Rock Court: Huey Lewis (& the News) Edition

rockcourt

For the prosecution: Jon Cummings

Dudes and dudettes of the jury,

Before I wrap up my case against the defendant – that man over there with the plaid sportcoat, golf pants and bad haircut, the one who has refused to wipe that shit-eating grin off his face at any point during these proceedings (or, indeed, during his entire career) – I’d like to congratulate each of you for being selected to pass judgment on the serial crimes committed against rock ‘n’ roll by this defendant, Mr. … Lewis? (Actually, his given name is Hugh Cregg the Third.)

RS430~Huey-Lewis-Rolling-Stone-no-430-September-1984-Posters[1]Take a look around you. You, my friends, are the soul of Popdose’s vast readership, the very backbone of music-blog culture! And that makes you – let’s face it – cool. Hip. Happenin’. You are steeped in music history and well-versed in the loose morals and bad attitudes that make rock ‘n’ roll what it is and always has been, at its best: Cutting-edge. Rebellious. Dangerous. You know perfectly well which music lives up to those standards, and which does not. You know which artists have provided major contributions, and you know – perhaps more than anyone – that with a fat recording contract and a complacent rubber-stamp from radio, a swill merchant like Mr. Lewis can do enormous damage to this music, this culture, this … industry of cool in which we are all invested.

And make no mistake – the crimes we’re discussing here are not trivial ones. The defense has tried to convince you that Mr. Lewis was just making “good-time music,” having fun, giving the people what they want. But the fact is that Mr. Lewis and his band, having built their career by stringing together a nice series of hits while presenting themselves as a bunch of regular Joes – a run-of-the-mill bar band made good – proceeded to engage in years of shameless, chart-topping hackery.

They repeated themselves with ever more tired and poorly written paeans to beach music (“If This Is It,” “Stuck with You” [download], “Doing It All for My Baby”); they interpreted a ponderous Bruce Hornsby song with the brain-dead quality of a George Bush speech (“Jacob’s Ladder”); and, eventually, they drained every last bit of soul out of a series of R&B classics (“It’s Alright,” “Some Kind of Wonderful,” “Cruisin’”) in a fashion reminiscent of a latter-day Pat Boone (or an only slightly more authentic Bruce Willis).

You have heard the prosecution witness Mojo Flucke, who so succinctly summarized Mr. Lewis’ historical context that I will repeat his exact words: “James Brown launched a thousand rappers and funky, dance-mixing DJs. Elvis inspired an even greater number of rock and country acts. The Beatles still are being imitated, half a century later. But Huey Lewis is so lame, so far only Ray Parker Jr. has bothered to rip him off.” Questions about the creative lineage of “I Want a New Drug” and “Ghostbusters” aside, there is little dispute that Mr. Lewis’ tangible legacy has failed to extend much beyond the occasional corporate holiday-party gig, his continued presence on oldies radio, and infrequent appearances of his aforementioned shit-eating grin on our TV screens in bad movies (Duets) and Reba McEntire videos.

However, the psychic scars engendered by Mr. Lewis’ offenses are deeper and longer-lasting. Indeed, Mr. Lewis’ most profound transgression – the one for which The People are requesting lifetime banishment from the rock pantheon – was his unforgiveable betrayal of the one principle that true fans of rock ‘n’ roll hold most dear: that our beloved music is superior, more important … cooler than the music preferred by lesser mortals, and that the music in turn makes us cooler because we listen to it. Mr. Lewis – or is it Mr. Cregg the Third? – spat in our faces when he wrote, performed and climbed to the top of the charts with a “rock” song, replete with crunchy, garage-band guitar chords, that advised us it is somehow “Hip to be Square” (download). Here is what he wrote:

“Now I’m playin’ it real straight and yes, I cut my hair / You might think I’m crazy but I don’t even care … I like my bands in business suits, I watch them on TV / I’m working out most every day and watching what I eat … It’s not too hard to figure out, you see it every day / And those that were the farthest out have gone the other way / You see them on the freeway, it don’t look like a lot of fun / But don’t you try and fight it, an idea whose time has come…”

With every word … every putrid, establishment-hugging phrase … Mr. Lewis attempted to sap the lifeblood from our rock ‘n’ roll hearts, to strike at the very essence of what makes our music so powerful. “Hip to be Square” was music for the accountant in the back room at that so-called “music club” in which you never would have been caught dead during the ’80s, the one that still booked the Lettermen and Bobby Vinton and Bobby Goldsboro. It was music for Marilyn Quayle, who would later say of her generation, “Not everyone demonstrated, dropped out, took drugs, joined in the sexual revolution or dodged the draft.” Worst of all, “Hip to be Square” was wildly popular, forcing all of us to question the sturdiness of our most cherished attitudes and requiring us to wonder – not for the last time – Is This What Rock ‘n’ Roll Is Coming To?

Lads and ladettes of the jury, I am now a 43-year-old man. My hair is no longer as long as it once was, nor as thick. My hearing is half shot from too many occasions in which I stood in too close a proximity to amplifiers that emitted too many decibels. I live in a nice suburban home with an amazing wife and a couple of kids, and I don’t lack for much of anything. And yes, I frequently find myself on those freeways Mr. Lewis mentioned.

I am 43 – which means that, at the time Mr. Lewis was perpetrating these crimes against rock music and its fans, I was a 20-year-old college music critic who blew every bit of my discretionary cash at the record store and frequently ditched my studies to head into the city and see one more show. With all of my own heart and soul, I rejected Mr. Lewis’ betrayals of our value system when I was a young man. And we must – all of us, no matter what our ages – still reject it today.

We may get older, and many of us may come to live “establishment” lives, but we must never give up our white-knuckle grasp on the coolness of youth. We must not go gently into that good night of dull conversation and Branson visits and Il Divo fandom, and we must never say to our spouses anything so simultaneously self-loathing and insulting as “Yes, it’s true – I’m so happy to be stuck with you.” And we must never – ever – concede the possibility that it might be “Hip to be Square.”

You can stop this travesty right here, right now. Look within yourself, find your own inner cool, and convict this defendant for his crimes against your music, your self-image, your very being. The prosecution rests.

For the defendant: Anthony Kuzminski

Ladies and gents of the jury:

huey_lewis[1]I’d like to start my rebuttal with four words: “The industry of cool.” Let me repeat that — “the industry of cool.” Your prosecutor likes throwing phrases like this around when, in reality, what he deems cool and what actually is are vastly dissimilar. Music has never been about fads or fashions, but how it makes you feel. The prosecution is trying to poison your mind against your true inner feelings. Hey, I like feeling cool too, but can you honestly say you don’t have a single bone in your body that shivers and shakes when an absolute pop tune comes on the radio? I know many of you want to love TV on the Radio — but in reality, you listen to Huey Lewis far more often.

Huey Lewis and the News was a band that, for a lot of reasons, should never have become a thriving machine of pop hits. They didn’t fit in with any fad or fashion, and were playing music that went out of vogue two decades before their first Top 40 hits. They didn’t have a look others imitated, and their sound was inimitably unpretentious. For this, they deserve immeasurably more acclaim than your prosecutor would ever dream of giving them. Make no mistake; they were one of the biggest bands of the 1980s for a reason. They simply played to their strengths and fashioned music that wouldn’t have been out of place in the 1950s. In fact, I see them as the descendents of Bill Haley and His Comets. Ultimately, what makes the music of Huey Lewis (& the News) so endearing is that they were true to themselves.

If you listen to “Workin’ for a Livin’,” you won’t hear any out of date synthesizers. There’s nothing on that recording except tenacious rock n’ roll with a concentration on nostalgic guitars, an ever-steady rhythm section, a riotous harmonica solo and an organ that flourishes but never dominates the song. Does this sound like a recipe for success in 1982? If you go to their 2001 release, Plan B, specifically “The Rhythm Ranch,” you’ll hear the same exact band. Like most of their recorded output, the strength of the songs came through in a combative drive where the group never let anyone outshine another. They weren’t going to let anyone tell them what was hip or cool, they merely created the music they wanted to create. Each and every one of the members are all integral pieces to the overall success of the band.

Their Sports and Fore! albums had 10 Top 40 hits between them (nine of them Top 10 hits, no less) and while people may not deem these records cool today, can you really find anything wrong with them? As mentioned previously, here is a band that took a simple rhythm, blues and rock template and expanded on it. They weren’t chasing Michael Jackson’s success and weren’t trying to be like Bruce Springsteen. They were simply, then and today, a damn good little rock n’ roll band who wrote some darn good tunes and had a bit of good fortune along the way. The fact that they became as commercially triumphant as they did is an afterthought and partly pure chance. I remember hearing these songs on the radio before I was even interested in music, and when I did eventually get around to buying these albums, songs like “The Heart of Rock N’ Roll,” “I Want A New Drug,” “Stuck With You,” and yes, the aforementioned “Hip to Be Square” sound like you have always known them. Why is this? Their influence comes from the Hank Williams, Buddy Holly, Elvis Presley, Jerry Lee Lewis, Les Paul and other godfathers of rock. As for the prosecution’s claims of repeating themselves, I don’t agree with it, but if you’re going to throw Mr. Lewis under the bus, why don’t we throw the Ramones and every other blues artist while we’re at it? A guilty verdict against Huey Lewis and the News may as well be one for the ones who created, forged and brought this art form to the masses.

I love danger as much as the next guy. I love it when rock n’ roll creeps around the fringes of society, but in the beginning were the Beatles all that dangerous? No. Was Buddy Holly? No. Does that take away from their infinite talent? No way. Allmusic sums up Huey Lewis and the News perfectly: “Huey Lewis & the News were a bar band that made good with their simple, straightforward rock & roll.” They never tried to be the biggest band on the planet, or even the best. They simply made music they loved and you can’t blame them if people followed. Look at Small World from 1988. I’ll be the first to admit it isn’t their strongest album, but they simply did what they wanted. Even if you detest the album, I dare you to listen to “Old Antone’s” (download) and not be entranced by their four-chord rock n’ roll spell. There is homage in the track, joy in the performance and the very spirit of rock n’ roll in the performances. For further examples of their nostalgic rhythm and pop sensibilities on display, listen to “Don’t Look Back” (download), from 1991’s underrated Hard at Play. The shuffle beat sounds vociferous, the band is firm and a chorus readymade for the radio. Is it full of clichés? Sure it is, but that is exactly what makes the song so damn irresistible. If this song proves to be too much, check out the honky tonk goodiness of “Time Ain’t Money,” from the same record. This is a band following their own muse, not being concerned with being cool or hip and because of this defiant attitude, it makes them cool in their own right. Pretending or thinking you’re cool is one thing, but not giving a rat’s ass about what people think about you? That’s truly cool.

Huey Lewis and the News enjoyed tremendous success over a handful of years, and when the sun stopped shining as brightly, they didn’t chase it, they didn’t conform and they didn’t try to be something they weren’t. They released a covers collection in 1994 (Four Chords & Several Years Ago), the height of the grunge explosion. Not exactly something that screams commercialism. This is a band that has continued to tour and enjoy their lives. If there’s anything that the defendant is guilty of, it’s not being more active musically. However, I admire them for not turning into a miserable cash-in band that charges $100 for nosebleed seats, selling their music to commercials and pretending they’re still at the top of the musical heap. In fact, in the 1980s, the Coca-Cola company approached them about using some of their music in commercials. This would have brought the band an eight-figure payday — but they walked away from it. The only other major artist to turn down that kind of money is Bruce Springsteen — and the last time I checked, the Boss was still pretty damn cool.

In a day and age where artists maybe have a handful of songs they can play their entire career, we’re seriously putting someone on trial for having a dozen Top 10 hits, and another dozen tracks that charted in some form or fashion on the Billboard charts? I ask you to put all labeling to the side and let me ask you one simple question: Does the music of Huey Lewis and the News make you feel good? I know the answer to that question, and so do you. The only question left is if you’ll be brave enough to admit it.

The defense rests.

How does the jury find Huey Lewis (& the News)?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • forwardgirl
    I'm going to have to recuse myself. He's just too damn good-looking.
  • Tmccort
    Nice job, prosecutor. I concur. Guilty all the way.

    I think I've been waiting for this article for years. Back in the day, it was my firm theory that the government was fed up with the outlandish behavior or rock stars and creating Huey Lewis as a government band and an attempt to send mind-control music to the masses. Who else would write songs like Hip to be Square and I Want A New Drug other than the government? How else could one explain their ability to make the airways if it wasn't for powerful, covert government agencies forcing DJ's at gun point to play it?
  • jim
    while Huey does get points for using the Attractions on his first and i believe second album. The content and insufferable grinning that he subjected us to non stop outwiegh any good he may have attempted.
  • EricL
    The Defense lost me when they stated that, "As for the prosecution’s claims of repeating themselves, I don’t agree with it, but if you’re going to throw Mr. Lewis under the bus, why don’t we throw the Ramones and every other blues artist while we’re at it?" A lot of The Ramones sounded the same, but blues sure as hell doesn't. At least good blues doesn't. Good rock shouldn't either. The Ramones got away with it because they were tremendously engaging but that is very rare.

    The Prosecution won when they brought up that duet with Gwyneth Paltrow. It wasn't just a "shit movie." The cover is an assault on AC rock that should not go unpunished.

    Even though I voted guilty, I feel a little bad about it. In the end, there is nothing wrong with perfectly acceptable. They were a diversion that got lucky and never took themselves too seriously. There is something to be said for that.
  • Huey Lewis was the music of choice of Izod-clad preppies at this one bar I hung out at back in'83-'84, and I was struck by how such plodding beats could be embraced as "good-time music". I thus tend to sympathize with the prosecution. But we are all "hip to be square" nowadays; how could we have survived the Bush years otherwise without making a trip to prison? The concept of rock music saving the world had a stake driven through its heart long before Screwy Huey Louie got his cold corporate hands around its neck.

    The defense starts well in comparing The News to Bill Haley and His Comets, and generally recognizing them as '50s throwbacks. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something, though, but Buddy Holly and The Beatles weren't dangerous? The defense needs to talk to some people who were there. Start with Little Richard, who tells of Holly banging girls on the dressing-room table as the stage manager is hollering "Showtime, Mr. Holly!" You couldn't survive the Reeperbahn back then without acquiring a taste for danger. John Lennon and George Harrison wear their leather jackets in Heaven.

    I bought a copy of Sports at Goodwill for $2.50 a few years back: it wasn't half as horrible as I'd remembered it. Huey Lewis And The News were neither hot nor cold, they were lukewarm, and the Lord will spew them from His mouth. Lacking that sort of authority, all I can do is declare a mistrial, and reluctantly let the defendants walk.
  • "Huey Lewis And The News were neither hot nor cold, they were lukewarm, and the Lord will spew them from His mouth."

    That's poetry right there. That's what that is.
  • I can't believe what the Popdose jury is willing to let people get away with. We're like the downtown Baltimore of music sites.
  • JonCummings
    No foolin'. I'm thinking strongly of retracting my entire second paragraph. I guess flattery gets you nowhere with this crowd.
  • MichaelFortes
    Dude is totally harmless.
  • The Prosecution left out one of the most damning points against Mr. Lewis & said Newsmen. They did a PBS concert to promote "Four Chords & Several Years Ago". Take that by itself for what it is: PBS, the network of brie eating elitists (such as me).

    But, much worse, after the end of the first "set" of the show, where they go through live versions of most of the tracks on the album Huey says "Okay...enough of this fooling around...let's rock". Upon which, the band tears into either "I Want A New Drug" or "Power of Love".

    Two Comments:
    (1) If you are going to use the overused expression "let's rock", you better have something that follows it that rocks harder than "Power of Love", and a HELL of a lot harder than "I Want a New Drug". The fact that Mr. Lewis seems oblivious to the appropriate usage of the term "let's rock" would seem to be worthy of conviction of some sort of Rock-related crime.

    (2) Second, and most seriously...just allow the first part of his statement to sink in. In Mr. Lewis's own words playing all of these oldies was the "fooling around" part of the show, and the "real" rock were the News' blend of pop and bar-rock. Not only is this a cynical, dismissive statement to make about the music that supposedly influenced them, but is counterproductive to the very fact of recording those songs for an album, and then featuring them in the special they were taping that very moment!

    The defense attorney uses this album as an example of Huey and the boys just having fun, and consciously deciding not to go in the direction that music was heading in 1994. Firstly, the covers album WAS a trend in 1994: For instance, the year before, Neil Diamond (a better writer than singer) released a two-disc set of Brill Building covers which was probably his biggest non-Xmas success since Heartlight a decade before. Even The The came out with an album of Hank Williams covers (Hanky Panky) in 1994 for God's sake!

    The real truth as can be deduced from Mr. Lewis's comment, is once again more cyncial. They didn't go in another direction not because they didn't want to....but because they couldn't: the well was dry. Not only had each and every album post-Sports been less successful than the one prior to it, and not as good, but after 1991's Hard at Play, do you know how many non-covers Huey Lewis recorded over the next decade?

    Three.

    Those would be three of the four new songs on their 1996 Greatest Hits package, one of which was then recycled another five years later on Plan B...which also had two covers on it. That means that over the last 18 years, Lewis and the News have written and recorded a total of 11 new songs. The covers album was something they could do as a placeholder to stay in the public's eye, while waiting for new material and a better record deal that ended up not coming for a number of years, and only after the group ended the hiatus it was on while Lewis tried pursuing a second career in acting.

    So what do we REALLY have here: We have a band still "doing what they love" because they don't know how to create or perform any other type of music, and who, according to their lead singer, think playing the classics that supposedly influenced their sound and love of music is really just "fooling around". Unfortunately, like many artists, they blew their creative wad (that is, I believe, the appropriate legal term?) in a short period of time, and then have cynically tried to maintain a career out of that wad, sans forward momentum for more than two decades since then.
  • Malchus
    Interesting points, Matthew. Tell me, what do you think of Joan Jett?
  • Considering that she's never had a real hit that was an original song, I truly believe that if she was a man, she would be thought of as a second-rate Bryan Adams. Instead, she's generally looked at as an important female rocker, even though she's no more than a 3rd-rate Chryssie Hynde.
  • Malchus
    Actually, Jett co-wrote "I Hate Myself for Loving You," which was a big hit for her.
  • mojo
    which has been reborn as the nbc sunday night football theme with whatsherface the blonde country singer (faith hill) singing in her great outfits -- i hate myself for liking that song now...
  • Well, even David Coverdale fell into "Here I Go Again" As Shania would say (ugh!), that don't impress me much.
  • Wow, the defense must be loving the power of Popdose love at this point....

    I've just listened to Hip To Be Square like 10 times - tough for me to vote guilty when the prosecution is using two songs that I love... Innocent all the way!
  • deltaslide
    Prosecution's case was well presented and based on the most solid evidence-the horrible music!Could there possibly be a lamer, more un-rock n' roll band ever? (OK maybe Sugar Ray...) About the only time I ever wasn't directly tortured by hearing Huey Lewis was during the scene in American Psycho.
  • TheScreenDoor
    I should have elaborated on the Beatles comment. In comparison to other acts (the Stones) and even latter day Beatles, their early stuff (while utterly brilliant) was poppy and fun. It was rock n' roll and pop music simultaneously that everyone seemed to gravitate to. I probably should have done more of an elaboration...but what I was trying to say is that you don't have to be Radiohead (always out there, pushing the envelope)to be great. For the court's record, I have read many a book on Holly and the Beatles. :-)
  • bkharmony
    Again. Read a book. The Beatles were raw rock n' roll before The Stones were even conceived. You're thinking "Love Me Do." I'm thinking "Dizzy Miss Lizzy." You're thinking nice suits. I'm thinking head-to-toe black leather and amphetamine-induced brawls.

    And as far as the term "dangerous" goes; do you not think the establishment found The Beatles in '63 plenty dangerous? Particularly to the virtue of their young daughters? The world hadn't changed much from the backlash against Elvis' hip gyrations. And Buddy Holly fit right into that as well. That's why they killed him.

    I guess the Beatles books you've read begin in 1964.

    http://members.home.nl/jpgr/1961hamburg.jpg
  • bkharmony
    I'm probably coming off as a dick. Hell, I probably am a dick. Let me just say, it's nothing personal.
  • TheScreenDoor
    Nothing personal at all, good discussion is what music is all about. I see your point, I get it, but perception in 1964 was that rock n' roll was evil. Not necessarily the Beatles. I see where you're coming from, but "Love Me Do" was a single, "Dizzy Miss Lizzy" wasn't. And, one has to remember, the leather jackets were ditched once Epstein got involved, because he wanted to cast the widest possible net for them.

    In short, (and this is not the first time I have done this) I need to learn that to NEVER under penalty of death compare *anyone* to the Beatles. They are and always will be the greatest band of all time.
  • mojo
    JEFF!

    Looking at the voting here, I think we all can agree jury tampering has taken place. I move for a mistrial.
  • ericl
    Huey automatically receives a "pass" on some of his latter transgressions due to of him playing with Thin Lizzy on the classic "Live and Dangerous". When Phil Lynott introduces him - "Make a lot of noise, on harmonica - Huey Lewis!" - all bad thoughts about "Cruisin'" get obliterated. Further, Lewis played harmonica on Nick Lowe's "Labour of Lust" and Dave Edmunds' "Repeat When Necessary" (thanks allmusic).

    Although not covered, there are a couple good tues from the first couple albums before Sports and Fore. "Sonner or Later" off the debut album and the classic "Do You Believe in Love" off "Picture This" are well executed pop songs that you can find little fault with.
  • Russ
    I second this. If Phil Lynott, Dave Edmunds, and Nick Lowe want to play with you, you gotta be doing something rock 'n' roll.

    You don't hear about Huey bitching about the end of the hits. They just keep on playin' for whoever wants to see 'em and appreciate it. You'd have a better case ripping on Joe Walsh - an oridnary average guy who's had the same stretch of hitless albums - and he still plays with those ass holes The Eagles.
  • KingPERvus
    Unfortunately, the additional knuckleheads riding this thread are showing no love for your comments reguarding Thin Lizzy and the pub rock set, but I have to agree. Although I always rated HL a bit below even Bryan Adams in listenability (ie marginal) he gets cool points for his choice of side gigs.
  • bkharmony
    I find for The Defense, but The Defense needs to read a freakin' book.

    "...in the beginning were the Beatles all that dangerous? No. Was Buddy Holly? No."

    Wrong and wrong. Seriously, head-smackingly wrong.

    Disbarred!
  • Matt
    I've got every goddamn album that Huey has ever put out. With the exception of parts of the Small World album, ol Huey hasn't ever let me down. And hopefully, never will. One of my fave Huey moments will always be the live version of Trouble in Paradise, originally found on the We Are The World disc. Good stuff!
  • Most of my fondest 80's memories are tied to Huey Lewis and the News tunes. And even through "Plan B" (save for the hokey "Rhythm Ranch" and abysmal "My Other Woman") I've followed and loved the band.

    As an aside, I've seen Huey and the boys no less than 5 times in the last few years and to be honest, If I've got half the energy that guy has at 60 I'll be a happy. They still put on a hell of a show.
  • Also, I notice no mention of the fact that Huey Lewis is supposedly the largest man in rock, if you know what I mean and I think you do.
  • Sooner or Later! I still like that song.
  • < "Do You Believe In Love?" -- could anybody really hate that song?

    Please tell me you're joking.

    The defense did an excellent job pleading his case, and I will admit that the band has its moments and Huey seems like a good guy. But there is just no defending any band responsible for "Bad Is Bad," "Stuck with You," "Doing It All for My Baby," and "Jacob's Ladder." Hang 'em high, sheriff.
  • Pwyll
    The News (sans Huey) were the backing band for Elvis Costello's "My Aim Is True". There's your brush with new-wave "coolness". Solid players all, with an ear for great pop. Not guilty!
  • Todd
    Actually, that was "Clover," A pre-News band that Huey 'Louis' played in. Sean Hopper was the the only member of the News to play on "My Aim Is True."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clover_(band)
  • Fantastic job, both of you, although I would have preferred some stabs at each others' mothers.

    (Not guilty!)
  • I stabbed your mom last night.
  • I should have been more specific: I meant funny ones.
  • Good point. She was screaming from all the pain.
  • Matt
    Haha.....Mr. Lifton, you always have a good line or four!
  • napoleondolemite
    Is that mug shot on the front page legit?
  • I'm flattered that you asked, but no. That's just Photoshop.
  • Matt
    I was gonna say something... Huey's taller than that. (I think he's about 6'3" or so...)
  • "Stuck With You" was the beginning of the end for the News, as far as I'm concerned, but here's a rebuttal question I'd ask the prosecution: What makes the Smithereens hip and Huey Lewis/News not? Both play a simple, timeless style of music.

    "I Want A New Drug" and "Hip To Be Square" were witty -- the former moreso than the latter. "Workin' For A Livin'" is a good, solid blue-collar anthem, and "Do You Believe In Love?" -- could anybody really hate that song?

    If Huey and company were smug about it, sure, you'd have a case. But they're not. They'll just play for whoever can pay for their horn section, shake hands with everyone there and move on.
  • JonCummings
    The Huey/Smithereens comparison, frankly, made me lose my breakfast. (The sound of my wretching, interestingly, was a lot like "Jacob's Ladder.") Here's the difference between them: While "Behind the Wall of Sleep" may be one of the greatest songs ever sung from the perspective of a dork who's pining for a girl who's out of his league, at no point does the protagonist (or, to my knowledge, ANY protagonist in ANY Smithereens song) suggest that it's OK not to strive to be cool enough to get that girl.

    There's a huge difference between dorky people (sorry, Pat--I think you're aces) making music that makes you feel cooler than you are, and dorky people telling you to give up on coolness and revel in your own dorkiness. The former is a key part of what rock 'n' roll is all about (see Buddy Holly, Roy Orbison, Michael Stipe, the dB's, the Decemberists, and thousands in between); the latter is the kind of sentiment that leaves Elvis, James Brown, John Lennon, Marvin Gaye, and probably even Rick Nelson spinning in their graves.

    I thought early Huey was great, too. I loved "Do You Believe in Love," "Workin' for a Livin'," "Heart and Soul," and even "The Heart of Rock 'n' Roll" (kinda). But I bet Jeffrey Dahmer was real sweet to his mama, too. Doesn't make his crimes any less heinous.
  • I'd say Huey was the good-looking guy who made you feel better about yourself by refusing to take himself too seriously.

    Might depend on whether you take "Hip to be Square," too seriously, which I don't. I view it as more of a flimsy commentary on Reagan-era conformity.
  • OJ Incandenza
    Ah, if only Pat had sprung for three full verses instead of stopping at two and a half. But that's neither here nor there.

    As horrible as "Hip to be Square" is, I think Patrick Bateman's encomium in "American Psycho" takes a lot of the air out of the argument against it. Curse you, irony! Back to the Urban Outfitters with ye!

    Ultimately, I'm torn: my first exposure to HL&N was the Popclips staple "Some of My Lies are True", which predates MTV even and isn't bad at all--even now! Sure, they may have ended up seriously sucking ("Heart of Rock & Roll", I'm looking at you), but it's still hard to find active animosity toward them.
  • Matt
    Smithereens and Huey Lewis are both hip in my world!!

    Good stuff...
  • mojo
    Actually, I am with you on the smithereens. I once won a fan-club trivia contest...and won a band-autographed picture.
  • The prosecution's case walked a thin line. Not guilty.
blog comments powered by Disqus