By the way, just for the record, I sent Pete the link to this piece and told him that Dave's response to his comments had been added, but that I felt that, given the situation, it would be best if any further responses were offered up within the comments section rather than in the piece itself. I don't know if he will choose to do so, but I felt like the offer needed to be made, at least.

Actually, Mr. Haycock comes off far worse than Mr Wakeling here. And Mr. Harris … well, you could have (and probably should have) put all of the Haycock correspondence into a separate article to begin with. Wakeling was right to be miffed at your faux pas. (To your credit, you had the grace apologize, and to post his comments about the issue.)

BUT…all that aside, this was a great piece, full of interesting info!

And Dave, I suspect you're *never* gonna get the money IRS owes you — so take the deal where you get ownership of the masters!

By the way, just for the record, I sent Pete the link to this piece and told him that Dave's response to his comments had been added, but that I felt that, given the situation, it would be best if any further responses were offered up within the comments section rather than in the piece itself. I don't know if he will choose to do so, but I felt like the offer needed to be made, at least.

Actually, Mr. Haycock comes off far worse than Mr Wakeling here. And Mr. Harris … well, you could have (and probably should have) put all of the Haycock correspondence into a separate article to begin with. Wakeling was right to be miffed at your faux pas. (To your credit, you had the grace apologize, and to post his comments about the issue.)

BUT…all that aside, this was a great piece, full of interesting info!

And Dave, I suspect you're *never* gonna get the money IRS owes you — so take the deal where you get ownership of the masters!

By the way, just for the record, I sent Pete the link to this piece and told him that Dave's response to his comments had been added, but that I felt that, given the situation, it would be best if any further responses were offered up within the comments section rather than in the piece itself. I don't know if he will choose to do so, but I felt like the offer needed to be made, at least.

Actually, Mr. Haycock comes off far worse than Mr Wakeling here. And Mr. Harris … well, you could have (and probably should have) put all of the Haycock correspondence into a separate article to begin with. Wakeling was right to be miffed at your faux pas. (To your credit, you had the grace apologize, and to post his comments about the issue.)

BUT…all that aside, this was a great piece, full of interesting info!

And Dave, I suspect you're *never* gonna get the money IRS owes you — so take the deal where you get ownership of the masters!