The Three Strike Rule: “Mad Men”

Scott Malchus October 17, 2010 20

Mad Men wraps up its fourth season tonight on AMC and for anyone who hasn’t been watching, you’ve missed Emmy winning show’s finest cycle of episodes since it first came on the air in 2007. The focus of this season has been Don Draper, specifically, who is Don Draper? In fact, the opening moments of the season premiere had a reporter posing that question to Draper and the slick ad man couldn’t deliver a definitive answer. For 12 weeks, he’s had to claw through his past in an attempt to figure out who he really is and exactly what it is he stands for.

For years, Draper (Jon Hamm) has related success, wealth and family as the definition of what a man is; however, this season has seen the typically confident Draper struggle with the many facets of his life. Having divorced his bitter wife, Betty (January Jones), Draper’s family is in a shambles. Not that he was ever a good husband. Sure, he’s been a  provider, but Draper has slept with more women than he can remember and lied about his true identity to his trophy wife. And what kind of role model has he ever been for his children? Everything that this man has is founded on a lie.

Longtime viewers know that Draper is was born Dick Whitman, the son of a poor farmer and a prostitute, and that he assumed the identity of Don Draper after a military hospital mix-up gave him the name of a fallen soldier and the dead man his. What would his children, especially his precocious daughter, Sally (this season’s secret weapon, Kiernan Shipka), think of their father if they found out that he was a liar and a cheat?

While Draper seems to be plenty wealthy as the partner in an ad agency and one of the most well regarded creative men in the ad business, as the season is coming to a close that agency is in a disarray, on the verge of going under. Everything that Draper has worked for- family, wealth and success- are ready to come apart and we’re left wondering what will happen to this man.

Why should we care about Draper? He’s a man who treats his underlings like shit; a man who is seemingly uncaring when it comes to his kids (although that may just be how men acted in the 60’s); and a man who can’t remain faithful, even to the one woman he finds who understands him and believes in him (that would be Cara Buono’s Dr. Faye Miller)? I believe that like any great character of fiction, we see a part of ourselves in Don Draper. We see a human being with faults, albeit ones that  are amplified by being the central character of a hit TV series. The lucky few out there who’ve never questioned their purpose and meaning in the world probably aren’t the people making Mad Men one of the most watched series on cable television.

Don Draper/Dick Whitman is an everyman who’s risen to the top of his world by using nothing but luck, hard work and, as we saw this season in a flashback that shows Draper taking advantage of Roger Sterling’s alcoholism, cunning intuition. For the same reason we root a Bruce Springsteen to become a famous rock star or a Tom Hanks to become a famous actor, we look past the shortcomings of a Don Draper and hope that he will become the great man he has hinted at being. Throughout season 4, we’ve seen Draper show sides of his greatness and I’ve personally rooted for him to curtail his drinking and become a better father. He’s come close, oh so close.

It helps that Draper is portrayed by the immensely talented Hamm, an actor who seemed to come out of nowhere when the show premiered and has emerged as one of the finest actors working (not only in drama, but in comedy, too, as seen in his stints on 30 Rock and hosting Saturday Night Live). Because of the construct of this particular season and Mad Men creator, Matthew Weiner’s decision to make this year about that one question, Hamm has been required to carry the bulk of the season on his shoulders. Meanwhile, exemplary actors like Elizabeth Moss (as Peggy Olson), Vincent Kartheiser (as Pete Campbell), John Slattery (as Roger Sterling) and Jared Harris (as Lane Pryce) have been relegated to supporting status.

This season, Hamm has shown us new sides to Draper. We’ve seen him desperate for attention and giddy with delight when he won a major award; we’ve seen his scared and impotent when his true identity was on the verge of being revealed to the government; and we’ve seen him as a shattered, emotional wreck when his oldest friend, Anna Draper (Melinda Page Hamilton)- the real Don Draper’s widow and confidant to Hamm’s Draper- dies from cancer.

That particular episode, “The Suitcase,” featured the finest acting by Hamm in all four seasons of the show. Together with a stable and splendid Moss alongside him, the two actors helped create one of the most riveting and beautiful hours of television this year. The term “instant classic” doesn’t begin to describe “The Suitcase.”  If Hamm and Moss are overlooked once again at next year’s Emmy Awards, there is something very wrong with the Television Academy.

Whatever the future holds for Don Draper and Mad Men after this season, as I sure the focus of the series will shift in season five  to include more ensemble work, it feels as if tonight’s episode is the culmination of four years. It feels as if the question posed by the reporter as this season opened was actually the question Weiner and his staff have been exploring since day one and after tonight, hopefully, Don Draper will know who he is and he’ll be able to take the next step in his remarkable journey.
  • http://www.popdose.com Ted

    This season started out slow, but it’s been building in a really satisfactory way (for me, at least). I’ll certain me one of the millions tuning in tonight to see how this season concludes.

    As an aside … every time I see Sally and Glen on screen together, it just creeps me out — kind of like Betty’s reaction when she saw them together in last week’s episode.

  • Anonymous

    They certainly did make Glen’s character very creepy. I liked how those two were able to talk about their problems, though. Funny that she’s better at finding a way of dealing with her emotions than her parents.

    It’s weird that some critics have painted this portrait of Sally as being depressed, but I feel like she’s just acting out like any child would when their family is falling apart.

  • http://www.popdose.com Ted

    Glen is just waiting to pounce – and Betty knows it.

    But I agree that Sally isn’t depressed at all. She just didn’t want her family (no matter how dysfunctional) to split up.

    On a separate note… Flash forward 10 years from where the series is now, and you’ll see Sally Draper livin’ it up in the early days of disco (circa 1975).

  • http://www.popdose.com Ted

    Glen is just waiting to pounce – and Betty knows it.

    But I agree that Sally isn’t depressed at all. She just didn’t want her family (no matter how dysfunctional) to split up.

    On a separate note… Flash forward 10 years from where the series is now, and you’ll see Sally Draper livin’ it up in the early days of disco (circa 1975).

  • JonCummings

    “After tonight, hopefully, Don Draper will know who he is and he’ll be able to take the next step…”

    So what do you have to say now, wise guy? Because (DON’T READ FURTHER IF YOU HAVEN’T WATCHED THE EPISODE YET) it seems Don did exactly the opposite — he chose the beautiful, young, maternal secretary who knows nothing about his past over the pretty, brilliant, high-achievement woman to whom he’s told his dark secret. He seems to have chosen to go back to square one, unsuspecting trophy wife and all.

  • Anonymous

    I agree, to a degree, Jon.

    The trouble is that there was a huge jump in time between the last two episodes. 10 weeks have passed. I’d say that that’s enough time for Don to be seeing Megan everyday and getting to know her better. To viewers it seems like it all happened really fast, but in Mad Men time, it was an eternity.

    We’ll see if this is true love or not next season when we learn whether Don has had the courage to tell her his entire past.

  • JonCummings

    Don’t bet on it. My guess is that Megan’s going to get crushed — or, perhaps more likely, that she’s going to rebel rather quickly. I find Don’s choice rather disheartening…though, I suppose, more realistic for him than a real move forward would have been.

  • Anonymous

    I read an interview with Matthew Weiner in the NYT in which he states that he doesn’t see Glen as creepy at all:

    “I know people use the word creepy, I don’t understand it. I don’t find him to be off-kilter. I’m very proud of their conversations, because anyone who has seriously eavesdropped on children, that is the way they talk to each other. Glen’s always going to be defined by the fact that he asked [Betty] for a lock of hair and he walked in on her in the bathroom, and I know that. But we have a delusion, I will say, in this country, that children are not people. People forget the thoughts they had when they were 6 and 7 years old, and how much of them was in there already.”

    (full interview is here: http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/matthew-weiner-closes-the-books-on-season-4-of-mad-men/?hp)

    Also, I think Kiernan Shipka did an incredible job this season. That girl might have some Best Supporting Actress nominations in her near future.

  • http://robertcashill.blogspot.com BobCashill

    There’s no ‘true love” on MAD MEN. Like Roger and the secretary he married? Like Roger and Joan? Don and Megan have no future; in fact it wouldn’t surprise me if they were kaput by the time Season Five begins. She’s overbitten more than she can chew.

    I liked how this strong season ended without any real cliffhangers. We’ll see how the baby (no surprise there) is integrated. There was talk of a suicide, and Betty was certainly pulling ahead of Roger last night as a candidate, but nothing. (Then again Betty had almost nothing to do this season except snap at Sally and look depressed, when she did get some air time; as in life, the show is having difficulty integrating those left behind, which I guess is preferable to bringing them in for no reason at all but likely unsatisfying for the Emmy-nominated Jones.)

  • Anonymous

    Actually, Ken Cosgrove proved that he had true love when he refused to use his fiance for a business opportunity. Good for him!

  • http://robertcashill.blogspot.com BobCashill

    Loser. :)

    One of the “true loves” on the show was between Sal and his spouse, save for one big issue…

    Like Dexter and Tony Soprano, Don is a sociopath and a criminal. Love and redemption are impossible to imagine, but the possibility intrigues.

  • Anonymous

    The only thing that bums me out about that is that RAY WISE is Ken’s future father-in-law.

  • Anonymous

    The only thing that bums me out about that is that RAY WISE is Ken’s future father-in-law.

  • Anonymous

    The only thing that bums me out about that is that RAY WISE is Ken’s future father-in-law.

  • Anonymous

    C’mon, you don’t cast Ray Wise (the Devil!) for one scene if he’s not going to come back at some future point.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, there’s no way that character isn’t coming back.

  • http://www.jasonhare.com Anonymous

    Not for nothing, but the minute I saw Ray Wise, for a brief second I was 14 again, nearly peeing my pants at the sight of BOB.

  • Anonymous

    And don’t forget: he’s spoken directly to the Popdose readership, back when he was on “Reaper.”

    http://earbuds.popdose.com/will/RayWise/RayWise%20-%20Popdose.mp3

  • http://www.jasonhare.com Anonymous

    I hate you, Will.

  • Anonymous

    Sleep tight. :-)