Yeah Yeah Yeah Yeah #02: “Recording the Beatles”

Dan Wiencek March 8, 2012 9

Another book about the Beatles?” ask Brian Kehew and Kevin Ryan. “This many decades later, how much more of their story needs to be told?” A worthwhile question, and all the more so because the two men asking it wrote their own book about the Beatles, and pose the question themselves in their own introduction. Maybe they’re right to do so — neither of the writers tapped to provide the book’s forewords, EMI engineer Ken Townsend and Beatles scholar Mark Lewisohn, can refrain from making similar points even as they refute them (“sure there are all kinds of Beatles books, but this one is different!”). We have reached a particular point in Beatles scholarship, Beatles publishing, Beatles logorrhea or whatever you choose to call it, a point at which we must acknowledge that the low-hanging fruit has been picked, and wonder how much intellectual energy can rightly be devoted to a pop group, even one with the far-reaching impact of the Beatles.

Well, you can likely guess where I fall on the question. I have been a rabid Beatles fan since I was in my teens, and while my tastes and listening habits have evolved (and occasionally regressed) over the years, I’ve never stopped listening to them, never grown tired of their music or their story. While every fan grasps it instinctively, it often goes unsaid that the Beatles’ story itself, the remarkable account of their coming together, their extraordinary peak and their inevitable decline, has the satisfying emotional sweep of a great epic. It has unforgettable characters, dramatic reversals and heroes brought down by their own flaws. If it were a novel, you couldn’t put it down. And like a great novel, every new foray into the tale brings you closer to understanding it without ever quite taking you all the way. There always feels like there’s something left to learn, some key insight that will make this unlikely, nearly impossible phenomenon appear vuesca. That, I suppose, is the high-falutin’ reason why I wanted to do this column, and why Popdose’s sage editor Jeff Giles encouraged me by noting that “people never, ever, ever get tired of talking about the Beatles.” No we don’t, do we?

Now, as regards Beatles books, despite what I said above I am actually more of a fussy eater than an omnivore. While the number of published titles alluded to by Kehew and Ryan is likely unknowable, it easily stretches up into the high hundreds, and I have always believed that Sturgeon’s Law applies as well to Beatles-related writing as it does to any other form of expression. So I have picked and chosen finickily (let’s pretend that’s a word) in stocking my Beatles bookshelf, and so have ended up with a collection that, while still growing, hits the high points while avoiding the obvious cash-ins. Many of these titles are ones that every fan has or has read: the Anthology, Revolution in the Head, The Beatles Recording Sessions and The Complete Beatles Chronicle, as well as many individual biographies and tales told by various associates. But I do want to occasionally yield the spotlight, as it were, and highlight some books that may have flown a bit under the radar, which brings me to this month’s selection: Recording the Beatles: The Studio Equipment and Techniques Used to Create Their Classic Albums, by the aforementioned Brian Kehew and Kevin Ryan. These guys aren’t kidding around. This may be the most extensively, minutely researched book about the group I’ve ever read.

The first thing to note, because Amazon does not make this at all apparent, is that this is as much a collector’s object as a book. It ships in a box designed to mimic the style of an EMI tape box and is packed with supplementary goodies, including a poster of the Beatles’ mixing console and reproductions of various studio docs and correspondence. But the real goodies are between the covers. This book is gorgeous. Every microphone, mixer, limiter, monitor and flange box is lovingly depicted in both vintage photos and full-page beauty shots worthy of a museum catalog. The text explains what each piece of gear did and how it contributed to the Beatles’ overall sound. Is it technical? Is it ever, and I can imagine some fans more interested in the human side of the equation finding this all a bit much — or, indeed, a lot much. For the rest of us, it examines an often-overlooked aspect of the Beatles’ history in a way that’s comprehensive and utterly definitive.

Among the many treats Recording the Beatles has to offer is a detailed look at Abbey Road Studios — not just good ol’ Number Two but every mixing room and cutting room, along with the staff who made everything go. The book captures the strange institutional mindset of EMI, a company of such exacting and peculiar standards that its equipment didn’t run at standard electrical impedance; every piece of third-party kit brought into Abbey Road had to have its innards rewired to work with the studio’s rig. It explains, finally, why the mono mix of “Help!” has different vocals from the stereo mix. Best of all, the last section features in-depth looks at the recording of many individual songs, complete with illustrations depicting the exact recording setup for that particular session:

It bears repeating that this book deals with the Beatles’ recording process on an extraordinarily technical level, and much of the detail may seem arbitrary or meaningless to anyone other than a producer or engineer. That isn’t really a criticism as much as an observation; far better that the book err on the side of completeness rather than skimp on the specifics, and it’s easy to skip around to the parts that interest you (in fact, it was designed to be easily browsed and does not suffer from being read out of order). If I had to critique it, my main beef would be that, being a large, square book of more than 500 heavy pages, it is physically difficult to actually hold and read. The inclusions (posters, postcards et al) are fairly pointless, and I would have liked to see more individual songs profiled in the last section. You should also know that amid this avalanche of detail, the Beatles’ own instruments are not included (you can read Andy Babiuk’s Beatles Gear for that stuff). Small potatoes, though: this really is an essential addition to any Beatles library. Just make sure you have a sturdy shelf to put it on.

(Buyer’s note: For some reason — I think it’s called “capitalism” — Amazon’s affiliates are selling this already expensive book at a considerable markup. Buy direct from the publisher and save.)

Next month: the “Think for Yourself” session.

  • JonCummings

    As a serial devourer of Beatles books myself — two dozen at least, most recently Philip Norman’s Lennon bio from ’08 — I have to admit that even this one sounds intriguing. But not compelling. I’d love to read SOME of this material, the most interesting of it, but not enough to hold a 10-pound, LP-jacket-sized book in my lap for a week.

    Short of John and George returning from the dead and penning memoirs from the perspective of their never-experienced dotage — because heaven knows that “Many Years from Now” did not adequately fill the bill for Beatle autobiography (partly because it was “as told to,” and partly because it was…you know…Paul, and came with all his self-serving hagiography) — the one sort of book I’d love to see is a definitive oral history. I know there was one published about 15 years ago, featuring all sorts of second-string characters. But before any more of these folks pass on, somebody (maybe including Tom Shales, who did such good work with the SNL and ESPN orals) should round up everybody (including Paul, George, Yoko, and all the various wives and lovers) who had a relevant stake in every aspect of their lives and careers, sit them all down and create a definitive, 10-volume magnum opus of Beatledom.

    C’mon, how hard could it be?

    BTW, I just got a press release this morning concerning a new documentary DVD about Apple Records called “Strange Fruit.” It sounds as though it will be in no way definitive, but even if it were the greatest thing ever, who the hell thought that title would be appropriate? Were there lynchings on Savile Row that we don’t know about?

  • JonCummings

    I didn’t mean my second use of the word “George,” obviously – I meant Ringo…

  • Jonny the friendly lawyer

    Geoff Emerick’s book ‘Here, There and Everywhere: My Life Recording the Music of the Beatles’, is worth a mention on this subject.  I also never get tired reading about the Beatles and have gotten into a number of books about them.  The review of this new book is intriguing but I don’t know about dropping $100 on a technical coffee table book.  Emerick’s book is a great read for a few important reasons: (1) He was there, in the booth, and speaks from personal experience.  Right off the bat that lends him more credibility than 99% of other Beatles authors; (2) He really knows what he’s talking about, and only writes about what he knows.  When the Beatles went off to perform or to India or do whatever they did away from EMI studios, Emerick doesn’t speculate about it.  He only writes about his involvement and his observations; and (3)  He does not pull any punches.  Emerick is very frank in his assessments of the talents and personalities of each of the Beatles, and of George Martin, under whose direction he was ostensibly working.  It’s not hard to tell who he liked and disliked, but he has his reasons and they seem to make sense.  Most importantly, it’s about as inside a view as you can get about what it was like to set the mics, slide the faders and roll the tapes that are so comprehensively documented in the ‘Recording the Beatles’ book.

  • Dan Wiencek

     Jonny, you’re dead right about “Here, There and Everywhere,” and I plan to tackle it in a future column.

  • Dan Wiencek

     I think the closest we’re likely to get to the hypothetical book you’re talking about is Mark Lewisohn’s upcoming biography, which is supposed to be finished … soon. (A year? Two?) I gather he’s been at it for ten years or so (above and beyond all the time he’s already spent researching the group) so if nothing else it’s bound to be comprehensive.

    PS. I got that presser too, and I had the same reaction you did. Some doco producer getting a little too clever for his own good.

  • http://beatlessongwriting.blogspot.com/p/be-atletudes.html Matt Blick

    Great post Dan, I’ve been sorely tempted by this book for a long time. Lewisohn’s book is multi volume – so only the first part is (over)due next year. It should be amazing. The 90% is crud link doesn’t work for me – is this right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon's_Law. 

    And finally my own Beatles blog might be something you’d like to take a glance at – I’m blogging my way thorough all 211 songs and analysing the songwriting. Like Pollack but more user friendly and practical

    http://beatlessongwriting.blogspot.com/ 

  • jbacardi

    May I also suggest this book; it’s a fascinating dissection of the Fabs’ oeuvre, especially the early years, and I refer to it often. 

  • Dan Wiencek

     I remember reading “Tell Me Why” quite a few years ago, I think after I had already read “Revolution in the Head.” The former book unfortunately suffers from comparison to the latter — for one thing, you really need to look at the songs in recording order, not release order as Riley did — but it’s still a good read.

  • Dan Wiencek

     Cool blog, Matt, I’ll add it to my feeds. (And yes, that Wiki link is correct, sorry if mine was munged.)