hoo at the bluedogs are only doing so because it’s safe for them to do so. If supporting the plan put them at risk of winning next go-round w/their constituency, they’d be doing the exact same thing – coming out against it. And you guys would have to come up w/some other name to call them (hopefully a better one). It’s not about what they believe is right for the country, it’s about self-preservation. It always is!!

    Heard of Lamar Alexander? Yeah, that guy. Can’t get re-elected as an R, so just switches to D. Okily-dokily, bro. Anyone know what the guy actually believes in? I’ll tell you. He believes in getting re-elected. Because if he doesn’t he may actually have to get a real job, and then he’d see how bad the health care system is screwed up for us normal folk, you know, his minions. I remember watching that unashamed douch-bag make his announcement and with my high-def you could actually see the slime oozing out of his pores. Remember – this is called “politician”

    Until the two party system is buried 6 feet under, we will continue to go round in circles, not getting much done. Period. The far leftys and far righties will continue to fling boogers at each other, and us normal-thinking independents will just sit back and laugh. And then cry….

    That brings me to our last politician (I’m using the slur-meaning of the word here, the only one), Mr. Obama. His approval ratings have been tanking at light-speed, even though the mainstream (non-cable) media is still in the last stages of their Obama-induced orgasm. But their wild Obama-gasm moanings haven’t been able to rescue him from himself. From his small yet astoundingly stupid mistakes like AirForceOne-Gate, to his far more sinister ones, like saying “no lobbyists in my administration!” and then turning around the very next day and appointing a lobbyist (wtf?), to his huge mistakes, like not learning a damn thing from Hillary-Care (did Harvard Law require any contemporary history classes?). And new polls show that w/independents like me – many who hesitatingly/suspiciously voted for him – he’s also sinking fast.

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/01...

    But the funniest is to watch the far lefties at my office, the ones who saw him as the second coming (of the God they don’t believe in in the first place, but I digress……). They obviously have varying degrees of buyers-regret, yet they’re still afraid to come out and say it, for fear of being kicked out of their little horn-rimmed-glasses and tofu clubs. But one-on-one they tell you – is this guy ready for this, because he sure seems to be f-ing up…. And he hasn’t even faced his Biden-predicted test, which will come. I bet even Biden is saying wtf because he knows it’s still coming, and let’s face it, he pretty much says anything he wants. God I’d love to go drinking with him, just once. Anyhoo, Obama’s approval ratings are lower than W’s at the same time - of course W went way up after his test on 9/11, but then etched himself into the annals of stupidity and showed his true douche-bagginess with Iraq. I get the feeling that most Obama supporters who scarily watch him rumbling/fumbling/stumbling down-field so far only hope at this point that he gets to at least enjoy a year of post-9/11 type high approvals from some nationalistic-triggering event before he ultimately crashes and sputters in to finish out his term. But at least we know he will support and pretend to be whatever it is that will get him re-elected, just as he campaigned from the middle (while having the most far left voting record in congress). And the circle goes round….

    Meanwhile us normal-thinking independents just sit back and laugh. And then cry….
  • David_E
    So your answer is ... what? The LaRouche/Greenpeace ticket? Or are you Paul/Nader 2012?
  • JonCummings
    Steve! We've missed you (sorta), and your fascinating ideas about what a "normal-thinking independent" thinks. Lamar Alexander would like to have a talk with you about party-switching, which he hasn't done--he's still a Republican (I believe you're thinking of Arlen Specter, about whom you'll get no argument from me).
  • steve
    right you are, I always did mix those two up.

    and btw, if you want another fascinating "normal thinking independent" tip - how about being anti-abortion and anti-death penalty? I think it's wrong to kill people both before they're born, and after they're born. But those two viewpoints put together are not held by many Dems or Republicans, because their "club" tells them not to think that way. Ahhh... the need to belong.
  • Joel
    Great column Jon. I thought it was kinda funny that the ad for free access to Ann Coulter's column appears right next to the picture of her bound and gagged, along with the description of her untimely demise at the hands of stiletto-wielding 9/11 widows. Popdose ought to plan its ad-placements a little better. Or maybe they planned it perfectly...
  • JonCummings
    We don't control which ads appear, though apparently we can ask that certain ads be taken off. In this case, why bother? Sadly, that ad didn't come up when I pulled up the page, though I do have Google ads for Va. gubernatorial candidate Bob "Macaca 2" McDonnell and a "Republican singles" group. Hopefully an S&M Republican singles group...
  • bagman27
    I enjoyed the first half of your article, until you switched to using name-calling and blanket statements. Then it just became dull and mean-spirited.You look at politics too much like a football game. There is no "we" and "they" as you like to keep saying.

    I honestly believe that if there were no republicans, you would be bored out of your mind.
  • JonCummings
    Nah, I'd just go after moderate Democrats.

    Thanks for enjoying the first half. Did the part you didn't like come before or after I put Sarah Palin in front of the firing squad?
blog comments powered by Disqus