Random Play: “Born This Way”

Robin Monica Alexander January 18, 2011 6

I am almost too overwhelmed with emotion to write coherently about my new favorite blog. My instantaneous love for this simple, eloquent project is difficult to explain, much like my love for the community it is intended to represent. The purpose of Born This Way is simple: to put to rest the idea that sexual orientation can be chosen by encouraging gay, lesbian, bisexual and/or transgendered people to share photos of themselves as children in which they feel their identity is already established and apparent.

Like the “It Gets Better” videos and children’s book My Princess Boy, this project just naturally makes anyone who cares about equality and the human spirit feel awesome. As its founder acknowledges, it runs the risk of “furthering stereotypes” about queer people; specifically, that gay males are always “effeminate” and gay females are always “butch.” But he feels it’s worth it in order to counter the argument that gayness can be denied, suppressed or changed. If we see images of kids acting “different”—manifesting behavior outside of their “normal” gender role long before they can possibly have been influenced by some alleged gay agenda—maybe we will finally come to accept gender and sexual fluidity as part of the natural order. In my case, he’s preaching to the choir, since I not only merely accept queer people and culture, I honor and adore them. I don’t identify as gay (I’m not trying hard enough, I suppose), but I honestly feel as if my life would be sadder and less rich without gay people, places and things in it. And I don’t mean simply because I really like disco and feminism.

When you look at the pictures at Born This Way, you will see a lot of familiar gay themes: males in dresses, wigs, and makeup; females with short, shaggy hair in overalls; boys holding Barbie dolls and girls getting ready to play softball. They are accompanied by remarkably insightful, usually touching, and frequently hilarious stories of feeling different, or sad, or happy, or fabulous. Some express wonder that their parents didn’t catch on until they came out as teens or adults, while others admit that Mom and/or Dad clearly knew before they themselves did. Both the tales that could be accused of playing right into homophobes’ hands (the lesbian who recalls “trying to get the other little girls…to go behind the shed with me and play house.  I was always the daddy”) and those that might stop them in their tracks (the gay man who “like[s] to build things…while lip synching to Lady Gaga”) fairly burst off the screen with the force of truth.

The subjects of the pics posted so far (the blog just launched on January 9) represent an amazing range of ages, from folks born in the 1940s to those who are still in their teens, and include people of every ethnicity, from around the U.S. and the world. The “markers” of their difference can be as subtle as a tilt of the head or a cautious smile (or lack thereof) or as obvious as jazz hands or a feather boa. There are certain specific generational commonalities, some predictable, some less so (who knew that so many lads were lusting after Grizzly Adams in the late ’70s?), but across the board, the pictures and their attached stories communicate purity and innocence; the children we see may or may not yet be aware of sexuality per se, but their individuality and their passions shine through. From the tween girl rocking her Sporty Spice Halloween costume to the little fellow doing the ironing in a tutu, the message is clear: even a child knows the difference between natural and unnatural. The former is what happens when parents, siblings, teachers and neighbors allow kids to do and be whatever gives them joy; the latter is what we get when politics, religion, and plain old meanness conspire to take that joy away.

Okay, so why should those of us not “in the life” care about any of this? Is it weird, or unseemly, or even (heaven forfend!) politically incorrect for a heterosexual woman to feel such a profound attachment to the culture of gay pride? At risk of being pigeonholed as just another sad and desperate “hag,” I declare my eternal solidarity with my queer sisters and brothers (and most of the time, they’re nice enough to accept it with an indulgent smile). This week, we celebrate the legacy of Dr. King, who famously looked forward to a time when children would “not be judged by the color of their skin.” Despite the fact that King’s daughter, also a minister, has actively worked to undermine the gay rights movement, I feel that he himself would additionally ask us not to judge people by the limpness of their wrists, or the butchness of their hairstyles, or their fondness for showtunes, or the pronoun by which they refer to their life partners. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere, and whenever someone tries to tell you that one kind of prejudice is “different” from another kind, well, watch out: he may have a bridge to sell you.  As someone who has been “different” in all sorts of ways—some visible, some less so—since birth, I celebrate Born This Way in honor of Dr. King…and Harvey Milk…and Virginia Woolf…and Geoff.

Enhanced by Zemanta
  • http://thevitaminkid.blogspot.com autodidact

    I thought identical twin studies have shown that twins raised apart show a marked divergence in sexual preferences, whereas those raised together are much more congruent. This is not true of skin color, or eye color. So then environment plays a major role, while genetics may set up a predisposition to certain environmental triggers. Like cancer. But it is certainly not a “born with” proposition as with truly genetic traits.

    There is no denying that homosexuality is natural. Violence seems to be natural — we see it everywhere in the human and animal kingdoms. Many natural things are undesirable. Homosexual behavior is immoral, and people do have the choice not to engage in it, just as I have the choice to engage or not engage in immoral behaviors I am attracted to. One cannot choose not to have blue eyes. One can choose not to live this lifestyle.

    The blog may make you feel good for some odd reason, but I believe it is based on a distortion of the scientific reality. Homosexuality goes against our traditional religious morals, which many of us believe are based on very sound and time-tested principles. As a Christian, I believe that God defined as sin those behaviors which would tend to harm us and/or harm society. This is our objection to homosexual behavior.

    If you want to learn more about the very real harm that homosexuals do to themselves by putting their “orientation” (or compulsion or attraction) into action, as well as the scientific studies I alluded to, I suggest you look up the book Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, by Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, who as a brilliant scientist (he was mentored by Nobel-winning physicist Richard Feynman) details the scientific work that has been done, and as a psychiatrist can describe the medical and psychological side of this troubling problem. Well, you should look this up if your not afraid of exposing yourself to a fact-based series of arguments that oppose your already well-established predispositions.

  • Krh6626

    Homosexuality is, by and large, a consensual act that harms no one. Thus, it cannot be compared to violence. If it were comparable to violence, remember that war is just about the most violent thing humans can participate in, yet American evangelicals seem pretty supportive of violent solutions to what they believe are tenable threats. In this case, is violence still “amoral”? If there are situations where violence is moral and necessary, couldn’t the same be said for homosexuality? Try again.

    But before you do, don’t forget that as a Christian your “sound and time-tested principles” include the condemnation of those who do not believe that Christ was anything more than a man (John 3:16-3:18), and they include Jews, Muslims, and any other being who has led a caring, lawful life (and they are legion).

    You already believe everyone is going to hell, gay or not. What concerns me is that those who agree with your statements also believe our current government should enact policy based on what your religion – born a thousand years ago – identifies as a “sin.” And a sin that doesn’t even make the top ten! Do you believe the government should put on the books that we should obey our parents? What if your parents are homosexuals? Tricky!

    You cannot scientifically prove what is moral and what is not moral. It was once immoral to walk into church with a bare head. It was once immoral to marry someone from another race. It was once immoral (and to some, still is) to get a divorce, to have sex before marriage, etc. Morals are cultural trends. In general, it has worked out for humans to have a baseline moral of not harming others, but as mentioned above this really doesn’t include non-traditional sex lives of a consensual nature.

    I haven’t read his books, but I do recall Dr. Jeffrey Satinover is a religious man and a big name amongst “Bible Code” crackers. I assume you are serious about reaching the Rationalists with your name tossing of Feynman, but Feynman was an “avowed atheist,” in his own words. This simple switch of perspective changes everything about the way a scientist approaches reason.

    Try again.

  • http://www.facebook.com/djpaulv Paul V. Spins

    Robin!
    I can not even to begin to tell you how moved and amazed I am by what you wrote about my blog. THANK YOU SO MUCH! In a way, I want to keep MY opinions and explanations of “Born This Way” to a minimum, so as not to taint or influence the purity or simplicity of the postings – as I say, they speak for themselves. But you really hit a homerun with YOUR description. Much love!!! Paul V.

  • DumpsterBaby

    You Sir, disgust me. You and your holier-then-thou BS. Hiding your prejudice behind your “religious values” You should be ashamed. It’s people like you that make me ashamed to be an American. If you don’t like gays, that’s your prerogative, but be honest, don’t pull that “God told me so crap”. Gays cannot help who they are…any more than a Priest can help being attracted to little boys. You say they should just “not act” on their urges…ok, so from now on, you cannot have any sex with Women..at all. See how happy you are with that.

  • http://www.rftmusic.com Annie Zaleski

    “As a Christian, I believe that God defined as sin those behaviors which would tend to harm us and/or harm society. This is our objection to homosexual behavior.”

    So, answer me this: When’s the last time you personally were harmed directly by a homosexual? I’d like a specific, detailed answer, please. Go on. I’m waiting.

    “If you want to learn more about the very real harm that homosexuals do to themselves by putting their “orientation” (or compulsion or attraction) into action…”

    Am also curious how what people do in their own private homes/places of residence has to do with you and/or your business. And/or how you are harmed by the actions of others when you’re not actually there.

  • http://www.facebook.com/djpaulv Paul V. Spins

    I prefer to follow science, reality, and facts – not fiction, lies, and repression wrapped in the guise of ANY religion.

    If there’s any harm in this world, it is what is spewing out of the mouths of people just like you.