Posts Tagged ‘Zack Dennis’

NFL Picks: Week 9

Gamblor had another lackluster performance last week, going 6-7 and dropping $34 in the process, which means it has now fallen just below fifty-one percent for the season (weighted win percentage of 50.9%) and is now dipping into last season’s winnings to support its incorrigible habit of betting on underdogs, who are thus far 54-60-1 for the year.  My own picks were terrible, going 3-10.  The most thrilling part of my football weekend wasn’t actually until Tuesday, when I learned the results of Monday night’s game – I had changed the channel with a minute and a half remaining expecting that New Orleans would be able to kill the clock with ease.  What a pleasant surprise!

I saw it suggested (plausibly) last week that New Orleans’ kicker John Carney was shaving points at the behest of the books against Miami (he missed a key extra point near the end of the game, and booted the ball out of bounds on their final kickoff to give the Dolphins terrific field position), but I certainly don’t believe that anymore. Carney nailed an otherwise meaningless extra point with just three minutes left in the game, putting the Saints up by 11 against a spread that originally opened at -10. This would be bad news for the books, of course, because most of the money early in the week went towards the Saints. The action was getting so lopsided that by Monday afternoon they had moved the spread all the way to -11.5 and even -12 in some places. Which meant that the sportsbooks, already suffering quite badly this year, were in very realistic peril of getting middled. Fortunately, Mike Bell came to their rescue in a huge way, fumbling the ball away on third down and giving Atlanta the opportunity to cover the spread with a late field goal.

(To watch this video, right-click and hit play)
flashfiller


flashfiller

This is the first year I've paid attention to line movement, so I've overlooked the prospect of hitting a middle until now. I've mentioned before that the sportsbooks don't like to move the lines very much - but this year, facing an unprecedented number of blowouts, an expanded salary cap, and several of the worst NFL teams in decades, they're in full-on panic mode and will be moving the lines a lot more than usual. The prospect of a middle actually seems like a pretty good investment, especially now that the two-point conversion has made score differentials like 5 and 2 much more common. For those who are unfamiliar with how a middle works, it's pretty simple.  Imagine the spread opens at -6.5 on Monday, and you put a $11 bet down on the favorite, standing to win $10. Everyone else does too, so the book gets spooked and moves the line to -7.5 by Thursday in hopes of getting more people to bet on the underdog. If you then put in another $11 bet on the underdog, it won't matter what the final score is - the most you can possibly lose is $1 (if you lose one bet, you'll win the other - laying down $22 and getting $21 back). But on the slim chance that the game is decided by a single touchdown, your favorite bet (-6.5) will win $10, and your underdog bet (+7.5) will also win $10, for a total of $20. So basically you're taking a 20 to 1 shot that the spread is going to be exactly right.

The question then becomes one of how often the "middle" actually pays off.  According to my database, the spread is exactly right only about once per 30 games.  Of course, since a good portion of the time the spread includes a half-point to prevent pushes, and if you're playing for a middle you're most likely going to have a half-point on each side (bets of, let's say, -3.5 on the favorite and +4.5 on the underdog), it's important to include games where the spread is correct to within half a point.  Games which (with the spread factored in) are decided by a half point or less are much more common - they occur once every 16 games.  So in principle if it's possible to get a middle, it's probably worth taking a shot at it.  Of course, since I don't normally put my bets in until Friday, it's not something I expect to be attempting this year - but in the future if I see a lot of line movement late in the week like we did with the New Orleans game, I might give it a shot.

Anyhow, I hope you enjoyed my digression here.  I'll be back with another top 5 feature next week - and if you haven't watched it yet, and you like to watch hot chicks talk about Dungeons and Dragons, you should go watch the video that Shi Ne (aka The Sports Report Girl) put together for last week's Halloween post.  Here are the week's picks, along with a nifty printable summary sheet so you can follow both Gamblor's and my own predictions at home, if you happen to be so inclined.

WASHINGTON REDSKINS
at
ATLANTA FALCONS
Gamblor's Pick: Washington (+10)
Bet Amount: $31.18 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: Washington's defense put forward a spectacular effort against Philadelphia, but it wasn't nearly enough to compensate for their lack of offense. And they'll be able to keep Matt Ryan and Michael Turner in check much the same way. Atlanta is going to be suffering a tremendous letdown after such a fierce effort against the Saints. This game will mean a lot more to the Redskins, who will be able to actually put forward a competitive effort this time around. It's hard to have faith in such a poorly-managed squad, but if Vegas thought this game was going to be a blowout, they'd have made the spread a lot bigger.
ARIZONA CARDINALS
at
CHICAGO BEARS
Gamblor's Pick: Arizona (+3)
Bet Amount: $0.56 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: Chicago looks to be getting together after a healthy dose of Cleveland's Miracle Rejuvenation Tonic, while the weaknesses that Arizona has successfully concealed for much of the season were on full display against Carolina last week. My feelings on this game aren't all that strong, but I do think Old Man Warner's arthritic hip will act up in the cold and Sulky Jay will be looking forward to the upcoming winter of discontent enough to deliver a solid outing. My only concern is that the line feels a little trappy - with Chicago's strong day against Cleveland and Arizona's woes against Carolina, expect lots of money on Chicago.
BALTIMORE RAVENS
at
CINCINNATI BENGALS
Gamblor's Pick: Cincinnati (+3)
Bet Amount: $8.26 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: Baltimore certainly looked like a complete team against Denver, but they won't be able to run the ball nearly as well against Cincinnati's ground defense forces. Chicago couldn't. Houston couldn't. And oh yeah, Baltimore couldn't either when these teams met in Week 5. I'm not sure why Vegas is giving Baltimore the edge here.  Sure, revenge is a factor, but enough to flip the home-field advantage for two divisional rivals who sport a similar record? Gamblor actually thinks this line isn't too far off from where it belongs, but it irks me (and the Bengals, no doubt) to see Cincinnati coming off a 45-10 thumping of a solid Chicago team and a week of rest to be viewed as underdogs at home against a team they have already beaten.
HOUSTON TEXANS
at
INDIANAPOLIS COLTS
Gamblor's Pick: Houston (+9)
Bet Amount: $30.81 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: Sure, I know I said I'd keep picking Indianapolis until someone proved me wrong, but that didn't mean that I'd stop picking them for good once it happened. Houston's defense is way too soft to contain Peyton Manning - he'll torch them and Schaub won't be able to keep up - and might even end up getting hurt trying.
MIAMI DOLPHINS
at
NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS
Gamblor's Pick: Miami (+10.5)
Bet Amount: $3.38 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: New England has looked great lately - even in London, where I thought they'd show up flat. Miami managed to beat the Jets, but I doubt they'd have pulled that off without three huge plays from their defense and special teams (a fumble returned for a touchdown by Jason Taylor and the two kickoff returns by Ted Ginn). Bill Belichick will have watched the tape of the Saints game enough times during his week off to recite each play from memory, and he's got the personnel to imitate Sean Payton's game plan exactly. Should be a very easy win for the Patriots.
GREEN BAY PACKERS
at
TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS
Gamblor's Pick: Tampa Bay (+9.5)
Bet Amount: $42.08 (Hedge and Flip - 92%)
WHY I AGREE: Tampa is going to win a game sooner or later this season. And of course it won't be here. But Gamblor sees this line as an out-and-out trap and I can't disagree - especially since I've seen the line move down from its original value of +10. This is the only great (okay...decent) vs. horrible machup this week, and lots of bettors will be dumping money into Green Bay as a result. I don't have any genuine answers for how Tampa will manage to stay close with the Packers (um...let's say desperation?) but I firmly believe the result of this game will surprise a lot of people.
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS
at
JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS
Gamblor's Pick: Jacksonville (-6.5)
Bet Amount: $22.92 (Flip - 90%)
WHY IT'S WRONG: Jacksonville has shown that they're capable of being competitive in games against tough teams - let's not forget that nobody has come closer to beating the Colts this season. Then again, they got pummelled 41-0 in Seattle and only just barely beat St. Louis before losing to the winless Titans. Kansas City hasn't proven a damned thing. But they haven't really had a chance to - their schedule has included Baltimore, Philadelphia, the New York Giants, Dallas, and San Diego - and they beat Washington and should have beaten the Raiders, too. Jacksonville is nowhere near good enough to lay these kinds of points, even at home. Which, incidentally, is exactly how Gamblor sees it - but I'm personally envisioning a different outcome and a much closer game.
DETROIT LIONS
at
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
Gamblor's Pick: Detroit (+10)
Bet Amount: $31.75 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: I'm not even entirely sure Seattle can beat Detroit, let along rout them as this line suggests. I know Seattle is supposed to be great at home, but a home crowd only really helps a good team - it doesn't do much for a lousy one (just ask Kansas City or the Lions). The public consistently underestimates Oakland's ability to keep games close (myself included), and I think Seattle is their mirror image in this regard. Everyone expects the Seahawks to serve up a magnificent offensive performance and blow away their opponents whenever Hasselbeck is healthy, and sometimes they do, but more often they serve up a generous helping of disappointment. Seattle has got a good track record against weak teams so far this year (beating Jacksonville 41-0 and rolling over St. Louis 28-0) but Detroit's offense should keep them in this game. There's no way I'm laying 10 points with a 2-5 team - even when they're playing against a 1-6 one.
CAROLINA PANTHERS
at
NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
Gamblor's Pick: Carolina (+13)
Bet Amount: $26.30 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: Who or what on earth can stop Drew Brees? A Robotech warrior made of out kryptonite piloted by Chuck Yeager? A defense that includes six down linemen, nine linebackers, and a secondary featuring fourteen steroid-enhanced hybrid clones of Ronnie Lott and Darrell Green? I think it would be kind of funny if Thomas Morestead (the Saints' punter) waited until halftime to show up for one of their games, just to see if anyone would notice. I'm not happy taking anything less than 14.5 points against the Saints, so I'm picking them yet again here.
SAN DIEGO CHARGERS
at
NEW YORK GIANTS
Gamblor's Pick: San Diego (+4.5)
Bet Amount: $10.33 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: It all seems to be coming together for San Diego right now, and it seems an awful lot like they're stealing it from the New York Giants. Shawne Merriman has finally emerged bright-eyed and bushy-tailed from his tequila-induced slumber, Rivers is remembering that as long as he puts enough air under the ball one of his behemoth receivers will pull it down, and Darren Sproles will be getting more and more carries as Ladanian Tomlinson's age continues to show. By contrast, Eli Manning and the Giants can't seem to anything right lately and I swear Tom Coughlin is getting more senile by the hour. Curiously, the line for this game opened at 3.5 and has moved to 4.5 in response to the public's enthusiasm for the Giants, so this would have been one of those "middle" opportunities I was discussing earlier, with the target being a 4 point Giants victory. That's a very real possibility here.
TENNESSEE TITANS
at
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS
Gamblor's Pick: Tennessee (+4)
Bet Amount: $70.44 (Hedge and Flip - 92%)
WHY I AGREE: By a curious coincidence, this game also featured another middle opportunity - the spread opened at -5.5, meaning that a bet on Tennessee followed by a similar bet on San Francisco with the new spread of -4 would pay off double if the Niners won by 5 points. But I actually don't think that's likely to happen - I think there's a very strong possibility that Tennessee is going to win this game. It's certainly true that they're only just starting to dig out from the colossal hole they have found themselves in since the beginning of the season, but they have to be feeling quite fine about their 30-13 rout of Jacksonville last week. Having Vince Young under center is going to give them as sense of "New Directions" style glee, and they'll be facing a San Francisco team that just had their heart broken by Indianapolis. The Titans couldn't stop Maurice Jones-Drew, but the 49ers don't have anyone who is healthy or good enough to duplicate that feat, so they'll have to depend on Alex Smith to get their offense moving. He won't lose the game for him, but he won't win it either. And Vince Young is primed to become the next coming of Steve McNair - win quietly, win close, win ugly...but just win.
DALLAS COWBOYS
at
PHILADELPHIA EAGLES
Gamblor's Pick: Dallas (+3)
Bet Amount: $9.02 (Flip - 86%)
WHY I AGREE: I'm still not convinced about the Eagles. They always seem to surprise everyone when the odds are stacked against them, but suffer a huge letdown when expectations are high. Factoring in the home field advantage, the spread tells me that this game should be a toss-up. Dallas has a lot of offensive talent, but didn't hold up well against the Giants. And considering how thoroughly the Eagles dominated the Giants last week, it's easy to envision a solid win for the Eagles. But I don't see that happening here - Andy Reid will find some way to blow it. Hopefully the Cowboys are smart enough to actually send someone with DeSean Jackson goes deep (there is NO excuse for the Giants failing to shut him down after seeing him burn the Redskins), and they'll be able to pull out an exciting win.
PITTSBURGH STEELERS
at
DENVER BRONCOS
Gamblor's Pick: Pittsburgh (-3)
Bet Amount: $15.22 (Flip Conflict - 90%)
WHY I AGREE: Denver has come back to earth with a resounding thud. Pittsburgh knows how to beat the Ravens, and they also know how to imitate them. Denver's weaknesses were very much on display last week. The Stellers will blitz Kyle Orton relentlessly, and he's too methodical to be able to take advantage of the man coverage. They'll get to him a lot. Ben Roethlesberger will helm a characteristically chaotic game, and the Steelers might only win by a few points, but they'll definitely win.

flashfiller

Week

Zack

Gamblor

Weighted Wins

Weighted Picks

Weighted Win %

Profit

Win

Lose

Push

Win

Lose

Push

1

7

9

-

9

7

-

1339

1727

77.5%

$155.71

2

9

7

-

11

5

-

970

1292

75.1%

$98.97

3

9

7

-

6

10

-

607

1552

39.1%

-$61.75

4

8

6

-

5

9

-

288

963

29.9%

-$70.33

5

6

8

-

6

8

-

655

1217

53.8%

$15.46

6

7

7

-

8

6

-

625

1231

50.8%

-$10.53

7

8

4

1

3

9

1

246

1161

21.2%

-$127.43

8

3

10

-

9

7

-

709

1548

45.8%

-$34.43

Total

57

58

1

54

61

1

5439

10691

50.9%

-$34.33

For legality purposes, this website does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.

NFL Picks Week 8 (updated)

UPDATE:  The Giants line continues to see wild movement – it has shifted all the way to +1 and now the Eagles are considered underdogs.  Gamblor now likes the Giants well enough to bet above the $5.00 minimum on them.  I’d have rounded up anyhow, but somehow this makes me feel vindicated.  The juice on the Buffalo game was very heavy (-120) so Gamblor doesn’t stand to win all that much on its second-largest bet of the week.  Apologies to those who have seen their comments disappear – the old post was giving me formatting issues so I put it on waivers – DON’T THINK YOU WON’T GET CUT FROM THIS TEAM, WORDPRESS!  An updated summary sheet is here for those who want to follow along at home.

Last week was an absolute nightmare for the computer, as favorites covered the spread in all but two instances (plus a push) and my season’s winnings so far went up in smoke. It was particularly heartbreaking to see Miami blow a lead of 21 points (especially considering they were getting an extra 6.5 points from the spread) and then get my hopes up by holding tough on their goal line to preserve the cover, only to toss up a completely meaningless pick-six at the end of the game. I was the beneficiary of an identical finish in Pittsburgh in my second-biggest bet of the week, so I suppose I ought to be grateful the week wasn’t even worse, but it’s hard to find much joy when your bets go 3-9-1 and your top bet loses by a score of 38-0. My own picks were pretty good, going 8-4-1, but that’s scant consolation for such an awful, awful week.

I wasn’t alone in my anguish last week – last week practically bankrupted a number of sportsbooks. Most of the games that featured lopsided betting on the favorites – New England (87%), Green Bay (91%), San Diego (91%), Indianapolis (95%), the New York Jets (76%), New Orleans (90%), and Philadelphia (89%) – ended up being blowouts and a lot of parlays paid off. In terms of competitive football, it was actually the most uninteresting weekend we’ve seen all year. The disparity in talent between NFL teams this year is pretty amazing; if the NFL were run like the Premier League in England you could expect a few teams to be relegated at the end of the season in favor of some of the more competitive college squads. From a fantasy perspective, though, it was an exciting week, as a number of players had spectacular offensive performances and lots of matchups turned into shootouts that weren’t decided until Monday night.
(To watch this video, right-click and hit play)
flashfiller


flashfiller

Fantasy football has sometimes been described as "dungeons and dragons for jocks". There are certainly a few parallels - each player (owner) develops a character (team) whose abilities are determined by a roll of the dice (random draft order). Players develop a deep affinity for their creation, and can spend inordinate amounts of time selecting a name and drawing sketches (designing logos) of their alter-ego. The campaign (season) is overseen by a dungeon master (commissioner) who manages the adventure and adjudicates disputes, but ultimately the success or failure of the players is left up to how well they allocate their resources such as weapons, spells, and magic items (quarterbacks, running backs, and wide receivers) with an element of random chance (injuries and turnovers) thrown in. Not to mention that participants can display a level of obsession that is terrifying to those unfamiliar with the game.
Proponents of fantasy football argue that since the games take place in the real world with flesh and blood players, and since real treasure is often awarded to the winner of the league, the two aren't all that similar. And although fantasy football has enjoyed a huge surge in popularity in recent years due to the accessibility of the internet, the game itself actually predates Dungeons and Dragons. The concept of fantasy football originated amongst a group of team employees and sportswriters in Oakland, who created the first league in 1962, just a few years after the invention of fantasy baseball. Dungeons and Dragons didn't surface until 1971, when Gary Gygax and Jeff Perren published Chainmail, a set of rules for warfare with miniature figurines (a pastime that lives on in such tabletop games as Warhammer 40K and the currently endangered Heroclix) that ultimately evolved into Dungeons and Dragons, the first box set of which was published by TSR in 1974.

Now of course most jocks wouldn't hesitate to stuff your head in a toilet if you accused them of playing with figurines of elven warriors and twelve-sided dice, but for Halloween, I thought it would be fun to count down 5 of the monsters from the AD&D's Monster Manual along with their 5 counterparts from the NFL. Taking over from here is the lovely Shi Ne of The Sports Report Girl.com.

Gamblor is doubling down this week, taking yet another broad selection of underdogs - but this time for even higher stakes. And as queasy as it makes me feel, I'm glad. It's not possible for the sportsbooks to take another beating like they did last week - it just won't happen. There's simply no way, or sports gambling as we know it will come to an end. Here's the picks.

HOUSTON TEXANS
at
BUFFALO BILLS
Gamblor's Pick: Buffalo (+3.5)
Bet Amount: $38.50 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: There's a general sense that on a good day, the Houston Texans can beat just about anybody. While this is certainly true of an offense that can put up so many points so fast, Houston's defense hasn't shown that they can stop anybody (except for Oakland, who doesn't count). Although Buffalo's fans are dying to get rid of Dick Jauron, they haven't yet given up on the team and are likely to show up in full force. Buffalo's got a bye week coming while Houston is looking ahead to their matchup with the heretofore invincible Colts next week, so as uneasy as it makes me feel to pick against the Houston points machine, I'm taking Buffalo here.
CLEVELAND BROWNS
at
CHICAGO BEARS
Gamblor's Pick: Cleveland (+13)
Bet Amount: $21.20 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: The Bears will certainly be stinging after last week's humiliating loss to Cincinnati. But it took Cincinnati until the very last seconds of overtime to beat Cleveland. So why such a large spread? Hint: it's because Cleveland sucks. Cutler hasn't turned out so great yet, but he won't be called on to do all that much here - expect the Bears to keep the ball on the ground against Cleveland's truly pathetic run defense - much as Green Bay did last week. The only problem is that this won't lead to blowout-level points. I just don't see Chicago putting enough points on the board to cover a spread this large, and I see this one turning out as Vegas' revenge on gamblers who saw all the big spreads last week get covered easily and are getting a bit too greedy.
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
at
DALLAS COWBOYS
Gamblor's Pick: Seattle (+9.5)
Bet Amount: $29.76 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: I really have no idea what to expect from Seattle during any given week. I'm still convinced that they're terrible, but every time I put that in print they burn me. Then again, Dallas looked spectacular last week and Miles Austin looks like Calvin Johnson decided to dress up in a Cowboys uniform for Halloween just to experience what it's like to play for a winning team. Dallas is a very public team and their lines tend to get inflated, though Gamblor doesn't see that being the case here. A victory of greater than 9 points is a lot for this unreliable offense to deliver. I think they will probably succeed, but I'm no more confident of that than I am of the outcome of a coin toss.
SAINT LOUIS RAMS
at
DETROIT LIONS
Gamblor's Pick: St. Louis (+4)
Bet Amount: $35.52 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: There's no line yet for this game. And I don't really care what it is. Detroit is a terrible team that can't stop anyone, but they actually can put of a few points of their own. St. Louis can do neither. It feels strange to describe any game as a routine blowout for the Lions, but that's what I see happening here.
NEW YORK GIANTS
at
PHILADELPHIA EAGLES
Gamblor's Pick: New York Giants (-1)
Bet Amount: $7.81 (Flip)
WHY I AGREE: The books have been sliding this line towards Philadelphia all week long. Would you believe that this one opened up at -3? It's a pretty classic example of what Gamblor looks for - Vegas not giving the New York Giants the points they ought to be getting. Although looking at the score last week would convince you that Philadelphia won pretty convincingly, they actually looked terrible. They couldn't move the ball at all, and really only were able to build a big lead based on Jason Campbell's turnovers. I don't see them standing a chance against a Giants team that is looking to lash out against anyone - particularly a divisional rival. Tom Coughlin will have no trouble motivating his men for this contest, and I think they'll be able to win this one with ease.
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS
at
INDIANAPOLIS COLTS
Gamblor's Pick: San Francisco (+13)
Bet Amount: $14.69 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: As I said before and intend to keep saying until someone makes me eat my words, I'm with the Colts all the way.
MIAMI DOLPHINS
at
NEW YORK JETS
Gamblor's Pick: New York Jets (-3.5)
Bet Amount: $2.79 (Flip)
WHY I AGREE: Nothing can help a team get their mojo back more than playing the Raiders. The Jets rushed for over three hundred yards against the Raiders, which is even more impressive when you consider the amazingly short fields that Jamarcus Russel was giving them to work with. Like all the other suckers who bet against New Orleans last week, I'm furious with Miami for blowing a 27.5 point (spread-adjusted) lead. After such a spectacular meltdown, I wouldn't trust them to carry my bag, let alone try to take control of a team like the Jets.
DENVER BRONCOS
at
BALTIMORE RAVENS
Gamblor's Pick: Denver (+3)
Bet Amount: $17.30 (Flip)
WHY I AGREE: Once again, Denver is being treated as equal to or inferior to a team with a far worse record than their own. They can only summon the energy for these contests so many times before they run out of gas, but this is a seriously disrespectful line. The only decent opponent Baltimore has beaten has been San Diego, and they would have been beaten there as well if it weren't for Ray Lewis' late-game heroics. Gamblor sees this line as a trap because Baltimore was so tough at home last season; it expects Denver to be getting more points. I think a more appropriate line would be +1.5 or so, but right now the money is pretty much split between the two teams. I like Denver here, pulling off one more win before their winning streak finally comes to an end next week against Pittsburgh.
OAKLAND RAIDERS
at
SAN DIEGO CHARGERS
Gamblor's Pick: Oakland (+16.5)
Bet Amount: $18.60 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: I'm amazed that during the season so far, Gamblor has actually made money betting on the Raiders - even including last week's disaster, the computer has earned $9.84 from their victories against the spread - but I think this week is where that dives back down into negative territory. It's amazing to think that the Raiders practically beat San Diego in their opening game this year. The team hasn't gained or lost any signifincant personnel, but that doesn't matter to the oddmakers in the slightest - they're telling us loud and clear to expect Oakland to be blown out. But is that really how things are going to turn out? Home field advantage shouldn't matter too much; the annual Raiders-Chargers game in San Diego is famous for how many Raiders fans turn up in the stands. But I think what this game will come down to is coaching - Norv Turner is smart enough to make adjustments to his game plan based on what he saw in Week 1, while Tom Cable is still puzzling over the "shoelace matrix."
JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS
at
TENNESSEE TITANS
Gamblor's Pick: Jacksonville (+3)
Bet Amount: $38.68 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: Every week during the early part of the season, everyone expected the Titans to turn things around. This week, we said, is the week they finally get their first win. Well, it's been seven weeks so far, and literally every week the margin has gotten worse. Just look at the progression: -3 (OT), -3, -7, -20, -22, -59...and now they're favored? Vince Young is great at winning games, and I think if he starts here he'll be inspired to play his best football in ages. But Jacksonville already put up 37 points against the broken secondary of the Titans - they won't score as many this time around, but they'll score enough that the spread will factor in and put them over the top (if they don't win outright).
MINNESOTA VIKINGS
at
GREEN BAY PACKERS
Gamblor's Pick: Minnesota (+3)
Bet Amount: $23.62 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: A lot is being made out of Brett Farve's return to Green Bay this weekend, but I'm not actually all that concerned about it as a factor in this game. I think it's a lot simpler than that - Minnesota is the better team. They proved it when they beat the Packers at home - it was a very solid victory before Green Bay scored 10 points in the final 5 minutes to pull within a touchdown. The only decent team that Green Bay has beat this season was Chicago - and it took a late game drive to pull that one off. The points are a gift here - take 'em.
CAROLINA PANTHERS
at
ARIZONA CARDINALS
Gamblor's Pick: Carolina (+10)
Bet Amount: $17.85 (Hedge)
WHY I AGREE: Arizona's defense has been looking unbelievably fierce lately. And I'd expect them to eat Jake Delhomme for lunch. Arizona's offense has also been looking really tough, and should have an easy time working with the short fields they'll get after Delhomme inevitably turns it over two or three times. But something here makes me uneasy. Arizona isn't going to take Carolina seriously, and with San Francisco expected to lose to Indianapolis, they won't feel any pressure to win to hang onto their division lead. I doubt that the Cardinals will lose to the lowly Panthers (especially in front of their home crowd), but I do think that 10 points is too many for them to cover.
ATLANTA FALCONS
at
NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
Gamblor's Pick: Atlanta (+10)
Bet Amount: $21.57 (Hedge)
WHY IT'S WRONG: I'm not picking against New Orleans. I could talk myself into seeing reasons for Atlanta to keep this one close, but after last week it's going to take more than just 10 points for me to pick against the Saints.

flashfiller

Week

Zack

Gamblor

Weighted Wins

Weighted Picks

Weighted Win %

Profit

Win

Lose

Push

Win

Lose

Push

1

7

9

-

9

7

-

1339

1727

77.5%

$155.71

2

9

7

-

11

5

-

970

1292

75.1%

$98.97

3

9

7

-

6

10

-

607

1552

39.1%

-$61.75

4

8

6

-

5

9

-

288

963

29.9%

-$70.33

5

6

8

-

6

8

-

655

1217

53.8%

$15.46

6

7

7

-

8

6

-

625

1231

50.8%

-$10.53

7

8

4

1

3

9

1

246

1161

21.2%

-$127.43

Total

54

48

1

48

54

1

4730

9143

51.7%

$0.10

For legality purposes, this website does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.

NFL Picks: Week 8

Hi folks. Due to formatting issues, the updated post is now here. Go there now. NOW, DAMNIT!

Last week was an absolute nightmare for the computer, as favorites covered the spread in all but two instances (plus a push) and my season’s winnings so far went up in smoke. It was particularly heartbreaking to see Miami blow a lead of 21 points (especially considering they were getting an extra 6.5 points from the spread) and then get my hopes up by holding tough on their goal line to preserve the cover, only to toss up a completely meaningless pick-six at the end of the game. I was the beneficiary of an identical finish in Pittsburgh in my second-biggest bet of the week, so I suppose I ought to be grateful the week wasn’t even worse, but it’s hard to find much joy when your bets go 3-9-1 and your top bet loses by a score of 38-0. My own picks were pretty good, going 8-4-1, but that’s scant consolation for such an awful, awful week.

I wasn’t alone in my anguish last week – last week practically bankrupted a number of sportsbooks. Most of the games that featured lopsided betting on the favorites – New England (87%), Green Bay (91%), San Diego (91%), Indianapolis (95%), the New York Jets (76%), New Orleans (90%), and Philadelphia (89%) – ended up being blowouts and a lot of parlays paid off. In terms of competitive football, it was actually the most uninteresting weekend we’ve seen all year. The disparity in talent between NFL teams this year is pretty amazing; if the NFL were run like the Premier League in England you could expect a few teams to be relegated at the end of the season in favor of some of the more competitive college squads. From a fantasy perspective, though, it was an exciting week, as a number of players had spectacular offensive performances and lots of matchups turned into shootouts that weren’t decided until Monday night.

(To watch this video, right-click and hit play)

flashfiller

flashfiller

Fantasy football has sometimes been described as "dungeons and dragons for jocks". There are certainly a few parallels - each player (owner) develops a character (team) whose abilities are determined by a roll of the dice (random draft order). Players develop a deep affinity for their creation, and can spend inordinate amounts of time selecting a name and drawing sketches (designing logos) of their alter-ego. The campaign (season) is overseen by a dungeon master (commissioner) who manages the adventure and adjudicates disputes, but ultimately the success or failure of the players is left up to how well they allocate their resources such as weapons, spells, and magic items (quarterbacks, running backs, and wide receivers) with an element of random chance (injuries and turnovers) thrown in. Not to mention that participants can display a level of obsession that is terrifying to those unfamiliar with the game.

Proponents of fantasy football argue that since the games take place in the real world with flesh and blood players, and since real treasure is often awarded to the winner of the league, the two aren't all that similar. And although fantasy football has enjoyed a huge surge in popularity in recent years due to the accessibility of the internet, the game itself actually predates Dungeons and Dragons. The concept of fantasy football originated amongst a group of team employees and sportswriters in Oakland, who created the first league in 1962, just a few years after the invention of fantasy baseball. Dungeons and Dragons didn't surface until 1971, when Gary Gygax and Jeff Perren published Chainmail, a set of rules for warfare with miniature figurines (a pastime that lives on in such tabletop games as Warhammer 40K and the currently endangered Heroclix) that ultimately evolved into Dungeons and Dragons, the first box set of which was published by TSR in 1974.

Now of course most jocks wouldn't hesitate to stuff your head in a toilet if you accused them of playing with figurines of elven warriors and twelve-sided dice, but for Halloween, I thought it would be fun to count down 5 of the monsters from the AD&D's Monster Manual along with their 5 counterparts from the NFL. Taking over from here is the lovely Shi Ne of The Sports Report Girl.com.

Gamblor is doubling down this week, taking yet another broad selection of underdogs - but this time for even higher stakes. And as queasy as it makes me feel, I'm glad. It's not possible for the sportsbooks to take another beating like they did last week - it just won't happen. There's simply no way, or sports gambling as we know it will come to an end. Here's the picks.

HOUSTON TEXANS

at

BUFFALO BILLS

Gamblor's Pick: Buffalo (+3.5)

Bet Amount: $39.06 (Hedge)

WHY I AGREE: There's a general sense that on a good day, the Houston Texans can beat just about anybody.  While this is certainly true of an offense that can put up so many points so fast, Houston's defense hasn't shown that they can stop anybody (except for Oakland, who doesn't count).  Although Buffalo's fans are dying to get rid of Dick Jauron, they haven't yet given up on the team and are likely to show up in full force.  Buffalo's got a bye week coming while Houston is looking ahead to their matchup with the heretofore invincible Colts next week, so as uneasy as it makes me feel to pick against the Houston points machine, I'm taking Buffalo here.
CLEVELAND BROWNS

at

CHICAGO BEARS

Gamblor's Pick: Cleveland (+13.5)

Bet Amount: $23.43 (Hedge)

WHY I AGREE: The Bears will certainly be stinging after last week's humiliating loss to Cincinnati.  But it took Cincinnati until the very last seconds of overtime to beat Cleveland.  So why such a large spread?  Hint: it's because Cleveland sucks.  Cutler hasn't turned out so great yet, but he won't be called on to do all that much here - expect the Bears to keep the ball on the ground against Cleveland's truly pathetic run defense - much as Green Bay did last week.  The only problem is that this won't lead to blowout-level points.  I just don't see Chicago putting enough points on the board to cover a spread this large, and I see this one turning out as Vegas' revenge on gamblers who saw all the big spreads last week get covered easily and are getting a bit too greedy.
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS

at

DALLAS COWBOYS

Gamblor's Pick: Seattle (+9.5)

Bet Amount: $31.99 (Hedge)

WHY IT'S WRONG: I really have no idea what to expect from Seattle during any given week.  I'm still convinced that they're terrible, but every time I put that in print they burn me.  Then again, Dallas looked spectacular last week and Miles Austin looks like Calvin Johnson decided to dress up in a Cowboys uniform for Halloween just to experience what it's like to play for a winning team.  Dallas is a very public team and their lines tend to get inflated, though Gamblor doesn't see that being the case here.  A victory of greater than 9 points is a lot for this unreliable offense to deliver.  I think they will probably succeed, but I'm no more confident of that than I am of the outcome of a coin toss.
SAINT LOUIS RAMS

at

DETROIT LIONS

Gamblor's Pick: St. Louis (+4.5)

Bet Amount: $39.06 (Hedge)

WHY IT'S WRONG: There's no line yet for this game.  And I don't really care what it is.  Detroit is a terrible team that can't stop anyone, but they actually can put of a few points of their own.  St. Louis can do neither.  It feels strange to describe any game as a routine blowout for the Lions, but that's what I see happening here.
NEW YORK GIANTS

at

PHILADELPHIA EAGLES

Gamblor's Pick: New York Giants (Pk)

Bet Amount: $2.23 (Flip)

WHY I AGREE: The books have been sliding this line towards Philadelphia all week long.  Would you believe that this one opened up at -3?  It's a pretty classic example of what Gamblor looks for - Vegas not giving the New York Giants the points they ought to be getting.  Although looking at the score last week would convince you that Philadelphia won pretty convincingly, they actually looked terrible.  They couldn't move the ball at all, and really only were able to build a big lead based on Jason Campbell's turnovers.  I don't see them standing a chance against a Giants team that is looking to lash out against anyone - particularly a divisional rival.  Tom Coughlin will have no trouble motivating his men for this contest, and I think they'll be able to win this one with ease.
SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS

at

INDIANAPOLIS COLTS

Gamblor's Pick: San Francisco (+13)

Bet Amount: $15.06 (Hedge)

WHY IT'S WRONG: As I said before and intend to keep saying until someone makes me eat my words, I'm with the Colts all the way.
MIAMI DOLPHINS

at

NEW YORK JETS

Gamblor's Pick: New York Jets (-3.5)

Bet Amount: $2.79 (Flip)

WHY I AGREE: Nothing can help a team get their mojo back more than playing the Raiders.  The Jets rushed for over three hundred yards against the Raiders, which is even more impressive when you consider the amazingly short fields that Jamarcus Russel was giving them to work with.  Like all the other suckers who bet against New Orleans last week, I'm furious with Miami for blowing a 27.5 point (spread-adjusted) lead.  After such a spectacular meltdown, I wouldn't trust them to carry my bag, let alone try to take control of a team like the Jets.
DENVER BRONCOS

at

BALTIMORE RAVENS

Gamblor's Pick: Denver (+3)

Bet Amount: $16.18 (Flip)

WHY I AGREE: Once again, Denver is being treated as equal to or inferior to a team with a far worse record than their own.  They can only summon the energy for these contests so many times before they run out of gas, but this is a seriously disrespectful line.  The only decent opponent Baltimore has beaten has been San Diego, and they would have been beaten there as well if it weren't for Ray Lewis' late-game heroics.  Gamblor sees this line as a trap because Baltimore was so tough at home last season; it expects Denver to be getting more points.  I think a more appropriate line would be +1.5 or so, but right now the money is pretty much split between the two teams.  I like Denver here, pulling off one more win before their winning streak finally comes to an end next week against Pittsburgh.
OAKLAND RAIDERS

at

SAN DIEGO CHARGERS

Gamblor's Pick: Oakland (+16.5)

Bet Amount: $18.41 (Hedge)

WHY IT'S WRONG: I'm amazed that during the season so far, Gamblor has actually made money betting on the Raiders - even including last week's disaster, the computer has earned $9.84 from their victories against the spread - but I think this week is where that dives back down into negative territory.  It's amazing to think that the Raiders practically beat San Diego in their opening game this year.  The team hasn't gained or lost any signifincant personnel, but that doesn't matter to the oddmakers in the slightest - they're telling us loud and clear to expect Oakland to be blown out.  But is that really how things are going to turn out?  Home field advantage shouldn't matter too much; the annual Raiders-Chargers game in San Diego is famous for how many Raiders fans turn up in the stands.  But I think what this game will come down to is coaching - Norv Turner is smart enough to make adjustments to his game plan based on what he saw in Week 1, while Tom Cable is still puzzling over the "shoelace matrix."
JACKSONVILLE JAGUARS

at

TENNESSEE TITANS

Gamblor's Pick: Jacksonville (+3)

Bet Amount: $39.61 (Hedge)

WHY IT'S WRONG: Every week during the early part of the season, everyone expected the Titans to turn things around.  This week, we said, is the week they finally get their first win.  Well, it's been seven weeks so far, and literally every week the margin has gotten worse.  Just look at the progression: -3 (OT), -3, -7, -20, -22, -59...and now they're favored?  Vince Young is great at winning games, and I think if he starts here he'll be inspired to play his best football in ages.  But Jacksonville already put up 37 points against the broken secondary of the Titans - they won't score as many this time around, but they'll score enough that the spread will factor in and put them over the top (if they don't win outright).
MINNESOTA VIKINGS

at

GREEN BAY PACKERS

Gamblor's Pick: Minnesota (+3)

Bet Amount: $24.18 (Hedge)

WHY I AGREE: A lot is being made out of Brett Farve's return to Green Bay this weekend, but I'm not actually all that concerned about it as a factor in this game.  I think it's a lot simpler than that - Minnesota is the better team.  They proved it when they beat the Packers at home - it was a very solid victory before Green Bay scored 10 points in the final 5 minutes to pull within a touchdown.  The only decent team that Green Bay has beat this season was Chicago - and it took a late game drive to pull that one off.  The points are a gift here - take 'em.
CAROLINA PANTHERS

at

ARIZONA CARDINALS

Gamblor's Pick: Carolina (+10)

Bet Amount: $17.11 (Hedge)

WHY I AGREE: Arizona's defense has been looking unbelievably fierce lately.  And I'd expect them to eat Jake Delhomme for lunch.  Arizona's offense has also been looking really tough, and should have an easy time working with the short fields they'll get after Delhomme inevitably turns it over two or three times.  But something here makes me uneasy.  Arizona isn't going to take Carolina seriously, and with San Francisco expected to lose to Indianapolis, they won't feel any pressure to win to hang onto their division lead.  I doubt that the Cardinals will lose to the lowly Panthers (especially in front of their home crowd), but I do think that 10 points is too many for them to cover.
ATLANTA FALCONS

at

NEW ORLEANS SAINTS

Gamblor's Pick: Atlanta (+10)

Bet Amount: $21.20 (Hedge)

WHY IT'S WRONG: I'm not picking against New Orleans.  I could talk myself into seeing reasons for Atlanta to keep this one close, but after last week it's going to take more than just 10 points for me to pick against the Saints.

flashfiller

Week

Zack

Gamblor

Weighted Wins

Weighted Picks

Weighted Win %

Profit

Win

Lose

Push

Win

Lose

Push

1

7

9

-

9

7

-

1339

1727

77.5%

$155.71

2

9

7

-

11

5

-

970

1292

75.1%

$98.97

3

9

7

-

6

10

-

607

1552

39.1%

-$61.75

4

8

6

-

5

9

-

288

963

29.9%

-$70.33

5

6

8

-

6

8

-

655

1217

53.8%

$15.46

6

7

7

-

8

6

-

625

1231

50.8%

-$10.53

7

8

4

1

3

9

1

246

1161

21.2%

-$127.43

Total

54

48

1

48

54

1

4730

9143

51.7%

$0.10

For legality purposes, this website does not promote or advocate gambling. This is solely for entertainment purposes only.

NFL Picks: Week 7 (updated)

UPDATE: There were two major moves in the lines since Wednesday.  Pittsburgh surrendered another 1.5 points to Minnesota, closing at -5.5.  Which means Gamblor really adores Pittsburgh now, even more than it already did.  And (in my sportsbook at least) they took Green Bay at Cleveland off the board for a while and when it came back it has moved a full 2 points – from +7 to +9.  While that’s not very encouraging (it reeks of panic) on a gut level, Gamblor sees this spread as being a little closer to where it belongs, and thus it upped its bet a little bit.  Here’s a revised, printable summary sheet in pdf form.  Good luck this week!

UPDATE 2: I’ve got something special lined up for my Halloween feature next week, including an appearance by a very sexy special guest, so be sure to stop by!

Last week turned out to be a mirror image of Week 5, in that the computer put together a winning set of picks (8-6) but prioritized its bets poorly so it lost a little money. Three of its correct picks came in games where it didn’t have any actual money on the line, and it missed its top pick (Giants). The morning session was a disaster, as Minnesota managed to piss away a seventeen point lead in the fourth quarter and I got cheated out of a push on yet another failed goal line stand – this time by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. But the afternoon featured a very nice turnaround, as Gamblor hit on its #2, #3, and #4 bets – including a huge upset in Oakland that nobody in their right mind would have predicted. Effectively the computer broke even, coming in with a weighted win percentage of 50.8% and losing $10 due to the effect of the juice. A summary of last week’s performance is here.

Last week, if Tom Brady had injured himself on the first series of the second half, I’d have injured myself from laughing so hard about it. And I wouldn’t have felt ashamed for it, either. Aside for the pain, Tom Brady would have been fine – he’d have to suffer another miserable winter convalescing in Brazil with his supermodel wife, but that’s about it. I’ve got nothing against Tom Brady. No, I’d be laughing because it would be a very fine comeuppance for Bill Belichick, who courted disaster by sending his star player back onto a snowy field to risk injury in a game that the Patriots were leading 45-0. Apologists for Belichick have zeroed in on the fact that the Patriots haven’t really been in sync as a team and suggested that playing more minutes together would help their offense develop a rhythm they haven’t had since 2007. That’s horseshit. With the way Tennessee’s secondary had completely given up, there’s nothing the Patriots could have accomplished at Foxboro Stadium that they couldn’t have accomplished on a practice field running seven-on-seven drills against their second-team defense. It was an incredibly arrogant and stupid coaching move to send Brady back out to pile up points against a defense that had already been thoroughly humiliated and would be looking to lash out. And lash out they did – defensive lineman Tony Brown got flagged for roughing the passer on the very first play of the second half.

(more…)

NFL Picks: Week 6

UPDATE:  Some minor changes, but nothing worth writing about.  Updated summary of wagers is here.

After two disappointing weeks in a row, the computer found its footing again and had a decent week. Although Gamblor’s picks were 6-8, it prioritized very well – hitting its #1, #3, and #4 picks. This was strong enough to finish with a weighted win percentage of 53.8% and turn a small profit of $15 (a summary sheet is here). If either of the two games that ended with goal-line stands (one that succeeded by the Arizona Cardinals and one that failed by the New York Jets) had turned out the other way, it would have been much better. Having Detroit cover through the back door against Pittsburgh was a nice treat, and instead of regretting the fact that I managed to sneak in a bet in on Jacksonville just in time to lose it, I’ll share the joy of other gamblers and laugh at how much money Vegas threw away by setting an insane line in an Indianapolis game that contained no surprises whatsoever. Although those goddamned Seahawks continued to make me look like an ass, the trends I outlined last week did a good job of proving my point that trends shouldn’t be trusted. If you’d bet on all five of the trends that I discussed (including the ones that overlapped each other), you’d have gone 4-6.

Despite my passion for the subject of politics, I figured I’d make a conscious effort to refrain from preaching in this column. Of course, with Rush Limbaugh having been considered to take part in a bid to buy the St. Louis Rams, that might have ended up being pretty difficult. But Jon Cummings has already got that subject covered for Popdose, so instead I’ll share my thoughts about the Nobel Peace Prize. Last week, when a clearly astonished Barack Obama was announced as the winner, many conservative Americans felt the same way that Vikings fans would feel if Brett Farve had been awarded the MVP before the season had even begun. The president is like America’s quarterback – he doesn’t call the plays (Congress does that – which shows you how dysfunctional a team would be if the plays were called by a committee), but he executes them and ultimately gets credit or blame for the team’s performance during the season. For those who thought the U.S. should have signed the veteran McCain to the starting job, seeing Obama receive the Nobel prize causes all kinds of conflicted loyalties. (more…)

NFL Picks: Week 5 (updated)

UPDATE: The only line that changed was the Raiders line – which moved down to +14.5 from +16, which means the computer thankfully wants to risk just a little less on the Raiders. Some of Gamblor’s bet amounts changed due to fluctuations in the models, but nothing more than a few cents either way. There’s STILL no line for the Seattle game, but the computer sees these teams as pretty evenly matched so it will be taking the points in this one regardless of who’s getting them. A final summary sheet is here.

Last week was the worst in Gamblor’s season so far, both in terms of weighted win percentage (29.9%) and money lost (-$70.33). My own picks were fine, going 8-6, but the computer’s finished at 5-9. Surprisingly, I don’t feel all that bad about it. The computer is going to have some bad weeks, and I’d prefer that they happen when there’s not all that much money on the line. Plus, its biggest pick (Detroit) was looking pretty damned good up through halftime and until about 4 seconds into the third quarter. I’m still up $120 for the season so far, and the season’s weighted win percentage is still at a perfectly healthy 57.9%, so I’ll shrug off last week and move on.

About once a week, the predictions of the Hedge model and the Flip model coincide and both models agree on an underdog in one of the games.  This means that the outcomes from the various simulation schemes range from less than 55% to sometimes as high as 90% in favor of one team.  But this isn’t an indication of supreme confidence, all that it’s actually showing is that the statistics for one (or both) of the teams are pretty volatile.  So far this has turned up four times this year, and it’s gone 2-2.  Nothing special.  But the weighted win percentage is out of this world at 78.5% (both of the winners were big bets and both of the losers were little ones).  If we look back through all of last season, the weighted win percentage was still pretty incredible — 71.1% over all seventeen weeks.  This week, unless the spread moves quite a bit, both models will be agreeing on Atlanta as an underdog of 2.5 points at San Francisco.  So with these kinds of percentages, why don’t I consider this to be a special situation and put down a huge bet on Atlanta?

Simple.  The “Agree” bet doesn’t provide any real advantage.  Sure, in 2008 it came in at 71.1% – but in 2007, it performed at a simply awful rate of 37.4%.  In 2006 it was strong again, at 65.3%, but in 2005 it was a bottomless pit of despair at 36.2%.  Throughout the lifetime of the data back to 1998, this particular situation performs at a weighted win percentage of 55.0%, almost exactly identical to the Gamblor’s overall performance with the weighing scheme I’ve chosen to use.  The fallacy of betting based on — or against — trends is what I’ll be talking about in this week’s feature.

(To watch this video, right-click and hit “play”)
flashfiller


flashfiller

Top 5 NFL Betting Trends You Should Be Wary Of:

Trends are a very dangerous temptation in sports betting. In my opinion, paying attention to trends against the spread in the NFL makes about sense as looking for trends at a roulette table. They don’t exist.  If the ball has landed on black nine times out the last ten, the likelihood that it will land on red (or black) on the next spin is not altered in the slightest. For every arcane trend you can find that virtually guarantees a victory for one side, you can find another equally cromulent trend that will tell you the exact opposite. You should no more trust an ongoing trend to continue than you should bet against it under the assumption that Vegas has spotted the trend and is taking measures to reverse it. With that in mind, here are five NFL trends you should know about — and then proceed to completely ignore:

5. Playing Surface. I haven’t programmed Gamblor to make predictions about the over/under, but everything it needs is there. I’m just not sure whether it’s possible to gain any kind of edge. A lot of gamblers believe that paying attention to field conditions can be pretty lucrative, particularly when concerned with the over/under. The 3-0 disaster between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Miami Dolphins at a sodden Heinz Field in 2007 was a classic example of how a messy field can shut down scoring in a football game.  Since the Arizona Cardinals moved into their new stadium in 2006, the games have been played on a grass field that grows outside in the perfect Arizona sun and then gets moved inside the dome for the games.  It’s a unique situation which has led to a 19-7 record for gamblers who bet on the over.  This week, the Cardinals are hosting the Houston Texans.  The Cardinals defense is remarkably porous, having only held opponents to less than 17 points just eight times in their last 67 games (from 2005 to present).  Houston has a potentially explosive offense and a similar philosophy of indifference when it comes to stopping their opponents.  The over/under on this contest is at 48 points, which is on the upper end of the range — but still rather appealing considering the way these teams match up.

4. Teams Coming Off a Bye. When I first programmed Gamblor, I tried to give a lot of consideration to teams that were coming off a bye week. I thought that these teams would play better as a result of the rest, or that bettors would overcompensate for this and there would be an advantage in the opposite direction. I was wrong on both counts – statistically, the bye week had no impact whatsoever on teams that were playing, or the teams they were playing against.  This week Atlanta, Philadelphia, Arizona, and Carolina all had the previous week off.  Of these, Philadelphia has been red-hot in their return to action, going 11-0 straight up and 9-2 against the spread.  Philadelphia has been looking great so far this season, but this trend is running headfirst into two other trends as the Eagles host the winless Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

3. Big Time Underdogs. There are only three or four games every year where the spread exceeds two touchdowns — so the fact that we’ll see two such games this week (Oakland at New York, Tampa Bay at Philadelphia) is quite an unusual occurrence.  Shocking upsets are very rare in this situation, but a lucky play at the beginning of the game can be all it takes for the underdog to keep things close enough for the spread to factor in, and laying so many points as a favorite leaves a lot of room for a backdoor cover after the starters have finished playing.  It’s always very stressful to bet the underdog in what’s expected to be such a lopsided game, but underdogs playing on the road that are benefiting from a spread of more than 14 points are 14-4 since 2005.  Tampa Bay is getting a 15 point boost in Philadelphia, and the Raiders are getting 16 points against the Giants.   I’ll be nervous if the spread drifts any higher for either game because I’ll interpret that to mean the books are trying to scare money off of the favorite — but for spreads of 16 or more, the underdog has covered the last seven times in a row.

2. Winless Teams. There’s a philosophy that teams who have made it four or more games into their season without winning yet tend to get great value against the spread, because nobody wants to bet against such a worthless crew of losers. Plus, the winless team will be playing their hearts out against an opponent that is most likely phoning it in. The philosophy behind this makes sense — and the numbers back it up quite well. Since 2000, teams with records of 0-4 or worse are 52-28 against the spread. With a win percentage of 65.0%, that’s a pretty seductive trend.  This week Tampa Bay, St. Louis, Kansas City, Tennessee, and Cleveland will all be striving to lock down their first win.  I wouldn’t really say that any of them have a realistic chance of winning outright, but everyone except Tennessee is facing a spread of 9 or more (and the Titans line, which is only 3.5 against the Colts, looks an awful lot like a trap!).

1. Hello, Good-Bye. The incomparable Walter alerted me to this one, and it’s pretty hard to ignore. It’s been 2-0 so far this season, and it’s been 33-6 since 2000.  So what’s this magnificent trend?  It’s to bet on favorites of 6.5 or more points in their last week before a bye.  A spread of 6.5 or more points indicates that the favorite is expected to fully dominate the game.  And with nothing on the immediate horizon to distract them, players can focus entirely on the game at hand.  Furthermore, the players know that if their coaches see them dog it against a clearly inferior opponent, they’ll be doing nothing but running drills for the next five days.  This week, the Cowboys are headed to Kansas City to face the winless Chiefs and although the Cowboys’ season has been pretty disappointing thus far, they can avoid a lot of punishment in practice the following week by putting together a solid win over the Chiefs.

Gamblor is loving underdogs again this week, and frankly, I’m glad. Favorites have been ruling the season so far (34-27 against the spread). It’s very unlikely that we’ll ever see a repeat of 2005, known as the “year of the favorite,” when favorites covered the spread at an astonishing rate of 55% and many sportsbooks flirted with bankruptcy.  So you can expect the underdogs to bounce back with a vengeance as the season wears on. Here’s the summary of bets for Week 5. Good luck!
(more…)

NFL Picks: Week 4 (updated)

UPDATE: Some of the lines moved a little, so some of the bets have changed a little.  The most significant change was the single half-point in the Cincinnati – Cleveland game causing Gamblor to triple its bet.  A similar change also cause it to boost its bet in the Tampa Bay – Washington game.  And they finally posted a line in the Seattle – Indianapolis game, though the bet didn’t change much and neither did my opinion.

I was hoping I’d be able to wait a little longer into the season to run with this clip, but unfortunately…

(To watch this video, right-click and hit “play”)

flashfiller

Gamblor had its first losing week of the season, coming in with a weighted win percentage of 39.1% and hitting just 6 out of 16 picks. It was particularly tough to watch its biggest pick — Buffalo — stay alive all the way into the fourth quarter before crumbling. And surprisingly enough, the lowly Rams were alive into the fourth quarter as well. All in all it could have been far worse, as the computer only ended up dropping $61.75 based on total bets of $271.49 (a summary of last week’s performance is here). My own picks were pretty solid, going 9-7. I’m still resentful that Vegas switched the line on the Denver-Oakland game; it seemed obvious that the books were panicking when they moved the line so much so quickly. And like most non-Redskins fans out there, I found it heartening to see Detroit finally break their losing streak. (more…)

NFL Picks: Week 3 (updated)

UPDATE: A few minor tweaks in the spread have changed my bets a little bit, but nothing more than half a point or more than few dollars.  Gaining the half point in Chicago made the computer a bit less enthusiastic about the Bears, and the change on the Dallas line led to the computer switching its pick, since a single hedge bet came in on the side of Carolina.  A new summary sheet is here.  Still no line on the Philadelphia game.

UPDATE 2: Ah, finally.  The line on the Philadelphia game is up – the Eagles are favored by 8.5 points.  Which means that Gamblor would like to place (gulp) a $31.50 bet on the Chiefs.  My thoughts are summarized below.

I really enjoyed my Sunday last week. In the morning, I watched my chosen team (the Raiders) put together a sensational drive late in the game to come from behind and pull out an improbable win (and win some money for me). In the afternoon, my girlfriend and I watched her chosen team (the Bears) put together a sensational drive late in the game to come from behind and pull out an improbable win (and win some more money for me). In the evening I went out and saw We Were Promised Jetpacks, The Twilight Sad, and Frightened Rabbit play a corker of a show at the Knitting Factory.  It was a good day.  Last week I mentioned that I’d be impressed if Gamblor could beat his Week 1 weighted win percentage of 77.5%. He didn’t, but he came awfully close, nailing 75.1% of his picks – and finishing 11-5 for the week (tabulated summary is here). My own picks were a little better, going 9-7, which brings me to even for the season.  As I mentioned before, you’re better off listening to the computer, not me.

You’d expect that Vegas would have enjoyed their Sunday as well, as the week featured a number of close games and underdogs prevailed in 9 of the 16 games. Unfortunately, the bettors were a little bit too savvy and correctly identified Oakland and Baltimore as the same kind of dogs I’d like to see set loose on Michael Vick’s testicles. So the books took a beating, and likely will try to recoup their losses this week. I find Gamblor’s picks a bit unsettling this week, as it only likes one favorite in the entire slate of games. Then again, it only liked one favorite last week too, and it’s awfully hard to argue with those kinds of results. This week, the computer is making a grand total of 1464 hedge bets – its sixth most ever.  For some historical context, the most hedge bets it has ever made was 1806, which happened in Week 15 of 2005.  In weeks that it has wanted to make this many hedge bets, it has actually done quite well – when making 1200 hedge bets or more it has been profitable 13 out of 22 times – with an overall win percentage of 57.2%.  So I’ll swallow my concerns and let Gamblor continue (I hope) to work his magic.

One of the reasons the computer is so enthusiastic about underdogs this week is because many of those underdogs are playing at home.  Some of the tougher teams in the league (New Orleans, Green Bay, New York Giants, and Pittsburgh) are headed out on the road against comparatively weaker teams (Buffalo, St. Louis, Tampa Bay, and Cincinnati), which means that although we’ll probably see at least one upset, it’s virtually guaranteed that a few unlucky cities will have to watch their teams get slaughtered on their own home fields. Which brings me to my feature for the week… (more…)

NFL Picks: Week 2 (updated)

UPDATE: The lines wiggled a little bit before I placed my bets, so I updated the lines and the bet amounts to reflect my wagers. The only major change was the line in the Jets game dropping from +5 to +3.5. Smells like a trap to me. Here’s a summary sheet of the computer’s picks if you want to follow along at home.

Wow! For those of you who decided to blindly trust some guy on the Internet in his first week of making football predictions, congratulations! The computer hit the ground running, nailing its top three picks and five of its top six en route to a dazzling weighted win percentage of 77.5% (tabulated results are here)! I hope this isn’t the finest week the computer has this season, though it has set the bar awfully high for itself. Overall, the computer pulled in a profit of $156. My own personal predictions were much less impressive; I was 7-9 for the week. Some of my assessments were dead-on (Philadelphia, Atlanta, Minnesota, Green Bay), I was wrong about the particulars but ultimately prevailed on a couple (Buffalo, San Francisco), and on some I just flat-out missed the mark by a mile (Seattle, Oakland). And there were a pair of games where I was tantalizingly close to being correct. The first was my weeklong dream that Detroit would sneak in a backdoor cover against the Saints — which almost came true. They made it all the way to New Orleans’ 36 yard line with 5:00 left before Stafford tossed his third pick of the day and New Orleans put together a long drive to finish killing the clock. The second brings me to my feature for this week:

The Top 5 Indescribably Idiotic Decisions of Week 1.

insertbrainIs there anything more satisfying than second-guessing the decisions that players and coaches and referees make while they are in the midst of intense pressure, deafening crowds, and hurtling bodies that collide with such force that it’s a wonder fission doesn’t take place? Monday morning quarterbacking is one of the guiltiest delights of the game of football. The tactical nature of the game enables us to pick through every play in slow motion and critique every missed block, every mistimed route, every blown coverage that occurs during the course of a single play. There’s no sport that gives us a better chance to say “…if only” and be absolutely certain that if that receiver had just thought to lateral the ball before getting laid out by the safety while he was six inches short of the first down marker, the outcome of the game if not the ENTIRE SEASON would been totally different.

Of course, it’s not always tactical mistakes that raise our ire. Sometimes players can do things that are so mind-numbingly, soul-crushingly stupid that you want to reach into your television set, take off their helmet, and beat them about the ears with it. Players will call for a fair catch at the one-yard line, try to scoop up fumbles they should have just pounced on, spike the ball in the middle of a play, and casually run out of the back of the end zone as though the field were ten yards longer. Blooper reels are filled with players displaying magnificent lapses in judgment. Leon Lett’s entire legacy is built on a pair of these plays. It sometimes makes you wonder whether suffering a coma-inducing concussion would actually make some of these guys smarter. Here are my nominees for what I think are the most boneheaded decisions of the first week of NFL football:

5. Hines Ward, Tennessee vs. Pittsburgh. Once he’s inside the ten, all he’s got to do is protect the ball, let them kill a bit of clock, and then Jeff Reed would handle the rest. Instead, by trying to fight his way through for a touchdown, Ward fumbled away a sure victory and put the game in jeopardy. Without the good fortune of winning the coin toss, Pittsburgh could easily have lost this game.

4. NFL Officials, San Diego vs. Oakland. Absolute horseshit, and I’d say this even if I hadn’t been a Raiders fan since the age of seven. If a player has two feet down and has control of the football in the end zone, it’s a touchdown. End of story. Anything that happens afterwards is irrelevant. I don’t remember the league contorting themselves into sixteen different positions to explain why this was ruled as a touchdown. According to their own assessment of what the completely undefined term “going to ground” means, they applied the rule correctly. Except just like the “tuck rule,” it’s a terribly defined rule that whose inadequacies should have been blatantly obvious to them the instant it was committed to paper.

3. John Harbaugh, Kansas City Chiefs vs. Baltimore Ravens. With thirty-one seconds left on the clock, the ball on the Kansas City goal line, and a seven point lead, Baltimore coach John Harbaugh decides to try to run it into the end zone to build a fourteen point lead, cover the spread, and earn the eternal enmity of all the bookies in Las Vegas. What are the odds of getting a touchdown on fourth and goal from the 2 yard line? About 43%. From this distance, a field goal is essentially an extra point, and what are your chances of connecting on that? 98%. I know Harbaugh’s kicker is effectively a rookie and this ended up being irrelevant when they scored the touchdown, but this is an incredibly bad decision by an otherwise intelligent coach.

2. Patrick Mannelly, Chicago Bears vs. Green Bay Packers. This was a disastrous decision, but at least there was a certain logic to it. Mannelly correctly noted that Green Bay had twelve men on the field and tried to take advantage of it, snapping the ball directly to running back Garrett Wolfe with the prospect of getting a free play; either Wolfe runs for the first down and the penalty is declined, or Wolfe fails and the Bears punt from five yards further forward. Unfortunately for Mannelly, by the time he snapped the ball the Packers had cleared their twelfth man and there was no penalty – giving Green Bay the ball deep in Chicago territory with just twelve minutes left in the game.

1. Leodis McKelvin, Buffalo Bills vs. New England Patriots. Wow. Leodis managed to fuck up this play in just about every possible way. Instead of taking a knee in the end zone, he runs it upfield. Possibly in a quest for late-game glory, possibly in an ill-advised attempt to run the clock down to the two-minute warning, either way it’s a bad idea. And then, rather than finding his way towards the relative safety of the sideline, he darts up the center of the field and plunges into a crowd of tacklers (who have undoubtedly been properly coached by Beilichick to STRIP THE BALL in this situation). And then, rather than go down at the first sign of contact, he tries to stay on his feet and muscle through, prolonging the play until the Patriots gleefully strip him of the ball and the kicker – the kicker – recovers the fumble. I’m not sure we’ll be able to top this level of ineptitude this season, but if we do, it’s going to have to be something special.

Without further ado, here are your picks for Week 2!

(more…)

NFL Picks: Week 1

Welcome to Week 1! I can’t tell you how excited I am for this football season to get started. Vegas set the lines for these games almost a month ago, before preseason even began, and there’s been a bit of movement in a few games since then, but most lines have stayed pretty much the same. I think many people put a lot of stock in the changes that teams make from season to season (draft picks, free agent signings, coaching and system changes) but in truth the players and philosophy that make up the team’s core rarely change all that much during the offseason. Vegas tends to use this misconception to set a few traps. The computer’s historical performance in Week 1 doesn’t deviate much from its overall performance; the Weighted Win Percentage (WWP) is 54.3% compared to a lifetime WWP of 55.6%. Hedge bets during the first week tend to perform poorly, but this is balanced by the flip bets, which do quite well. There’s only one team that the computer is 90% confident about this week, and that’s the Atlanta Falcons. But the largest bet of the week is actually Philadelphia, where over 1/3 of the models call for a bet on the Eagles with 85% confidence. The other big bets are hedges on Denver, Detroit, and Oakland. It’s important to remember that the lines you see here are from when I placed my bets, and don’t necessarily reflect the final lines on each game. It’s also important that you listen to the computer, not me. The computer is better at this than I am. (more…)