Posts Tagged ‘Ann Logue’

Numberscruncher: No More Blogging for Dollars?

The Author is this piece is pushing her own book, so no money changed hands.

The Author of this piece is pushing her own book, so no money changed hands.

Last week, the Federal Trade Commission announced it would fine bloggers as much as $11,000 for violating its guides to the use of testimonials in advertising. The rules are designed to ensure that customers have a fair basis for buying a product. The basic rules are that if someone is compensated, that should be made clear; if a celebrity endorses a product, he or she should actually use it. Most of us didn’t want to know about Bob Dole‘s Viagra prescription or Lita Ford’s favorite ball gag (NSFW), but at least we know they are telling the truth about their preferences. The full details are on the FTC Web site in all their bureaucratic glory.

This creates some sticky problems for people blogging about books, movies, and music. You know, folks like us here at Popdose and our readers, at least some of whom are artists looking to get attention for their work. I can’t speak for everyone involved with Popdose, as that is a job for Jeff Giles. But, yes, we receive books, MP3s, DVDs, and bottles of tequila to review. We also write reviews about things that we bought with our money. I write book reviews for Barron’s, and those books are usually sent to me through my editor. Sometimes, though, he has misplaced the book or can’t remember if the publicist sent him a copy, and he doesn’t want to ask the publicist to send out a new one, so I go to the bookstore and buy it.

Like most reviewers, I quickly end up with more free books than I can possibly read. I usually end up dropping these books off at random places through Bookcrossing or donating them to the thrift shop. Some reviewers sell their excess copies to used bookstores or online, turning them into cash that way, although I have heard tell of writers who use something close to their real name on Amazon being shunned by authors who feel cheated out of royalties. (more…)

Numberscruncher: The Magic of Medicare

your_health__medicare.Par.15273.Image.0.0.1[1]The debate about health care reform has more irony than a vintage issue of Might magazine. To start, notice how no one is talking about dismantling or privatizing Medicare? That’s because Medicare is way too popular to mess with.

My parents love Medicare; my father was the executive director of a regional trade organization and had a hard time securing health insurance at a reasonable price because there were so few employees and because my mother survived cancer. No matter what doctors or medical researchers say, insurance companies do not believe that it is possible for someone to be cured of cancer. Premiums for a cancer survivor are high, and many insurance companies refuse to write individual or small group plans if a cancer survivor is in the group. My mother’s 65th birthday was a huge relief to my parents, because she could finally get health insurance.

My husband loves Medicare, too. He handles affairs for one of his grandmothers, and the health insurance part is easy. She sees a doctor, the bill gets paid, and my husband receives a notice. As opposed to health care for our healthy 11-year-old child, insurance for an elderly woman with diabetes is handled with no patient explanations that our coverage is through Blue Cross of California’s out-of-state plan, not Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, and the information is on the card, so please check your files and resubmit the bill; no fights over whether the vaccine falls under the pharmaceutical benefit or an office procedure and thus whether it is covered by the co-charged against the deductible; no worries about whether the doctor is in-network at the city location and the suburban location or just at the city one. Under Medicare, the very little paperwork moves from place to place and culminates in a check for the doctor. Hurray! (more…)

Bride of Popdose: A Wedding Songs Mixtape

If you’ve ever ventured into that thicket of sweetness and stress known as Planning A Wedding, you’ve probably at least considered buying one (or five) of those awful compilations of “wedding music.” They come in all sorts of flavors – classical, country, Contemporary Christian, pop standards, classic R&B – and they’ve got icky titles like A Day to Remember, or Songs That Say “I Love You.” They tend to feature a lot of the same songs, like “Always and Forever,” and “Three Times a Lady,” and “Wonderful Tonight,” and Pachelbel’s Canon, and “The Way You Look Tonight,” and that horrible Boyz II Men song “On Bended Knee.” And, just like the Book of Common Prayer, they’re all diabolically designed to make your nuptials sound just like everybody else’s.

My wife Gwen and I wed 15 years ago today, and to celebrate that occasion – along with the onset of the June wedding season – I thought I’d give Popdose’s loyal readers an anniversary present: a mixtape of wedding songs and stories from some of our columnists, and an opportunity to share your own remembrances and ideas in the comments. These songs aren’t your garden-variety bridal standards; in fact, a few of them are downright bizarre. But even if you don’t find them suitable for your own purposes the next time you get hitched, hopefully they’ll inspire you and your betrothed to follow your own muse, and not some music conglomerate’s. Click here for a compressed file of all the tracks featured here, and read on! (more…)

Where’s the (Tea) Party?

Rick Santelli of CNBC has called for a Chicago Tea Party, a revolt by taxpayers against a government stimulus package that may reward some irresponsible folks for their behavior. Jon Stewart invited him to appear on The Daily Show, but Santelli canceled. Hence, the Daily Show staff prepared a little tirade against Santelli and CNBC for missing the whole market implosion.

So much shouting! Of all the political revolutions coming out of Illinois right now, Santelli’s Tea Party is a strange one. Most folks in Cook County could take paying more in Federal taxes; we’re ticked off about the county board president, elected under questionable circumstances, finding great jobs for his relatives. The foreclosure rate here is relatively low, too, so it’s not like mortgage restructuring offends frugal Chicagoans the way they might upset the frugal in Phoenix.

Santelli covers the derivatives markets. With derivatives, there is a loser for every winner. Because many people buy derivatives as insurance, they are okay with taking small losses on the exchange instead of large losses outside of it. Hence, options and futures traders are no more affected by this market mess than they are by any other bit of news. Whether the news is good or bad, some win and some lose, and those who lose more than they win quit. It’s likely that Santelli and his friends on the floor aren’t suffering the losses that other investors are. I know some people who work at a futures trading firm here in Chicago, and they are so relaxed right now it’s almost scary.

But here’s what Stewart missed: CNBC is entertainment. Jim Cramer is a comedian. Rick Santelli is an actor. All financial news happens too fast for professional investors to rely on the media. If you read about it in the Wall Street Journal, it’s too late to make a trade; investors pay good money for Bloomberg boxes so that they can see the news as it happens. Small trading rooms will sometimes keep CNBC on in the background, more for the activity than for the insight, the same way that I like to go to sleep with the TV on when I’m alone.

But, but, but, you might be saying, some of the stock ideas from CNBC make big money! Of course they do. In theory, the investment markets are efficient. In theory, securities prices reflect the amount of risk that they have, so in theory, you could pick stocks by throwing darts at pages of the Wall Street Journal. (If you read the Journal online, you might want to use spitballs instead.) So, of course some stock pickers and some investment styles are going to be right on occasion. (more…)