<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Bigger Picture: In Glorious 3D!</title> <atom:link href="http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/</link> <description>your daily dose of pop culture</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Arend Anton</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51275</link> <dc:creator>Arend Anton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:51:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51275</guid> <description>First of all, &quot;Coraline&quot; isn&#039;t your standard kids movie and I wouldn&#039;t have expected as many really young ones as I saw. It&#039;s pretty heavy and dark.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, I wasn&#039;t complaining about them. I love kids, but they have a habit of talking through movies. I was just stating the fact, but it&#039;s not going to deter me from watching a movie that I think looks interesting. Sorry if it sounded like a complaint.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And regarding the DNC convention, the answer is that the Republicans are all around you. They&#039;re just wearing the Democrats&#039; skin.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, &#8220;Coraline&#8221; isn&#39;t your standard kids movie and I wouldn&#39;t have expected as many really young ones as I saw. It&#39;s pretty heavy and dark.</p><p>Secondly, I wasn&#39;t complaining about them. I love kids, but they have a habit of talking through movies. I was just stating the fact, but it&#39;s not going to deter me from watching a movie that I think looks interesting. Sorry if it sounded like a complaint.</p><p>And regarding the DNC convention, the answer is that the Republicans are all around you. They&#39;re just wearing the Democrats&#39; skin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lance Berry</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51274</link> <dc:creator>Lance Berry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51274</guid> <description>I&#039;ve never been a fan of the 3-D experience, and avoid such films at all cost, preferring to see the standard versions(if one exists) instead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I gotta say...if you&#039;re going into a film which you KNOW is supposed to be a &quot;kids&#039; movie&quot;, you can&#039;t complain about the theater filling up with kids! That&#039;s like going to the DNC and complaining &quot;Where the f**k are all the Republicans?!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve never been a fan of the 3-D experience, and avoid such films at all cost, preferring to see the standard versions(if one exists) instead.</p><p>However, I gotta say&#8230;if you&#39;re going into a film which you KNOW is supposed to be a &#8220;kids&#39; movie&#8221;, you can&#39;t complain about the theater filling up with kids! That&#39;s like going to the DNC and complaining &#8220;Where the f**k are all the Republicans?!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arend Anton</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51273</link> <dc:creator>Arend Anton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:20:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51273</guid> <description>Yeah, the difference in 3D glasses is the main thing my Dreamworks friends were telling me. However, I really don&#039;t think it will make a major difference if the 3D effect is used unnecessarily. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was sitting towards the middle of the theater. Next time I take in a 3D movie I&#039;ll try sitting closer to the back. Maybe that will help, fellow giant.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, the difference in 3D glasses is the main thing my Dreamworks friends were telling me. However, I really don&#39;t think it will make a major difference if the 3D effect is used unnecessarily.</p><p>I was sitting towards the middle of the theater. Next time I take in a 3D movie I&#39;ll try sitting closer to the back. Maybe that will help, fellow giant.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arend Anton</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51269</link> <dc:creator>Arend Anton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:04:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51269</guid> <description>I think you&#039;re absolutely right, Jack, and that&#039;s the point I intended to make in my column. I think movie technology is best used when it is not noticed, because when done subtly it can really suck you into a different world. Coraline is simply a great movie, but the technology works because it doesn&#039;t shout, &quot;HEY, LOOK AT THE 3D!&quot; at the audience.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#39;re absolutely right, Jack, and that&#39;s the point I intended to make in my column. I think movie technology is best used when it is not noticed, because when done subtly it can really suck you into a different world. Coraline is simply a great movie, but the technology works because it doesn&#39;t shout, &#8220;HEY, LOOK AT THE 3D!&#8221; at the audience.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BobCashill</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51272</link> <dc:creator>BobCashill</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51272</guid> <description>In a nutshell--and this is very basic--there are two kinds of 3D. The red-and-green paper glasses kind (&quot;anaglyph&quot;), used for the commercial, a recent episode of &lt;i&gt;Chuck&lt;/i&gt;, and I think the last &lt;i&gt;Spy Kids&lt;/i&gt; movie, is old school, and not always very effective for color processing when done on the cheap. (But the 3D works surprisingly well on the new &lt;i&gt;Friday the 13th III&lt;/i&gt; DVD.) Real3D, the current rage, uses the more comfortable &quot;sunglasses&quot; as a gateway to accurate color rendering of the image, besides the 3D. It&#039;s head-and-shoulders above its predecessor. (I&#039;m taller than you are--there must be a height requirement in place on the Popdose film desk--and I&#039;ve never had much of a problem with 3D, unless the quality of either the 3D or the film is lousy. You may adjust with repeated exposure.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The best effect in &lt;i&gt;Coraline&lt;/i&gt;, as I mentioned in my review, is at the very end of the end credits. Otherwise, as you noted, its use is to enhance an already immersive environment. Some of the 50s features, like &lt;i&gt;Dial M for Murder&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Kiss Me Kate&lt;/i&gt;, pointed the way, but by that time the effects-oriented craze had run its course.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I love 3D, and basically lived at Film Forum here in NY when they had a festival of 50s features a few years back--they proved to be better than their reputation. But I&#039;m not really seeing it as &quot;saving&quot; an industry that at least now, after a torrid, recession-proof winter at the boxoffice, doesn&#039;t need it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a nutshell&#8211;and this is very basic&#8211;there are two kinds of 3D. The red-and-green paper glasses kind (&#8220;anaglyph&#8221;), used for the commercial, a recent episode of <i>Chuck</i>, and I think the last <i>Spy Kids</i> movie, is old school, and not always very effective for color processing when done on the cheap. (But the 3D works surprisingly well on the new <i>Friday the 13th III</i> DVD.) Real3D, the current rage, uses the more comfortable &#8220;sunglasses&#8221; as a gateway to accurate color rendering of the image, besides the 3D. It&#39;s head-and-shoulders above its predecessor. (I&#39;m taller than you are&#8211;there must be a height requirement in place on the Popdose film desk&#8211;and I&#39;ve never had much of a problem with 3D, unless the quality of either the 3D or the film is lousy. You may adjust with repeated exposure.)</p><p>The best effect in <i>Coraline</i>, as I mentioned in my review, is at the very end of the end credits. Otherwise, as you noted, its use is to enhance an already immersive environment. Some of the 50s features, like <i>Dial M for Murder</i> and <i>Kiss Me Kate</i>, pointed the way, but by that time the effects-oriented craze had run its course.</p><p>I love 3D, and basically lived at Film Forum here in NY when they had a festival of 50s features a few years back&#8211;they proved to be better than their reputation. But I&#39;m not really seeing it as &#8220;saving&#8221; an industry that at least now, after a torrid, recession-proof winter at the boxoffice, doesn&#39;t need it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DwDunphy</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51271</link> <dc:creator>DwDunphy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51271</guid> <description>All true, but I think there is a matter of source material to reckon with. Coraline was written by Neil Gaiman who works in adult and kid-lit, yet both sides are thoughtfully drawn out and equally known for being creepier than their standard bearers. With such stories to adapt, director Henry Selick would have made the cardinal mistake almost every other Hollywood production has made when approaching Gaiman&#039;s stories: going for the big bang versus the myriad, tiny and spooky ones.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Meanwhile, Dreamworks has wrung out the Shrek towel once too often, is probably working on Half A Loaf Of Kung Fu Panda right now and have concluded their menagerie of Madagascar animal aren&#039;t funny and are all deserving of being stuffed with straw. Every one of them. Especially the Schwimmer. Monsters Vs. Aliens is all about grabbing kids by the decals and shaking the Garanimals to pieces. Expect very little subtlety, and a whole lot of detritus, whizzing by.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All true, but I think there is a matter of source material to reckon with. Coraline was written by Neil Gaiman who works in adult and kid-lit, yet both sides are thoughtfully drawn out and equally known for being creepier than their standard bearers. With such stories to adapt, director Henry Selick would have made the cardinal mistake almost every other Hollywood production has made when approaching Gaiman&#39;s stories: going for the big bang versus the myriad, tiny and spooky ones.</p><p>Meanwhile, Dreamworks has wrung out the Shrek towel once too often, is probably working on Half A Loaf Of Kung Fu Panda right now and have concluded their menagerie of Madagascar animal aren&#39;t funny and are all deserving of being stuffed with straw. Every one of them. Especially the Schwimmer. Monsters Vs. Aliens is all about grabbing kids by the decals and shaking the Garanimals to pieces. Expect very little subtlety, and a whole lot of detritus, whizzing by.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack Feerick</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51270</link> <dc:creator>Jack Feerick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:56:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51270</guid> <description>That being said: 3D also makes sense for me in a film like &lt;i&gt;Coraline&lt;/i&gt;, where you&#039;re looking at actual objects and sets that have an objective physical presence, in a way that&#039;s not true for a computer-animated movie like &lt;I&gt;Monsters vs Aliens&lt;/i&gt;, where the depth and distance between objects is only a function of algorithms to begin with.&lt;/I&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That being said: 3D also makes sense for me in a film like <i>Coraline</i>, where you&#39;re looking at actual objects and sets that have an objective physical presence, in a way that&#39;s not true for a computer-animated movie like <i>Monsters vs Aliens</i>, where the depth and distance between objects is only a function of algorithms to begin with.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jack Feerick</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-51268</link> <dc:creator>Jack Feerick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:54:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-51268</guid> <description>I thought &lt;i&gt;Coraline&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s use of 3D was impressive precisely *because* it was so subtle. There weren&#039;t a lot of &quot;paddleball moments,&quot; but I thought it was interesting how the depth of field would skew in the passage between worlds. The so-called &quot;real world&quot; was shallow, slightly claustrophobic, while the Other Mother&#039;s domain was deep and immersive. Even the kitchen seemed vast, enveloping... devouring, maybe.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The same principle was in operation when &lt;i&gt;The Wizard of Oz&lt;/i&gt; shifted from B&amp;W to full-color as we went from Kansas to Oz - which, let&#039;s face it, is a pretty heavy-handed effect. In practice, though, the 3D in &lt;i&gt;Coraline&lt;/i&gt; was more akin to the digital palette-tweaking used i  many of today&#039;s films; if you&#039;re looking for the perspective shift (and I was), you&#039;ll see it; otherwise, you&#039;ll just absorb it subliminally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s the real future of 3D, I think - rather than as an end in itself, it has the potential to become just another tool at a filmmaker&#039;s disposal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought <i>Coraline</i>&#39;s use of 3D was impressive precisely *because* it was so subtle. There weren&#39;t a lot of &#8220;paddleball moments,&#8221; but I thought it was interesting how the depth of field would skew in the passage between worlds. The so-called &#8220;real world&#8221; was shallow, slightly claustrophobic, while the Other Mother&#39;s domain was deep and immersive. Even the kitchen seemed vast, enveloping&#8230; devouring, maybe.</p><p>The same principle was in operation when <i>The Wizard of Oz</i> shifted from B&#038;W to full-color as we went from Kansas to Oz &#8211; which, let&#39;s face it, is a pretty heavy-handed effect. In practice, though, the 3D in <i>Coraline</i> was more akin to the digital palette-tweaking used i  many of today&#39;s films; if you&#39;re looking for the perspective shift (and I was), you&#39;ll see it; otherwise, you&#39;ll just absorb it subliminally.</p><p>That&#39;s the real future of 3D, I think &#8211; rather than as an end in itself, it has the potential to become just another tool at a filmmaker&#39;s disposal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arend Anton</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-42075</link> <dc:creator>Arend Anton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:51:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-42075</guid> <description>First of all, &quot;Coraline&quot; isn&#039;t your standard kids movie and I wouldn&#039;t have expected as many really young ones as I saw. It&#039;s pretty heavy and dark.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Secondly, I wasn&#039;t complaining about them. I love kids, but they have a habit of talking through movies. I was just stating the fact, but it&#039;s not going to deter me from watching a movie that I think looks interesting. Sorry if it sounded like a complaint.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And regarding the DNC convention, the answer is that the Republicans are all around you. They&#039;re just wearing the Democrats&#039; skin.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, &#8220;Coraline&#8221; isn&#39;t your standard kids movie and I wouldn&#39;t have expected as many really young ones as I saw. It&#39;s pretty heavy and dark.</p><p>Secondly, I wasn&#39;t complaining about them. I love kids, but they have a habit of talking through movies. I was just stating the fact, but it&#39;s not going to deter me from watching a movie that I think looks interesting. Sorry if it sounded like a complaint.</p><p>And regarding the DNC convention, the answer is that the Republicans are all around you. They&#39;re just wearing the Democrats&#39; skin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lance Berry</title><link>http://popdose.com/the-bigger-picture-in-glorious-3d/comment-page-1/#comment-42074</link> <dc:creator>Lance Berry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:39:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=13208#comment-42074</guid> <description>I&#039;ve never been a fan of the 3-D experience, and avoid such films at all cost, preferring to see the standard versions(if one exists) instead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, I gotta say...if you&#039;re going into a film which you KNOW is supposed to be a &quot;kids&#039; movie&quot;, you can&#039;t complain about the theater filling up with kids! That&#039;s like going to the DNC and complaining &quot;Where the f**k are all the Republicans?!&quot;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve never been a fan of the 3-D experience, and avoid such films at all cost, preferring to see the standard versions(if one exists) instead.</p><p>However, I gotta say&#8230;if you&#39;re going into a film which you KNOW is supposed to be a &#8220;kids&#39; movie&#8221;, you can&#39;t complain about the theater filling up with kids! That&#39;s like going to the DNC and complaining &#8220;Where the f**k are all the Republicans?!&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Minify debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Theme:              ddf04
Template:           single
-->
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 55/72 queries in 0.038 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: popdose.com @ 2012-02-11 23:29:18 -->
