Author Archive

CD Review: Jay Nash, “All the Stars in Copenhagen”

All-the-Stars-In-Copenhagen-by-Jay-Nash_Fn8dZmG4B6Ax_full[1]Jay Nash has shared the stage with Sara Bareilles, but he’s more of a rocker than that association might suggest; rather than an earnest white boy straining for soul (a la John Mayer) or a pure pop smoothie (a la Jason Mraz), Nash has an authentically bluesy growl and a deep comfort with rootsy, dressed-down instrumentation. “Hard Lesson,” from Nash’s 2008 full-length release, The Things You Think You Need, sounds like it could have been cut by Anders Osborne in a particularly commercial mood. He’s a guy who can do more than one thing, in other words — which is what makes his new EP, All the Stars in Copenhagen, something of a disappointment. Five songs’ worth of tastefully placid, country-tinged rock ballads, Copenhagen shows only one side of Nash’s artistic personality — and even worse, it’s his least interesting side.

Make no mistake, none of Copenhagen’s songs are bad; they’re just sort of dull, especially when taken together. You keep waiting for Nash to open things up and kick a little ass, or at least change things up a little, but it’s just one ballad after another. Maybe Copenhagen makes Nash sleepy. Any of these tracks would sound just fine as a bit of breathing room between uptempo numbers, but as an EP, they form a fairly ominous hint about where Nash might be heading for his next full-length effort. Here’s hoping this is merely a detour, and he just needed a little breather before turning up the amps again.

You Again?: Timothy B. Schmit, “Expando”

youagainbanner

Poor Timothy B. Schmit.

No matter how many millions of dollars he has in the bank, or how many Caribbean islands he owns, it’s hard not to feel bad for Schmit, because he’s never been much more than the country-rock equivalent of Jan Brady — a guy whose two biggest gifts are a knack for walking into a room after Randy Meisner leaves and a singing voice that combines the estrogen-frosted purity of Christopher Cross with the raw energy of an angry Art Garfunkel. Schmit has definitely paid his dues (most notably during a nearly decade-long run with the perennially talent-rich and sales-poor Poco), and he can certainly sing and/or play the bass, but his timing sucks; he joined the Eagles after the bajillion-selling Hotel California, only to end up watching with dumb, Ted McGinley-esque horror as the band imploded around him.

Instead of spending the ’80s keeping the beat alongside Don Henley’s drum machine, Schmit wandered open-mouthed through a succession of embarrassing solo albums with titles like Playin’ It Cool and Timothy B. I personally think the video for 1987’s “Boys Night Out” is sadder than Schindler’s List: (more…)

CD Review: Various Artists, “Playing for Change: Songs Around the World Deluxe Edition”

61pYvpfA6nL._SCLZZZZZZZ_[1]Playing for Change, the globetrotting multimedia charity project that blends cutting-edge technology with lo-fi live street performances from artists around the world, is one of the coolest compilations to come out in 2009 — but if you aren’t the kind of person who spends a lot of time watching PBS or thumbing the racks at your local Starbucks, you probably missed it when it was released in April. So here, to help you mend the error of your ways, is something even cooler: the deluxe edition version of the album, which adds a DVD containing the entire Playing for Change documentary, titled Peace through Music, plus bonus material, to the original 10-song CD.

I reviewed the non-deluxe version of the album back in April, and this is what I had to say: (more…)

CD Review: Pete Seeger, “Live in ‘65″

51CO+1aESFL._SCLZZZZZZZ_Pete Seeger’s unlikely late-career resurgence continues with Live in ‘65, Appleseed Recordings’ latest contribution to the folk icon’s vast catalog. Culled from a performance at Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Music Hall, these previously unreleased recordings capture Seeger in his post-blacklist prime, leading a loudly appreciative audience through a 31-song set of standards, covers, and originals, including “Oh Susanna,” “Turn! Turn! Turn!” “This Little Light of Mine,” “Greensleeves,” and “A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall.”

The fidelity, as you might imagine, is a little suspect; though the tapes were cleaned up using the Plangent Process (recently used to tremendous effect on Woody Guthrie’s The Live Wire), they’re still more than 40 years old — and getting a pristine live recording out of Seeger was a tricky proposition anyway, because he had a tendency to move around the stage, and cared more about getting the crowd to sing along than putting himself squarely in the mix. The result is an album that sometimes sounds like it’s been swaddled in cotton, but believe it or not, that doesn’t make Live in ‘65 any less entertaining — in fact, I think it adds to its charm: Seeger sounds so loose and carefree here that the imperfections make perfect sense. (more…)

CD Review: Chasing Kings, “The Current State of Our Future”

61sZa6QKv7L._SCLZZZZZZZ_[1]Blending the porcelain pop of Coldplay with artfully ramshackle rock, L.A.’s Chasing Kings may seem a little staid compared with some of the more experimental bands on the indie landscape, but beneath the implacable surface of their debut EP, The Current State of Our Future, lies the pounding heart of a group of musicians who would dearly love to swoop in and carry you off to heartbreaking rock & roll heights. They don’t quite get there here — these songs all go down smooth, but they leave behind a lingering vanilla aftertaste — but they do get a lot closer than any band has a right to with its first release.

This is partly by virtue of the EP’s spotless pedigree — it was produced by Tony Berg, so clearly, there’s some money in The Current State of Our Future — but for the most part, it holds up for the simplest of reasons: the songs are solid, if not especially flashy, held together by a muscular rhythm section, bright, sinewy guitars, and supple, pleasantly sandy vocals. The record’s sound is so spotless that nothing really has a chance to reach out and grab you; still, even if you aren’t knocked off your feet, you should still find yourself swaying. It’s a pleasant sensation, and you also get the feeling that this is the work of a real band — one that probably kicks a little mid-tempo ass in concert. Next time out, I’d like to hear something with a little more raw heat from Chasing Kings, but in the meantime, there are far worse ways to fill up space on your iPod.

CD Review: Rod Stewart, “The Rod Stewart Sessions 1971-1998″

51JHX7JQDyL._SCLZZZZZZZ_[1]Rod Stewart is one of the most soulful vocalists on Earth, as well as one of rock’s finest interpreters.

He also sucks.

This Rod dichotomy has been a part of the Stewart listening experience since 1976’s Atlantic Crossing, which, while very much a solid album, hinted at the dark depths to which the erstwhile Face would soon sink. 1977’s Foot Loose & Fancy Free kicked off Stewart’s plunge to the bottom of lowest-common-denominator MOR rock in earnest, slipping the loathsome “Hot Legs” out of its asscheeks, followed the next year by Blondes Have More Fun and “Da Ya Think I’m Sexy?” From then on, every Rod record has contained a few gems scattered between fragrant mounds of dookie; he’s turned himself from the heartbreaking singer of his early sides into the musical equivalent of a classroom fuckup who has to follow any honest effort with a fresh round of cheerful stupidity. Even worse, as the ’80s became the ’90s, his periodic bursts of actual talent grew dimmer (like, say, “Rhythm of My Heart”), and were followed by ever more spectacular feats of lameness (like, say, “The Motown Song”). (more…)

Bourbon Street: (rī)1

Like my dear, esteemed colleague Ted Asregadoo, I’m fond of liquor, particularly the hard stuff. Unlike Ted, I tend to approach my drinking with a “seasons” philosophy; although bourbon is my favorite drink, I only buy it in the fall and winter, when its punchy warmth feels right against the frost and harsh winds of six more months under the New Hampshire snow. When the ice melts and the landscape turns green again, I’m into tonic drinks and beer, dropping slices of lime in my vodka (and cucumber in my gin) as I swat away the bugs and count down the days until autumn.

I’m also something of a liquor loyalist — partly because I love the stuff, and partly because I “earned” a free bottle cradle during one of the brand’s anniversaries, I’m a Knob Creek man. I buy a big-ass bottle when fall sets in, drop it in the cradle on my kitchen counter, and refill as necessary. For this reason — and because I live in the land of state-run liquor stores, where BevMo is a distant, shining beacon of boozy choice — I wasn’t sure I’d be up for joining Ted on Bourbon Street this year. In the end, though, temptation won out, and even though I still have a couple inches of Knob Creek left in fall’s first bottle, I headed out to my local liquor outlet last week and took a gamble on a container of (rÄ«)1, a newish brand of rye whiskey.

You might be saying — as the niggling Ted did — that rye isn’t bourbon, and shouldn’t be allowed in a series called Bourbon Street, but as the sheriff of this little burg, I make the laws. And anyway, rye and bourbon are linked, both as close liquor cousins and by history — many of the classic bourbon drinks were made with rye before Prohibition, and though it’s not as popular as it used to be, rye is a distinctly Northeastern drink; since I live in a distinctly Northeastern area, I figured (rÄ«)1 would be just about perfect for my first trip down Bourbon(ish) Street. (more…)

Letter From the Editor: Rockin’ the Unemployment Line

JohnnyHatesJazzShatteredDreams1987A[1]When I was a kid, I wanted nothing more than to be a rock star (as did many of you, I imagine). While my friends were off breakdancing, playing with marbles, or arranging elaborate battles between G.I. Joe dolls, I was spinning my mom’s old Billy Joel, Elton John, and Eagles records on a Fisher-Price turntable, daydreaming of a life of hotels, screaming crowds, and platinum sales. It is, as I said, not an uncommon dream, and although I followed it longer than most (and probably longer than I should have), I never came anywhere near the kind of success I imagined, for two reasons: One, I wasn’t very good, and two, that life doesn’t really exist.

Well, I don’t know. Maybe it does if you’re Eric Clapton, or Barbra Streisand, or one of the very few artists who have sold a ton of records and/or haven’t been divorced often enough to ever have to worry about money. But really, for most stars — even the ones who have been lucky enough to score some hits and earn some name recognition — music is still a job. It’s a really cool job, but still, it doesn’t keep you from having to worry about ordinary stuff like professional security, career advancement, and financial stability. It isn’t very glamorous, but it’s about the best anyone who’s dreaming about “making it” in the music business can hope for — a rewarding life, but one not without many of the same workplace anxieties the rest of us experience. Most of us don’t know what it’s like to hear ourselves on the radio. We do, however, know what it’s like to look for work, or lose a job without warning; it’s a nerve-wracking ordeal, to which many of the people appearing on our favorite albums can relate.

It’s a side of the dream we don’t think about or discuss much, and in order to explore it, I reached out to three musicians who have experienced the ups and downs of a career in music, and they were all gracious enough to take some time to discuss what it’s like for a rock star to lose a job — and where to go from there. (more…)

You Again?: Lita Ford, “Wicked Wonderland”

youagainbanner

Once upon a time, rock & roll was thought of as a young man’s game, far too alive and dangerous for anyone older than, say, 30. And really, the early rock records make a convincing argument for this school of thought; the arrangements might seem a little timid compared to the stuff we’re used to hearing now, but they hum with the unique energy and excitement of youth. Elvis and Buddy Holly are superficially square by today’s standards, but their music speaks to a resistance against the status quo that leaked out of rock music sometime after John Mellencamp’s “Authority Song” and Twisted Sister’s “We’re Not Gonna Take It” took the music’s rebellious shtick to its logical conclusion (and far beyond).

What we learned, though, is that the music was deeper and more absorbent than anyone could have guessed; rock eventually grew to include dozens of subgenres, and the artists who came up trying to tear down the old guard eventually joined it, finding their own music railed against (and ultimately canonized) by younger generations. It’s a phenomenon we’ve seen happen countless times since rock’s beginnings, and it’s extended to R&B, hip-hop, and even electronica. The music, to everyone’s seeming surprise, always manages to expand and deepend along with the perspectives of its aging artists. It can be a little depressing sometimes — poor Pete Townshend and his public death wish — but it’s contributed to some of the best music of the last quarter century, late-period Rolling Stones albums notwithstanding.

The one genre that can’t seem to wrap its head around aging, though, is hair metal; despite the continued touring power/absurd, cockroach-like persistence of bands like Poison and Warrant, none of the bands that were abusing spandex, hairspray, and amps in the ’80s have been able to figure out how to make the transition into middle age. It’s understandable — more than any other genre, hair metal was, at its peak, preoccupied with cheap sex and substance abuse, not necessarily in that order, and as awesome as that stuff sounds when it’s being shouted about by twentysomethings, it’s sad and a little scary when folks in their 40s and 50s do it, particularly if they have the grizzled, slightly dazed look of people who have been there and done that an unhealthy number of times. Any new post-grunge album from an older hair metal act seems to deal with this problem in one of two ways: either by embracing the genre’s cornball underpinnings and trying to quasi-ironically recreate the old sound, or by trying to copy trendier, younger metal acts. Either strategy has been known to yield limited results, but more often than not, they just leave the artist in question with something to hold down the tablecloth at the merch table. (more…)

Blu-ray Review: “Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory”

61dlqbdREvL._SCLZZZZZZZ_[1]Synopsis: A poor little boy wins a ticket to visit the inside of a mysterious and magical chocolate factory. When he experiences the wonders inside the factory, the boy discovers that the entire visit is a test of his character.

A movie about a wild-eyed reclusive madman who sends the entire world into a candy-scrabbling frenzy as part of an elaborate mindfuck culminating in the transfer of his candy empire to a child, 1971’s Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory is one of the odder “children’s” movies ever made, and one whose survival as a cult favorite was largely dependent on Gene Wilder’s tremendous work in the title role, as well as the movie’s natural appeal to the type of weirdos who grow up to be film directors (see: Burton, Tim). Willy Wonka wasn’t terribly successful when it was released, least of all among parents who questioned its dark overtones and smattering of scary moments (just ask poor Spike Jonze about those folks), but it’s become accepted as a sort of minor classic over the years, particularly since Burton fumbled his Johnny Depp-led Wonka remake a few years ago. (more…)