Rock Court: The People vs. Eric Clapton

Ed Murray and Mojo Flucke September 25, 2009 38

Rock Court

For the prosecution: Mojo Flucke, Ph.D.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the prosecution will prove that Eric Clapton has committed numerous crimes against rock, namely:

• Making music way more derivative than legally permissible for a rock god
• Exploiting fans by releasing milquetoast pap
• Squandering monstrous talent

Clapton is not God, contrary to the Islington graffito proclaiming it during his tenure in John Mayall’s Bluesbreakers. He is, however, an excellent blues mimic, taking compositions like Robert Johnson’s “Crossroads,” William Bell and Booker T. Jones’ “Born Under a Bad Sign,” and for Mayall, Freddie King’s “Hideaway.” He can derive like few others on earth, in a musical milieu where creatively covering other compositions is the best way to connect with the audience.

Yet great blues musicians contribute at least one or two original compositions–or the definitive interpretation of someone else’s song–to the canon of blues standards. B.B. King has “The Thrill Is Gone” and “Every Day I Have the Blues.” Junior Wells, “Messin’ With the Kid.” John Lee Hooker, “Boogie Chillen’,” “Boom Boom” and “One Bourbon, One Scotch, and One Beer.”

Clapton’s got nothing. “Layla” is known for its innovative coda written by Domino Jim Gordon and a legendary main riff written and co-performed by Duane Allman. “Sunshine of Your Love” was co-written by all three members of Cream. Its undisputedly legendary guitar solo opens not with an original Clapton-improvised phrase, but the melody from “Blue Moon.”

Left to his own devices, Clapton churns out total dreck. There’s a lot to choose from; I’ll keep it brief by offering the “greatest whiffs” from three different decades:

Exhibit A: “I’ve Got a Rock ‘n’ Roll Heart.” Have you known any Brit to espouse the glories of American carmakers in a song? Clapton didn’t; someone sold him on the song. This 1980s total cash-in opened his moldy 1960s output to a new generation.

Eric Clapton in the '90s

Exhibit B: “Wonderful Tonight.” The message is the most left-handed compliment a knucklehead can give his woman, even back in the ’70s: “Honey, the more smashed I get, the better you look.”

Exhibit C: “Running on Faith” (Unplugged).” One of several 1990s hits for Clapton, it should be titled “Running on Fumes,” because the fire, the passion, the blistering energy that fueled his great performances (such as the aforementioned “Sunshine” solo) left the building long ago. Clearly, he just doesn’t care.

Once Jimi Hendrix and Duane passed away, Clapton assumed the mantle as the most recognized blues-rock guitarist on earth. And what did he do with it–and the promising start of his 1960s recorded output and Layla, mostly great rock albums? Mostly crap. When he does dip back into the blues, Clapton still is strong, see the Me and Mr. Johnson (2004) covers CD and the B.B. King duet album Riding with the King (2000).

The question, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, is: The recent Johnson and King albums show that early-career drug use and Father Time clearly have not diminished Clapton’s skills. So why can’t he write a song to save his life, and why does he continually rely on the Mellow Gold sound instead of reaching for more creative heights? The answer: He’s guilty as charged.


For the defense: Ed Murray

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the prosecution’s arguments against Eric Patrick Clapton are patently absurd, especially the ludicrous attempt to paint the defendant as first and foremost a songwriter, when his talents – and primary musical focus! – have clearly always been as a guitarist. Far from being prosecuted for his crimes against rock, Clapton should be (and has been) honored for his contributions to rock.

The Yardbirds. John Mayall’s Bluesbreakers. Cream. Blind Faith. Clapton was already long established as a major blues and rock guitar virtuoso well before the release of his first solo record in 1970. He also helped give birth to both the mid-’60s British blues craze and late-’60s psychedelic rock, both movements which, in turn, spawned countless bands, sounds, styles and other pop cultural artifacts. Calling him derivative, or a mimic, is a cheap shot. Blues has always been an interpretive art, and Clapton’s guitar prowess introduced and popularized electrified blues to an entire generation of musicians and fans on both sides of the Atlantic.

Eric Clapton in the '90s

I’ll posit that Clapton is not the strongest songwriter to grace the airwaves. Indeed, Clapton has always been strongest as a collaborator and interpreter, as part of all the aforementioned groups, as well as Delaney & Bonnie & Friends and Derek & The Dominos. His biggest early solo hits, in fact, were covers of other people’s songs – “After Midnight” and “Cocaine” (J.J. Cale), “I Shot the Sheriff” (Bob Marley). In fact, if you go through his entire canon, almost every familiar song – from “Badge” (with George Harrison) to “It’s In the Way That You Use It” (with Robbie Robertson) – carries a co-writer credits.

But is it a crime against rock to be a better instrumentalist and collaborator than a songsmith? Is Clapton on trial for not being a superlative songwriter? And if the defendant’s “Bell Bottom Blues” can’t be considered a staple of classic rock radio, than I don’t know my AOR. Ditto (Knocking “Wonderful Tonight” is a low blow even for the prosecutor; sure, the sentiment is a little sappy, but that guitar hook gets me every time.)

In fact, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I’ll submit that Clapton’s mid-career penchant for weepy ballads and at-times generic corporate rock were simply an attempt by the defendant to redefine himself as merely a blues-rock guitar god – and maybe to get some Top 40 action (and cash), to boot. We’re still, after all, talking about someone who has won 19 Grammy awards, alone and or shared with other artists, as well as being the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame’s first and only Triple Inductee: as a solo artist, as a member of Cream and as a member of the Yardbirds.

The prosecution’s assertions against Clapton’s weak songwriting form a classic straw man argument. Let’s face it, when the defendant focuses on his guitar playing, he can do no wrong. In later years, Clapton himself seems to have realized this. The all-blues From the Cradle, released in 1994, was one of his most successful albums, both commercially and critically. The soloing on “Five Long Years” proves that Clapton’s guitar chops are still and forever what will define this artist. The prosecution gave props to Me and Mr. Johnson and Riding with the King. And as recently as 2006, Clapton released the critically acclaimed collaboration with J.J. Cale, The Road to Escondido (another Grammy winner, no less).


Prosecution’s closing argument:
The defense has been wonderful tonight, erecting a concise, clear argument that Eric Clapton is more like Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, Keith Richards, Paul Butterfield and even Billy Gibbons than God. Except those guys could write their way out of a paper bag, which we’ve established Clapton can’t. He just doesn’t deserve the iconic status he’s given in rock. Especially after committing the numerous musical crimes outlined above. No true rock fan could listen to the whole of Clapton’s 1980s output and return anything other than a “guilty” verdict. Now go vote with your ears.


The defense’s closing arguments:
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the prosecution is “Pretending” that EC hasn’t earned and doesn’t deserve his stature in the annals of rock history. Are you going to judge a man whose career in music is approaching the 50-year mark by a handful of mediocre albums in a 12-year chunk of that career? And I know plenty of people who love Journeyman (though I’m not one of ‘em, heh-heh). The prosecution also raises the scepter of other so-called guitar gods in comparison. I’d challenge him on all of ‘em: Jimmy Page had Robert Plant and John Paul Jones (not to mention the blues canon itself). Keith Richards had Mick Jagger. Billy Gibbons penned some good hits, but what has he done for us lately? And I dare you to name a few of Jeff Beck’s or Paul Butterfield’s hits (without using Google or iTunes, of course). Clapton is still a viable force in music (his Crossroads Guitar Festivals prove that), and if the guitar solo fits, you must acquit! The defense rests.


How does the jury find the accused?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …
  • Russ

    I voted innocent, but I still think Dave Edmunds is a way better guitarist (and he can't write either).

    However, if the prosecution would have mentioned his horrible re-recording of After Midnight for a Michelob commercial in the 80's (a la Don't Stand so Close To Me '86) I might have been swayed. Plus, no one needs to look up anything to know that Freeway Jam and Blue Wind are better than Layla. Maybe the harpsichord version of For You Love IS better than the guitar version. Say, can I change my vote?

    Looks like a hung jury.

  • MichaelFortes

    I'm on the fence here. On the one hand, I've always maintained that Clapton is way more boring than he's made out to be. On the other hand, he totally rips shit up when he's collaborating with others. I saw him with Steve Winwood a few months ago, and it was amazing. If Clapton's guilty of anything, I think it's not living up to his God-like reputation and for producing a catalog that's way, way spottier than his talent would have predicted. I'll convict him for that, but I'll still love listening to Layla, Reptile, 461 Ocean Boulevard and his solo on “While My Guitar Gently Weeps.”

  • mojo

    I'd comment, but Giles would throw me in the pokey for jury tampering.

  • http://garagerock.wordpress.com edmur

    I OBJECT!

  • Matt

    Clapton is God. Dammit.

  • http://www.kenshane.com kshane

    Mojo, I would have respected your case more if you'd had the chutzpah to include “Tears In Heaven'' among your whiffs, because it is that for sure. Ed, I think “Forever Man” is a great, more recent track. Clapton's guitar playing on it is superb, as is his vocal. You should have used it to make your case the EC is not just an oldies act. There's also the evidence of the superb shows he's been doing with Steve Winwood lately. Innocent!

  • mc3

    Another fence-sitter. I voted guilty. Though I like much of his career output – I still think he's overrated and given more credit than he deserves. His playing, while very good, has never blown me away the way Jimi Hendrix, Stevie Ray Vaughan, Duane Allman, Warren Haynes, Jerry Garcia, Jimmy Page, and others blow me away.

  • jonnythefriendlylawyer

    Your honor, the jury finds as follows on the following counts:

    • Making music way more derivative than legally permissible for a rock god
    NOT GUILTY
    • Exploiting fans by releasing milquetoast pap
    GUILTY
    • Squandering monstrous talent
    NOT GUILTY

    On the first count, the defendant's transformation from human to immortal status was based on his skills as an interpreter of an existing form. The music was supposed to be derivative, and the defendant is exonerated for his prodigious talent in the interpretation of music from the genre. That is to say, he is an excellent blues guitarist and is not responsible for creating the blues.

    On the second count, the defendant failed to maintain his level of excellence by not applying the skills warranting his reputation as god to material worthy of that designation. That is to say, he played very well or only well enough on boring music too often.

    On the third count, as established above, the defendant's talent is for guitar playing, not composing. He played guitar on a lot of boring music but the playing itself was still to a higher standard. That is to say, the fact that he's not a great songwriter should not be held against his reputation as a great guitarist.

    Exonerating circumstances: (1) The defendant is a criminally underrated singer. Like the late Stevie Ray Vaughan, Clapton is and has always been a gifted vocalist whose amazing guitar skill has completely eclipsed his impressive pipes. (2) It would be unwise for this honorable court to set a precedent of denigrating musicians who are monstrously talented but responsible for only parts of their oeuvre. (See, e.g., Morrissey, Jerry Garcia, Elton John, David Gilmour, etc.).

  • mojo

    Here's a little inside baseball to explain that: Ed and I had a gentleman's agreement not to talk about drugs or his personal life because we wanted to make the debate about music, and not about our personal feelings/mores.

    We both could have fired fastball after fastball at each other over several different issues but chose not to.

  • http://garagerock.wordpress.com edmur

    I'm still not a fan of “Forever Man,” but I totally agree about the shows he's been doing w/ Winwood (not to mention the recent album w/ JJ Cale, which I mentioned is fantastic!)…even though they have a whiff of “oldies act” about them. But, they still prove my points that Clapton is and has always been a better guitarist and collaborator than a songwriter.

  • http://garagerock.wordpress.com edmur

    Get this man to a Rock Court!!!

  • JonCummings

    Clapton is the Whitney Houston of blues-rock. Massive ability, no idea what to do with it (at least when in the recording studio). Mojo, you had me at “I've Got a Rock'n'Roll Heart.”

  • stevefischle3r

    Guilty!

    I was just having a conversation this a.m with a well known artist who has worked and knows Eric.
    Personally, I also work for the Estate of Delaney Bramlett and prior to that I was his Promotions Director, (still am) for his record label, Magnolia Gold Records.

    Eric is a very shred businessman.

    …but in listening to his singing you have to agree that Delaney Bramlett was his biggest influence. Remember Delaney did produce Eric's first solo LP.

  • mojo

    hear hear–he's so good he could get Milli Vanilli off on a technicality

  • http://www.popdose.com Zack

    It's worth remembering that Clapton's “Rock and Roll Heart” managed to (barely) beat out Lou Reed's version in a Song-Off long ago, for what it's worth.

  • http://www.bastardradio.com steed

    Tough one. Both sides have merit. I have to go with innocent though.

  • http://harpandthistle.blogspot.com RLB

    Ditto. Michelob does 'im in.

  • http://harpandthistle.blogspot.com RLB

    Ah, anyone could defend the Vanillis. They have a baked-in defense… (wait for it)…. BLAME IT ON DA RAIN!

  • http://marcmaronrules.blogspot.com/ Michael

    Just wish he would go back to playing a Gibson,cranked up through a Marshall Stack ..
    Just saying..

  • jhallCORE

    All right, I voted guilty.

    • Making music way more derivative than legally permissible for a rock god
    • Exploiting fans by releasing milquetoast pap
    • Squandering monstrous talent

    The prosecution's three point introduction (above) is right on I'm sad to say. I do disagree with the slam of the Unplugged version of “Running On Faith,” one of my favorites of Clapton.

    That said, he has made a lot of bad albums in the last decade-plus. I saw him live when he did the From The Cradle record and it was fairly snooze-inducing. I agree with the sentiment that he is much better collaborator with like talents, not so much when he's making records with Simon Climie.

    I do like much of the Riding With The King album with B.B. and his instrumental work on the Rush soundtrack is chilling.

    Overall, though, I have to concur with a previous poster's Whitney Houston analogy. Funny and painfully true.

  • tonys1

    Guilty. None of his music save Derek and the Dominoes is emotionally compelling. That's the key. I don't care if he could write or not, or how good his guitar is. What I care about is: is there something about his records that draws me back to obsessively listen — the same way I'm drawn obsessively to everything from Smokey Robison to “The Who Sell Out” to “Paul's Boutique.” The answer is no. Clapton does not have that “it” factor.

  • http://drsardonicus.blogspot.com drsardonicus

    Yet great blues musicians contribute at least one or two original compositions–or the definitive interpretation of someone else’s song–to the canon of blues standards.

    Cream's version of “Crossroads” is so definitive that hardly anyone else has tried to top it – Lynyrd Skynyrd gave it a good try, but they couldn't match Clapton with three guitarists. Clapton's weakness is that he is a reluctant frontman, which he readily admits. Clapton should be judged as a gutarist, not as an entertainer. If all Clapton had recorded was Layla And Other Love Songs, he would still be one of rock's greatest guitarists. If recording mediocre efforts in old age is a crime, then every surviving 60's rocker is guilty. Acquit.

  • Pingback: Is it super easy to plant seeds of emotion in people that’s triggered every time they do something? | Chocolate Sunflower Seeds

  • http://thejazzsession.com Jason Crane | The Jazz Session

    For me, this is a simple case. In The Band's concert film The Last Waltz, there's a moment (I believe it's in “Further On Up The Road”) when Clapton is soloing and his guitar strap breaks. Robbie Robertson is standing next to Clapton and takes over the solo, mopping the floor with Clapton. Robertson's got more blues and soul in his half-chorus of playing than Clapton displays on the rest of the tune. The prosecution rests.

  • slappyfrog

    Fry him.

    His only work of consequence is either a cover of someone with vastly more soul or is the result of those surrounding him and giving him guidance for his technical proficiency (Ginger Baker, Jack Bruce, John Mayall, etc.)

    F–k Clapton.

  • slappyfrog

    I made this point much later in a comment, but, Clapton is only as good as whoever is reining him in, B.B. gave him the necessary framework.

  • http://thevitaminkid.blogspot.com autodidact

    Agree with tonys1. Clapton is not emotionally compelling. Hasn't it been downhill since Cream? Mojo mentioned the Crossroads Guitar Festival. The last one I saw (on PBS, probably the 2007 festival) had Jeff Beck smoking anything that Clapton played.

    Now, Eric is a good guy, a pleasant singer and player, doesn't seem to be an ego-freak. But why people are still buying the records, or even the concert tickets, is a mystery to me.

  • http://johnozed.com johnozed

    I voted Guilty. Not a fan of his music Dave Edmunds is better and more fun to watch. Since this was all about Clapton's music I'm not bringing up his inadvertent creation of Rock Against Racism. And that is my main sticking point with Clapton. If he is god, I'm glad I'm an atheist.

  • outsidecounsel

    “If all Clapton had recorded was Layla And Other Love Songs…” then this would be a different case. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, a guy who could have done anything with an electric guitar insted elected to become a second J.J. Cale, a pointless redundancy, since one J.J. Cale is completely ample. (Indeed, how many J.J. Cale sides does anyone need?) Now consider “There's One in Every Crowd”, “No Reason to Cry”, “Slowhand”, and “Backless”– essentially his 70's studio output, excepting “461 Ocean Blvd”. Has there ever been a major artist with a string of such mediocre albums? There was a time that the cut-out bin was the best place to find a Clapton side, and I would put it to you that it was all on merit. Delaney & Bonnie and Friends are certainly implicated in this, as noted above, although there are probably a number of other accomplices. Steve Winwood deserves to be indicted as a co-conspirator, as well as on individual grounds.

    Jeff Beck was a better Yardbird, Duane Allman was a better Domino, and George Terry is more interesting on 461 Ocean Blvd. Guilty as charged.

  • jesselun

    Running on Faith is a bad song? Insane
    Clapton has been fortunate to be in such great bands. He's not the best guitarist, but he's sure been in some of the best bands

  • Russ

    But their version of Riding With The King is pathetic. (Part of that is BB's fault.)

  • Russ

    Which makes me think of Eric's work with Ronnie Lane, probably Eric's best playing – with the most un-shrewd businessman ever. Ultimately Eric's involvement with ARMS tipped me toward not guilty.

  • Russ

    Hell, Johnny Winter was smoking anything that Clapton played, and he's practically a corpse.

  • slappyfrog

    Still overall a better album than most, if not all, of Clapton's solo stuff.

  • JamesSig

    When Clapton was first referred to as GOD he was doing what no one else had done yet — at that time. And he didn't ask to be called GOD .. in fact it was something he tried very hard to escape, and this is largely responsible for his getting side-tracked from the Blues and Blues-Rock which was what he was (and is) adored for by people who do like him — which includes ME!! He never claimed to be a composer of original songs, yet has either written or collaborated in writing some definite classic such as “Tears in Heaven”, “Layla', “Bell Bottom Blues”, his very personalized version of “Crossroads” — and as an interpreter of Blues and Blues Rock classics – such as he demonstrated on the (still not officially released) concert documentary “Nothing But the Blues” and the released albums and videos of him playing through so many of Robert Johnson's classics – as FEW other could do – make him INNOCENT and still one of the VERY BEST Blues/Rock guitarists ever – and he's getting better with age, IMHO! In comparison to other guitarists, he is a god in relative terms, and the fact that he can write ballads such as “Wonderful Tonight” as well as hard rock interpretations and compositions such as “After Midnight”, “Cocaine', “Layla” – all written by or with others, but PLAYED by him in a way that have made them HIS and so memorable that they will still bring an audience to their feet – HE'S THE BEST!! And I find him completely INNOCENT of these and any charges and LONG LIVE EC!!!

  • johngt8

    If you could make a guitar talk, sound with feeling, and do whatever you wanted it to do….you then may even pretend to judge this man.

    Do you think playing like he does came from a middle class, parents gave them everything, or trust fund baby parentage lineage-? Of course not…and you have no place to stand in judgement of this man…just appreciate the beautiful sounds he can create while he is still alive. (c. 2009)

  • johngt8

    If you could make a guitar talk, sound with feeling, and do whatever you wanted it to do….you then may even pretend to judge this man.

    Do you think playing like he does came from a middle class, parents gave them everything, or trust fund baby parentage lineage-? Of course not…and you have no place to stand in judgement of this man…just appreciate the beautiful sounds he can create while he is still alive. (c. 2009)

    PS: EC is God
    I vote Innocent on all charges.

  • johngt8

    If you could make a guitar talk, sound with feeling, and do whatever you wanted it to do….you then may even pretend to judge this man.

    Do you think playing like he does came from a middle class, parents gave them everything, or trust fund baby parentage lineage-? Of course not…and you have no place to stand in judgement of this man…just appreciate the beautiful sounds he can create while he is still alive. (c. 2009)

    PS: EC is God
    I vote Innocent on all charges.