White Label Wednesday: The Rolling Stones, “Too Much Blood”

David Medsker April 9, 2008 11

wlw.jpg

People are making a big deal out of Fatboy Slim and Soulwax doing remixes of tracks from the Rolling Stones’ back catalog, but this is truly much ado about nothing. The band, after all, was one of the first rock acts to play the remix game with “Miss You,” and beginning with their 1983 album Undercover, they would commission remixes of nearly every song they released as a single. Few bands understand crossover potential like the Stones. Whether you were at the concert hall or in the club, the Stones loved you. And your money.

The remix genre didn’t have much of a personality when “Miss You” was made, but it definitely had one by the time Undercover arrived. The band went the ‘extend the album version’ route with the album’s first single, “Undercover of the Night,” but when it came time to issuing remixes of the third single “Too Much Blood,” the band chose New York freestyler Arthur Baker to man the boards. The difference between the remixes for “Undercover” and “Too Much Blood,” to borrow an expression from comedian Larry Miller, is like the difference between shooting a bullet and throwing it.

While the modus operandi of remixers today is to strip a song of all of its definable characteristics, Baker did the opposite; he would keep the track more or less intact, and would add a couple elements to punch things up. In this case, punching up the track meant two new keyboard lines – one of which, a Funkadelic-style synth bass, doesn’t appear until after the third chorus – and a whole mess of percussion. What was once a song is now a party, and now that everyone is feeling festive, Baker decides to have a little fun.


Baker’s mix of “Too Much Blood” is 12:33. That is not a typo. Twelve and a half minutes of Stones-y goodness, nearly twice the already lengthy album version. If that seems like a tad too much remix for a song that has little more than a catchy chorus at its core, fret not. Baker has some tricks up his sleeve, and doesn’t even begin to play his hand until the 2:42 mark, when he turns the big horn riff on its ear. Wham, wham, wham, wham, wha-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-tat-wham-wham-wh-wh-wh-wh-WHAM! Holy shit, what was that? Actually, it’s the work of frequent Baker collaborators the Latin Rascals, the edit-happy duo that carved up Warren Zevon’s “Leave My Monkey Alone” in the White Label installment from a few weeks ago. Heck, even the Lord-Alge brothers, both Chris and Tom, got their hands on this remix.

If the edits are what you enjoy, then you will luuuuuuuuurve the “bonus groove” segment of the track. The song seemingly ends at the 8:35 mark, only to rise from the dead – a fitting analogy given the gruesome story Mick tells after the first chorus about the Japanese guy in Paris who cut up his girlfriend and put her in his refrigerator – and go completely apeshit for another four minutes. Backwards drum tracks, Mick’s voice sampled at various speeds, and what would ultimately become half of Phil Harding’s playbook, from the galloping kick drum to the syncopated clap track, make the track’s third act a bonus dub mix of sorts. You can dance to it all, of course, but it’s much more fun to simply listen to.

Regrettably, we do not have the song’s dub mix to post with it. (Must get USB turntable, stat.) It’s worth inclusion solely for the part where Baker has fun with Jagger chastising Michael Jackson for his “Thriller” video. “Very fucking funny, Michael!” Jagger yells. The next year, of course, Mick would duet with Michael on “State of Shock.” Very fucking funny, Mick.

  • scrumble

    From what I recall, this song was the Stones trying to get back to the danger of the era of “Gimmie Shelter” and “Brown Sugar” and Exile on Main Street and it wasn't received very well, criticized for misogyny, violence, etc. Maybe they needed Mick Taylor back–heck, they still do. Critical reaction to this track was probably directly responsible for Mick Jagger shifting allegiances to Columbia Records, hence “State of Shock”, “Harlem Shuffle”, “Let's Work” ad nauseum …

  • Darren

    Based on that pic sleeve for Too Much Blood, I have one question:

    For how long did Jim Varney front the Stones?

  • http://www.bullz-eye.com DavidMedsker

    Did people miss the part where the song's called “Too Much Blood,” not “Gimme More Blood”? The song is about as anti-violence as they get.

    “Let's Work” sucked ass.

  • scrumble

    I'm just remembering the reviews and lukewarm sales reaction that followed. Same confusion would've extended to “Undercover of the Night” as well as the video for “She Was Hot”. Keep in mind they were still being marketed to a teen audience (to some extent) and that must've been a factor in their decision to play it safer when it came to image and subject matter (well, that and the Steel Wheels tour money).

  • MichaelFortes

    “Dance with a one-legged woman!” I especially love this remix for all the extra Mick vocals added to it. The video was awesome too. You haven't lived till you've seen Keith Richards chasing Mick Jagger with a chainsaw.

  • http://astreetproductions.com/weblog andrew t.

    I thought it was more “Zombie Jim Varney” myself.
    That photo is the stuff of nightmares…

  • Elaine

    When “Undercover” came out, I remember my friends and I being amused that side one was all sex and side two was all violence. We considered the album to be somewhat of a big wink/joke.

  • http://www.popdose.com 1Py_Korry1

    It's like we have the same record collection, David. I was just listening to this song the other day. I've always liked this song, and thought it had such a great dance groove that I played it at a party in 1984. I got the strangest looks from those on the dance floor — because, it seems, the party goers were actually paying attention to lyrics. :-)

  • http://www.popdose.com 1Py_Korry1

    It's like we have the same record collection, David. I was just listening to this song the other day. I've always liked this song, and thought it had such a great dance groove that I played it at a party in 1984. I got the strangest looks from those on the dance floor — because, it seems, the party goers were actually paying attention to lyrics. :-)

  • Elaine

    When “Undercover” came out, I remember my friends and I being amused that side one was all sex and side two was all violence. We considered the album to be somewhat of a big wink/joke.

  • http://www.popdose.com 1Py_Korry1

    It's like we have the same record collection, David. I was just listening to this song the other day. I've always liked this song, and thought it had such a great dance groove that I played it at a party in 1984. I got the strangest looks from those on the dance floor — because, it seems, the party goers were actually paying attention to lyrics. :-)