<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Wuz Robbed! Great Number 2 Hits of the &#8217;50s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/</link>
	<description>your daily dose of pop culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:59:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesus of Cool: We Wuz Robbed! Great #2 Hits of the â€™80s &#124; Popdose</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-30775</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus of Cool: We Wuz Robbed! Great #2 Hits of the â€™80s &#124; Popdose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-30775</guid>
		<description>[...] in slapping together this (too)-long-running series â€“ which already has examined hits from the â€™50s, â€™60s and â€™70s that ran out of gas just one block short of the Texaco â€“ has been the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in slapping together this (too)-long-running series â€“ which already has examined hits from the â€™50s, â€™60s and â€™70s that ran out of gas just one block short of the Texaco â€“ has been the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus of Cool: We Wuz Robbed! Great #2 Hits of the &#8217;70s &#124; Popdose</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-29951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus of Cool: We Wuz Robbed! Great #2 Hits of the &#8217;70s &#124; Popdose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-29951</guid>
		<description>[...] or BT Expressâ€™ â€œDo It Til Youâ€™re Satisfied.â€ But at least, as I looked back at the 1950s and â€™60s, it seemed a healthy proportion of the #2 hits were terrific, or truly important songs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or BT Expressâ€™ â€œDo It Til Youâ€™re Satisfied.â€ But at least, as I looked back at the 1950s and â€™60s, it seemed a healthy proportion of the #2 hits were terrific, or truly important songs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus of Cool: We Wuz Robbed! Great #2 Hits of the &#8217;60s &#124; Popdose</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-29316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesus of Cool: We Wuz Robbed! Great #2 Hits of the &#8217;60s &#124; Popdose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-29316</guid>
		<description>[...] the top of Billboardâ€™s pop singles chart. In the course of compiling and monitoring responses to the seriesâ€™ first column a couple weeks ago, I learned a number of things, the most important of which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the top of Billboardâ€™s pop singles chart. In the course of compiling and monitoring responses to the seriesâ€™ first column a couple weeks ago, I learned a number of things, the most important of which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonCummings</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-40677</link>
		<dc:creator>JonCummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 23:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-40677</guid>
		<description>Son of a bitch! Well, my work is done here...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, that means I&#039;m just gonna have to vent five times the snark on &quot;Winchester Cathedral&quot;...why have I never seen this book in a store? (Probably for the same reason it&#039;s out of print.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Son of a bitch! Well, my work is done here&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually, that means I&#39;m just gonna have to vent five times the snark on &#8220;Winchester Cathedral&#8221;&#8230;why have I never seen this book in a store? (Probably for the same reason it&#39;s out of print.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonCummings</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-28715</link>
		<dc:creator>JonCummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 22:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-28715</guid>
		<description>Son of a bitch! Well, my work is done here...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Actually, that means I&#039;m just gonna have to vent five times the snark on &quot;Winchester Cathedral&quot;...why have I never seen this book in a store? (Probably for the same reason it&#039;s out of print.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Son of a bitch! Well, my work is done here&#8230;</p>
<p>Actually, that means I&#39;m just gonna have to vent five times the snark on &#8220;Winchester Cathedral&#8221;&#8230;why have I never seen this book in a store? (Probably for the same reason it&#39;s out of print.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twostepcub</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-28713</link>
		<dc:creator>twostepcub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 21:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-28713</guid>
		<description>Fun post, Jon, I&#039;m sure you can go on forever about the 60&#039;s hits kept out by crappier fare.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, Fred Bronson didn&#039;t write it, but there IS a book, the Billboard Book of Number Two hits..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Billboard-Book-Number-Two-Singles/dp/0823076954&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Billboard-Book-Number-Two...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;scary, eh...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers&lt;br&gt;2sc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun post, Jon, I&#39;m sure you can go on forever about the 60&#39;s hits kept out by crappier fare.</p>
<p>BTW, Fred Bronson didn&#39;t write it, but there IS a book, the Billboard Book of Number Two hits..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Billboard-Book-Number-Two-Singles/dp/0823076954" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Billboard-Book-Number-Two.." rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Billboard-Book-Number-Two..</a>.</p>
<p>scary, eh&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers<br />2sc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Border Patrol</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-28708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Border Patrol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 20:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-28708</guid>
		<description>If you think &quot;Little Darlin&#039;&quot; is criminally neglected, you obviously don&#039;t live in Canada.  You can hear the song at least twice daily on any Canadian oldies station.  Good thing it&#039;s a great record!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Oh, and Fats Domino may have never got to number one, but he probably rested easy knowing he sold more than 40 million records between 1950 and &#039;58.  Nope, that&#039;s not a typo -- 40 million (mostly singles, but also 3 million of those new-fangled LP things starting in &#039;56.)  And, very unusually for the time, Domino was wise enough to have signed a contract back in 1950 that called for royalties on records sold. From all accounts, he got paid those royalties, too -- which means that unlike almost every other Rock and Roll pioneer, Fats Domino didn&#039;t get totally ripped off by his record company.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Getting ripped off by chart compilers is, of course, another story.  It&#039;s funny how much emphasis we put on charts, when we know full well they have been influenced -- even sometimes driven by -- payola and racism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think &#8220;Little Darlin&#39;&#8221; is criminally neglected, you obviously don&#39;t live in Canada.  You can hear the song at least twice daily on any Canadian oldies station.  Good thing it&#39;s a great record!</p>
<p>Oh, and Fats Domino may have never got to number one, but he probably rested easy knowing he sold more than 40 million records between 1950 and &#39;58.  Nope, that&#39;s not a typo &#8212; 40 million (mostly singles, but also 3 million of those new-fangled LP things starting in &#39;56.)  And, very unusually for the time, Domino was wise enough to have signed a contract back in 1950 that called for royalties on records sold. From all accounts, he got paid those royalties, too &#8212; which means that unlike almost every other Rock and Roll pioneer, Fats Domino didn&#39;t get totally ripped off by his record company.  </p>
<p>Getting ripped off by chart compilers is, of course, another story.  It&#39;s funny how much emphasis we put on charts, when we know full well they have been influenced &#8212; even sometimes driven by &#8212; payola and racism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonCummings</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-28700</link>
		<dc:creator>JonCummings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-28700</guid>
		<description>I love &quot;Lollipop&quot; -- mostly because I&#039;m really good at making that noise with my finger and the inside of my cheek.  It can hold toddlers entranced for hours -- which may explain why I keep getting served with restraining orders...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love &#8220;Lollipop&#8221; &#8212; mostly because I&#39;m really good at making that noise with my finger and the inside of my cheek.  It can hold toddlers entranced for hours &#8212; which may explain why I keep getting served with restraining orders&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-28698</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-28698</guid>
		<description>Great Mini-bios. I&#039;m impressed. Keep up the good work. It&#039;s nice to have a Rock History lesson! &lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Mini-bios. I&#39;m impressed. Keep up the good work. It&#39;s nice to have a Rock History lesson! <br />Cheers,<br />Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonhare</title>
		<link>http://popdose.com/we-wuz-robbed-great-number-2-hits-of-the-%e2%80%9950s/comment-page-1/#comment-28696</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonhare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popdose.com/?p=17770#comment-28696</guid>
		<description>First of all, I am very excited about this series. Second of all, I&#039;m relatively certain you are the only person who read my post about &quot;Only in America, Volume 2.&quot; I did repost the track if anybody cares (nobody does).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I am very excited about this series. Second of all, I&#39;m relatively certain you are the only person who read my post about &#8220;Only in America, Volume 2.&#8221; I did repost the track if anybody cares (nobody does).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
