Posts Tagged ‘24’

Sugar Water: “24” and the Enhanced Techniques of Viewer Torture

sugarwater.gif

In February 2007 The New Yorker published “Whatever It Takes,” an article by Jane Mayer about the Fox series 24, and how the politically conservative views of the show’s creators, Joel Surnow and Robert Cochran, have influenced its use of torture scenes. “The truth is, there’s a certain amount of fatigue. It’s getting hard not to repeat the same torture techniques over and over,” said Howard Gordon, the show’s head writer, or “showrunner,” who described himself as a “moderate Democrat.”

In that same month, Barack Obama, the junior senator from Illinois, announced he was running for president, while on 24 there was already a black president in the White House: Wayne Palmer, the brother of ex-president David Palmer, who was assassinated in season five. That’s right — two black presidents in a span of three fictional terms of office. Pretty liberal, huh? (Author and NPR favorite Sarah Vowell is a fan, and former Air America radio host Janeane Garofalo was a regular cast member this past season.) And how about all those scenes of indestructible government agent Jack Bauer using “enhanced interrogation techniques,” forcing terrorist suspects to talk so he can find whatever ticking time bomb is set to go off before the end of each season? Pretty right-wing, huh? (Rush Limbaugh’s a fan — and a good friend of Surnow’s — and Senator John McCain made a cameo in season five.)

24 is a bleeding-heart-liberal show soaked in the blood of our freedom-hating enemies. Everybody wins! Everybody except the show’s fans, who, regardless of their personal politics, know the once riveting show’s best days are behind it, and not just because the post-9/11 cultural zeitgeist can no longer lend 24 the kind of collective-unconscious off-screen urgency it used to. Garry Trudeau’s Doonesbury summed it up nicely in a strip earlier this month, in which a CIA applicant who asks about “ticking time-bomb exemptions” is told, “Everyone’s over ‘24.’” The truth is, there’s a certain amount of fatigue on both sides of the screen when it comes to the long-running series.

(more…)

Political Culture: The Bush Administration’s Funny Games

Py Korry’s excellent piece the other day about the John Woo torture memo got me thinking about, of all things, a movie trailer that I saw repeatedly over the holidays while haunting the local art houses. The trailer is for an upcoming remake of the 1997 Austrian horror film Funny Games; the new version stars Naomi Watts, Tim Roth and Michael Pitt, and was directed by the same guy who did the original, Michael Haneke. It’s due in theaters March 14, and it looks like nothing so much as a feature-length extension of the “Singin’ In The Rain” scene from A Clockwork Orange.

The original Funny Games, hailed for its harrowing portrait of youthful nihilism and a random breach of middle-class security, was an early harbinger of the subgenre that New York magazine critic David Edelstein affectionately labeled Torture Porn. That subgenre, descended from a line of Italian frightfests in the 1970s, experienced a swift rise to popularity during the mid-Noughties via the Saw and Hostel series. The torture films have proved a boon to cultural critics of both the professional and armchair variety, who have blathered on about a “coarsening of the culture” and a “deficit of values” the same way they always do when the culture…well…coarsens in one way or another (gangsta rap, dirty dancing, insert your favorite Bill Bennett-hackle-raiser here). (more…)