Political Culture: John McCain, Coward

“Napoleon once said, when asked to explain the lack of great statesmen in the world, that to get power you need to display absolute pettiness. To exercise power, you need to show true greatness. Such pettiness and such greatness are rarely found in one person. I look upon the events of the past weeks, and I’ve never come so to grips with that quotation … Your leadership has raised the stakes of hate to a level where we can no longer separate the demagogue from the truly inspired.”
–President Jackson Evans (Jeff Bridges) in The Contender (2000)

Rod Lurie’s political films remind me of a college professor whose classes I simultaneously loved and hated: you had to sort through a lot of annoying bullshit to get to the brilliant insight at the end. (I figure I’m going to pay for that sentence in the comments section. Have at it!) Nevertheless, I happened to catch the last 15 minutes of The Contender on the tube Sunday morning, right after John Kerry nearly bitch-slapped the utterly deserving Joe Lieberman on Meet the Press, and that quarter-hour (like Lieberman’s performance) fairly reeked of the colossal stench John McCain’s campaign has been emitting for the past couple weeks.

In particular, the last line from Bridges’s speech begs to be viewed in the context of this presidential race. The Republican Party’s entire modus operandi, in the absence of any ideas that resonate with the American people, is now to render the electorate incapable of “separat[ing] the demagogue from the truly inspired.”

McCain once promised that things were going to be different this time. In April he said, point blank, “This will be a respectful campaign. Americans want a respectful campaign … they’re tired of the attacks. They’re tired of impugning people’s character and integrity. They want a respectful campaign — and I am of the firm belief that they can get it and they will get it if the American people demand it, and reject the negative stuff that goes on.”

McCain has never been a man whose phraseology demanded parsing, the way the Clintons’ does — or the way every utterance of the Bush White House demands to have the lies and fiction sifted from the mere stonewalling. But the last piece of that McCain quote may hold the key to the cowardice he has exhibited in recent weeks.

“If the American people demand it, and reject the negative stuff that goes on.” That’s a big “if,” and McCain now seems to be using it as an excuse for his current behavior.

Unfortunately, while “the people” always say they dislike negative campaigning, they far too often fall for it. McCain knows this from experience — from his own demolition at the hands of Karl Rove’s gutter politics in South Carolina in 2000, and from the way Bush’s jackals tore apart Max Cleland’s patriotism in 2002 and Kerry’s military record in 2004.

McCain, particularly as a Navy man, ought to know better after all that. He claimed to know better, promised he knew better. But then, he long claimed to be all about honor and duty and country and bravery and all that stuff.

Well, that’s all gone now. Forget about the Hanoi Hilton, forget about campaign finance reform, forget about all that “maverick” hoo-hah. There’s no honor, no bravery in “he’d rather lose a war to win an election” or “he’s played the race card from the bottom of the deck” or the Britney/Paris ad or the “Moses” ad. For McCain, there’s only cowardice — the cowardice of acting on the belief that he can’t win on the issues, or on a comparison of the candidates’ real characters, but only by creating a bogeyman.

George, didn't you tell me we OWNED this guy?Of course, McCain probably never imagined in April that things would turn out this way. But then, how many of us imagined that by the end of July Obama’s judgment on Iraq would have been validated by the Iraqi government, or that his judgment on Afghanistan and Pakistan and Iran would have been validated by the Bushies themselves? We all knew McCain didn’t have a prayer on the economy, but it must have come as something of a shock when Obama was revealed as an oracle on foreign policy as well.

Obama’s arrival back home last weekend, hailed as a genius on at least three continents and with unbeatable press coverage in the States, sparked McCain’s descent into full-on desperation. At the beginning of the week McCain tried to convince us that a candidate whose message of renewed American leadership resonated with foreign audiences must be viewed suspiciously here at home — because heaven forbid the world come to respect and admire the USA again! By the end of the week, Obama’s enormous substantive achievements on his trip had been boiled down to the dismissive phrase “he’s the biggest celebrity in the world” — bigger than Brit! Bigger than Paris!

Big enough for Berlin, certainly...

How pathetic. So far McCain and the Republicans have made this campaign all about Obama: Is he ready? Is he right? (Is he a Muslim? Is he a Black Panther? Is he a himbo? Is he — as the Wall Street Journal has asked — too thin, and therefore not enough like us fatty Americans?) But McCain soon is going to find out that this election’s really a referendum on him and his party — their abject failures, their lack of ideas or vision, their corruption — and, yes, their (and his) cowardice.

Until then, the only course for Obama is full speed ahead. By putting up roadblocks to your hospital visit in Germany, George Bush’s Pentagon sought to create exactly the situation they did, and you fell for it. Screw Bush’s Pentagon, and the rest of the executive bureaucracy — it’s now a wholly owned subsidiary of the McCain campaign.

And BTW, George, didn't you say this guy was your post-Blair butt boy?By comparing you to Britney and Paris, the McCain campaign sought to plant the idea that your popularity and inspiration are a liability, not a positive. (They also reprised the black man-white woman juxtaposition that served Tennessee’s Bob Corker so well in his Senate victory against Harold Ford in 2006.) Screw them! Go to Denver this month, stand before 75,000 adoring devotees and give the speech of your life.

By citing one of your standard stump-speech lines and suddenly claiming that you’re “playing the race card,” McCain and his campaign were trying less to attack you than to inoculate themselves from responsibility for the hideous, cowardly attacks they’re plotting. (“He played the race card first; we’re just responding,” you can just imagine them saying.) Screw them! Your job is to make independents comfortable with the idea of you in the White House, and your race is part of your “riskiness.” Keep right on making light-hearted reference to that discomfort — and keep your powder dry for the Republican attack machine that we all know is just getting started.

As for McCain: You want to be president? Give us a few good reasons why. Defend your domestic policies, and explain how they’re going to solve the economic mess we’re in. Come up with a real plan for solving our oil crisis — not gimmicks like a gas-tax holiday or increased drilling — or else admit that there is no short-term solution. Explain why you remain wedded to an indefinite presence in Iraq when the Iraqis themselves clearly want us out. Convince us that we should trust a Republican executive branch for four more years when even you suggest that the last eight have been such a god-awful shambles.

This is not going to be a pretty autumn for the Republican Party. You are most likely going to lose this election, and even if you manage to win you almost certainly will face increased Democratic majorities in Congress. If you squeak your way to victory only because you stick to the low road and create a caricature of, yes, our first African-American nominee that you know full well has no basis in reality, then you and your policies will run into a buzzsaw of historic proportions.

In short, the only way for you to emerge from this campaign with your beloved “honor” intact is to pull your campaign out of the sewer and return to your high-minded promises of the spring. Win or lose this election on the issues, not on character assassination, and force your party to do the same.

Stop being a coward, Senator McCain, and start being a man.

Tags: , ,

  • Jamielyon
    Amen!
    You know, I liked Bob Dole in the early part of his election campaign, when he had a sense of humor and didn't take himself so seriously...in other words, before he became a jerk. I can't believe McCain didn't learn anything from Dole's blunder!
  • ryan
    At this point, I have realized that I don't even care if McCain wins, because if he becomes president then the failure of his policies will put the last nail in the coffin of Reagan-style conservatism (and on the off-chance that he does manage to unfuck America, then good for him).
  • Umm, we're screwed to the wall no matter who wins. I only hope with McCain we will retain a few more freedoms. A few.
  • You think drilling and pumping our own oil instead of continuing to buy it from our foreign enemies for now and forever is not an idea that resonates with Americans??? You know that is not true. Yes, we need conservation measures, nuclear plants, renewable energy and many other strategies, too. McCain has endorsed those. Real ideas.

    But the campaign is about Obama, because he is an issue. He may be THE issue. From Obama's Berlin speech: "The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down." Except for the part about religious tolerance, this sounds like an invitation for the rest of the world to pick our pockets, for illegals to pick our pockets, for the weakening of national sovereignty and the pursuit of interests other than the USA's. If Obama wants to run for leadership in the EU, that's fine with me. It sounds very utopian, and I'm sorry, but most Americans have enough common sense to distrust utopians. (You could say the same about Bush's nutty utopian idea of bringing democracy to Iraq.)

    And then you have to question the character of a guy who goes to Germany -- Germany of all places -- and apologizes for our conduct in the world. As if we must stand in shame before a Europe that created a massive slaughterhouse and dragged the rest of the world into it not once but twice in the past century?

    All in all, I didn't think the speech was that offensive. However, it raises legitimate questions about who Barry Obama is, what his core values are, and where his true allegiance lays. Foreign policy victory it was not. Look at the polls. Slight bump, now evaporated.

    I have no idea how all this will turn out. But if McCain is truly cowardly, then Obama should get on the same stage with him in a town hall meeting or a real debate (not the glorified press conferences we are used to, false called "debates") and challenge him on it, mano a mano. It's must happen sooner or later. Obama doesn't always do that well when he's unscripted. Maybe McCain doesn't either, not all the time, but at least he's had more practice.
  • You want this McCain (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVgT__TZNdQ) to take on Obama in a town hall format? Dude, you're absolutely crazy.
  • steve
    You want this Obama?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6D7sxmmLaik

    to take on McCain?

    Serious?

    Or this one?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDJSVPAx8xc

    Zack, people are people, they make mistakes. So if you wanna play that game both sides could pull up endless gaffs. Both candidates scare me, but it's true that McCain has been challenging Obama and he's been dodging.
  • E
    challenging? desperately screaming for attention, maybe; I suspect McCain would be lucky to draw 200,000 people all year to come listen to him yell at clouds.

    besides, given McCain's jumping into bed with the corpse of Lee Atwater over the past few weeks, why should Obama even give him the time of day?

    Let him keep shooting himself in the foot, and if he finally, at long last comes up with an original idea or a positive reason why he, John Sidney McCain III, would make a half decent president, maybe then he can have some attention.
  • steve
    E - McCain has been challenging Obama to town hall debates for over a month now, and Obama has refused. Yes, they're both screaming for attention. Yes, they're both playing politics as usual. But the fact remains that Obama has refused McCain's town hall debate challenges. I don't see why he would do that, but his strategists must have a reason.
  • Honestly, I don't know how the Dems plan on introducing more alternative energy solutions, so I can't rightly comment on that. However, the Republican slant (slant-drilling, natch) is just to bring pressure on foreign oil so the price goes down, stabilizes, and we can lull ourselves into another coma of ignorance until the next crisis.

    This s not a case where competition is the solution. A radical shift is the solution, and all the D&D dragon dice rolls of more drilling and exploration amount to nothing more than many dependent years on a finite resource.
  • JonCummings
    Obama's Berlin speech was full of empty, nonpartisan platitudes--which are the only kind he has any right to offer in a foreign setting at this point, and he clearly knows it. It's so cute how the Republicans have turned such blather into some sort of leftist, utopian, "naive" manifesto--because they've got nothing at all to run on themselves.

    This is quite simple. McCain--had he a decent speechwriter and/or a shred of Obama's eloquence--might have given exactly the same speech in Berlin, and you'd be falling all over yourself proclaiming him a great statesman. Of course, he would have been giving that speech to 20 diners in a spaetzle house, but nevertheless...

    Damn straight, somebody needs to apologize to the world for the criminal behavior of the American government the last eight years. How many international laws have been broken straight up to the Oval Office? Dozens, no doubt--enough to put away a large cadre of our current "leaders," were the US a nation civilized enough to submit to accountability for their actions when we sign on to international laws. In the absence of any such accountability, apologies will have to do.

    McCain was the victim of torture himself and supposedly is a major supporter of the Geneva Convention and other national & international laws against torture. If he doesn't find it appropriate to apologize for the Bush administration's behavior--if for no other reason than because it will help future American soldiers avoid what he himself went through--then he's a coward.

    As for offshore drilling, sure it resonates--but only among the ignorant or delusional. Never mind that man behind the curtain, the one with the PhD in economics who keeps telling us that neither offshore drilling nor a gas-tax holiday will make a scintilla of difference in gas prices in the short term. No experts, please -- we're Republicans.

    If McCain pitches such ideas despite his own knowledge that they won't work--which is exactly what's happening--then we must discount everything else he says about alternative energy (which he swears he supports, but never seems to vote for when a bill is presented). And if he can't get real on oil, and expects to fool the electorate into voting for a delusion, then he's a coward.
  • steve
    Jon, today Obama moved more to the center on offshore drilling. They both suck, frankly. They're both playing classic politics, instead of being themselves and being truthful in how they convey their beliefs. I want someone who is who he is, unapologetically. I wanna know where they stand and that they won't conveniently change that stance to get a vote. Obama is changing his rhetoric on offshore drilling to get ahead. McCain has done the same with tax cuts. Obama did it again with campaign financing, McCain with his position on talking to certain enemies. They're both typical Washington hypocrites.
  • JonCummings
    I wrote in this column six weeks ago that a temporary increase in offshore drilling might be acceptable as a stopgap on the way to phasing out petroleum as a major source of our energy--only if it's accompanied by huge investments by the oil companies in developing alternative sources. So I'm not utterly against the concept of offshore drilling--but I am dead-set against using it as a substitute for developing alternatives, or as a method of fooling people into thinking we can drill our way out of high prices. The latter is what McCain's doing.

    I'm still waiting for Obama (most likely) to throw himself behind a space-race-level effort to wean us off fossil fuels--the type of commitment Bill Richardson made last year, and Al Gore recently promoted--and I remain disappointed in Obama every day he doesn't do it.

    All that said, Obama's agreement to consider a bipartisan compromise on the drilling bill currently before the Senate only seems like "flip-flopping" because the Republican Party has criminalized compromise over the last 20 years. This used to be the way things got done in Washington--the two sides would argue with each other, then they'd hammer out an agreement that didn't make anybody completely happy, but represented a good-faith effort to come together and get something done.

    The vast majority of today's Republicans are so ideologically rabid that they can't imagine doing such a thing. They'd rather do nothing, because they've decided that a government that does nothing (or does everything badly) suits their purposes as well as it would if they got their way all the time.
  • JonCummings
    It looks like I should have waited to watch today's news before writing the comment above. Today in Detroit, Barack Obama said: "Increased domestic oil exploration certainly has its place as we make our economy more fuel-efficient and transition to other, renewable, American-made sources of energy. But it is not the solution...We simply cannot pretend, as Senator McCain does, that we can drill our way out of this problem. We need a much bolder and much bigger set of solutions. We have to make a serious, nationwide commitment to developing new sources of energy and we have to do it right away...

    "Breaking our oil addiction is one of the greatest challenges our generation will ever face. It will take nothing less than a complete transformation of our economy. This transformation will be costly, and given the fiscal disaster we will inherit from the last Administration, it will likely require us to defer some other priorities. It is also a transformation that will require more than just a few government programs. Energy independence will require an all-hands-on-deck effort from America - effort from our scientists and entrepreneurs; from businesses and from every American citizen. Factories will have to re-tool and re-design. Businesses will need to find ways to emit less carbon dioxide. All of us will need to buy more of the fuel-efficient cars built by this state, and find new ways to improve efficiency and save energy in our own homes and businesses...

    "We must end the age of oil in our time."

    The other day in Missouri, as an aside, Obama mentioned that Americans keeping their tires fully inflated can save more gasoline annually than could be provided by increased offshore drilling. (A true fact, actually, according to no more impartial source than the Bush administration's energy department.) McCain's response? To harp for three days on tire pressure being Obama's entire energy policy, and to hand out gimmicky tire-pressure gauges printed with the words, "Obama energy policy."

    John McCain is a coward.
  • You won't see any difference, in the next few months, Jon. The pundits will fall all over themselves attempting to resolve McCain's dishonorable attacks with their honorable portrayal of him (rather than simply admit that they were, you know, WRONG about his character), the hysterical shrieking about Obama's intent to turn our country into a caliphate will grow louder, and Obama will handle both with the characteristic grace he's shown so far.
  • Darren
    It is this kind of bloated self-importance that will cost McCain the election. He sees all those who've perished via these very same methods, yet he thinks the results will somehow be different his time around. The difference, of course, is that the GOP blowhard-of-choice is not running against charisma vaccuums like Gore and Kerry. Obama is charisma personified and you just can't beat that with stubby arms and insults.

    I wish somebody would because Obama is nothing BUT charisma. His endless posturing and scripted bravado are a front for business-as-usual, mark my words.
  • I won't insist that you're wrong, but I have to say that I hope you're wrong...wait...am I talking about hope again? Damnit! All day long, it's "I hope they haven't run out of egg salad at the sandwich shop" this and "I hope they pair Joshua and Katee back up for the finale," that. Damn you, Obama, for filling me with hope!
  • bill
    You sit behind your typewriter and take potshots at people. John McCain spends five years being tortured (two of which were in solitary confinement) and never gives up his country or his comrades in arms, and he is the coward. Pitiful.
  • But that's exactly Jon's point - forty years ago, McCain was enough of a badass that he fed his torturers the names of the starting lineup of the Green Bay Packers rather than sell out the true names of the members of his squadron. A month ago, while campaigning in Pennsylvania, he changed it to the Pittsburgh Steelers. The old McCain would never have pandered so shamelessly to a local crowd, and that's why he's in danger of losing his honor.
  • The assertion is that people change. McCain was a war hero, he hung in where most would have cracked and no one could ever take that away from him. However, he has now cracked under the weight of the GOP party line, saying things that he never would have eight or so years ago.

    You're showing me the before photo and telling me to buy into the after, sight unseen.
  • David_E
    Typewriter?
  • JonCummings
    I like to sit in front of it, actually. It lessens the arm strain, and I can see the keys better for hunt-and-peck purposes. Good old' Smith-Corona...
  • StandingDamaged
    You have GOT to be kidding me???
    Mr I was against torture before I was for it?
    Abu Ghraib and Gitmo and Afghanistan and ALL done on YOUR tax dollars and in YOUR name boys and girls... HOW DARE this sanctimonious a$$hole try to use "I was tortured in Nam" as grounds for a Presidency!!!!! in todays' fascist climate!!!!!!!!!! I agreed with Wesley Clarke - I don't think crashing 4 or 5 jets and getting shot down are actually resume qualifiers for the job.
    But I guess if it makes him a hero and a possible president then all those Gitmo detainees are heroic presidential material for the next couple of decades eh?
  • JonCummings
    Now. now, let's be respectful...(said the man who seems to have developed a Tourette's-like need to repeatedly call McCain a coward)...

    I hadn't considered Gitmo detainees as future presidents ... nice one.
  • Malchus
    I used to respect McCain until he began kowtowing to Bush and the Republican muscle. After the smear campaign that ruined McCain's 2000 bid, the guy should told Rove and co. to go fuck themselves. But he played the political game because he knew that his day would come. Now that day is here and instead of taking the high road, he uses the same damn tactics. This disgusts me.

    However, the real issue to me isn't just about the men who are running for the oval office, but also the people they surround themselves with. We all know that one man does not make the decisions in this country (despite what Bush would have you believe) and thus, what we need is a real LEADER. Using the two men we have before us, the two candidates, which one is acting like a real leader? Which one is acting like a man who has the capacity to inspire people in this shitty economy and during a time of war? While McCain has people who seem to be using any tactic necessary to get the power, Obama is out there doing his best to represent himself and show the world what he'll be like when/if he wins in November. The people he has working for him are doing their best to keep the campaign respectable.

    These are the people I want surrounding the President come January 2009, not another group from the same mold as we've had the past 8 years.

    Look, I don't think Obama has all of the answers. And from what I've read and seen of him, I don't think he believes he has all of the answers. He knows that it's going to take people working together to turn this country around. He knows that he can't do it alone. It's that message of honesty and, yes, hope, that has earned my vote come November.
  • Ted
    It's pretty clear that McCain must have had a meeting with his strategists who told him: "You want to win? Here's what you have to start doing..." If John Kerry's service in Vietnam can be called in to question long enough to nullify Bush's "full dinner jacket" service during the same time, then it's no surprise, after repeated racial jabs at Obama by the Right, that Obama's comment about presidents and dollar bills would suddenly become the "proof" McCain needs to call Obama a race baiter.

    It's a classic Lee Atwater/Karl Rove tactic: take your opponent's supposed strength and turn it into a liability.
  • JonCummings
    Agreed, that McCain's hiring of Steve Schmidt has steered him to the low road. But McCain is the candidate, and he's responsible for every last bit of the drivel that comes out of his campaign. He gets no points for honor or dignity when he hires scumbags and then lets them run amok.
  • MatthewF
    Seems to me that one of your problems here is the epic length of the election campaign. Do the American people genuinely need a year + to decide on who they want to vote for? It gives each candidate the time to change direction 11 times depending on whatever the current poles are. Here in Britain we have (at least officially) a six week general election campaign, and thank god for that I say, because it would drive me nuts if it were longer.
  • MatthewF
    yeah and I meant 'polls' not poles...
  • Dan
    "You think drilling and pumping our own oil instead of continuing to buy it from our foreign enemies for now and forever is not an idea that resonates with Americans???"

    "We" don't drill and pump "our own" oil. We allow the oil companies to drill and pump. Then they SELL it to us. Or China or whomever they want to sell it to, depending on where they can get a better price.
  • Dems would be better off not suggesting foreign policy involve actual foreigners. Apparently people find this insulting.
  • Al
    COWARD FROM HEAD TO TOE!!!!!
blog comments powered by Disqus