The Three Strike Rule: “Lost”

I was supposed to write a column about several reality shows airing this summer, and I had good intentions of doing just that. But the only reality I know right now is that I’m an addict … to Lost. I must find out what happens to the survivors of Oceanic Flight 815, which departed Sydney, Australia, for Los Angeles, California, on September 24, 2004, and crashed on an uncharted island.

It began as a curiosity. See, I was over at ABC.com, doing research for my Three Strikes column on Brothers & Sisters. All I wanted was a jpeg, you know? Honest, this was the only reason I was even near the site. Then I saw an option: “Full Episodes.” I mean, what could it hurt to check and see what they were streaming, right? Maybe… maybe they had unaired episodes of Cavemen, I liked that show. I did; really, I’m not making this up! Clicking that link was like finding a private room at some teenage suburban party where all of the “good” kids are drinking smuggled beers in the living room and the “cool” kids are doing something else away from the crowd.

I’d decided long ago that I wasn’t going to get caught up in the Lost hysteria. After I missed most of the first season, I thought there was no way to catch up. Sure, the DVD’s are available to rent, but I wasn’t going to waste one of the entries of my Netflix queue with Lost, not when I had 300 movies to get through. And after two seasons, I stopped caring. I thought, “Come on, can it really be as good as Deadwood, Veronica Mars or Friday Night Lights. Was Lost even close to the caliber of The Sopranos?” I scoffed at the notion. But Abc.com… damn you ABC! It taunted me… “Lost Season 1 in streaming HD.” HD? C’mon, it can’t be that good. I reasoned with myself, “Look, just this one episode. I’ll watch the pilot and be able to claim I’ve seen Lost. Then, back to my life.”

My life. Ha! I have no life! Two hours after watching the pilot, I was hooked. I saw Matthew Fox display once again why he’s one of this generation’s finest actors; I saw Terry O’Quinn sink his teeth into a complex, difficult role that is light years from the first time I saw him in The Stepfather; I was introduced to actors Josh Holloway, Jorge Garcia, Yunjin Kim, Evangeline Lily and the great Michael Emerson; I was swept away by the gorgeous score composed by Michael Giacchino; and I was blown away by the vision of executive producer J. J. Abrams and the two geniuses who run the show, Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof. Across the board, I discovered what critics have been talking about for four and a half years: Lost is simply one of the best shows on television, ever.

If you are unaware of the plot of Lost, here is a brief rundown: An airplane crashes on an uncharted island. The survivors band together and wait to be rescued. Meanwhile, many dark secrets lurk in the lush foliage of this island, including: an elusive monster that sweeps the jungle; the remnants of a mysterious experiment called the Dharma Initiative; and a second group of island inhabitants who are hostile to our heroes and come to be known as the “Others.” Each episode focuses on one character, using flashbacks to give us important details of their lives leading up the crash (this technique was modified for the just-ended fourth season). Thus, the characters are more fully realized than standard dramas trying to make up shit on the fly. We get to see how the characters grow, or not, and come to care deeply about most of them. Yet, no one ever appears safe. One week you may be rooting for someone; the next, he/she may get killed. That’s all I’m going to tell you. If you want to learn more, head over the ABC.com or rent the DVDs. The rest of the story is too complex and, at times, mind-blowing to go into in this small TV column.

As for me, I am plowing through all four seasons at a disgusting, maddening pace. When I should have been resting a sore back (injured due to sitting in my damn office chair for too many hours… watching frickin’ Lost), I was staying up late watching an entire disc of season 3 episodes. And when I should be writing or getting the next draft of a script revised, I’m on the computer. I find myself trolling the dark alleys of eBay, hoping to score a deal on the season 1 box set. Maybe I’ll be that lucky schlep who wins the box with just $20! Can you imagine?!

Please, help me. I NEED HELP!

The one blessing in all of this insanity is that there is an end in sight. Once I complete season 4, I join the rest of the millions of people who watch Lost and are waiting until January 2009 for the fifth season to begin. My eyes will have time to recover from the glare of the computer monitor; I won’t feel as if my retinas are burning. Moreover, ABC and the producers have agreed to end the show in 2010, giving the series just two more seasons to wrap up everything. This is a brilliant move. With an end date and a finite number of hours, we viewers won’t be subjected to meaningless characters and stories that feel like filler. Thank you ABC, for saving my life. Although Lost is so dense, like a Dickens novel, it’s worth watching many times over. No! Stop!

All right. I have to wrap this up. It’s 6 AM on Sunday morning. My wife just left for work and the kids are still sleeping. I think I can get an episode or two in before they wake up. Yes, if I time it just right, I can get at least two more in to get me through the day.

Tags: , ,

  • I envy those of you who get to experience Lost for the first time :)

    I will not help you either, because it's so worth going through that maddening DVD watching pace :)
  • I don't know whether you're saying the series is good, or just addictive.

    It is undeniable that the first season and parts of the second were some of the best episodic TV ever done -- like the first season of 24. But somewhere along the line, things started to fall apart. Unlike Babylon 5, which kept a strong sense of forward momentum and deliberate purpose throughout the series (especially the first four seasons), I get the sense that the story arc of LOST is not so solidly planned. And that in the end, we're going to be sorely disappointed, as we were with J.J. Abram's Felicity and Alias.

    I will finish the series, because I am hooked too. But I expect to be angry when it all ends. I mean, really! Now we're getting stuff like moving the island by going into a subterranean cave and turning a giant crank! Who comes up with this stuff??? LOST has lost its way. It is a show about writers who have crashed on the shores of amnesia. They've forgotten what made the show an essential part of your weekly television diet -- the personal dramas and conflicts. Oh, those personal conflicts are still there to some degree, though they are not as compelling by any stretch of the imagination, and they are put in the context of increasingly wacky plot devices and elements which I do not believe will ever be resolved in a manner that allows our suspension of disbelieve to remain intact. I know my suspension is already cracked in several places. Perhaps the show will surprise and delight me by tying up the loose ends in an acceptable way. I'm not holding my breath. At this point, I am looking forward to the next season only with a kind of morbid fascination.
  • JonCummings
    I couldn't disagree more with your characterization of the past season, Eric--particularly the idea that Lost's writers have lost their way. I've never seen a series in which events, personalities and motivations from the past, present and future (!) were tied together so brilliantly, and with so much obvious forethought.

    The first half of season 3 was, admittedly, a tough slog, and it seemed the writers were marking time waiting for inspiration to hit. However, the season ended with perhaps the most magnificently realized shock in TV history, and since then Lost has been a steamroller, undeniable in its storytelling and emotional resonance.

    I do find the idea of "moving" the island preposterous, but I have no doubt that Cuse and Lindeloff know exactly what they're doing, and that this bizarre twist will be brought off in a thoroughly satisfying way and within the show's broader context.

    As for the "personal dramas and conflicts" whose absence you bemoan, it must be remembered that the writers' strike chopped three episodes off the season and that events had to be condensed in order for the story arc to reach its intended season-ending cliffhanger. Besides, if anything I believe the stunning shift to flash-forwards opened up a new and thrilling set of opportunities for character development.

    In particular, the episodes "The Constant" (in which Desmond finally reaches Penny) and "The Shape of Things to Come" were enormously successful, and likely will result in a slew of Emmy nominations.

    OK, I'm through gushing. I'll just finish by saying that I envy Scott his newfound addiction, and his ability to find time to fit 80 intense hours of television into such a compressed schedule. I experienced a similar obsession last summer when I TiVo'd the entire season of Mad Men before watching a single episode, then couldn't stop watching it once I'd started. But that was only 13 episodes...
  • Malchus
    My biggest problem with having so much ground to cover is trying to avoid spoilers that are over the internet. And they're not intentional. People are just chatting or making comments (like yours, Jon) about to episodes already aired and I keep getting hints and clues about what is going to happen. It is frustrating, but also very exciting knowing that some weird shit is about to happen.
  • JonCummings
    Sorry, Scott. No more spoilers from me...
  • Sorry, Jon. I have no desire to kill anyone's buzz. If you like it, that's what counts. Enjoy, enjoy! It's not like your rotting your brain with American Gladiators or something.

    Our family has been rolling our eyes about various plot developments and the overall direction of LOST since the third season. And it's kind of frustrating to be so hooked, compelled to watch hoping there will be answers to the mystery, yet not enjoying it very much. We just don't have the strength of will to jump off the ride at this point.

    Part of the problem is that I'm having trouble caring about these characters any more. John Locke, for example. His back story and early actions on the island made me very sympathetic to him. Lately, not so much. To some extent, I feel that way about Jack as well. You can't be mad at Hurley, and I'm OK with Desmond. I really hate how they've tried to make us feel bad for a worm like Ben by killing his daughter. Ben is sick, evil. Giving him a role in saving the decent people on the island is a bit distasteful.

    What can I say? I have some issues. :)
  • allen
    Lost is an anomoly. A television show that is a fully contained story with a beginning, middle and an end.
    There has never been anything done on television on this scale.
    I expect, like a great novel, it will be very satisfying when it's over.
    I also recognize that, like a great novel, we are in the middle of the story and that is usually where books get more dense, expository and slow.
  • Then, supplement your viewing by spending hours on Lostpedia trying to make sense of it all.
    http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Main_Page
  • Malchus
    Yes, I've been to Lostpedia and it is so thorough that I dare not click on any of the character links. I've done that a couple times and learned the fates of characters before I wanted to.
  • I was once like you were, Scott -- for years, I resisted the "Lost" cries, refusing to trust the buzz. Even after my brother loaned me the Season One DVD set, I had no plans to watch it. But one night while I was out of the house, my wife popped the first disc in, and when I came home, she wouldn't stop talking about how great the show was. We've been hooked ever since.

    Unlike what seems like the majority of viewers, I've remained happy to be along for the ride, even through the supposedly crappy third season. And this last season? Wow. Just wow. I don't know what show you're watching, Eric, but the "Lost" I see is better than it's ever been.
  • Malchus
    I really haven't had any problems with season 3. There were a couple of clunker episodes (in season 2, also), but you get that with any show. the way they handled the fan hatred of Nicki and Paulo was brilliant.

    And for as complicated as the plot is and for the number of characters being juggled, I can;t think of any show that does it better. Unlike, say, "Heroes", which tanked miserably in its second season (as did "Ugly Betty" after the writers strike), "Lost" has remained consistently good. What's more, I am eager to go back and rewatch each season to pick up on the clues that have been laid out since episode one.
  • Congrats on discovering the best TV series that will take you away from life itself. I've watched since day one but I just got a friend of mine into the show half-way through S3. She was adamant that she wouldn't like it and I kept pushing her. Gave her S1 and she actually called out of work! Then she went online and bought S2 immediately. Then downloaded the first half of S3 on iTunes. Then she didn't know what to do with herself...she had to actually wait like the rest of us LOST schlubs. I don't know why I keep getting more and more people into this show but now I'm receiving too many calls at 10:01p asking, "What just happened? They did not end it like this, OMG!"
  • matthew
    To my eyes, the produces of Lost have been shafted by the demands of big budget US network television, which demands 22 episodes a year for 5 years in order to justify itself. If Lost truly is a single story with a beginning a middlle and an end (which I doubt) then it would be hugely improved by being shorter. No story is so compelling that it requires 150 episodes to tell....and no writers are good enough to maintain suspense for that long. If they could have restricted themselves to 3 seasons tops then I'm sure it would have been excellent, in a similar manner to the UK show Life on Mars, which ended after 2 short seasons. That show is currently under going americanisation and I wonder how they can spin out the premise for 5 years (if it's a hit)?
  • Malchus
    I agree with you about the demands of US network television. Still, I think that "Lost" has been able to sustain most of its integrity through four seasons, three of them being 22 (23, actually) long. But, television is a business, after all, and if a show is a hit, the networks want more. Even the series you mention, "Life on Mars" wasn't able to truly sustain itself through 2 seasons. The second season seemed to drag on until the very final episode; but I loved the show anyway. And when the BBC wanted more, the producers went on to create "Ashes to Ashes", which is inferior to its predecessor. As for the American version of "Life on Mars," I am also curious of how they'll stretch out the story to last more than a season. Apparently they have a plan, but first the producers will have to get over the hurdle of bad press.
blog comments powered by Disqus