Posts Tagged ‘Barack Obama’

Political Culture: I Have More Influence than Rush Limbaugh

It’s been a giggle this week watching Democrats paint Rush Limbaugh as the “bloated, drug-addled” head of the Republican Party, as Paul Begala put it the other day. It’s been even more of a giggle watching Republicans contort themselves into rhetorical knots as they try to deny Limbaugh’s stature without offending the man himself.

Democrats have been playing a lot of winning hands lately, and this is another one. They’ve learned the trick that Republicans used throughout the Bush years: When there’s a leadership vacuum in the opposing party, focus your attention on the person whom voters will find most unpalatable. Hillary, then Nancy Pelosi were the GOP’s bogeywomen. Now, since positively no one is afraid of Mitch McConnell or John Boehner, since no one has yet stopped laughing at Michael Steele or Sarah Palin, and since Bobby Jindal still needs to find a grown-up first name (if not a persona to match), Democrats smartly have anointed Rush as (to borrow a phrase) The One.

To the extent that the Dems can encourage Americans to equate Limbaugh with opposition to President Obama’s grand schemes – and to the extent that they can keep us more disgusted with Limbaugh’s oft-stated hope that “Obama fails” than we are concerned about the fiscal ramifications of Obama’s potential success – they will have played this game of misdirection brilliantly. But let’s not pretend that it’s anything more than a game. (more…)

Sugar Water: Break On Through (To Another Side of Acting)

sugarwater.gif

“A liar lies and a thief steals from you, but a hustler gives you something that you don’t mind parting with your money for. You’re entertained by the meal or the sex or the impression that something is going to happen. You’re given a sense of well-being….” –actor Val Kilmer describing porn star John Holmes, who he portrayed in 2003’s Wonderland

Val Kilmer wants to be the next governor of New Mexico. In fact, as he told the Associated Press in a recent interview, “If I run, I’m going to be the next governor.”

That’s the spirit! After all, Arnold Schwarzenegger had never held public office before he became governor of California in 2003, and by most accounts he’s done an admirable job in that post. But Schwarzenegger was always more of a movie star than an actor, and one reason he got to be such a huge international star was because he was a smart businessman (and, by extension, politician). He promoted action films like Total Recall and comedies like Twins with equal amounts of salesmanship and hyperbole, appearing on as many talk shows and in as many entertainment magazines as he could. He knew he wasn’t a great actor, and he knew his fans didn’t want to see him try anything Oscar-worthy, which is why the clip of him playing a pyrotechnic Hamlet in 1993’s Last Action Hero is the best joke in that otherwise misbegotten attempt at melding Schwarzenegger’s two favorite genres. (“To be or not to be,” he says before deciding on “not to be” and detonating the royal castle.)

Kilmer, however, is much more of an actor than a movie star, despite matinee-idol looks and brief brushes with superstardom in blockbusters like Top Gun (1986), in which he played one of Tom Cruise’s rivals, and Batman Forever (1995), where his Batman was overshadowed by Jim Carrey’s Riddler and Joel Schumacher’s campy direction. (To be fair, 2005’s Batman Begins is the only Batman film that focuses more on the title character than the villains. Even last year’s critically adored The Dark Knight gave more screen time to the Joker and Two-Face.) Kilmer decided not to reprise his role for 1997’s Batman & Robin. This probably pleased Schumacher, who returned for the franchise’s fourth installment and told Premiere magazine in ‘97 that “Val is the most psychologically troubled human being I’ve ever worked with. The tools I used to work with him — tools of communication, of patience and understanding — were the tools I use on my five-year-old godson. Val is not just high-strung. I think he needs help. I say this to you only because I have said it to him.”

(more…)

Political Culture: Taking a Hit (For All of Us)

Like most people I know, my favorite feature in Us Weekly is the “Stars — They’re Just Like Us!” spread. You know, Brad Pitt with his fly down, Ryan Phillippe pushing a cart at Ikea … (No, I do not read Us Weekly! Sometimes I just, you know, catch a glimpse when my wife leaves it open on the vanity.)

Next week, Us readers might see a spread featuring Michael Phelps (“They take bong hits in public!”), Tom Daschle (“They cheat on their taxes!”), and Christian Bale (“They tear underlings a new asshole!”). A lot of those readers might be appalled. But how many of them would have a right to be?

OK, forget Bale — that tirade truly was out of the ordinary. But before we send Batman after these other two arch-villains, can we please take a moment to consider the sheer mundaneness (mundanity?) of their actions?

The bong water swirls, and makes the News of the WorldPhelps is a 23-year-old with pockets full of dough and time on his hands. He’s part of the Pineapple Express generation, for crying out loud! How many of his peers, much less their ’60s-bred parents, really care if his idea of blowing off steam involves sucking down illicit smoke? A recent survey quoted no fewer than 42 percent of Americans who said they’ve tried pot, and the nation’s marijuana laws are steadily becoming as flaccid as the stuff supposedly renders its male users (I have no direct evidence, of course). Why is this a big deal?

As for Daschle, yes, the dollar value of his outstanding tax liability was eye-popping. Still, I encourage the working mom who has never once handed a wad of cash to the nanny without reporting it to the IRS — or the homeowner who has never once acted on his impulse to fudge the “charitable contributions” line on his 1040 — to cast the first stone. The rest of us should pause a moment. There must be some reason why tax-debt resolution has become such a growth industry in this country — and it can’t be that liberal politicos are the only ones responding to all those commercials on Fox News.

(more…)

Political Culture: Bipartisanship — What Is It Good For?

As of last night, absolutely nothin’. (Legislatively speaking, at least.) But you gotta give Barack Obama points for trying.

Presidents don’t often do what Obama did on Tuesday. A week to the day after his inauguration, he returned to Capitol Hill and spent three hours glad-handing House and Senate Republicans in an effort to win at least a modicum of their support for his massive stimulus package. True to the promises he had repeated throughout the campaign – that he would change the terms of political debate and encourage legislators to rediscover the art of compromise – Obama surrendered his home-court advantage, reminded Republicans of the concessions he had already made (tax cuts added, spending increases deleted), and asked them to help show the citizenry that its government has a firm, somewhat unified grip on the situation.

And the Republicans, true to their nature, responded, “Thanks, but no thanks.” (Apply Palinesque intonation at your peril.) Last night, not a single GOP House member defied his sewn-together-from-corpses leader, John Boehner, to vote for the package.

House Minority Leader John BoehnerOne of the hoariest clichés out there is the notion that politicians “campaign in poetry, but govern in prose.” Both Obama and John McCain campaigned last fall with uplifting calls for bipartisanship – McCain because he needed to overcome the Republican brand, Obama because he wanted to run up the score and break through the “50-percent-plus-one” nightmare of the Bush years. But even now that Obama has achieved that breakthrough, he’s still governing (at least for the moment) in poetry, and Monday’s visit to the Hill was nothing if not poetic.

Whether it was poetic like the opening moments of Camelot, or poetic like a sweet picture of a baby seal taken immediately before it’s clubbed, remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: Congressional Republicans, despite their current status as the Detroit Lions of American politics, have decided to go down to defeat in prose. (more…)

Pop Politico: “The Great Transition”

transitionAs the news about the global economic downturn goes from bad to worse, we’re at a point where government inaction is not a palatable option.  Something needs to be done, and countermeasures against further slippage into recession need to be implemented with all deliberate speed.  Most other countries in the grip of this recession are doing the same, and now, it seems, the United States is poised to spend an amazing amount of money to prime the pump to revive the economy. And since private enterprise is doing everything in its power to weather this storm the only way it knows how (i.e., by cutting overhead, reducing spending, and laying off employees), the importance of government action is magnified, because it’s seemingly the only option left.

President Obama’s proposed $825 billion stimulus package is currently running through the sausage mill of Congress, but this time, it’s supposed to be an “earmark free” bill.  But that’s not stopping Republicans from bloviating about pork in the bill that allots money for family planning (Contraceptives!) and the NEA (Robert Mapplethorpe! “Piss Christ!” One of the Guys!).  Those amounts are small compared with the money directed at improving the infrastructure of many agencies in the federal government — which, like the Social Security Administration for example, have not upgraded their central computer system Since the last days of the Carter Administration.

If pork = any kind of government spending, then the Republicans ought to stop acting holier than thou on this stimulus package and remember the heady days when they were in full support of blowing billions on war and war related organizations like Kellogg, Brown and Root.  You remember Kellogg, Brown, and Root, right?  You know, the company Dick Cheney was president and CEO of before appointing himself the vice presidential candidate during George W. Bush’s campaign for the White House?  The same company that’s been overcharging the American taxpayer for services provided to American soldiers serving in Iraq — just to name one example? I know, there’s a thing called “the loyal opposition,” but it seems the Republican leadership has very little they can really oppose, so they are going after those golden oldies of the cultural wars:  birth control and controversial artists.  What was that line Obama used about setting aside childish things?  Clearly it has fallen on deaf ears. (more…)

Political Culture: Obama Ascendant

“Tomorrow is some shit, people,” Adam Yauch declared matter-of-factly Monday night, after searching for an appropriate way to close out the Beastie Boys’ fearsome inaugural-eve Rock the Vote gig in Washington. He meant it positively, of course – and he certainly cracked himself and his audience up with his offhand bon mot. (“You can Google that tomorrow,” he added – and, as of now, he’s right.) But his imprecise phrasing struck me as a delightfully precise reflection of the Rorschach blot that was Barack Obama’s inauguration.

There were at least 1.8 million stories in the bone-chilling city of Washington on Tuesday – most likely a lot more, considering the many thousands who came to town but never made it to the Mall. Each of us had his own reasons for being there, brought his own personal history and emotions, and emerged with his own tales to tell. We had all come to celebrate and to stand up for our new President and his achievements, but we were also there to commemorate our own successes and indulge our own euphoria.

Young people flooded into town because this was the first time they felt truly connected to the workings of their country, and they were justifiably excited about the role they had played in Obama’s victory – and because they knew, as my friend said the other day, that this was going to be “the party of our lifetime.”

For hundreds of thousands of African-Americans, the draw to DC was of course a profound one, and many of those who showed up did so in their grandest finery, even in the bitter chill of Tuesday morning. Their enthusiasm during the endless walks and Metro rides, their tears through the events of Sunday and Tuesday, the huge numbers who turned out to work in soup kitchens and on park cleanups during Monday’s Obama-mandated Day of Service, the thousands of charity and social workers who crammed into the JW Marriott hotel for a “People’s Inaugural Project” convention and then dominated the Neighborhood Ball … their resplendence in three-piece suits and chinchilla coats, putting to shame us whiteys who were shivering in bulky sweaters and ski caps. It was a sight to see. (more…)

Pop Politico: The 44th President

us-gray2

Even if Barack Obama was just another in the long line of white males who have been elected to the presidency, this would still be an historic moment in the United States. There’s a political sea change happening that, if played right, could herald a new progressive era; an era where instead of “going back” to an ideal of small government of the 19th century, we will see an active government that uses innovations from the private sector in novel and pragmatic ways to address the mess Bush left.

The sweeping changes enacted by Bush since his presidency began will have to be quickly undone so the United States can repair deep rifts with our allies, address the economic catastrophe we’re currently mired in, and defuse tense political situations in the Middle East, the Gulf, Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India (just to name a few).  Add to that all the small, medium and large political battles that will be fought daily, weekly and monthly, and it’s clear the number of hurdles Obama must overcome to be an effective leader are jaw-dropping in scope. But he spent two years telling us that he wanted the job, and, well, the majority of voters gave it to him — and gave it to him enthusiastically.

During my years of political socialization, the high level of cynicism toward government and politicians has been a constant that I didn’t think would ever change in my lifetime.  However, during this election the exigencies of our economic and political condition were such that a good deal of that cynicism transformed into genuine hope. Never have I witnessed the energy, elation, and enthusiasm of voters as they worked and worked and worked to help get Obama elected president. And unlike Bill Clinton who, it seemed, promised voters anything and everything  — only to break their hearts over and over — Barack Obama comes across as a guy whose realism and understanding of the political processes are such that the phrase “the art of the possible” may aptly describe the guiding philosophy of his administration.

Time will indeed tell if the progressive pragmatism of Obama will be a reality. My views of his candidacy, his campaign, and his ultimate election to the highest office of the land are, for those who regularly read my writing, well known.   However, I’d like to start an open thread on what you think are the most pressing problems the Obama Administration needs to address — and the realistic outcome you would like to see.

I’ll meet you in the comments section!

Political Culture: White Like … Who, Exactly?

We white folks are feeling pretty good about ourselves these days. And why not? A couple months ago, almost half of us voted to put a black guy into what is now ironically called the White House – more than enough to win him the election, when combined with his avalanche of African-American support. And polls show that even a majority of those who didn’t vote to put him there think that, all in all, America has done the right thing by breaking the color barrier at the very top of our meritocracy.

Since the election, we’ve imagined how the world will look to us with renewed respect and affection and hope, and envy even, because we’ve had the audacity (particularly after the colossal disgrace of the past eight years) to hand the keys to a member of the race whose oppression and struggle defines our history. And we’ve rejoiced in the anticipation, not to mention the first anecdotal reports (breathlessly passed along by the news media), of young African-Americans using Barack Obama’s election as inspiration to improve themselves and set their ambitions higher. You go, girls! (and boys!), we root silently. If a black man can get himself elected president, what’s stopping you from achieving the American Dream? No more excuses!

But wait just a minute, there, bub. Our cheerleading assumes a universal, colorblind buy-in to an “American Dream” that was dreamed up, after all, by white people. And who’s to say that the young African-Americans we’re rooting for might not already be achieving at the same level as young whites – if only the society we’ve inherited didn’t still keep a rather stiff boot on their necks?

Sure, we voted in enough numbers to elect a black guy president – but aren’t we still complicit in the maintenance of inherently racist educational, economic, political and legal institutions that keep the vast majority of African-Americans from succeeding on anything like Obama’s level? Well? Say something, cracker! Defend yourself, peckerwood!

Those no doubt bear some resemblance to the arguments that will soon be offered (though perhaps without that last bit of derision) by Tim Wise, the “anti-racist” activist and author whose latest treatise, Between Barack and a Hard Place: Racism and White Denial in the Age of Obama, is coming out in paperback this month. Full disclosure: I have not read this slim (120 pages) volume of buzzkill musings, but that’s OK – I just got around to finishing Wise’s last book, the less-slim yet provocative White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son.

With its brevity, its already-clichéd title, its lack of hardback-itude, and its Inauguration-friendly release date, Between Barack and a Hard Place bears all the earmarks of a cash-in. But Wise should be forgiven the indiscretion, because in recent years his authorial career has suffered from exquisitely poor timing. White Like Me first hit bookstores in early 2005, and (after not exactly flying off the shelves) was already headed for the remaindered racks when Hurricane Katrina suddenly shone a brilliant light on the struggles of poor blacks in our major cities – and white America’s inattention to those struggles. Sensing that the book had just barely missed its historical moment, Wise’s publisher offered him, in effect, a mulligan: a second edition that would incorporate an “open letter” to his fellow whites about Katrina. The new version, as fate would have it, was published in late December 2007 – just a week before a gaggle of honkies caucusing in Iowa launched the Obama campaign toward the presidency. (more…)

Pop Politico: “Happy New Year?”

The optimistic adage that a rising tide floats all boats is less sanguine when one contemplates the obverse. As the Great Recession of 2008 spills over to 2009 with what some are predicting is going to be far worse than what we experienced in 2008, the tools government has at its disposal to address global economic crises may not be strong enough to combat the ills that ail us.  In the United States, the housing bust that affected the financial markets — and is now affecting the retail sector — has global consequences. No one knows this more than people who spend their entire careers watching, examining, analyzing and writing about economic issues.

Just this weekend, a throng of such folk met San Francisco for the annual American Economics Association conference. And while I’m sure there were many dry and arcane recitations of scholarly papers that very few in the world can understand, there was one academic paper I read that suggests individual countries will have a difficult time recovering from this financial crisis by using what are thought of as tried and (mostly) true tools of the trade.  As Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff wrote in the conclusion of their paper “The Aftermath of Financial Crises:”

Since the onset of the current crisis, asset prices have tumbled in the United States and elsewhere along the tracks lain down by historical precedent.The analysis of the post-crisis outcomes in this paper for unemployment, output and government debt provide sobering benchmark numbers for how the crisis will continue to unfold.  Indeed, these historical comparisons were based on episodes that, with the notable exception of the Great Depression in the United States, were individual or regional in nature.  The global nature of the crisis will make it far more difficult for many countries to grow their way out through higher exports, or to smooth the consumption effects through foreign borrowing.  In such circumstances, the recent lull in sovereign defaults is likely to come to an end.  As Reinhart and Rogoff (2008b) highlight, defaults in emerging market economies tend to rise sharply when many countries are simultaneously experiencing domestic banking crises.

In other words, because of the banking crises (which generally take a long time to recover from), the large amount of debt governments are going to assume to loosen up credit, spend on New Deal-type jobs programs (like what Obama is proposing), stanch the number of mortgage defaults, and get the economy headed into positive numbers is clearly premised on the availability of money.  Alas, in the U.S., foreign credit comes mainly from sources who aren’t really allies (i.e., China, Russia and OPEC countries). If that money dries up due to a sharp decline in oil and product consumption, we may be headed deeper into the financial abyss. (more…)

Political Culture: We Said We Wanted a Revolution…

“Eighty percent of success in life is just showing up.” – Woody Allen

For a few years there – as George Bush “won” a pair of shady elections and then repeatedly defied the Constitution, the will of the people and any decent measure of common sense – Americans disenchanted or disgusted by his reign could be forgiven for wondering if some sort of coup might be required to remove the Republicans from power. Such a measure seemed unlikely, of course, and not just because violent overthrow is about as un-American as, say, torture. It’s worth noting that, in order to stage a coup, a large number of us would have needed to get our asses up off the sofa and take to the streets! Instead, we spent seven years watching dejectedly, furiously – but, for the most part, passively – as Bush and his minions screwed up every single thing they touched.

Election nightIn the end, however, electing Barack Obama and ending the Bush era didn’t require violence, or even civil disobedience. All it required was the force of our better ideas, the inspiration of a great young leader – and the resolve to stand steadfast against a stream of vitriol from politicians (and their dwindling core of followers) who couldn’t believe their house of malfeasance and misanthropy was at long last crumbling around them. American democracy finally proved capable of withstanding even Bush and the modern GOP – assuming, that is, that Bush and Dick Cheney actually vacate their residences on January 20.

We did stand with Obama this fall, and we did it in huge numbers. It’s been a big year for big crowds – big, peaceful crowds, fortunately. Since the beginning of this election cycle we’ve all marveled at the turnouts for Obama’s rallies, from 15,000 freezing souls at his announcement speech in February ’07 to a convention crowd of 90,000 in Denver, 100,000 in St. Louis, 200,000 in Berlin, and 250,000 in Chicago for his victory speech. Guesstimates of the turnout for his inauguration are already off the charts; officials are preparing for an onslaught of up to 4 million celebrants on the National Mall.

BerlinOf course, Obama’s big crowds were never a perfect measure of his qualities as a candidate. They certainly did bear witness to his charisma, and his strength as an orator. More than that, though, I believe they were a testament to Americans’ pent-up desire to express ourselves politically, to participate in the act of changing this country, simply by virtue of Showing Up. It was a spirit of urgency and, yes, patriotism that also led millions of us to click a button on the Internet and send Obama another $10 or $100 every couple of months, and led many thousands to volunteer in campaign offices, on the phone and around our neighborhoods.

I’ve been thinking about those crowds a lot lately – and not just because I’ve been weighing the question of whether or not to fly cross-country and join the revelers on the Mall. (I’m currently leaning against it, though if Clooney or Spielberg has a couple seats open on the Gulfstream I’m willing to rethink.) The real impetus has been my recent viewing of a wonderful documentary, The Singing Revolution, that is being readied for DVD release in early 2009. It recalls the people of Estonia’s inspiring efforts to keep their culture alive through decades of Soviet occupation and even genocide, and shows how they finally gained their independence without spilling a drop of blood – by expressing their national pride through song, and by simply Showing Up in large numbers, unarmed, to assert their right to freedom. (more…)