Theatre Is Easy: “Next to Normal”

BOTTOM LINE: An exciting new musical with a lot to like — and, well, a lot to dislike.

Aaron Tveit, Alice Ripley, and J. Robert Spencer in Next to Normal (photo by Joan Marcus)

Musical theatre fans, rejoice — a brand-spanking-new modern musical starring the irresistible Alice Ripley is now on Broadway! Everyone else, remain seated.

I know Next to Normal will amass a following of devoted fans who connect with this rock musical as if it was written for them. And I know I’ll get flak for not jumping on board. It’s not that I don’t understand, and it’s not even that I don’t like the show, because there really are a bunch of fantastic things about Next to Normal. But there’s something missing — some nagging disconnect in the reality of it and the way the plot unfolds. I want to believe these people are real, but unfortunately I just can’t get there.

Let’s start with a little background. Next to Normal premiered off-Broadway at Second Stage Theatre last year and then played for a while at the Arena Stage in Washington, D.C. Before that the show was crafted on a smaller scale in New York and also ran for a bit in Seattle. All this time the creative team and producers worked to perfect the show, getting it ready for the inevitable Broadway production we have today. I’m sure it’s gone through a lot of changes in that time. Next to Normal is the story of a dysfunctional family; Diana (Alice Ripley) is a mother with mental illness, Dan (J. Robert Spencer) is her stable husband, Gabe (Aaron Tveit) is their son and Natalie (Jennifer Damiano) is their daughter. Diana’s condition is getting worse and rendering her all but unable to maintain a normal life. The family is left to deal with their mother’s addiction to meds, visits to various shrinks, suicide attempt, and eventually electroshock therapy which leaves her unable to remember much of the past.

Directed by Michael Greif (Rent) and with music by Brian Yorkey and Tom Kitt (High Fidelity), Next to Normal is a rock opera that never stops rocking. Nearly every word is sung and the band sits on stage next to the action. And the music is hands down the best part of this theatrical experience. Next to Normal feels very much like Rent in the sense that the music rocks hard and the pulsating score is consistent through the story, changing with the tone of the moment. And like Rent (which also tackles a sad and gritty storyline), the music is there as an outlet for these characters’ emotions, not just for theatrical show. You’d never call these songs “numbers” or “dittys” as they hold much more weight than that. Check out the songs on the show’s website for a taste of the score.

Another positive of this production are the performances, specifically the vocals. Everyone sings this show with absolute perfection, equally weighted and important to the story. It’s wonderful to listen to. Acting-wise, Ripley and Damiano are riviting. Ripley is charmingly disturbed and Damiano, as the 16-year old just trying to make it through adolescence, evokes such pain and weakness through a collected, determined exterior. To their credit, Tveit and Adam Chanler-Beret as Natalie’s boyfriend Henry do their best to create unique characters that support the story even though they aren’t given much to work with in the script. Louis Hobson as the various doctors is adequate although his part isn’t very deep at all. Spencer, as Diana’s husband, lacks adequate emotion; the ex-Jersey Boy sounds supurb but I never believed he was anyone’s husband or father, doting or otherwise.

If you’re a already a musical theatre fan, stop reading now and go see Next to Normal. You’ll like it, you’ll connect, you’ll cry, you’ll appreciate the uniqueness this show has to offer in a consistently cookie-cutter genre. It deserves credit for breaking the norm. But if you’re interested in the other side of the coin, I’ll be happy to tell you why this show doesn’t work for me. It mostly has to do with the minimalist, representational approach to the story-telling (which actually, I’m usually all about). The set (similar to Rent) is a three-storied structure of scaffolding representing the family’s home. The ground floor includes furniture that gets pushed to the front of the stage when it’s being used and pushed back when it’s not. The other scenes take place in the bare area in front of the house with a few set pieces or props to indicate the setting. Basically, the scenes are “suggested” to the audience and we use our imaginations to connect the dots. In theory, this technique should work, and if the characters were as real and grounded as the plot lends, I wouldn’t have had a problem with the minimalistic interpretation. It would’ve been an artsy storytelling choice that didn’t muddy the plot.

But sadly I didn’t, for one iota of one second, believe that any of these characters were real or their story true. The gravity of this situation, especially at the end of the play, wouldn’t make anyone sing, let alone look on any bright side of life. The plight this family goes through is so damn depressing I’m not sure one could just soldier on and look on the bright side, and at least not be severely screwed up. Seriously, it’s a downer. Maybe this story requires stronger acting choices, more depth to these characters to bring their drama to life. Next to Normal introduces a profound set of circumstances and never really delves into how the characters feel about them. Sure, we hear the lyrics and feel the drive of the music, but the actors don’t truly personify people going through a struggle (Damiano not included, she’s mostly dead-on with her character’s emotion). Maybe they’re too busy singing. And maybe this story would be better told without music. I really wanted to connect with this show, and through the music I did feel somewhat attached. But in the end, Next to Normal didn’t leave me feeling resolved or restored, it simply left me feeling sad and disjointed.

Next to Normal plays at the Booth Theatre, 222 W. 45th St. Performances are Tue 7 PM, Wed-Fri 8 PM, Sat 2 and 8 PM, and Sun 3 and 7:30 PM. The show runs 2 hrs. 20 min., with a 15-min. intermission. Tickets are $36.50-$111.50, with a limited number of $25 rush tickets available at the box office starting at 10 AM day of show. For tickets visit telecharge.com, for more show info visit nexttonormal.com, and for more NY theatre reviews visit theatreiseasy.com.

  • Howard
    You're right, Molly, it's not the traditional upbeat Hollywood ending, if you will, but it gives us all food for thought and creates an enormous emotional impact. I do agree that the boyfriend Henry could have been given a meatier role, but other than that, I strongly disagree with your comments about not believing it's a real family and about Spencer "lacking adequate emotion". Spencer's strength in his intentionally understated portrayal of Dan is to let everyone shine and react around him to make the wonderfully emotional and surprising ending even more hard-hitting. Not surprisingly, Ripley is terrific, but Tviet also shines in his role, which has much more substance than you imply.
  • Robert
    I get that you didn't connect with the show but I'm not sure how you could have misinterpreted the characters as "looking on the bright side of life" (other than lovestruck stoner Henry). Nor why you believe the goal of the show should have been to leave you "feeling resolved or restored." It left you sad? Good! One of art's purposes is to elicit emotion, and Next to Normal accomplished that to an overwhelming degree for me.

    I'm unclear about your comparison to Rent. You don't explicitly say that Rent's characters were more believable or that the show was more successful with its treatment of grim issues as a rock musical, but it seems that's the implication. So I ask: did you ever see an actual drug addict with AIDS in the East Village in the 80s? I guarantee you they would have stopped struggling and died on the spot before singing and dancing and cavorting like they were on some Up With Alternative People tour with its offensively upbeat ending. The two shows can be put into the same general category, but Next to Normal is quite a comparative leap forward. Ripley's performance alone makes for a colossally entertaining event.
  • molly
    thanks for your comments. i totally expected dissent (re-read my first few sentences) and just to clarify right away, i never said i disliked the show. i guess i'm glad that people feel the need to defend it (same thing on my blog, theatreiseasy.com) because that means it struck a chord and that's the whole point of creating art. this show is certainly groundbreaking, and it's obviously connecting with its audience...and regardless of my personal opinion, that rocks. i'm still going to be honest though, because i'm entitled to my opinion the same as you.

    i agree that this show elicited a lot of emotion–both from the actors and from me as an audience member. i just don't think this genre is the right way to tell this story. i'm a director and a dramaturg so i'm coming at this from a somewhat respectable background. i think the nature of musical theatre is big and showy and tends to get away from the meaty storytelling that a play requires because so many other factors come into play in only two hours. and i simply think this story is too real and gritty to be told with the distractions of musical theatre. and because of those other factors, the story didn't come across as valid enough for me to justify the stakes and the actions.
  • Brian Yorkey
    It's a great show. You have no fucking idea what you're talking about, and no right to write about the show.
  • David_E
    Oh, that was mature.
  • J. Robert Spencer
    Calm down Brian. We don't need another one of your little tantrums. I'm getting kind of sick of your shit.
  • molly
    brian yorkey? seriously? i'm almost flattered you wrote a comment! if that's really you, sorry i pissed you off, i actually think your music is awesome. and i have every right to write about this show...this is a blog and your show is a public event broadway.
  • Melissa
    Apparently, Yorkey trolls the internet for anyone who might have a less-than-stellar opinion about his shows, then throws a hissy fit. Like here: http://ccaggiano.typepad.com/everything_i_know_...

    I think it's rather sad.
  • You're right, it is sad. The bastard in me finds it hysterical, though. I want to try and talk Yorkey into writing a series about all the people he hates.
  • molly
    thanks for sharing that melissa! i hope ben brantley writes something positive or he's going to wake up with a flaming bag of poo on his doorstep.
  • Brian Yorkey
    That's not me writing. Don't know who it is, but it's not me. I don't post comments on reviews about my work. (Well, except this one, now, to say that the above poster is not me. Anyone who wants verification can contact our publicists, Barlow Hartman at www.barlowhartman.com).
  • Melissa
    Can somebody say "damage control"?
  • David
    Barlow Hartman just announced that it's closing. Epic fail, Brian. Epic fail.
  • Sort of. Barlow's moving on, but The Hartman Group is forming in its place:

    http://www.playbill.com/news/article/128717.html
  • Virilene
    I saw the show night-before-last. Enjoyed it, even though I'm not a huge fan of theater, less still of the 'rock opera' genre. It ranged from good-to-very good, never excellent, never great. But I enjoyed it, and that was plenty for me.

    Does art, theater in this case, necessarily have to leave one resolved and restored? Can a work not be successful if it portrays and depicts a specific set of circumstances, i.e., tells a story? Has a work not succeeded at some level if it makes you feel SOMETHING.....? Must a work resolve an issue for society in a way that pleases everyone? Hell, even if you leave angry and offended, have your opinions and beliefs probably not been challenged? Seriously, a couple of the rants I've read about this show remind me of the middle-aged man I overheard leaving Avenue Q a few years ago who fumed, "So they're saying we should just live for the moment?! That makes me so angry!"

    As for the issues addressed in the show....look, I've experienced very similar circumstances in my life, that had a more tragic ending than this. I identified with the emotions that every character depicted in some respect, and thought they hit very true emotional notes more often than not. Professionally, I've observed similar experiences at close enough range to know that sometimes psycho-pharmaceuticals work, sometimes not. Sometimes talk therapy and CBT works, sometimes not. Sometimes ECT works, sometimes not. Sometimes things get worse. Sometimes things get much, much worse.

    In this STORY, which the writers have chosen to tell, none of those therapies worked, which leaves a person with a couple of options--live as best you can without treatment, or stop living. Neither of those alternatives is particularly cheery, but N2N, for better or worse, 'resolved' itself with the lighter of the two. If you don't agree with that 'message', or if you simply don't like it, write your own damned musical. But don't just stand on the sidelines and carp that you don't like someone else's story. So it didn't work for you? It worked well enough for me.
  • JonCummings
    Virilene, you have no right to criticize someone else's criticism. If you don't like it, get your own fricking column!!!!! Don't just sit there and carp that you didn't like someone else's opinion.

    Of course, the previous sentence was BS, but the point is, people are entitled to their opinions and Molly has established herself (through her own blog, and now here) as someone with the experience and knowledge to offer worthwhile assessments of new productions. Furthermore, generally speaking, informed criticism is vital to theater (and all the performing arts), not only as a consumer guide but as a method of placing new works in historical and qualitative context.

    So, please, disagree all you like, as vocally as you like, but don't negate the importance or the validity of criticism -- or even, specifically, of Molly's judgment -- by falling back on the old "Write your own damned musical" line.
  • molly
    Look, Virilene, I liked Next to Normal. I, like you, didn't love it...and I took issue with the plot's development and final resolution, but jesus you don't have to get so defensive! Frankly, it says amazing amounts about this show that it creates such emotion from its audiences. Whether positive or negative, part of the reason I love writing about theatre is because I think theatre rarely gets the opportunity for dialogue I believe it deserves. This is especially true for non-obsessive theatre fans, who might not have much of a chance to opine since they probably don't frequent theatre websites...I'm assuming you fit into this category since you said you're not a huge fan of theatre. But seriously, unless you're an investor in the show (or sleeping with Yorkey) this review shouldn't be taken so personally! You don't have to be mean, I'm allowed to have an opinion too.

    And just for the record, I wrote this review in the manner I did because I knew this show would get a positive response from critics and fans and I wanted to voice my issues with the production to offer another side to those who want to know about the show. So everyone please back the eff off.
  • David
    Is "Virilene" a pen name for Brian Yorkey?
blog comments powered by Disqus