Sugar Water: Parade (Of Lies!)

sugarwater.gif

I should start subscribing to the newspaper again on Sundays. Not for the news, of course. Please. No, the only part of the paper I’m interested in is Parade magazine, particularly Walter Scott’s Personality Parade, the regular page-two feature where Scott answers readers’ questions about various celebrities’ careers, love lives, and deeply offensive character flaws.

Judging by his responses, I’m guessing that Scott is somewhere around the age of 117. He’s a curmudgeon who thinks Hollywood doesn’t make them like they used to, whether the “them” in question is movies, movie stars, or the tawdry things those stars do in public to keep Scott’s readers interested and thereby keep his mailbox full. Flash your unmentionables at the paparazzi all you want, Paris and Britney, but Walter Scott remembers a time when unmentionables with true talent were the talk of the town, and they were being violated by real celebrities like Fatty Arbuckle.

The people who send in questions to Personality Parade seem just as salty and centennial as Scott. Here’s a question from the January 6 issue, followed by Scott’s answer:

Q: Why do celebrities like the Olsen twins go around with long, stringy hair? Don’t they care what they look like?

A: Sure. However, they don’t want fans to think they care. Like ripped jeans, stringy hair is one way stars have of saying, “I’m so cool, it doesn’t matter how I look.” They should glance in the mirror.

Move over, Mr. Blackwell, there’s a new geriatric fashion sheriff in town! Here’s another Q and A, from the December 26 issue:

Q: Can you tell me why Wayne Newton and Kenny Rogers — two guys in their 60s — go around with such fake-looking faces?

A: They must have been childhood fans of Howdy Doody.

Oh no he didn’t! I’m not sure if Scott has always been this catty, but I do remember being surprised by one of his answers for the first time back in 1998, when a reader asked why Hollywood movies use so much foul language. Scott didn’t have enough space to explain how the Motion Picture Association of America dropped the Hays Code and its strict censorship guidelines in the late ’60s, or how many filmmakers strive to write and present dialogue that’s natural and immediate no matter how coarse it may sound. Instead he said something along the lines of “Hollywood movies use so much foul language because there aren’t any creative people left in Hollywood making movies.”

Walter Scott’s Personality Parade has been my favorite op-ed page ever since. The content may be shallow, but the soapbox reaches all the way to heaven. And once Scott does get to heaven — say, in 40 years, after he celebrates the big one-five-oh — the curmudgeon in training whose words you’re reading right now will be ready to take his place.

To be fair to Scott, he doesn’t always take the bait:

Q: Why won’t stars like Jennifer Lopez and Penelope Cruz admit it when they’re pregnant?

Yeah, why won’t they? They’re celebrities — they don’t deserve privacy. They don’t even deserve opinions about the welfare of their unborn children! Get ‘em, Walter!

Scott answers his reader’s question by saying that Lopez wanted to wait until she’d made it through her first trimester before publicly confirming she was pregnant — you know, like any other woman on the planet would do. He also explains that even though Cruz has allegedly been knocked up by No Country for Old Men’s Javier Bardem, her agent, manager, etc. all deny it, and a recent photo of the actress in a wet bikini — printed beside the answer strictly for scientific purposes — doesn’t reveal any “bump.” Therefore Walter Scott has proven that good-looking Spanish and Latina actresses aren’t filthy liars after all.

But you know who is a liar? Walter Scott.

That’s because Walter Scott isn’t Walter Scott. He’s not even the Walter Scott who wrote Ivanhoe. (That’s the biggest disappointment of all.) This Walter Scott is a complete fabrication — it seems I’ve been wasting my precious slings and arrows on an invisible man.

According to some minuscule research I did on the Internet five minutes ago, Walter Scott is a pseudonym for Ed Klein, the author of The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She’ll Go to Become President, as well as four books about the Kennedy dynasty. He’s also a former editor for the New York Times Magazine and Newsweek.

According to a 2005 New York Observer article, when Klein began his double life as Walter Scott in 1990 (I don’t know if there were other Walter Scotts before Klein assumed the role, although I bet Sean Connery would’ve been great), he was reportedly earning $300,000 for his services. Yowsah! That’s a lot of scratch for answering leading questions about celebrities in one paragraph or less while preaching to the choir. If we adjust for inflation, how much would $300,000 in 1990 be worth today? If someone would help me onto my high horse, which is where I keep my calculator, I’d be happy to do the math.

Walter Scott’s Personality Parade isn’t the only entertaining feature Parade has to offer, of course. Sometimes they have nutty cover-story headlines, like this one from January 6: “Is Benazir Bhutto America’s best hope against al-Qaeda?” Well, no, Parade, not anymore, considering she died on December 27. Did your entire editorial staff take a two-week vacation at Christmas?

Nowhere in the January 6 issue is it mentioned that Parade is aware of Bhutto’s assassination ten days earlier. Publisher Randy Siegel told the Associated Press that the issue went to press on December 21 and was already in transit to the 400 newspapers that distribute Parade when Bhutto was killed. So Parade sits in a corner at your local paper’s printing press, completely finished, for a week or more before it’s stuffed in the Sunday paper on Saturday night?

Parade left it up to the newspapers themselves to point out to baffled readers why it was still pretending Bhutto was alive, although Parade did update the story on their website. But how much would it have cost to update the print version? Yelling “Stop the presses!” wouldn’t have worked if the January 6 issue was finished before December 27, but clearly a recall was needed, as were major revisions to the Bhutto story. Would such a major undertaking have cost somewhere around $300,000? Is that roughly a third of what “Walter Scott” made in 2007 writing Personality Parade? If someone will help me climb onto my newer, even higher horse — now able to leap tall soapboxes in a single bound! — I’ll be more than happy to crunch the numbers again.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

  • ken
    Perfect Robert. Just perfect. I had to do a double take myself when I saw that Bhutto cover. I just assumed I got an old Parade in my Chicago Tribune but no, apparently accuracy isn't worth the time or money to correct it. As much as I loathe and hate Parade at the same time, I read it EVERY DAMN WEEK. Don't forget Marilyn Vos Savant (the world's smartest lady, who apparently has nothing better to do than solve lame reader-submitted riddles) and James Brady whose "In Step With" is almost as inane as gold ole Wally Scott.

    Just like Family Circle, it waits there every time just waiting to suck.
  • I almost covered James Brady as well, but I ran out of time. When I was much younger I thought Parade's James Brady was the same James Brady who was President Reagan's press secretary. That's how long Brady's been lobbing softball interview questions at B- and C-list celebrities!

    Parade is comfort food. I'll never deny that. I poke fun at Walter Scott and James Brady, but I'll read their pages every single time.
  • jack
    Considering Parade magazine is stuffed into a plastic bag with coupons and Circuit City ads, yeah, it's printed way in advance and shipped to papers across the country. That issue's cover story is the reason they usually go with Tom Hanks or any other family friendly celebrity who is likely NOT to be killed by extremists in the lag time between printing and distribution.
  • Ahhh ... see, in my hometown's paper, the Macon Telegraph, I'm pretty sure Parade isn't in the plastic bag that, say, the Atlanta Journal or Chicago Tribune puts it in. Maybe I'm wrong.

    By the way, you just gave the terrorists some good ideas. WAY TO GO, JACK! But what if a family-friendly A-list celebrity with a cover quote like "I found the light" -- the cover quotes are typically meant to be uplifting and semi-religious -- were to die between printing and distribution in some sort of drug- or prostitution-related murder? What would Parade do then?
  • And let's not forget the cartoons in Parade, including "Howard Huge," which makes "Garfield" look like "The Far Side."
  • Didn't there used to be another one that Parade ran all the time, JA? I feel like they had two for a while, but I guess Howard got too huge and took over the entire space for comics.
  • You think Walter Scott makes $900,000 for one weekly column? Man, I'm working for the wrong paper.

    And yes, Parade is indeed printed that far in advance. Ripping it up and starting fresh would've been logistically impossible.

    Most papers printed some sort of note on the front page explaining the situation.

    You should check out newspapers from time to time. We're not obsolete yet, no matter what Nelson says on The Simpsons.
  • I still read newspapers, Beau. In fact, I work for an alternative weekly newspaper (which is doing just as badly as any other paper right now in the Internet and Craigslist era). But I'm a very slow reader, so in the past when I've subscribed to a paper, I end up with stacks of sections in my apartment, and I slowly go nuts. And then I cancel my subscription.

    Thanks for the clarification about Parade really being finished that far in advance. I still think a recall and a cover-story switch was in order, but that's just me giving my Walter Scott-type opinion.

    Also, I don't really think Ed Klein makes $900,000 a week pretending to be Walter Scott, but he started at $300,000 all the way back in 1990. He must've gotten at least a cost-of-living increase somewhere along the way, right? Klein's gotta eat.
  • Old_Davy
    You know, I'm not so sure the QUESTIONS in Scott's column are real. Who in their right mind would even care why the Olsen twins dress like sluts?

    But ya gotta love that Marilyn. "I solved her little letter grid puzzle! I must be as smart as the world's smartest person!"
  • People with too much time on their hands, that's who. People who are 117. I think the questions are real, but they often look like they've been rewritten by interns, e.g. "Why does Katherine Heigl, the star of ABC's hit drama 'Grey's Anatomy,' look so nice?" You know the letter writer didn't include "the star of ABC's hit drama 'Grey's Anatomy" in his or her question, but Parade felt it was necessary to include it.
  • Elaine
    Hey, Ed Klein's just the next Dred Pirate Roberts.

    For the record, Gail Sheehy did go on tv interviews, following the assassination, with the story that Parade had decided to go to press with the Bhutto story as written. I saw her 2 or 3 times that week. Her angle was a bit like, 'oh, spooky..how prescient..' but she gave it lip service, nonetheless.
  • At the Chicago Reader, the newspaper I work for, we have a syndicated column called "The Straight Dope" that's written by Cecil Adams, except there is no Cecil Adams -- it's a pseudonym that's been used by at least three or four writers since the '70s.

    I don't blame Sheehy at all. And as Jack said, Parade really is printed two weeks in advance, but -- worst-case scenario -- couldn't a sheet of paper have been inserted into the plastic bag with Parade and the Circuit City flyers and grocery store coupons that had Parade's logo on it and a message from the publisher or editor explaining what had happened? Leaving it up to the editor of each newspaper that carries Parade to say something on the front page seemed so lazy.
blog comments powered by Disqus