Pop Politico: “It’s Not All a Dream”

Upon leaving office in 2000, Bill Clinton was keen on having a national conversation on race in America. He eventually did in 2004, but because he was a former president involved in this conversation and not a current president, it had very little effect on the political culture writ large. Neither of the two presidential candidates in 2004 even spoke about race in the narrative we’re used to (i.e., black and white), and with the current news of the “Under-30 crowd’s” intolerance of the use of race in a political campaign, one could easily argue that Martin Luther King’s “Dream” of a color-blind society is on its way to becoming a reality. In my own day-to-day, I’ve noticed that younger folks are more apt to have friends of different ethnicities and are very accepting of cultures that differ from their own. One could credit the growing emphasis on multicultural education in many school curriculums; however, the dry recitation of historical facts, sociological trends, or artistic creations is no substitute for a truly effective gateway into another culture: food.

My daughter and her cohort have benefited from educational events at her school that celebrate the rich diversity of human cultures through sampling of food. Granted, I live in an area where there is a large amount of ethnic diversity, but even among kids who consider themselves generically “white,” exploring the foods of other ethnic background leads them to be more accepting. When the richness of a culture can first be sampled using the taste buds, the nose, the hands, and the eyes, and the mind become more receptive to the more academic stuff. I’m not saying that food is the panacea for racism and intolerance in society, but it has done quite a lot to lessen the notion of difference as “Other.” That’s just academic-speak for saying our identities are often constructed through the differences in others. Depending on how secure your identity is, your view of the “Other” will fall along a spectrum of tolerance. Those whose identity is constructed with the view that the “Other” is something evil, and the antithesis of their being, will often act out to secure their identity by attempting to destroy, or severely wound the “Other.” At its most extreme, this acting out means violence that leads to death. However, the use of the “Other” to reinforce identity isn’t always an exercise in extreme and violent acts.

Politicians since the 1970s have gotten a lot of political mileage out of coded words when talking about race. Republicans, in general, have gotten the most bang out of that buck from the 1970s to 2000. Indeed, Republican consultants have been very creative, and in a Machiavellian way, quite brilliant in crafting code words that play on white resentment in the middle-to-lower-middle class. Richard Nixon talked about “The Silent Majority” as part of his attempt to battle the cultural and political changes demanded by African-Americans, women and gays. Ronald Reagan went after entitlement programs in the 1980s by talking about “Welfare Queens” who picked up their checks in brand new Cadillacs. George H.W. Bush used the face of Willie Horton as the Big Bad who would get out of prison and rape your wife if Democrats got into office. And operatives sympathetic to George W. Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign used John McCain’s adopted daughter (who was originally from Bangladesh) as the subject of a “push-poll” to derail his New Hampshire primary momentum. Calls were made before the South Carolina primary in which the “pollster” asked if McCain supporters would be more or less likely to vote for McCain if they knew he had fathered an illegitimate child who was black. That tactic worked, and McCain lost the South Carolina primary and nomination.

Well, here we are in 2008, and race, while still an issue in the minds of many voters, is not something candidates have to trot out to stir their base. Except for Huckabee’s idiotic statement after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto that we need to build a fence between the U.S. and Mexico to stop Islamic radicals with shoulder-armed rockets from Pakistan from entering the United States, race-baiting politics have been fairly quiet. It could be because of Obama’s win in Iowa, his close second place finish in New Hampshire, and the fact that his campaign stresses unity and not divisiveness – which is resonating among political independents and some Republicans.

I’m doubtful that we’ll ever reach the ideal sketched in King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, mostly because I’m not an idealist. However, I’ll take the constant striving to reach it over the alternative any day of the week. Also, from my (albeit limited) perspective of a family guy who lives in the ethnically diverse Bay Area, I think some of changes I’ve seen in the realm of racial and ethnic tolerance bodes well for the future – especially if the racially tolerant mindset of the so-called “Under-30 crowd” becomes politically dominant.

“Your Racist Friend” They Might Be Giants (Download)

Tags: , , ,

  • J
    I think food is a wonderful answer to racism, at least for people with a somewhat open mind. I know some folks (hell, I'm related to some folks) who can eat a lovely chinese meal, and still be as racist as ever. Sigh.
  • This touches on two things that have bothered me about all the candidates, both Republican and Democrat, in 2008. The first is that none of them have actually told me anything insofar as what they will do to make things happen if they're elected. Their platforms are the vaguest I've heard in years. All this leads to the conclusion that all they want is to be President and actual work-related ideas will not be formed until they are.

    I suppose that smacks of the "Well, d-uh!" variety, but while tag lines like hope, fresh, new, experienced, tough and fiscal are constantly tossed off, I'm more and more disappointed by the lack of statement of what each will do with their stated category.

    The second and most directly related argument is how racial and gender distinctions are driving Obama & Clinton's campaigns. I'm kind of offended by the "Vote for me because I'm black" and "Vote for me because I'm a woman" angles, and once clearer frontrunners are delineated, don't think Republicans won't jump on it.

    Mitt Romney spins his version, "Vote for me, I'm white and rich", as well but don't think that if he does make it to the top that he won't try to morph it into, "I have business savvy where my competitors just want your vote for being this classification. In my America, we don't objectify blacks and women like that!"

    It's the risk of running personality-based campaigns versus issues-based campaigns that intentions will rule the day. For myself, my vote is either between Barack or Hillary. If the Republicans win again, I feel it is virtually the end of the Democratic party, having seen the GOP screw up everything three times over and still not having enough ammunition to change it. That would be the end.

    I still wish I could vote for either of them based on what they will actually do for the country aside from their 'historical' existence within it.
  • I agree the marketing campaigns used by the frontrunners are devoid of substance. But if there was one thing Clinton learned in 1992 (and probably imparted to his fellow Dems) was this: if there's a Rep in office when you're running for Prez, don't talk about the particulars of what programs you'll promote because if you win and see how there' s no money to do much of anything, you'll be breaking campaign promises left and right.
  • True. Then there's the possibility of offering hints that zealous campaign runners can distort. The insiders call it "Atwatering", based on Lee Atwater turning Michael Dukakis' ideas into the infamous "Willie Horton Accusation".

    Still, I wish I could vote for someone with the stones to defy the works and give me actual hope and not just a bumper sticker with the word printed on it.
  • I hear ya! I guess when food is coupled with an event where you can learn more about cultures that aren't your own, it's a good thing. However, eating and then shitting on the people who just served you food (metaphorically speaking, of course) is just plain fucked up.
  • I would vote for that guy who is black on the right side and white on the left.

    Just remember, he has to be black on the *right*. :)
  • Ha!
  • Glenn Greenwald's got a great column up today about how the press has been talking about the McCain smear campaign, but has studiously avoided suggesting that *someone* (oh lord, who could it possibly be) was actually behind it. Everything is in the passive voice (i.e. "the voters of South Carolina let McCain be smeared").
  • I think in some way McCain has added to that passivity. Not only by his support of W in 2004, but also in begging for support from the very people whose views on race is anything but exemplary (i.e., Bob Jones).
  • Yeah, it was interesting watching a right-wing friend try to come up with an explanation of how McCain hadn't sold out when he jumped on board the Bushwagon in '04.
blog comments powered by Disqus