Posts Tagged ‘Karl Marx’

Numberscruncher: Sweden Is Not Socialist

Last week, a conservative friend asked me how I liked living in Sweden under Comrade Obama. I sighed. Somehow or another, it has become accepted that Sweden is a frightening socialist state and that life there would be horrible. I am here to defend Sweden, a nation I have never visited.

Sweden is a monarchy, a governmental structure very far from socialism and from the American ideal that all people are created equal.  Marx, of course, believed that his radical socialist ideal started with the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie, which pretty much eliminates a monarchy. The United States was founded on the principle that people did not need a king because they could rule themselves. We might think that the trappings of a monarchy are pretty and that their personal lives are fascinating, but is anyone really excited about the prospects of Prince Charles replacing Barack Obama?

Marx’s version of socialism, Communism, failed everywhere it was tried. No one seriously advocates Communism anymore. Socialism is more complicated, but it is not what Barack Obama or anyone else in U.S. government advocates. (By the way, “The Communist Manifesto” is in the public domain, in English, and it is short.  There is no excuse for not reading it. Frederich von Hayek would be good to read, too, but his books have a lot more pages.) (more…)

It’s Payday!

84227761Do you deserve a raise? Of course you do. Everyone thinks that he or she is underpaid. That’s just the nature of the working world. Teachers think that they are underpaid; AIG employees who received $700,000 bonuses believe that they are underpaid, too. Now, many teachers and all AIG employees who received $700,000 bonuses make more than the U.S. median income of $50,700.

Auto workers make more than the median, about $60,000 on average. Meanwhile, GM’s former CEO Rick Wagoner made $14.4 million dollars in 2007.

Who is overpaid? Who knows? My guess is that the guy on the line churning out Cobalts thinks he’s underpaid, and Wagoner thought that he was, too. Wagoner’s neighbors are probably jealous of his being one of the richest guys in Detroit, and the average UAW worker’s neighbor’s is probably bitter about a GM employee’s Cadillac health insurance.

How much money “should” anyone make? There are two thoughts on that. The first is simply supply and demand. The more people who can do a job relative to the number of openings for it, the lower the pay. Employers will pay as much money as they need to get people to fill the seats and not one penny more. Under this theory, it doesn’t matter what the worker actually does; the market decides on the value.

The second theory is that people should be paid relative to the value that they add to the finished product. This is easier, or at least more palatable, to measure in some fields than in others. Most teachers oppose any type of merit pay, even though we all know that some teachers are better than others. Meanwhile, many sales people work on straight commission. They get paid only if they produce. They can tie their pay to their output. Businesses have tried to do this with all employees if possible, giving them company stock and setting bonuses based on performance. That way, a company can see if a raise is justified without going through the hassle of advertising for the job and seeing who applies. Unfortunately, merit pay has led to the complicated situation where employees can beat their numbers even while the company crumbles around them. See: AIG. (more…)