You Again?: Dan Fogelberg, “Love in Time”

51gbIiDQTNL._SCLZZZZZZZ_[1]Oh, don’t give me that disappointed look, you jerks. The whole idea behind this series is “listening to new music from artists who aren’t supposed to have any,” and who fits that description better than a dead man?

Dan Fogelberg died on December 16, 2007, after a three-year battle with prostate cancer — a date I’m painfully aware of, because his music has been featured twice in Mellowmas. The first year, we gleefully trashed “Same Old Lang Syne,” coining the word “Fogelfuck” and generally tinkling all over one of the greatest hits of an all-around nice guy who was fighting for his life, which, as you can imagine, didn’t go over well with the Fogelfans. This only encouraged us to go back for more the next year, and we hated on Fogelberg’s “At Christmas Time” in a column that posted just a few days before Fogelberg’s death. Whoops!

Naturally, when I found out Fogelberg’s widow was arranging for the release of this posthumous album, my thoughts immediately turned to You Again? — and because nobody else understands the wrath of the Fogelmasses as well as Jason, I quickly e-mailed him to ask him what he thought about me featuring the new album in this column. Jason, being a nice guy, totally freaked out and insisted that it was a terrible, terrible idea, at which point I called him a pussy, got the affirmation I needed from Michael Parr and David Lifton, and set about writing this column.

Moral of the story: Jason Hare is a sensitive man, and whatever you read here isn’t his fault. He really tried to stop me.

I myself am not a terribly sensitive man, which is why I’m often disappointed when I sit down to write a You Again? and discover that the album I’m looking forward to teeing off on really isn’t that bad. This time, however, I listened to the music with some trepidation; after all, it’s one thing to trash a Christmas song — most of them are pretty trashy to begin with — but quite another to bash someone’s last musical will and testament. I wasn’t about to sugarcoat things if Love in Time sucked — and I was all but certain it would — but I wouldn’t get as much joy out of it as I would have if, say, Al B. Sure!’s latest record had stunk. If only for the sake of avoiding hate mail, I wanted this album to succeed.

Well, call off the hounds, Fogelfaithful, because I’m here to tell you that even from the perspective of a person who’s never really cared about Dan Fogelberg’s music, Love in Time is a surprisingly solid album.

I’d written off Fogelberg after 1993’s River of Souls, which took all the ground he’d gained with 1990’s The Wild Places — his sporadically lovely, albeit rather half-cooked, swan song for Epic — and blew it on bland, shapeless hooey like “Faces of America” and “Holy Road.” After getting bored with his precisely calibrated brand of singer/songwriter pop/rock in the ’80s, Fogelberg shucked it all and went genre-hopping, fiddling with country and bluegrass (1985’s High Country Snows, which went gold) and straight-ahead rock (1987’s Exiles, which didn’t). It was a brave move for an artist who turned everything he touched into platinum throughout the ’70s and early ’80s, but I think it also indicated that Fogelberg’s muse was deserting him. At its best, The Wild Places fused together all the disparate elements of his artistic personality — folk balladeer, rocker, social activist — but instead of kicking off a new chapter in his career, it was essentially the end. After leaving Epic for Giant, Fogelberg released a pair of underwhelming records (the aforementioned River of Souls and 1996’s No Resemblance Whatsoever, which reunited him with flutist Tim Weisberg for a lukewarm puddle of smooth jazz) before vanishing into the wilderness.

Okay, so Fogelberg wasn’t totally AWOL. But he might as well have been: After leaving Giant, he signed with Chicago Records, the miserable excuse for a label that was briefly “run” by the band Chicago, managing to release a Christmas album and a live compilation before the band realized it had made a terrible mistake and had no business managing a record company. In fact, after River of Souls, he managed only one album of new material — 2003’s Full Circle, which I have never heard and will not comment on — before he passed away.

Or that’s what we thought, anyway. Turns out Fogelberg started working on Love in Time after he found out he had cancer, finished it before his death, put the masters in a safety deposit box, and told his wife to release it after he was gone. I’m sorry, did you just read that? Because it’s fucking heartbreaking. Dan Fogelberg is like the last chapter of a Nicholas Sparks novel and the 2Pac of the singer/songwriter world, all rolled into one.

He had some good songs up his sleeves, too. As tended to be his wont later in his career, Fogelberg played all the instruments on Love in Time, which is usually the kiss of death, especially for a guy with such a weakness for schmaltz. And true to form, there are some cheesy bits on the album — tinny-sounding keyboards, hokey rhythm programming — but for the most part, it’s a pretty stripped-down affair that plays squarely to Fogelberg’s strengths. The title track kicks things off in a mildly rocking fashion, tracks like “Diamonds to Dust” remind you that Fogelberg harmonized with himself like no one else, and the wiry, six-minute “Nature of the Game” finds him peeling off some spry acoustic licks in a prolonged intro that might be the best thing on the whole record.

Fogelberg could be a pretty sentimental fellow even when he was perfectly healthy, and with death staring him in the face, you might expect — and be willing to forgive — some rather mawkish balladry. Love in Time actually stays away from that stuff, for the most part, although I’m sure not a few Friends O’ Fogel will be reduced to tears by his album-closing cover of Neil Young’s “Birds,” which contains lines like:

When you see me
Fly away without you
Shadow on the things you know
Feathers fall around you
And show you the way to go
It’s over, it’s over

Yeah. Even if the record was a complete dud, I think I’d give it a pass simply because if I were Fogelberg’s widow, I’d have hung onto it like Gollum, not wanting to let it anywhere near creeps like me; the odds against it holding up out of the context of Fogelberg’s death were incredibly steep. But there’s really only one bad track here — “Come to the Harbor,” which the press kit claims was “written in Maine on his boat while waiting for his wife Jean to join him for a harbor dance,” but neglects to mention that he must have been listening to “Horse with No Name” while he was waiting. The rest of it, although it may not contain another “Part of the Plan” or “Leader of the Band,” is a charmingly low-key farewell. If you miss the glory days of the Laurel Canyon singer/songwriter genre, you won’t want to miss it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • I demand a refund. I paid for blood!
  • EightE1
    My loathing of all things Fogelberg is well documented. The fact that he covers one of my favorite Neil Young songs should send me over the edge.

    Yet, your words, Jefito -- they soothe my loathing, like an Alka Seltzer and water calms that horrible acid burn in my belly. I ... I want to hear this. I want to give it a try. I want to put aside my utter disgust and listen with an open mind. Is this possible? Can it be?

    I'm certain this feeling will pass eventually (the acid burn ALWAYS comes back), but I thought you should know.

    Rob
    EightE1
  • Check your FTP directory in about an hour, Rob.
  • EightE1
    You're too kind, man. Very Fogelrific of you. Thank you.
  • I missed all of his 90's output so my memory was solely of “Leader of the Band" era mellow gold goodness. You did a good thing here Jeff...
  • Rick
    Why Pay for Blood? Do the world a favor you obvious proof of Cranial Liposuction abuse, and slit your throat.
  • It's so cute when mellow folk rock fans get angry.
  • A DanFan
    I am not really sure where to begin with my response, so please bear with me and forgive me if I ramble on a bit.

    I understand that you are not a DanFan or even an unbiased listener, you have made that painfully clear. But that is your right. Dan would have been the first one to say that. And I happen to believe that too. For the record I love most types of music and appreciate most artists' talent. I love the Beatles, Mozart, Michael Jackson, 80's new wave and Pink Floyd and most genres in between and around. Music makes me happy, makes me want to dance and sing along. I appreciate the creative talent these people put into their work, because I unfortunately do not share their talent.

    But Dan Fogelberg...his music...his legacy speaks to me (and all DanFans) on a whole other level. If you go to thelivinglegacy.net and read the messages that people left for Dan (myself included) when he was ill, you will understand what I mean. His music, his songs...weren't "just songs"... these songs...Dan's beautiful, elegant lyrics and often moving music, gave many of us hope when there was none, or led us to hold on for one more day because Dan clearly understood our pain or confusion or whatever was troubling our soul. Many of Dan's fans are survivors of horrific childhoods/youths, they were homeless and victims of abuse and Dan gave them hope and comfort.

    To DanFans, his music is very spiritual. On a personal level, I was abandoned by my parents and raised by my grandparents, "Leader of the Band" helped me say goodbye to my beloved Grandfather and cope with his passing, the "Exiles" album helped me through my divorce, "Same Old Lang Syne"... something eerily similar happened to me. "Part of the Plan" gets me through my darkest hours and "Phoenix" is my mantra. "Forefather's" makes me proud of my roots and who I am and where I come from and that I'm a fighter and will always survive. All of Dan's songs are about love, honor, kindness, truth, trust, respect and rising above situations and transcending them to be the best person we are capable of being. If you think these things are schmaltzy or not worthy of songs then I feel sorry for you.

    Your own language in this blog entry speaks to either your lack of adequate vocabulary or a desire to come across as "cool and edgy". In fact, you only come across as a mean sort of "wanna be". Surly you can find a more eloquent way to “critique” Dan’s work. Surely if you are bashing a man that was nothing if not eloquent, you can rise to the same level of eloquence?

    Dan had an incredible career spanning 5 decades (he began performing with a band and cut his first single in the 60's). He was successful and well respected in the music industry, most of his albums earning multiple platinum and gold status. Graham Nash on "Larry King" stated no one could harmonize or hit the high notes like Dan could. His talent and artistry are beyond reproach.

    Dan was probably his own worst critic. He was true to his vision. And the reason he experimented in different genres? Well sir, it wasn't because his muse had deserted him. It was because, as with any artist, he didn't want to be trapped in one medium or period for his entire career. One need look no further than Picasso. His "Blue Period" was only a small part of his long, successful career. As an artist he experimented and grew. And those who appreciated his art, followed him, just as DanFans followed Dan.

    If you must make fun of DanFans, please go ahead. I bear no shame in being a DanFan. I am quite proud of it in fact.

    As a DanFan with a degree in English/Creative Writing with a concentration of study in Literature, I can tell you that Dan's lyrics stand alone as poetry, and not just any poetry, but truly beautiful, soul touching poetry in the vein of Byron, Keats, Shelley and even more contemporary, Wallace Stevens.

    Forgive me if I don't grub around for the crumbs of approval that you have thrown out on Dan's final album which, make no mistake, was a gift to his fans for their loyalty. Neither I nor the other DanFans need your approval to tell me to like or dislike something. I have a brain and I think for myself. Dan touched my heart by giving us this final gift, which if you had really wanted to critique would have noted that the last note on "Birds" (the last song on his last album) was the first note on his first song "To the Morning" on his first album "Home Free". Many of us believe this was Dan's way of saying life is a circle and he had come full circle, not only in his music...but in his life as he was going from where he came. I can tell you that for me...and I suspect other DanFans it brings a fullness to his legacy, that I don't think many artists would have thought of, which again, speaks to his level of artisty and the courage he had to face the end of his life in such a graceful, bold, accepting manner...another reason I am a DanFan.

    If you and your friends feel the need to bash Dan and his fans to feel better about yourselves, to feel like the tough, edgy, cool crowd, go ahead. I won't bash you. You're entitled to what you think and feel just as we are. It's just too bad you feel the need to make fun of the "Fogelfans"...by the way, we prefer DanFans...but then as a person who is clearly not a DanFan, you wouldn't know that.

    Thank you for taking the time to read my response, and in spite of what it may seem, I do wish you well.

    Regards,

    Julie
blog comments powered by Disqus