<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Three Strike Rule: &#8220;Reaper&#8221; (CW)</title> <atom:link href="http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/</link> <description>your daily dose of pop culture</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: JohnHughes</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-50309</link> <dc:creator>JohnHughes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 23:32:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-50309</guid> <description>I think it actually DID suffer from the &quot;Monster of the Week&quot; problem with its first few episodes.  I know I gave it 3 or 4 chances until I realized I was just watching the same show over and over with different names.  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s improved since then, but that was a rough start and they lost me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it actually DID suffer from the &#8220;Monster of the Week&#8221; problem with its first few episodes.  I know I gave it 3 or 4 chances until I realized I was just watching the same show over and over with different names.  I&#39;m sure it&#39;s improved since then, but that was a rough start and they lost me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zack</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-50308</link> <dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 22:21:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-50308</guid> <description>What&#039;s funny is that I disagree with a lot of the subtleties that I think you&#039;re reading into the show...but I still love it and watch it faithfully.  Sock&#039;s dream sequence with Gladys was one of the funnies things I&#039;ve seen on TV in ages.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s funny is that I disagree with a lot of the subtleties that I think you&#39;re reading into the show&#8230;but I still love it and watch it faithfully.  Sock&#39;s dream sequence with Gladys was one of the funnies things I&#39;ve seen on TV in ages.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnHughes</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-42292</link> <dc:creator>JohnHughes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:32:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-42292</guid> <description>I think it actually DID suffer from the &quot;Monster of the Week&quot; problem with its first few episodes.  I know I gave it 3 or 4 chances until I realized I was just watching the same show over and over with different names.  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s improved since then, but that was a rough start and they lost me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it actually DID suffer from the &#8220;Monster of the Week&#8221; problem with its first few episodes.  I know I gave it 3 or 4 chances until I realized I was just watching the same show over and over with different names.  I&#39;m sure it&#39;s improved since then, but that was a rough start and they lost me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JohnHughes</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-23722</link> <dc:creator>JohnHughes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:32:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-23722</guid> <description>I think it actually DID suffer from the &quot;Monster of the Week&quot; problem with its first few episodes.  I know I gave it 3 or 4 chances until I realized I was just watching the same show over and over with different names.  I&#039;m sure it&#039;s improved since then, but that was a rough start and they lost me.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it actually DID suffer from the &#8220;Monster of the Week&#8221; problem with its first few episodes.  I know I gave it 3 or 4 chances until I realized I was just watching the same show over and over with different names.  I&#39;m sure it&#39;s improved since then, but that was a rough start and they lost me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zack</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-23721</link> <dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:21:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-23721</guid> <description>What&#039;s funny is that I disagree with a lot of the subtleties that I think you&#039;re reading into the show...but I still love it and watch it faithfully.  Sock&#039;s dream sequence with Gladys was one of the funnies things I&#039;ve seen on TV in ages.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s funny is that I disagree with a lot of the subtleties that I think you&#39;re reading into the show&#8230;but I still love it and watch it faithfully.  Sock&#39;s dream sequence with Gladys was one of the funnies things I&#39;ve seen on TV in ages.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: slappyfrog</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-23720</link> <dc:creator>slappyfrog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:42:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-23720</guid> <description>Love love love love this show.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great characters, witty dialog and don&#039;t forget Gladys at the DMV!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love love love love this show.</p><p>Great characters, witty dialog and don&#39;t forget Gladys at the DMV!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WHarrisBullzEye</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-23719</link> <dc:creator>WHarrisBullzEye</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:40:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-23719</guid> <description>I actually interviewed Tyler Labine (Sock) for Bullz-Eye last week, and when I commented on the show&#039;s opposition - &quot;American Idol&quot; and &quot;Lost&quot; - and asked him if he was optimistic about a second season, he surprised me by saying that, yes, he actually WAS.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Yeah, Iâ€™m definitely hopeful, especially because of the fact that weâ€™ve been told that the expectation for finishing the season is not in ratings, really, right now. Weâ€™re not banking on huge ratings because this season has beenâ€¦itâ€™s sort of been a turbulent year, obviously, and the network just wants to see how we finish up the season with the story, whether they like it a lot, whether the critics like it, which is really important. And weâ€™re routinely one of the top three or four most downloaded shows on iTunes the day after we air, and the DVD buzz is pretty huge for the show.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So there you go.  We&#039;ll see what actually happens, but at least the one of the stars is hopeful...and they&#039;re usually the ones most willing to fear the worst.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually interviewed Tyler Labine (Sock) for Bullz-Eye last week, and when I commented on the show&#39;s opposition &#8211; &#8220;American Idol&#8221; and &#8220;Lost&#8221; &#8211; and asked him if he was optimistic about a second season, he surprised me by saying that, yes, he actually WAS.</p><p>&#8220;Yeah, Iâ€™m definitely hopeful, especially because of the fact that weâ€™ve been told that the expectation for finishing the season is not in ratings, really, right now. Weâ€™re not banking on huge ratings because this season has beenâ€¦itâ€™s sort of been a turbulent year, obviously, and the network just wants to see how we finish up the season with the story, whether they like it a lot, whether the critics like it, which is really important. And weâ€™re routinely one of the top three or four most downloaded shows on iTunes the day after we air, and the DVD buzz is pretty huge for the show.&#8221;</p><p>So there you go.  We&#39;ll see what actually happens, but at least the one of the stars is hopeful&#8230;and they&#39;re usually the ones most willing to fear the worst.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eric S.</title><link>http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/comment-page-1/#comment-23718</link> <dc:creator>Eric S.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:56:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/reaper-cw/#comment-23718</guid> <description>This show is great, but I agree it kind of lost its momentum with the writers&#039; strike.  It doesn&#039;t help that the CW doesn&#039;t know how to market this show.  It&#039;s not horror or Sci-Fi, it&#039;s primarily a comedy.  As for the move to Thursdays, I wasn&#039;t even aware of new episodes until I caught the beginning of one after a &quot;Smallville&quot; I had recorded.  This show may be better off on a cable network that knows how to do &quot;quirky&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This show is great, but I agree it kind of lost its momentum with the writers&#39; strike.  It doesn&#39;t help that the CW doesn&#39;t know how to market this show.  It&#39;s not horror or Sci-Fi, it&#39;s primarily a comedy.  As for the move to Thursdays, I wasn&#39;t even aware of new episodes until I caught the beginning of one after a &#8220;Smallville&#8221; I had recorded.  This show may be better off on a cable network that knows how to do &#8220;quirky&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Theme:              ddf04
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 55/70 queries in 0.047 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: popdose.com @ 2012-02-11 02:04:23 -->
