Popdose Roundtable: Radiohead, the World’s Biggest Underdogs

David Medsker February 25, 2011 21

Radiohead released their eighth album online last week. Perhaps you heard something about that. After we had a few days to absorb The King of Limbs (or however it is that people ingest Radiohead’s music these days), the Popdose brass assembled to discuss the album, and wound up discussing the band’s bulletproof status as tastemakers…and the possible lie behind that distinction.

Dw. Dunphy: First questions: “What is a newspaper album,” and “Why does the band feel they’ve made the first of them if two variations of the newspaper theme have already been done?”

David Lifton: Newspapers are dead. If they were really as hip as everybody says, they’d put out an “app album.”

Kelly Stitzel: So, I’m guessing that I’m the only one who didn’t go batshit crazy when the album was announced and I haven’t heard it. I used to love Radiohead, but now…I don’t know. I’m just completely uninterested. I bought In Rainbows and listented to it twice before deciding that I think I’m just over them. We all move on, I guess (although, I don’t think the Internet will ever not love them, based on everyone losing their damned minds over getting the record one day early). I respect the band and think they’re doing some interesting, innovative things when it comes to releasing their music. But the music itself just doesn’t grab me anymore. However, I did love the gorgeous solo album that Phil Selway put out last year.

Jeff Giles: Radiohead’s music has never done anything for me, and I haven’t listened to King of Limbs yet, either. I joked on Twitter that New Radiohead Day always makes me feel like Kyle Broflovski on Christmas.

Dunphy: You’re not the only one. I’m excited that the music is out there, but I’ve had the MP3 album for three days now and haven’t even unzipped it yet. While I would like to buy the big set, and might if my tax return isn’t destroyed, it hardly feels imperative. To me, I’ve crossed that line from being intrigued by every cryptic thing they say to just admitting they’re weird and moving on.

David Medsker: I’ve listened to it once, and I guess I can appreciate the album as art, but it’s one of the coldest, most emotionless albums I’ve ever heard. I felt absolutely nothing while it was on.

Lifton: That’s exactly how I’ve felt about everything I’ve heard them do since The Bends.

Dave Steed: I haven’t been a fan since The Bends, but I did listen to this one and it just sounds like two different albums to me. The first four being very experimental and the last four being more straightforward. It didn’t flow very well at all, and that first track is just simply unlistenable.

Medsker: So is this an ‘emperor’s new clothes’ thing, then, where everyone praises the band because they’re afraid to admit that they just don’t get it?

Lifton: Hasn’t that always been the case with them?

Mike Heyliger: Not really. I’ll happily admit that I don’t understand Radiohead when they’re obviously trying to be weird – Amnesiac and Hail to the Thief are tuneless and pretentious. That said, I love Thom Yorke’s voice, and when he works within a more conventional musical framework, the music is always good, and often great. I haven’t listened to the new album yet (although I did download it), but if it sounds anything like In Rainbows, I’ll be happy.

Medsker: I don’t think that’s always been the case. OK Computer and Kid A had a pulse, and even Amnesiac had “Pyramid Song” and “Knives Out.” Since then, though, it’s all felt bloodless to me, and having kids hasn’t helped. “Guys, wanna listen to Radiohead?” “Waaaaaaaaah!”

Giles: I think David’s broader point is that Radiohead is a peer pressure band — if you don’t like their music, it’s because you aren’t smart or cool enough to understand what they’re doing.

Medsker: Precisely. And now that you mention it, I stopped writing about them the moment I stopped “getting” them. I guess I caved to the peer pressure, too. I am ashamed.

Stitzel: So what happens when you are smart enough and cool enough to understand what they’re doing, and once liked it, but now you don’t care?

Giles: I think that means you’re old.

Lifton: Then you’re no longer cool or smart enough. Duh.

Stitzel: Or maybe you’re cooler and smarter than everyone else?

Heyliger: Eh. I understand where you guys are coming from. Just don’t think that way myself.

Lifton: I always think of that line from The Commitments: “You had that Frankie Goes To Hollywood record before anyone else, and you were the first to realize they were shite.”

Medsker: My favorite line from that movie.

There have to be other people out there who feel the same way about the band as some of us do, which begs the question: don’t you think it’s curious that they haven’t suffered a backlash yet? Why exactly are they so unimpeachable?

Jason Hare: Perhaps the way they’ve bucked the system has had a part in avoiding it.

Jack Feerick: I think that’s a big part of it, actually. They seem to be protective of their integrity, and they’ve never been reticent about how uncomfortable they are about the machinery of stardom and promotion (Meeting People Is Easy, anyone?), and their constant willingness to try new things and think outside the box resonates with a lot of people, even if their music doesn’t. And they do it without seeming unnecessarily confrontational or obnoxious or even particularly full of themselves.

From the start, they’ve projected an image of low self-esteem, which has the paradoxical effect of making them seem like perpetual underdogs even as they’ve become arguably the Biggest Band in the World. And people like an underdog, so they continue to root for Radiohead long after they would have turned on a more self-aggrandizing group.

It doesn’t hurt, either, that they’ve never really used their position to try to set themselves up as kingmakers or spokespeople. The attitude seems to be, We’re going to do our thing and make the records we want to make, and if you dig it, great. I happen to be one of those people who doesn’t dig it, but somehow I get the feeling that Radiohead themselves wouldn’t hold that against me.

I don’t like Radiohead as a product, but I respect the hell out of them. As opposed to somebody like, say, Sonic Youth, who I think push a lot of the same buttons as Radiohead artistically — and who were, in their day, a similar sort of peer-pressure/litmus-test band — but who come off as sneering, pretentious jerks.

Lifton: Our friend Beau Dure has just given his take on that concept.

Michael Fortes: I like Radiohead because they make music that exists on a plane of its own. I’m actually envious of the fact that they can make such obtuse records. I have to be in the right mood for them, and when I am, they might as well be the only band that exists. I think Jack nailed their appeal precisely. I’ve liked everything they’ve done since OK Computer, though I didn’t fully jump on board till Kid A, which was what sold me on the band for good. I probably won’t be able to hear King of Limbs for a while just because of all the other music I’m committed to right now, but suffice to say, I’m expecting some mind benders.

Dunphy: My thing is that The Bends and OK Computer are, to me, just great records that came out in a period of so many great records. Kid A and Amnesiac may not be great, but each has great songs. Hail to the Thief left me cold and while I admire In Rainbows and like some of the songs, I don’t go back to it much. At any rate, I’ve fallen out of love with the contrariness of the group. I get that they’re not really interested in pleasing me and, as artists, that’s their right. But I’m no longer put off by that stance either, so if they’re not interested in pleasing me, big deal.

That’s where the reverse psychology falls off and, I think in a lot of ways, their primary marketing tool in the past decade has been just that: reverse psychology on a large scale.

Chris Holmes: I saw the video for “Lotus Flower,” and can’t remember a damn thing about it other than poor Thom Yorke being afflicted with St. Vitus’ Dance. I didn’t get into Radiohead until OK Computer, which is still one of the great albums from the 2nd half of the century. I appreciate Kid A and enjoy a lot of it. Right after Amnesiac I just lost interest completely. They’ve been cupping their own farts for the better part of a decade, and I just can’t be bothered anymore.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • http://www.drcastrato.blogspot.com drcastrato

    Interesting that you had a roundtable discussion of an album none of you listened to, from a band that none of you liked since The Bends. I’d be interested to read an actual review if any of you bother to write one.

    I loved In Rainbows, not because it was free, or hyped, but because I really think it has some great tunes. I am therefore a little bummed by King of Limbs because it seems to have less melody and sturcture and is more groove based. A little boring, really. The final 3 songs do create a nice melancholy mood, so it’s not totally worthless.

  • http://www.drcastrato.blogspot.com drcastrato

    Interesting that you had a roundtable discussion of an album none of you listened to, from a band that none of you liked since The Bends. I’d be interested to read an actual review if any of you bother to write one.

    I loved In Rainbows, not because it was free, or hyped, but because I really think it has some great tunes. I am therefore a little bummed by King of Limbs because it seems to have less melody and sturcture and is more groove based. A little boring, really. The final 3 songs do create a nice melancholy mood, so it’s not totally worthless.

  • David_E

    “Cupping their own farts” is a wonderfully descriptive phrase, and I hope you never, ever use it again.

  • Anonymous

    Let’s clarify here – Steed did listen to the album as he stated above, and I have liked them since Kid A and still do. A point that may have been lost since it wasn’t clearly stated was that there was little advance warning on the release of this record. If there was, perhaps more of us would have listened by now. In essence, you’re not just getting a commentary on the band itself, you’re also getting a look at what happens when a band suddenly drops an album with little warning and bloggers feel torn between joining the conversation right away – since this is part of what we’re expected to do – and giving a thougtful review. Not saying it’s right or wrong, it just is.

  • http://www.bullz-eye.com Anonymous

    I listened to the album.

  • http://www.grayflannelsuit.net/ Chris Holmes

    But this isn’t presented as a group album review, so I’m not sure what the big deal is.

  • http://www.drcastrato.blogspot.com drcastrato

    Alright, so it’s not a group review, and maybe that’s what I was expecting. But the introductory paragraph does mention that you had a few days to absorb King of Limbs and basically sets up the piece to be about the album. I generalized about NO ONE listening to it, but 5 of the 11 writers admit not listening to it, and most of the others don’t comment on anything specific to the music. I am not saying this piece is without merit – you are free to praise or condemn Radiohead for their image and attitude. It just seemed like a lot of people showed up to book club without having read the book.

  • BryanA.

    a bunch of douchebags who don’t get radiohead. sweet.

  • http://www.popdose.com Michael Parr

    Oh, look … the predictable internet troll whose only defense is to call us douchebags, and say we don’t get it. Even sweeter!

  • http://www.bullz-eye.com Anonymous

    Let’s see: ‘you didn’t listen to the album’ + ‘douchebags.’ That spells Comment Section Cliche BINGO!

  • http://www.popdose.com jefito

    I was guilty of chiming in without listening, but in my defense, the points I was trying to help illustrate weren’t really about the album, but about the cult that surrounds the band. I understand your consternation, but I saw this more as an open discussion than a review.

  • Andrew Moore

    But the album was released a week ago. I would have thought it a minor task to set aside 37 minutes to listen to album that you were going to have a roundtable conversation about. It seems that it was an excuse to air opinions about how wilfully obtuse and indifferent the band are to their listeners without listening to a minute of their latest release to confirm that opinion. It seems a particularly odd stance for a music blog to take.

    I’ll hold my hand up and admit they’re a band that have tended to exasperate me at times and the default praise from over earnest fans has left me feeling cold but I really enjoyed this album. I was never a fan of IDM which seemed to be the overriding influence on Kid A and I always think if you’re putting intelligent before something it usually equates to pretentious but I am enjoying what has been happening at the more abstract end of dubstep and there is some wonderfully emotive music being made by the likes of Scuba, Martyn and Burial – all music that seems to be inspiring the latest Radiohead release. I know that sort of dance music is probably outside the sphere of this blog but you should check it out sometime.

    I wouldn’t have any problem with the overriding crtitcism of the album if people actually listened to it and I’ve always enjoyed reading through this blog but man that was one lazy piece of music criticism. Maybe you should have a weekly section that is ‘Music I haven’t listened to but I know is going to suck’.

  • BryanA.

    well, you are, and you don’t. Radiohead takes multiple listens, a roundtable discussion where the people discussing haven’t even listened to the album has no credibility, at all. this was rambling bullshit. if you’re gonna criticize something like radiohead, it helps to have a little intelligence.

  • BryanA.

    well, you are, and you don’t. Radiohead takes multiple listens, a roundtable discussion where the people discussing haven’t even listened to the album has no credibility, at all. this was rambling bullshit. if you’re gonna criticize something like radiohead, it helps to have a little intelligence.

  • BryanA.

    well, you are, and you don’t. Radiohead takes multiple listens, a roundtable discussion where the people discussing haven’t even listened to the album has no credibility, at all. this was rambling bullshit. if you’re gonna criticize something like radiohead, it helps to have a little intelligence.

  • http://www.popdose.com jefito

    That’s a fair point, and in defense I’ll only say that the conversation just *started* — it wasn’t like we made an all-hands announcement and told the staff that we would be talking about the new Radiohead record on a given day. What you’re reading is really just a transcript of people’s feelings about the band/first impressions of the album. It’s a conversation starter, not an analysis, and that’s why we didn’t bill it as a CD review. That’s probably too fine a distinction.

  • Old_Davy

    Radiohead is this generation’s Kate Bush or Laurie Anderson. The kids claim to like them because all the “cool kids” like them, and by God, I want to be cool too! (“peer pressure band” = bull’s eye.) But if you really listen, it is pretentious BS. I respect a band or artist that can do what they want and still be successful, but it doesn’t mean that I will enjoy listening to them. Radiohead is much more about the excitement the band generates from their publicity than the music itself, while their music is much more about ideas than melody.

    I did not listen to King of Limbs, but did see the video for “Lotus Flower”. I couldn’t stand to watch it past the first 30 seconds, (Thom dances like a county fair chicken when the electricity gets turned up a notch too high) but did listen to the tune until the end. I thought it was pretty boring, tuneless and rambling.

    Saying this, I seem to like bands that critics claim to be Radiohead rip-offs – Mew comes to mind – but then, I also liked Stone Temple Pilots a hell of a lot more than Pearl Jam.

    By the way, I really enjoyed this round table discussion and encourage you to do more of them.

  • Russ

    I don’t “get” Radiohead. And I’m happy that I don’t. If I did, I might be a smarmy douchebag like their biggest fans.

    I thought Pablo Honey had a couple decent songs, and I like The Bends a lot. I tried listening to OK Computer multiple times and never made it through the whole thing ever. I just don’t like anything on it. I like Knives Out and maybe Bodysnatchers.

    I don’t want to denigrate anyone’s tastes, music either strikes you or it doesn’t. But if a band has to be “gotten” then they suck and their fans are trumpeting something other than their music. And I’ve simply been around too long to give a shit about anything other than the music anymore.

  • Anonymous

    Number one, I take particular offense to referring to my colleagues as douchebags. I can produce plenty of character witnesses to contradict your claim (for most of us, anyway). Number two, if you read more closely, you would see that several of us not only *do* get Radiohead, we actually like a lot of the music they produce. Number three, “wound up discussing the band’s bulletproof status as tastemakers” is the key phrase in this post’s opening paragraph, and as Jeff has pointed out numerous times in the comments section here, this post was *not* intended as a review of the album.

    Before you start hurling pejoratives at people you don’t even know, please think twice and re-read what you’re commenting about. We do what we do with good intentions, and if you don’t like it, that’s all well and good, but at least show some respect. And if you can’t do that, you’re welcome to hurl your pejoratives somewhere else.

  • Anonymous

    Now that I’ve had a chance to listen to the album, I have to say I agree with your take on it. But I’m also waiting for it to unfold over the next few months. Sometimes those groove-based records don’t reveal their true beauty for some time (I think of the first track of Miles Davis’ Get Up With It as a prime example – took me a good while to finally “get” it, even though the rest of the album grabbed me right away). I’m hoping that by the time the ‘newspaper edition’ of the album arrives, my feelings will be a little different, but for now I’m of the mind that it’s way, way less engaging than In Rainbows or Hail to the Thief, which I love quite a lot and are my ‘go to’ records when I’m in the mood for Radiohead.

  • Anonymous

    My main purpose for showing up was to add some balance to the overall perspective, and since the album itself wasn’t really being discussed anymore by the time I jumped in, I didn’t feel any shame in not having listened to it yet. But I would agree that the introductory paragraph could have been more clearly stated.