CD Review: “The Stone Roses” (20th-Anniversary Reissues)

Mojo Flucke July 9, 2009 8

“Anniversary editions” of an album rarely stand up to the hype. It’s as if the record companies, having run out of new recording formats to remarket to the public, latch on to these in place of having the next 8-track, cassette, CD, or SACD, or what not. Like, the jig’s up. We don’t feel inferior for only having MP3s.

Once in a while, however, they’re totally worth it. For example, Beck’s tenth-anniversary Odelay — it wasn’t even obvious there needed to be a celebration — but the bonus material was so good it turned it into an even better double CD than it was as an original single disc. (Just to be clear, I’m referring to the two-CD set, not the insane four-LP, $100 aberration still making the rounds. If you’re a vinyl junkie, God bless ya. Stick to music that came out on vinyl in the first place, not faux vinyl-fied CD releases.)

The Stone Roses is celebrating the 20th anniversary of its release this summer, and Legacy is pulling out all the stops with three separate editions due August 11: The Special Edition includes the remastered album with an expanded booklet; Legacy Edition adds the Lost Demos, featuring 15 tracks including the previously unreleased “Pearl Bastard” and a 1989 concert DVD. The Collectors Edition ($129.98) adds a third CD of B-sides and non-album singles, a 12-inch album folder with three vinyl LPs in a gold foil-embossed hardback slipcase. And this takes the cake: A lemon-shaped USB flash drive with promo videos, ringtones, wallpapers and previously released John Leckie home video footage of the recording of “Fools Gold.”

Collectors Edition

Collector

An aside: I’m an incorrigible collector. Hell, for three years I edited a 1,800-page price guide that attempted to price every baseball card since the 1860s in every condition. I own a couple dozen watches, and hundreds of fountain pens. Let’s not even talk about rock and blues autographs and ticket stubs I’m keeping for posterity. At present, I must have 10 different collections going (and why does Fred Lynn return, unsigned, the 2001 Fleer Red Sox 100th Anniversary cards I keep sending to his home address? What else does he have to do, really? Mow the lawn? C’mon!) I eat this stuff up, and The Stone Roses rocked my life when it came out. But even for someone like me, the LPs and flash drive are over the top. That’s way too much money for a manufactured collectible in this hardscrabble economy where we’re all picking up pennies we see on the pavement.

Thankfully, Sony sent Popdose a preview of the tuneage, so we can break it down and answer the question: Is it worth it, and if so, which editions represent the best bang for your music buck?

In a word, yes. Which one? The midline Legacy Edition. Upon several weeks of listening, I can vouch for the remastered original album sounding quite nice. Remasterings don’t often make much difference to my ear, although some (like Live At Leeds by the Who) can sound worlds better. In the case of The Stone Roses, things become more clear and dramatic, such as the extended introduction to “I Wanna Be Adored,” which used to be so much sonic mush to open the album but is actually quite the dramatic crescendo recast two decades later. “Elephant Stone” is crisper, more staccato. In general, things just sound a lot more live and interesting–a legitimate reason for repurchase of this disc even if you’ve held on to the beloved original. Don’t even get me started on the closing track “I Am the Resurrection,” the Roses’ “Stairway to Heaven” with its sweeping build to guitar nirvana at the end. And don’t get me started on the new realm of clarity and beauty to be experienced on the new “She Bangs the Drums.” Wow. It’s like we were looking at a slightly out of focus picture for years, and this is what we should have been seeing.

The demos are, for those fans hardcore enough to still be reading, precious. Stripped of the processing and studio sheen, Ian Brown sounds more tone-deaf than on the finished product, ’tis true, but in these tracks the band sounds more like a band than they do on the final work–answering the question of which came first, the producer or the group. It offers enough insight into the development of the songs that–if you were into the band back in the day–the demos CD will definitely hold your attention.

As for the extras, well, most Stone Roses fans have heard this stuff before, legitimately or otherwise. Not much to look at here, unless you were one of the poor sots who missed out on the CD of studio floor clippings Turns Into Stone. If you’re one of them, the bonus stuff is worth checking out.

The bottom line is, at least for this fan, the box set makes me fall in love anew with The Stone Roses. That’s a tall order, because I’d worn the CD threadbare through overplaying it over the last 20 years. Yet, in the democracy of my iPod, these tracks have found their way toward the top of the recently most-played list, and will likely stay there for some time to come.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    The mega-set probably represents Sony getting greed(ier) more than anything else. Pearl Jam's Ten mega-set represented something I don't think has happened before: a bonus track, usually a fluffy throwaway to justify a higher pricetag, actually became a hit. Forget that “Brother” represented something Pearl Jam fans really, really wanted – namely a “new” Pearl Jam track with the fire of their Ten era songs.

    Now for ultra hardcore Stone Roses fans, that need for the megabox may be a foregone conclusion. Still, the cynic in me says that Sony's fishing for another big one in the same waters, which is an absurd marketing decision as Pearl Jam and The Stone Roses, while both beloved, are on vastly different recognition strata.

  • http://www.popdose.com jefito

    Sony's as greedy as any other corporation, but I have to say, Legacy has done right by their reissues for the last several years. They've come a long, long way from the early '90s, when they were just shitting out reprints.

  • mojo

    I also think eBay has proven to the labels that there is a huge collector market out there that isn't interested in paying $20,000 for a concert-worn outfit by a band member or some item crucial to their history…but would pay $100 for smaller thises, thats, and the other things.

    I wish I knew how many of these collector edition boxes will actually be produced vs those that sell.

    They have to be producing them as they go along, and not manufacturing 100,000 right off…right?

  • Arend Anton

    EMI has been doing a lot of similar stuff with Radiohead's catalog, now that their contract is over.

    And Mojo, I have to say that “Tears” is probably more like the Roses “Stairway to Heaven.” At least in a literal, Jimmy Page-esque way.

  • mojo

    By the way, I realized just a couple days ago that “Elephant Stone” is not on the 20th anniv remaster…but they have the 12″ and demo of it…what gives, I asked Sony. A spokesperson confirmed a suspicion I had when posing the question: It wasn't on the UK version of the album…and the UK division is responsible for the project.

  • Anonymous

    Sony never sent you the remastered version of the album to review, you’re a liar.

  • ianbrown

    Sony never sent you the remastered version of the album to review, you're a liar.

  • Pingback: Microzide