CD Review: The Monkees, “The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees”

Will Harris February 22, 2010 29

BirdsBeesMonkees1

If there’s one thing you need to take into consideration when reviewing a release from Rhino Handmade, it’s this: don’t let yourself be overwhelmed with the presentation.

This is a particularly legitimate concern when looking at the label’s new 3-CD version of the Monkees’ fifth album, The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees, which features gorgeous 3D lenticular cover art and, on the inside, offers archival advertisements taken from the original release, a thick-ass booklet that’s full of the kind of detailed liner notes that have become de rigueur for these sorts of reissues, and even a promotional button. Meanwhile, the discs themselves are housed in reproductions of the original album sleeve art (or, in the case of the so-called “Raritees” disc, an adaptation thereof), and in addition to both mono and stereo versions of the original 12 tracks, you get no less than sixty-four additional tracks. In short, if you’re a Monkees aficionado, then you’ll very likely feel as though you’ve gotten your $59.98’s worth long before you ever actually get around to putting Disc 1 into your CD player.

But, say, how about that music? Most casual Monkees fans rarely bother to venture beyond a single-disc best-of from the band. If they’re of a mind to make a spontaneous, devil-may-purchase of one studio album by the band, is this the one that should be calling their name?

The shortest of all possible answers to this question is “no.” While there are no doubt those who swear by The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees as the great lost classic from Davy Jones, Micky Dolenz, Peter Tork, and Michael Nesmith (much as I myself will defend Press to Play to the death as one of Paul McCartney’s most underrated records), the fact of the matter is that – setting aside the soundtrack to “Head” – it’s easily the least of the albums recorded by the band as a foursome. The biggest reason for this, however, is that it’s…well, frankly, it’s kind of all over the place. Within the liner notes, Andrew Sandoval acknowledges that, while The Monkees were forever being compared to the Beatles, the band so often written off derisively as “the Prefab Four” actually hit their “White Album” phase before John, Paul, George, and Ringo did. Unfortunately, their approximation of that era – which, as you may have guessed, took place during the recording of this very record – was creatively sprawling without feeling nearly as cohesive as a whole. If you take the time to go probing through the bonus material, however, you’ll quickly wonder if the biggest problem was simply that the band’s vision of the era was insufficiently represented. There were definitely more than enough songs to make this into a 2-record affair, some of which would’ve been strong enough to pick up the slack from the lesser contributions.

Looking at the 12 songs which make up the original version of The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees, the title which inevitably stands out is “Daydream Believer,” the Davy-sung version of the John Stewart song which provided the Monkees with a #1 hit. It’s still the same bit of pop brilliance now that it was then and continues to be capable of cheering up Sleepy Jean and anyone else who may hear it. Similarly, although Nesmith may have been less than thrilled when the suits at RCA demanded the release of Tommy Boyce and Bobby Hart’s “Valleri” as a single (there’s a quote from him in Glenn A. Baker’s Monkee-Mania: The True Story of the Monkees where he described it at the time as “the worst record I have ever heard in my life”), it pulled a top-5 placing and has aged at least as well. Okay, so maybe it’s a bit brass-heavy, but the hook is undeniable.

BirdsBeesMonkees2

But, wait, doesn’t “Valleri” also feature Davy as frontman? Yep, and he also takes lead on three more songs on the album. In fact, the first side of the album features him on every other song. “Dream World,” which kicks off the proceedings, is pleasant enough, but it’s definitely not what you’d call a “grabber.” Still, it’s miles better than his next offering. “We Were Made For Each Other,” written by Carole Bayer (not yet Sager) and George Fischoff, which easily ranks as one of the schmaltziest songs Jones has ever committed to vinyl…and, boy, that’s saying something. The chorus is painful enough (“We were made for each other / As the stars were made for the sky / We were made for each other / No other love have I”), but when you meld it to a gloppy string arrangement, it’s much, much worse. Over on Side 2, “The Poster” – the lyrics of which instantly bring to mind “Being for the Benefit of Mr. Kite” – is thankfully at least on par with “Dream World,” which stands to reason, given that they were both co-written by Jones with one Steve Pitts. Let’s be realistic, though: Jones was far better at performing other people’s songs than he was at writing his own.

BirdsBeesMonkees2

Of the four Monkees, the real songwriting star of the record – as per usual – is Michael Nesmith. His creative gifts had been flourishing from the beginning, and whenever he was given the chance to shine, he was invariably up to the task, as he showed with numbers like “Papa Gene’s Blues,” “Mary, Mary,” “You Told Me,” “You Just May Be The One,” and “Sunny Girlfriend.” On The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees, however, he was definitely firing on all thrusters. Nesmith let Dolenz handle the vocals on “Auntie’s Municipal Court,” but he held onto the mike…no pun intended…for “Tapioca Tundra,” a musical amalgam which lopes along for its first few seconds before slipping into pulsating jangle-pop perfection. “Writing Wrongs” is the least of his contributions, but its epic nature grows on you after several spins, and while it’s tempting to write off “Magnolia Simms” as a 1920s-inspired novelty, it’s far too easy to sing (and swing) along for anyone to dismiss it so easily.

BirdsBeesMonkees2

Unfortunately, a quick glance over the credits for the album reveals that Jones and Nesmith were the only two members of the group to have managed songwriting contributions. As noted, Micky takes the vocal reins for “Auntie’s Municipal Court,” but he also gets to shine on the pop-tastic “I’ll Be Back Up On My Feet,” the classified-ad-inspired “P.O. Box 9847″ (the album’s only other Boyce & Hart composition), and the anti-war “Zor and Zam,” which, while decidedly heavy-handed, officially turns into a pretty cool song at the 1:08 mark. (Seriously, that powerful horn attack cuts right into you.) Poor Peter Tork, however, gets nothing. Nada. Zilch. It’s no wonder this proved to be his last proper album as a member of the Monkees during their original heyday, especially when you scour the bonus tracks and realize that he’d written and recorded several songs for consideration, the majority of which were more than serviceable.

Let’s talk about those bonus tracks, then, shall we?

BirdsBeesMonkees2

We might as well give the lion’s share of the discussion to the underrepresented Mr. Tork. “Long Title: Do I Have to Do This All Over Again?” eventually made it onto Head (as well it should have), and “Tear The Top Right Off My Head” sounds like he’d been taking the same country-music cues as Nesmith, which may well be why it didn’t make it onto the album, but based on the description of the “Lady’s Baby” sessions, it sounds like Tork’s eccentricities in the studio probably soured any chance of the song earning a spot. (Engineer Hank Cicalo refers to it as “a very weird and ridiculous situation,” describing a scene with rugs, pillows, and a fair amount of wine, with an actual baby crawling all over the place, its “smiles and coos” being recorded for inclusion on the track.) “Alvin,” meanwhile, is enough of a cousin to “”Peter Percival Patterson’s Pet Pig Porky,” from Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones Ltd., that it would’ve felt like repetition to include it on this record, too, and “Merry Go Round,” which Tork co-wrote with Diane Hilderbrand, never really takes off…but, then, it’s not even two minutes long, so that might have something to do with it.

There’s plenty of enjoyable material by the other three Monkees scattered throughout these three discs, though the repetition of tracks through various takes is likely to bore those who have no interest in hearing their musical evolution. Unsurprisingly, based on the evidence found on the album proper, Nesmith’s songs tend to be the strongest, with “Carlisle Wheeling,” “Nine Times Blue,” and an acoustic version of “Little Red Rider” among the strongest. (The latter would get a full-fledged studio performance on Nesmith’s Magnetic South album a few years later.) There’s a fantastic acoustic version of “Tapioca Tundra” that’s been unearthed for this set, and it’s particularly interesting to hear Nesmith’s vocal on an early take of “My Share of the Sidewalk,” an outtake which emerged several years ago on one of the band’s Missing Links collections. Mind you, it also explains why Jones sang on that version, as Nesmith’s performance reveals that the composition isn’t entirely within his range as a singer, but fair enough.

Really, we could go on for several more paragraphs praising the stuff that Rhino has unearthed for the fans, including a version of non-album single “D.W. Washburn” with an added bass vocal, Davy’s performance of Jan Berry’s “Laurel and Hardy,” Micky’s rockin’ take on “Don’t Say Nothin’ Bad (About My Baby),” and Peter’s whistle-happy performances of “Seeger’s Theme,” but it’s so much easier just to say that there’s hours of listening enjoyment to be had for those who are interested in delving deep into the band’s archives. If there’s anything we’d expect to hear complaints about, it’s the fact that the bonus material that’s been added to the first two discs of the set isn’t listed on the back of the CD sleeves, which means you’ll have to flip into the booklet to find out what you’re hearing. Even that, however, is easily defended by saying that it was done to maintain the integrity of the original cover art…and, okay, fair enough, we’ll buy that.

There’s no question about it: The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees is another clear-cut win for Rhino Handmade and can easily stand alongside their previous Monkees sets, The Headquarters Sessions and Summer 1967: The Complete US Concert Recordings. If you’re a fan who’s teeting on the face about picking it up, here’s hoping this review will serve to sway you into a purchase. After all, if this one doesn’t sell, there’s little chance you’ll see expanded reissues of the remainder of their catalog…and, c’mon, you know your life won’t be complete ’til you get that multi-disc version of Pool It!

  • Pingback: Monkeephilia » Blog Archive » Review of the new Rhino Monkee…

  • MatthewF

    I bought the Love re-issues about ten years ago and they all had stereo and mono versions on, and seriously, why is that? I never did see the point.

  • WHarrisBullzEye

    I expect it's because Rhino's fanbase is filled to the brim with musical purists who prefer to have both sonic options available to them. Release it as only one or the other, and they'll balk. But that's strictly a guess on my part.

  • Guest

    (INSERT SCOFFING SOUND HERE) As if I would, Mr. Hughes! But the question at hand was about the members’ post-Monkees albums.

    I’ve actually never heard that ’71 solo album from Davy, but given how much I love “Girl” and “Rainy Jane,” I can’t imagine I wouldn’t enjoy it. Well, you know, except for the overly saccharine ballads. :-)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=631635101 facebook-631635101

    Great review Will! It inspired me to check this reissue out, as I never heard the album in its original form. What post Monkees solo albums do you recommend?

  • Pingback: Monkeephilia » Blog Archive » Twitter Updates for 2010-02-22

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    Rhino is a smart company and although they had been doing mono releases long before the Beatles mono box, that hoopla certainly would have reinforced the market viability of such things.

  • WHarrisBullzEye

    As you might guess from the tone of the review, I'll instantly testify on behalf of Nesmith's solo work. You can't go wrong with any of his three albums with the First National Band, and the one he did with the Second National Band ain't bad, either. Personally, I think most of his stuff is at least worth a listen, but beyond those four, your best bet is “From a Radio Engine to the Photon Wing,” which has the radio hit “Rio” on it.

    As far as the other Monkees go, Davy's only done one proper solo album (a self-titled effort in '71), and Micky's solo records are mostly just cover songs, but the two of them did team up with Boyce & Hart for a one-off record together that's not too bad. Peter's stuff is kinda hit or miss, but I've liked the material he's recorded with James Lee Stanley.

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    I won't speak for Will, but for myself, I'd think the best starting point would be the Nesmith solo stuff.

  • http://www.facebook.com/carlosramirezjr CarlosRamirez

    Thank you for the suggestions! The only solo stuff I have is a Nesmith album. I'll check out the other stuff too.

  • luffy66

    Here is my favorite Nesmith solo song and video:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRWTz3zY1WY

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    Someone was listening to some Zappa there, eh?

    My favorite Nesmith moment, stupid as it may be, was from his NBC Television Parts show (a tamed version of Elephant Parts) – In an introduction, he started singing “Guantanamera”, but he sang it thus:

    “One ton tomato
    I ate a one ton tomato
    One ton to-maaaaay-to…”

    I was probably thirteen at the time so, frankly, that was high comedy.

  • WHarrisBullzEye

    I am reeeeeeeally hoping that Shout Factory will release “Television Parts” on DVD someday. I told Mr. Nesmith's wife, Victoria, that they'd be the perfect company to put out something like that, adding that I'd be more than glad to offer my services for the liner notes. She said she contacted them about it, but whether it'll actually result in a release remains to be seen. Fingers crossed, everyone…

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    If that happens, I am so there.

  • http://www.facebook.com/JohnCHughes John Hughes

    Let's not forget Davy's first solo album, under the name David Jones, released in 1965:

    http://991.com/newGallery/Davy-JonesMonkees-Dav

  • http://www.popdose.com DwDunphy

    Davy Jones always struck me the way Phil Collins strikes my brother. He comes off as Mr. Nice Guy but you still get the vibe he's probably a jerk.

  • WHarrisBullzEye

    (INSERT SCOFFING SOUND HERE) As if I would, Mr. Hughes! But the question at hand was about the members' post-Monkees albums.

    I've actually never heard that '71 solo album from Davy, but given how much I love “Girl” and “Rainy Jane,” I can't imagine I wouldn't enjoy. Well, you know, except for the overly saccharine ballads. :-)

  • http://mostlymodernmedia.wordpress.com Beau

    “You Just May Be The One” is pure pop joy.

  • brettalan

    Damn right that Press To Play is one of Paul's most underrated records! “Move Over Busker”, “Talk More Talk”, and “Footprints” are tremendous. (Tip: Play side two before side one, and it works better.)

  • breadalbane

    I tried that, but my CD player insists there is no music on side two.

  • http://emiliofrombrazil.blogspot.com/ Emilio

    “…know your life won’t be complete ’til you get that multi-disc version of Pool It!”

    What, no “Justus”?

  • WHarrisBullzEye

    I could listen to “Pool It!” in its entirety a hundred times before I could listen to “Justus” once. I wanted to like that record so badly, but I just can't make it happen.

  • Mark

    Here's another vote for Macca's Press to Play. Terrific record. I thought I was the only one who thought so! And just to stay germane to the conversation, I think The Birds, The Bees & The Monkees was the first album I ever bought. Lotsa good stuff there–especially “Valleri” and “Zor and Zam.”

  • Pingback: Monkeephilia » Blog Archive » Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-02-28

  • Pingback: CD Review: Monkees, "Head" (Deluxe Edition) | Popdose

  • Jr Shaney

    Even for a major Monkee fan three cds at fiftysomething dollars is a little much even for me. I do
    wish they’d make it two cds like the previous releases and offer it in stores as well.

  • Calvin G.

    I did not know about the Headquarters Sessions so I missed out on that one, but now I own all the other handmade monkees’ albums. I did like this one a lot, though I will add, with the different versions of the albums that Rhino puts out you kinda have heard some of this before, but I love the packaging and the immensity of it all. I sincerely can give away my other versions of this album (to get someone else hooked) I like the booklets/detailed info and how it’s packaged etc. and I really do wish that all their albums get this treatment. Even though it won’t be the headquarters sessions, I would love headquarters be done this way as well. And though Pool It was a decent album (maybe not great..but still very well done) I wouldn’t mind having it in this format as well. maybe as a bonus they can have a cd of a live performance from that era since they were enjoying the first of many comebacks. Also Justus deserves this treatment as well (hopefully they have enough left over studio tracks/outtakes to fill a three disc set..maybe another live cd). Either way I can’t complain about this purchase for $60 I can’t complain. I didn’t really expect much (since I had purchased other versions of this album) I basically didn’t let myself get carried away and then get disappointed when I finally got it. But when it arrived I was very impressed with the box set itself, with the packaging (the linticular cover is something you have to see in person to truly appreciate) The full color booklet with lots of details and pictures, many I’ve never seen before. As well as tons of bonus tracks. As with previous albums that included two cds and have included both mono/stereo versions of original album tracks, I am still uncertain if I care about this or if it’s necessary. I guess purists would want the original mono, but the monkees were always great with the vocal layerings that it seems to shine better in stereo. I guess this is like Star Wars though the new remasters lookf ar superior with it’s added special effects/scenes, there are always those who still want the originals as well. Even though I think if they got rid of the 12 mono tracks then they could have added 12 more rare songs, I kinda look at what they did give us and realise that’s probably as much as there is to have. I am surely satisfied with everything. The album everyone knows, so I won’t get into the songs, but the sound is great, and the bonus stuff is also in great condition. It has been archived well. and the monkees’ button is a nice touch. I haven’t seen those since the 80s lol. I really do miss them. Micky has always been my favorite monkee both musically and theatrically. And he is represented quite well on this release. Just wish he would have written more (he’s a better songwriter than he thinks he is). So I would agree that anyone who is a monkees’ fan (and not just a greatest hits buyer) this is definitely worth every penny.

  • Calvin G.

    You are probably right. If you put on both versions you’ll sell more. No one can really complain considering the amount of material that is available here. But I am unsure of the point myself, other than to appease purists. I find that the stereo remasters always sound great, so I am not sure if I “need” the mono versions.

  • Calvin G.

    I remember the Monkees episode where they were trading albums and I think it was Mike, was going to trade all of his albums for one davy jones album.