Political Culture: Obama Ascendant

“Tomorrow is some shit, people,” Adam Yauch declared matter-of-factly Monday night, after searching for an appropriate way to close out the Beastie Boys’ fearsome inaugural-eve Rock the Vote gig in Washington. He meant it positively, of course – and he certainly cracked himself and his audience up with his offhand bon mot. (“You can Google that tomorrow,” he added – and, as of now, he’s right.) But his imprecise phrasing struck me as a delightfully precise reflection of the Rorschach blot that was Barack Obama’s inauguration.

There were at least 1.8 million stories in the bone-chilling city of Washington on Tuesday – most likely a lot more, considering the many thousands who came to town but never made it to the Mall. Each of us had his own reasons for being there, brought his own personal history and emotions, and emerged with his own tales to tell. We had all come to celebrate and to stand up for our new President and his achievements, but we were also there to commemorate our own successes and indulge our own euphoria.

Young people flooded into town because this was the first time they felt truly connected to the workings of their country, and they were justifiably excited about the role they had played in Obama’s victory – and because they knew, as my friend said the other day, that this was going to be “the party of our lifetime.”

For hundreds of thousands of African-Americans, the draw to DC was of course a profound one, and many of those who showed up did so in their grandest finery, even in the bitter chill of Tuesday morning. Their enthusiasm during the endless walks and Metro rides, their tears through the events of Sunday and Tuesday, the huge numbers who turned out to work in soup kitchens and on park cleanups during Monday’s Obama-mandated Day of Service, the thousands of charity and social workers who crammed into the JW Marriott hotel for a “People’s Inaugural Project” convention and then dominated the Neighborhood Ball … their resplendence in three-piece suits and chinchilla coats, putting to shame us whiteys who were shivering in bulky sweaters and ski caps. It was a sight to see.

For not-so-young, white Democrats like myself, making the trip to Washington felt like raising a flag on retaken ground — ground whose provenance had been long fought over, ground on which much had been lost already. We were there to say, we’re not just leaving it to this guy we elected – we’re taking this capital city, and this country, back ourselves. Much of Obama’s inaugural address, then, was directed at us: his sweeping repudiations of the Bush legacy; his signals to the world that the real America, the one they (and we) want and need, is once more in effect; and (in my favorite line) his announcement that petty boomer-era politics are over, that “the time has come to set aside childish things” and get down to the real work at hand.

Of course, there was plenty of uplift in Obama’s speech as well, and there were numerous attempts to reach across the aisle on security, religion and other issues. My friend John Heilemann wrote on New York magazine’s website that the address’s relative paucity of rhetorical high points may have been part of Obama’s effort to unify the nation behind him: It “may not have been his prettiest or most intoxicating. But it may wind up serving a higher, more noble purpose: contributing to a climate where it’s possible to get shit done.”

Evidence of the need to revamp America’s priorities and capabilities in all sorts of areas was abundant even as Obama discussed it on Tuesday. The stock market plunged again, and even on a day of near-universal hopefulness a Senate Republican, John Cornyn of Texas, took it upon himself to delay Hillary Clinton’s scheduled confirmation as Secretary of State for no discernable reason apart from spite. Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts couldn’t even get the oath of office right. And a shambolic “system” of security checkpoints kept thousands of inauguration ticket-holders stranded in a tunnel for hours before being they were access to the Mall.

The view from the cheap seatsThe organization wasn’t much better for the non-ticketed proletarians like myself, who were given exactly one point of access on the otherwise-fenced-off Constitution Avenue. The way in actually wasn’t too bad, but the way out was a massive crush of humanity. It’s a damn good thing everyone’s spirits were so high, because the bottleneck at Constitution and 18th Street could easily have turned tragic.

Still, the logistics of the whole thing turned off a significant number of would-be attendees – like the pair of African-American teenagers I encountered on the Metro as they were being accosted by an elegantly turned-out black woman who was fresh from the Mall. “Why weren’t you out there for Barack? He’s our man!” she asked indignantly.

“He’s not just our man,” said one of the teens, cynically, turning toward me. “A bunch of white people voted for him … You voted for him, right?”

After I responded affirmatively, the other kid said, “We were going to go down there, but when we saw how many people were in the streets we decided to go do something else.”

The woman was incredulous. “But this was a once-in-a-lifetime thing! You’ll never see anything like this again.”

The first kid laughed. “We see him every day. He’s on the TV, like, 24 hours a day. If I need to see him, I’ll just turn on CNN.”

I still can’t decide which side of this conversation made more sense. For purposes of self-justification, I think I have to go with the lady, but the guys certainly had a point. Here’s hoping things go so well over the next four years that Obama’s next inaugural can be a quieter affair – one for which those already jaded boys, who by then will be grown men, might drum up some enthusiasm. Heck, they even be able to get right up close to the stage.

Tags: , , ,

  • Ted
    Wonderful reporting from the front lines, Jon.

    As Mr. T might say, there's been a lot of jibba jabba about Obama's speech and how he didn't strike an exultant tone. From my vantage point of the speech (i.e., family room sofa) I was glad he didn't sugar coat anything. Things really suck right now and for him to talk about idealistic themes in a time of real crisis would have been wasted.
  • Obama is a quick learner, and the most important lesson he might have learned in the realm of public speaking is, never ever proclaim mission accomplished. The inauguration speech would have set a lot of traps against himself if it was full of victory laps.
  • Ted
    From what I read, the speech was drafted in November, but Obama revised a good bit of it in early January. It would be interesting to compare the November draft with the final one he delivered to see if there were any "victory lap" lines in there.
  • steve
    This is gonna be interesting, to say the least. From another who voted for him, I think a black president is a great thing, especially considering my still-healthy mother was well into her 30's when Jim Crow laws still ruled much of America. What an amazing turn of events, something I really think only America can pull off.

    On the other hand, the messiah-worship of this guy - especially from the mainstream media - is getting outta hand. Bottom line - he's a politician (Read: Be weary, be very weary) . He's already made some dubious decisions - from breaking his promise on campaign financing, to choosing Hillary as Sec State. Jon - I distinctly remember you agreeing that choosing Hillary as Sec State is a really dumb decision so I know we agree on that. He's a smart guy so I see his intentions - keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Genius. How could Hillary possibly run against him in 2012 after being in his cabinet? He just neutralized her, right? Not so fast Barack. Hillary is in business for one thing only, Hillary Inc. And Hillary Inc. comes with a lotta baggage called Bubba. I get the feeling he'll regret that choice. I'd be interested to know why you agree that it's bad as you made the comment but never explained your reasoning.

    And he announced that "petty boomer-era politics are over" and he'll "set aside childish things", as you wrote. So for chief of staff, he chooses a guy who once sent a dead fish to his opponents in the mail and has told Republicans publicly to "Fuck Off". Another bad choice, not exactly in the spirit of his message.

    Overall, I've always been clear that I hate most politicians as I feel it's human nature to be corrupted by power and politicians are ones who voluntarily dive into pools of power. Most succumb. But I have to vote for someone, so I voted for him. Unlike Rush, I wish him success and hope he doesn't succumb. For the most part, he's doing well but it's two days in for crying out loud. If the media keeps making him a demi-god and getting "tingles up their leg", I'm gonna have to get rid of my TV and limit my news exposure. Because bottom line, he's still a politician.
  • JonCummings
    I absolutely respect your attitude, Steve, but I have the same counsel for your cynicism that you have for the "messiah-worshipers": It's two days in. Let's see how things go before we get dismissive. I remember when Bush was "elected," how the general sense was "Sure, he's dumb as a post, but at least Cheney is a seasoned hand who will make the trains run on time." We all saw how that turned out.

    I DID think Hillary was a bad idea when those discussions were first happening, and I still have some concerns about a Clinton fiefdom. But I've come to temper my concerns about all things Obama with a recognition that the man has not screwed the pooch once in two years since announcing his candidacy. Not once. (OK, once, with the "bitter" comment, but it's not like he wasn't telling the truth.) If Obama and his people, who so far have done practically everything about as well as you could do it, think Hillary can be an asset at State, then by god let's see how she does.

    You know, Karl Rove was right about one instinct: The public's response to 9/11 gave conservatives a golden opportunity to open up the throttle and see how well their ideology could operate at full speed. Now we're picking up the pieces of THAT jalopy. Obama's election, and the astounding mess in which we currently find ourselves, has given us a chance to find out what his brand of moderate liberalism can do when unimpeded, and Obama obviously plans to take full advantage. My attitude is, let's see how the engine runs when he opens it up, and if it doesn't run well I'm sure the country will let him know about it.
  • steve
    We'll see Jon. You say he hasn't screwed the pooch yet. Maybe so, but he's made a lot of mistakes and broken promises. Yet his faithful worshipers don't seem to care, and the media is too busy pricking their legs with pins trying to get the feeling back. Just today Obama named the top Raytheon lobbyist as the #2 at the Pentagon - one day after he was glorified and praised for making - as the tingly-legged media put it - "tough new ethics laws banning lobbyists from serving in the administration". Well, that serves him well doesn't it? He gets the glory and praise of his worshipers by saying "I'm not like the evil Bushies, no lobbyists in my administration!!" CHANGE!!!! Oh, but I can make an exception. Well, again, he gets the best of both worlds - the praise for so-called change, and then he gets a lobbyist in his administration where the back deals happen. And they will happen. This is not change. This is called politics from a typical politician, and it's a dirty, deceitful game. Welcome to Washington Mr. Obama.

    I want to believe Jon. I voted for him. Least of 2 evils. I want to believe.

    As for Hillary, I'm not as much worried about the fact that she could play favorites with countries who give or have given millions to Bubba. Yes, that's a big concern and frankly worrisome. More of a concern is that, in my opinion, she will have her own agenda that will not necessarily be based on the best interests of our country and western democracies, but just as focused on positioning her to become president in 2012 or 2016. Sometimes those interest/decisions may converge and be the same. But sometimes they may not. And in those cases, I have no doubt Hillary will choose what's best for her first. It's her destiny to be the first female president, and if she has to wait 8 years she will, and she'll do anything/everything to make it happen. That's why Obama will regret making her Sec. State.

    Jon, I wanna believe. I wish him well. The broken campaign finance promise, the Raytheon lobbyist, Hillary, I don't know man. He ain't screwing pooches yet but he's starting to eye 'em up. We need to get him out of the kennel.

    I hope - since I follow your posts, that you will have at least a smidgen of objectiveness and be strong enough to criticize this guy when appropriate. Because the mainstream media (besides Fox) obviously won't. Not until the feeling comes back their collective leg.
  • standing_damaged
    I agree with Steve - the man is first and foremost, a politician.
    You do NOT take on the Clinton Machine and beat it and NOT be good at this stuff.
    BUT - there is one thing, ONE thing, about him that gives me some small sense of hope.I think just from watching that the man truly not only LOVES his fa,ily he LIVES for his family.Unlike Gollum W's bunch where total self absorption was not only the norm it was expected.
    I can't see Barack making moves that would do harm to those he cares for.
    Now while NO politician has ever honored our treatys, at least this man contacted the tribes and laid out a plan, that's a first. And he seems to enjoy people, but again, I think he truly loves his family.That above all gives me some hope about his motivations. Ive learned that one who lives for the people does better than one who lives for the wiindigo.
    And I was one of those who participated in the nationwide smudging as Gollum boarded the chopper for his ignoble skulk back to Midlands...and my coyote have mercy on Midlands for accepting that :P
blog comments powered by Disqus